Outline ·
[ Standard ] ·
Linear+
Core 2 Duo E6650, E6750, E6800, and E6850
|
kmarc
|
Jul 15 2007, 02:35 PM
|
The future is here - Cryptocurrencies!
|
QUOTE(WingKalimdor @ Jul 15 2007, 02:29 PM) No, mobo 965 currently unable to support the the 1333Mhz processor. Since last time I purchase the e6750, I can't operate my PC, it run well after I change to DP35DP. Little weird is this type of processor is cheaper than 1066Mhz.  Eh? Since last time is when? I thought the CPU just came out? How the overclocking potential of your CPU? Kindly inform us!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
RokXIII
|
Jul 15 2007, 02:36 PM
|
|
QUOTE(WingKalimdor @ Jul 15 2007, 02:29 PM) No, mobo 965 currently unable to support the the 1333Mhz processor. Since last time I purchase the e6750, I can't operate my PC, it run well after I change to DP35DP. Little weird is this type of processor is cheaper than 1066Mhz.  p965 chipset unable to support 1333FSB? I think last time Gigabyte 965P-DS3 v3.3 can support 1333FSB already? This post has been edited by RokXIII: Jul 15 2007, 02:36 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
SlayerXT
|
Jul 15 2007, 03:12 PM
|
|
It will support the new FSB just no for Penryn.
|
|
|
|
|
|
WingKalimdor
|
Jul 15 2007, 04:28 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
kmarc
|
Jul 15 2007, 05:47 PM
|
The future is here - Cryptocurrencies!
|
QUOTE(WingKalimdor @ Jul 15 2007, 04:28 PM) Hi, I'll just include some screen shot from my pc for better understanding...
Thx but we know about that la. What we want is overclocking results!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
SlayerXT
|
Jul 15 2007, 07:07 PM
|
|
He use Intel mobo, no way to oc lor...
|
|
|
|
|
|
kmarc
|
Jul 15 2007, 07:44 PM
|
The future is here - Cryptocurrencies!
|
QUOTE(§layerXT @ Jul 15 2007, 07:07 PM) He use Intel mobo, no way to oc lor... OIC. Why do people use Intel mobo if it can't be overclock?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lemmings
|
Jul 15 2007, 08:21 PM
|
|
QUOTE(§layerXT @ Jul 15 2007, 07:07 PM) He use Intel mobo, no way to oc lor... What u mean ?
|
|
|
|
|
|
WingKalimdor
|
Jul 15 2007, 10:18 PM
|
|
QUOTE(kmarc @ Jul 15 2007, 07:44 PM) OIC. Why do people use Intel mobo if it can't be overclock? Because Intel mobo cost is lower than other overclockable mobo such as Gigabyte , Asus , Biostar .. etc. Plus I lazy to play with my jumper and no money to buy the cooler...
|
|
|
|
|
|
kmarc
|
Jul 15 2007, 10:23 PM
|
The future is here - Cryptocurrencies!
|
QUOTE(WingKalimdor @ Jul 15 2007, 10:18 PM) Because Intel mobo cost is lower than other overclockable mobo such as Gigabyte , Asus , Biostar .. etc. Plus I lazy to play with my jumper and no money to buy the cooler...  OIC. So sorry ya.... maybe you can get a 2nd hand mobo....
|
|
|
|
|
|
Skylinestar
|
Jul 15 2007, 10:42 PM
|
|
QUOTE(WingKalimdor @ Jul 15 2007, 10:18 PM) Because Intel mobo cost is lower than other overclockable mobo such as Gigabyte , Asus , Biostar .. etc. Plus I lazy to play with my jumper and no money to buy the cooler...  intel mobo is cheaper than asus, msi, gigabyte. but biostar is cheaper than intel.
|
|
|
|
|
|
speedguy10
|
Jul 15 2007, 10:56 PM
|
|
Heard that Intel Mobo provide more stable performance. Anyone wanna comment abt it ?
|
|
|
|
|
|
RokXIII
|
Jul 15 2007, 11:02 PM
|
|
QUOTE(speedguy10 @ Jul 15 2007, 10:56 PM) Heard that Intel Mobo provide more stable performance. Anyone wanna comment abt it ? I heard that also Intel mobo is more stable than other brands... Is it because it disable the OC features, thats y more stable??
|
|
|
|
|
|
kmarc
|
Jul 15 2007, 11:05 PM
|
The future is here - Cryptocurrencies!
|
QUOTE(speedguy10 @ Jul 15 2007, 10:56 PM) Heard that Intel Mobo provide more stable performance. Anyone wanna comment abt it ? Yeah, what do you mean by that? If the mobo cannot be overclocked, then how to gauge its stability? I mean, ALL mobo will be stable at stock ma.....
|
|
|
|
|
|
SlayerXT
|
Jul 15 2007, 11:23 PM
|
|
If stock also not stable then consider fail product.
|
|
|
|
|
|
BurgerRI
|
Jul 15 2007, 11:58 PM
|
|
QUOTE(§layerXT @ Jul 15 2007, 11:23 PM) If stock also not stable then consider fail product. lol...that statement hits the nail on the head....
|
|
|
|
|
|
duncan880409
|
Aug 6 2007, 08:09 PM
|
|
QUOTE(exhauster @ Feb 10 2007, 12:19 AM) The new processors will be the Core 2 Duo E6650, E6750, E6800, and E6850. Processors with a number ending in "50" will have a 1333 MT/s FSB. The processors will all have 4 MiB of L2 cache. Their clock frequency will be similar to that of the already released processors with the same first two digits (E6600, E6700, X6800) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intel_Core_2#Conroe_2hey, i brought a E6850 with 3.0ghz clock speed, but at the bios screen it detect 2.6ghz only but under device manager is 3ghz is it correct? This post has been edited by duncan880409: Aug 6 2007, 08:26 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
kmarc
|
Aug 6 2007, 08:47 PM
|
The future is here - Cryptocurrencies!
|
It's running the EIST - Intel's power saving feature. If you load the CPU, the multiplier will go up to 9x and your rig will run at 3.0ghz. You can disable the EIST in BIOS.
|
|
|
|
|
|
duncan880409
|
Aug 6 2007, 08:54 PM
|
|
how ? <10 word protector..
|
|
|
|
|
|
kmarc
|
Aug 6 2007, 08:58 PM
|
The future is here - Cryptocurrencies!
|
QUOTE(duncan880409 @ Aug 6 2007, 08:54 PM) how ? <10 word protector.. Errrr.... what was the question again?
|
|
|
|
|