QUOTE(cherroy @ Dec 19 2016, 04:30 PM)
dr m did not do that in 1998 due to the conditions imposed by IMF.the same conditions will apply now - and will be rejected.
becos the conditions will be about nep, civil service, mega projects.
going back to 1998, certain things happened to help the turnaround besides the peg. will current gomen do something like that or stick to "it will rebound (by itself)"?
QUOTE
By Autumn Malaysia’s government seems to have come around to the view that it needed to put its own house in order, rather than blame others for its problems. In early September the government deferred spending on several high profile infra-structure projects[/B] including its prestigious Bakun dam project. This was followed in December 1997 by the release of plans to cut state spending by 18%. The government also stated that it [B]will not bail out any corporations that become insolvent as a result of excess borrowing. Then in January 1998, IMF managing director Michel Camdessus, stated that Malaysia was correct in asserting that it did not need an IMF rescue package to get it through the regional financial crisis. "Malaysia is not facing a crisis in the same way as some of the other countries in the region, " he said, noting the authorities have taken measures to deal with the difficulties, particularly on the fiscal side. On the other hand, he did state that the government needed to raise interest rates to slow credit growth, moderate inflationary pressures and support the weakening currency.
http://www.wright.edu/~tdung/asiancrisis-hill.htm
This post has been edited by AVFAN: Dec 19 2016, 05:14 PMhttp://www.wright.edu/~tdung/asiancrisis-hill.htm
Dec 19 2016, 05:08 PM

Quote
0.0237sec
0.41
7 queries
GZIP Disabled