Outline ·
[ Standard ] ·
Linear+
THE BROADBAND RANT SINK, Rant about anything and everything here!
|
warez
|
Aug 2 2007, 11:43 PM
|
|
Pinging www.yahoo-ht3.akadns.net [87.248.113.14] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 87.248.113.14: bytes=32 time=1003ms TTL=39 Reply from 87.248.113.14: bytes=32 time=1003ms TTL=39 Reply from 87.248.113.14: bytes=32 time=1001ms TTL=39 Reply from 87.248.113.14: bytes=32 time=1003ms TTL=39 Reply from 87.248.113.14: bytes=32 time=1004ms TTL=39 Reply from 87.248.113.14: bytes=32 time=1005ms TTL=39 Reply from 87.248.113.14: bytes=32 time=1008ms TTL=39 Reply from 87.248.113.14: bytes=32 time=1002ms TTL=39 Reply from 87.248.113.14: bytes=32 time=1002ms TTL=39 Reply from 87.248.113.14: bytes=32 time=1002ms TTL=39
Ping statistics for 87.248.113.14: Packets: Sent = 10, Received = 10, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 1001ms, Maximum = 1008ms, Average = 1003ms
|
|
|
|
|
|
warez
|
Aug 12 2007, 05:38 PM
|
|
60.51 ip already fk up, lucky 124.82 ip still works fine.
Ping statistics for 203.84.203.127: Packets: Sent = 16, Received = 16, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 87ms, Maximum = 121ms, Average = 105ms
|
|
|
|
|
|
warez
|
Aug 20 2007, 04:53 PM
|
|
Another problem is getting high ping with 60.51 ip.
|
|
|
|
|
|
warez
|
Aug 21 2007, 03:07 PM
|
|
Did you guys found out during noon time our port will get blocked?
|
|
|
|
|
|
warez
|
Aug 22 2007, 10:45 PM
|
|
Pinging www.yahoo-ht3.akadns.net [209.131.36.158] with 32 bytes of data:
Request timed out. Reply from 209.131.36.158: bytes=32 time=274ms TTL=50 Request timed out. Reply from 209.131.36.158: bytes=32 time=274ms TTL=50 Reply from 209.131.36.158: bytes=32 time=270ms TTL=50 Request timed out. Request timed out. Request timed out. Request timed out. Reply from 209.131.36.158: bytes=32 time=271ms TTL=51
Ping statistics for 209.131.36.158: Packets: Sent = 10, Received = 4, Lost = 6 (60% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 270ms, Maximum = 274ms, Average = 272ms
|
|
|
|
|
|
warez
|
Sep 3 2007, 11:00 PM
|
|
Reply from 202.188.0.133: bytes=32 time=120ms TTL=246 Reply from 202.188.0.133: bytes=32 time=122ms TTL=246 Reply from 202.188.0.133: bytes=32 time=119ms TTL=246 Reply from 202.188.0.133: bytes=32 time=121ms TTL=246
Ping statistics for 202.188.0.133: Packets: Sent = 333, Received = 332, Lost = 1 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 80ms, Maximum = 249ms, Average = 122ms
|
|
|
|
|
|
warez
|
Sep 4 2007, 12:07 AM
|
|
Wow almost 10k ping to their dns, i never see before.
|
|
|
|
|
|
warez
|
Sep 4 2007, 01:06 AM
|
|
Oh no wonder, LOL.
|
|
|
|
|
|
warez
|
Sep 15 2007, 11:08 PM
|
|
QUOTE(skippro @ Sep 15 2007, 10:44 PM) somebody pls show me ur pings to 202.188.0.133 now......thanks Ping statistics for 202.188.0.133: Packets: Sent = 20, Received = 20, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 24ms, Maximum = 26ms, Average = 24ms
|
|
|
|
|
|
warez
|
Sep 16 2007, 05:42 PM
|
|
Yea suddenly got problem.
Ping statistics for 202.188.0.133: Packets: Sent = 85, Received = 85, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 276ms, Maximum = 362ms, Average = 312ms
|
|
|
|
|
|
warez
|
Sep 28 2007, 09:56 PM
|
|
Yea, extremely slow.
Reply from 202.188.0.133: bytes=32 time=615ms TTL=247 Reply from 202.188.0.133: bytes=32 time=599ms TTL=247 Reply from 202.188.0.133: bytes=32 time=594ms TTL=247
Ping statistics for 202.188.0.133: Packets: Sent = 10, Received = 10, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 594ms, Maximum = 619ms, Average = 609ms
|
|
|
|
|
|
warez
|
Sep 29 2007, 04:12 PM
|
|
DNS
Reply from 202.188.0.133: bytes=32 time=522ms TTL=247 Reply from 202.188.0.133: bytes=32 time=523ms TTL=247 Reply from 202.188.0.133: bytes=32 time=517ms TTL=247 Reply from 202.188.0.133: bytes=32 time=523ms TTL=247
Ping statistics for 202.188.0.133: Packets: Sent = 179, Received = 179, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 496ms, Maximum = 580ms, Average = 534ms
TMNet
Reply from 202.71.97.48: bytes=32 time=408ms TTL=118 Reply from 202.71.97.48: bytes=32 time=401ms TTL=118 Reply from 202.71.97.48: bytes=32 time=399ms TTL=118 Reply from 202.71.97.48: bytes=32 time=384ms TTL=118
Ping statistics for 202.71.97.48: Packets: Sent = 38, Received = 38, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 365ms, Maximum = 411ms, Average = 387ms
LYN
Reply from 202.190.197.145: bytes=32 time=449ms TTL=54 Reply from 202.190.197.145: bytes=32 time=460ms TTL=54 Reply from 202.190.197.145: bytes=32 time=455ms TTL=54
Ping statistics for 202.190.197.145: Packets: Sent = 91, Received = 91, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 424ms, Maximum = 493ms, Average = 449ms
This post has been edited by warez: Sep 29 2007, 04:23 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
warez
|
Oct 2 2007, 02:57 PM
|
|
These days ping to their DNS also damn high, but they still didn't fix it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
warez
|
Oct 3 2007, 01:29 AM
|
|
I think this upgrade will effect other state as well, just like last time. -.-
|
|
|
|
|
|
warez
|
Oct 10 2007, 08:03 PM
|
|
Reply from 202.188.0.133: bytes=32 time=90ms TTL=247 Reply from 202.188.0.133: bytes=32 time=91ms TTL=247 Reply from 202.188.0.133: bytes=32 time=89ms TTL=247 Reply from 202.188.0.133: bytes=32 time=89ms TTL=247 Reply from 202.188.0.133: bytes=32 time=74ms TTL=247
Ping statistics for 202.188.0.133: Packets: Sent = 1239, Received = 1216, Lost = 23 (1% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 71ms, Maximum = 98ms, Average = 77ms
|
|
|
|
|
|
warez
|
Nov 26 2007, 03:27 PM
|
|
QUOTE(Suk @ Nov 26 2007, 01:46 PM) Updated... PM me if interested. Not sure whether i can get it, already pm you. Thanks dude.
|
|
|
|
|
|
warez
|
Dec 12 2007, 03:27 AM
|
|
:::.. Download Stats ..::: Download Connection is:: 95 Kbps about 0.1 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB) Download Speed is:: 12 kB/s Tested From:: http://testmy.net/ (Main) Test Time:: 2007/12/11 - 12:25pm Bottom Line:: 2X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 85.33 sec Tested from a 2992 kB file and took 258.942 seconds to complete Download Diagnosis:: May need help : running at only 16.99 % of your hosts average (net.my) D-Validation Link:: http://testmy.net/stats/id-F81DBE00HUser Agent:: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.8) Gecko/20071008 Firefox/2.0.0.8 [!]
|
|
|
|
|
|
warez
|
Dec 12 2007, 05:30 PM
|
|
OMFG, extremely slow surfing. Come to lowyat also having problem, wtf did those noob done again. Latest speedtest result. :::.. Download Stats ..::: Download Connection is:: 53 Kbps about 0.1 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB) Download Speed is:: 6 kB/s Tested From:: http://testmy.net/ (Main) Test Time:: 2007/12/12 - 2:21am Bottom Line:: 1X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 170.67 sec Tested from a 2992 kB file and took 460.442 seconds to complete Download Diagnosis:: May need help : running at only 9.5 % of your hosts average (net.my) D-Validation Link:: http://testmy.net/stats/id-RN1P6M082User Agent:: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.8) Gecko/20071008 Firefox/2.0.0.8 [!] **Subscribe TM Streamyx, you can enjoy downtime up to 90%.
|
|
|
|
|
|
warez
|
Dec 13 2007, 09:19 PM
|
|
:::.. Download Stats ..::: Download Connection is:: 1371 Kbps about 1.4 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB) Download Speed is:: 167 kB/s Tested From:: http://testmy.net/ (Main) Test Time:: 2007/12/13 - 6:18am Bottom Line:: 24X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 6.13 sec Tested from a 2992 kB file and took 17.875 seconds to complete Download Diagnosis:: 90% + Okay : running at 100 % of your hosts average (69.251) D-Validation Link:: http://testmy.net/stats/id-IYJCNGL4TUser Agent:: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-GB; rv:1.8.1.6) Gecko/20070725 Firefox/2.0.0.6;MEGAUPLOAD 1.0 [!]
|
|
|
|
|
|
warez
|
Dec 18 2007, 10:33 PM
|
|
:::.. Download Stats ..::: Download Connection is:: 1383 Kbps about 1.4 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB) Download Speed is:: 169 kB/s Tested From:: http://testmy.net/ (Main) Test Time:: 2007/12/18 - 7:31am Bottom Line:: 24X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 6.06 sec Tested from a 2992 kB file and took 17.716 seconds to complete Download Diagnosis:: Awesome! 20% + : 29.62 % faster than the average for host (69.148) D-Validation Link:: http://testmy.net/stats/id-3Z5A2FUWLUser Agent:: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.8) Gecko/20071008 Firefox/2.0.0.8 [!]
|
|
|
|
|