QUOTE(icemanfx @ Jun 13 2022, 04:16 PM)

https://www.theedgemarkets.com/article/stat...pfs-t20-members
malehsians are poorer than most expected.
As reference, Singapore = SG$620k, USA = US$600k to be in their respective country's top 1%.
Multiple Signs of Malaysia Property Bubble V20
|
|
Jun 20 2022, 08:07 PM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,193 posts Joined: Feb 2012 |
QUOTE(icemanfx @ Jun 13 2022, 04:16 PM) ![]() https://www.theedgemarkets.com/article/stat...pfs-t20-members malehsians are poorer than most expected. As reference, Singapore = SG$620k, USA = US$600k to be in their respective country's top 1%. |
|
|
|
|
|
Jun 27 2022, 02:38 PM
Return to original view | IPv6 | Post
#2
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,193 posts Joined: Feb 2012 |
|
|
|
Jun 27 2022, 05:03 PM
Return to original view | IPv6 | Post
#3
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,193 posts Joined: Feb 2012 |
QUOTE(Jennypenny @ Jun 27 2022, 02:56 PM) I googled, but your numbers seem extremely high, hence, I am asking for your source. And ur sos ?For Americans, the top 1% salary seems to be around $300k. Taking $600k (household) divided by average household number = 2.6 --> 2 (rounding down to account for children) Where as for Singapore, they do not have an official number, but we can make some assumptions, like top 14% of households will be $240k. Take top 1% (240k x 2.5, following US trend), we can assume that S$600k per household (1%). Average household in Singapore is 3 (rounding down equally with US, gets 2.3). That will bring us to average of S$260k to crack 1% Feel free to discuss |
|
|
Jun 28 2022, 09:32 PM
Return to original view | IPv6 | Post
#4
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,193 posts Joined: Feb 2012 |
QUOTE(Jennypenny @ Jun 28 2022, 06:58 AM) https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2019/...%203.4%20people. I see you're differentiating between household and individual. Yes when you have a household, individual incomes within the household can be less but still collectively be in the top 1%, but I was only interested in individual top 1% and I didn't try converting it implicitly to household income or vice versa, because it's no longer an apple to apple comparison and doesn't tell us anything https://www.statista.com/statistics/625305/...03.15%20persons. https://blog.seedly.sg/average-singaporean-...d-income-stand/ https://smartasset.com/data-studies/what-it...1-by-state-2022 For Singapore there is this website called world inequality database with 1% data. |
|
|
Jun 29 2022, 06:15 PM
Return to original view | IPv6 | Post
#5
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,193 posts Joined: Feb 2012 |
QUOTE(Jennypenny @ Jun 29 2022, 10:28 AM) Yes, you are interested in the top 1% for an individual, hence I calculated that number for you. You are probably right that 600k is counted as household income and the actual individual income needed is less, but it's not a straight measure, conversion or extrapolation. You were using the wrong number for an individual. Imho the whole concept of household income is a sham. Half the people I know are single income households and the other half are double income from husband and wife. I've never in my life seen a household supported by 2.6 people, or a household supported by 5 people. So what, do they all come home and put all their money into the same tabung... ? This post has been edited by gooroojee: Jun 29 2022, 07:49 PM |
|
|
Jun 29 2022, 08:43 PM
Return to original view | IPv6 | Post
#6
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,193 posts Joined: Feb 2012 |
Duplicate - deleted
This post has been edited by gooroojee: Jun 30 2022, 01:00 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
Jul 2 2022, 09:15 PM
Return to original view | IPv6 | Post
#7
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,193 posts Joined: Feb 2012 |
QUOTE(Jennypenny @ Jun 27 2022, 02:56 PM) I googled, but your numbers seem extremely high, hence, I am asking for your source. Here is a more recent statement from the Singaporean MOF which like the USA has the only agency in the government that has individual income data based on reported taxable income. For Americans, the top 1% salary seems to be around $300k. Taking $600k (household) divided by average household number = 2.6 --> 2 (rounding down to account for children) Where as for Singapore, they do not have an official number, but we can make some assumptions, like top 14% of households will be $240k. Take top 1% (240k x 2.5, following US trend), we can assume that S$600k per household (1%). Average household in Singapore is 3 (rounding down equally with US, gets 2.3). That will bring us to average of S$260k to crack 1% Feel free to discuss https://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/budg...12-of-taxpayers It would seem that the annual income I had pegged for the top 1% in Singapore is not too high at all. The announcement to raise taxes impacting the top 1.2% of individual tax payers in Singapore, starts from people earning over $500,000 a year. If top 1.2% is $500,000 then top 1% is higher. This is by individual. Feel free to discuss. |
|
|
Jul 4 2022, 10:11 AM
Return to original view | IPv6 | Post
#8
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,193 posts Joined: Feb 2012 |
QUOTE(Jennypenny @ Jul 4 2022, 09:40 AM) Ah yes, this is indeed a good data point. That is completely unrelated, and also foreigners are taxed a flat rate.Singapore however has disproportionate amount of foreigners at their 1% as they are the regional hub for SEA, and Asia. I read in FT before that 30%++ of the top income earners are foreigners, but I cannot find the source. So, thanks for the data point. Jennypenny liked this post
|
|
|
Apr 9 2023, 05:28 PM
Return to original view | IPv6 | Post
#9
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,193 posts Joined: Feb 2012 |
QUOTE(AskarPerang @ Apr 9 2023, 03:38 PM) Whoever valued it at rm800k need to tell me what they are smoking... About rm400k lah, that unit. michaelchang and Sihambodoh liked this post
|
|
|
Sep 24 2023, 04:10 PM
Return to original view | Post
#10
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,193 posts Joined: Feb 2012 |
Auction market seems quite hot and prices quite low.
|
|
|
May 5 2024, 12:52 PM
Return to original view | IPv6 | Post
#11
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,193 posts Joined: Feb 2012 |
|
|
|
Jun 19 2024, 10:05 PM
Return to original view | IPv6 | Post
#12
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,193 posts Joined: Feb 2012 |
|
|
|
Jun 19 2024, 11:32 PM
Return to original view | IPv6 | Post
#13
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,193 posts Joined: Feb 2012 |
QUOTE(icemanfx @ Jun 19 2024, 10:51 PM) Thanks. Wasn't expecting that. Thought T20 would be skewed to 45-54 age group. Haha. |
|
|
|
|
|
Jul 18 2024, 09:18 AM
Return to original view | IPv6 | Post
#14
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,193 posts Joined: Feb 2012 |
|
|
|
Jul 29 2024, 10:54 AM
Return to original view | IPv6 | Post
#15
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,193 posts Joined: Feb 2012 |
|
|
|
Jul 28 2025, 11:40 PM
Return to original view | Post
#16
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,193 posts Joined: Feb 2012 |
Buy landed without maintenance fees still OK. End of the day, it is a place for people to live.
|
| Change to: | 0.4428sec
0.74
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 14th December 2025 - 07:58 AM |