QUOTE(aBcD-| @ Jul 6 2017, 02:05 AM)
My bad, I skimmed the text, was read as assignment haha.
I did experienced twice in peer assessments, but it just contribute at most 5 to 10 %. It applied in IS case study and FYP proposal, both are full coursework.
Having another party to point out your mistake, also help you to improve your proposal and develop better solution. Tutor some also missed some mistakes during presentation. Yeah, having peer assess also mean sharpen our analytic skills.
By right lecture hours should be longer than tutorial. As tutorial is one step behind of what was taught in lecture.
I never had lecture that less than 2 hours, but I guess I know how bad its effect to students.

The thing is in peer assessment, you straightaway give the marks without the need to point out any mistake. No report is needed and you just submit the marks.
QUOTE(evofantasy @ Jul 6 2017, 06:19 AM)
ah i think it is too early for such judgement to be in 1st year 1st semester. i personally enjoy tutorials more than lectures since lectures can be really dry.
Yeah, lectures are just you sitting there and listening while in tutorials you actually interact with each other. But still, lecture duration should be sufficient and not to the point that even the lecturers are complaining. The tutorials and workshops have mostly no issue with the timing.
You're a tutor of a 1st year and 2nd year units, right? Do you have any issues or things that you don't agree with in your units? And it's also kinda funny that I previously told you that I had issue with FIT1045 but eventually, it turned out that I have no issues on FIT1045 and instead it's the other units.

QUOTE(ngaisteve1 @ Jul 6 2017, 09:52 PM)
How's the assessment structure like in university or college for software engineering course/subject? 30% assignment and 70% theory (exams)?
I don't know about Software Engineering or any other courses. I'm currently studying Computer Science in Monash and the assessment structure differs between each unit. The assessment is classified into examination and in-semester assessment (which includes assignments, quizzes, workshops, tests, etc). In my case, I had four units in my last semester and their structures are as follows.
1) Examination: 40%; In-semester assessment: 60%
2) Examination: 60%; In-semester assessment: 40%
3) Examination: 50%; In-semester assessment: 50%
4) Examination: 70%; In-semester assessment: 30%
There's also hurdles policy where you must meet in order to pass a unit. The hurdles policy is at least 50% overall
AND at least 40% for the total non-examination assessment
AND at least 40% for the exam.
I just noticed the difference between the assessment structure of the units is also an issue. There needs to be a consistency.
This post has been edited by LightKeyDarkBlade: Jul 6 2017, 11:28 PM