Welcome to EM
Yours is facing the central linear garden?

This post has been edited by Jasoncat: Nov 18 2016, 07:26 AM

I'd thought of gathering the buyers (perhaps my Tenderfields precint) and initiate a meet-up session with EM Mgmt but I'm still thinking of whether there is such a need at the moment, and the timing as well. Anyway, if this is to be done, I think what needs to be done is to ensure only genuine buyers are in.

Lol... cyber world macam macam orang pun ada... never mind, I don't owe them any single cent

Haha... it's still fine. Whatever it's I will still try to keep close touch with EM/EW with feedback or suggestions constantly. Having said that, if I think there is a need to act then will not hesitate about it.

This thread has turned sensationalized and emotionalized already... and attract unnecessary troll from pathetic joker(s) - though it has no bearing on my life but its presence is like seeing lalat flying around... lol.

Since EW has also expanded overseas I think we can complaint to World Bank, United Nation and IMF as well.

+1. We are on the same page.
Directly or I directly I urged to use the above approaches... but some how people have different thoughts.

This post has been edited by Jasoncat: Nov 18 2016, 04:37 PM

For Cradleton and Tenderfields, JMB will be formed first then MC. But if I think Merrydale onwards will straightaway to MC - strata title should be ready upon vp then.

Correct! correct! correct!

Samkor, your advice to me: "people only label you as hater or trooper."
So, I'm out liao loh...

Haha... I think people will think throwing party in LYN lagi syiok.

Btw, side track a bit - those who go for "Clean" tomorrow I salute change must start from action... not to elaborate further...

Bro, if I don't respect your concern as a buyer here, I would have interrupted you or argue or ignored you (like I never bothered to entertain the pathetic joker)... whatever you name it. Anyway, my thinking / approach is different and to avoid further heating up the already hot situation, I only voiced out my views sparingly. I believe EM do note about the conversations / concerns in the forum - but how do we know whether they have taken / will take action? Whether it's already in the plan but just yet to be executed? Whether they really don't want to change at all - because couldn't be bothered? Because some practical issues? Because some reasons that I couldn't even think of? There are too many possibilities. How would we expect them to give an answer without talking? Rather than speculating and keep on writing thesis in the forum and sensationalize it with the hope EM will listen and act on it, why not taking a pro-active approach to talk to them? Since 1 buyer talking may not have the impact, what if there are more gather together? That's the reason why I put the "neighbour list" at the 1st post - for ease of communication with your neighbours / other buyers. Indeed I suggested so earlier. My view is simple - talk to them in group and see what's the explanation. From the outcome then strategize accordingly. We don't need to be hostile from the very beginning. If things really turn out very bad then perhaps move on to next step to escalate the matters - and of course through media is always one of the option.

Again, different people has different opinion and different approach. I may not agree with you but I respect your rights as a buyer here.

And one last thing - just ignore the pathetic joker lah...

Lol no small gas... I'm just a teaboy so trooper not my profession mah

So fast!? Presume defect rectified then you straight away move in?

Haha... I think FIABCI is sth EW is aiming...

As requested Samkor... Lake illustrative pic...


Attached thumbnail(s)

One thing here want to highlight, though not the focus of the discussion- DMC even if not stamped is still a legal binding doc and enforceable. The diff is it's not admissible to court if not stamped.

The question ask for "lake" pic. And btw that's not insider pic as you presume.
Whoever joker you want to ask I'm not interested.

Samkor, I refer to SMA Section 70. By-laws for regulation of subdivided building or land

Under subsection (2), A management corporation may, by special resolution, make additional by-laws or make amendments to such additional by-laws ......

Under subsection (3), The additional by-laws made under subsection (2) shall bind the management corporation and the proprietors, and any charges, lessee, tenant or occupier of a parcel to the same extent as if the additional by-laws -
(a) had been signed or sealed by the management corporation, and each proprietor and each such charges, lessee, tenant or occupier, respectively; and
(b) contained mutual covenants to observe, comply and perform all the provisions of these additional by-laws.
--------------------------------------------------------------
Based on the above, my interpretation is that there is no DMC to be signed between the subsale buyer and developer or MC as the prevailing DMC then shall be enforceable against the new owner.

It's Strata Management Act 2013 ("SMA") which governs the stratified development.

Nice sharing bro. Btw, you went in or it's from other source?

Based on my interpretation, no such need is required. Anyway, I just chui shui. Better check with lawyer / during pre-VP briefing / talk time.