Well I could get tempered glass as cheap as 9CNY and around 20CNY for similar casing on tmall.com. No secret here just look up the item for yourself and purchase it and get parcel forwarder. Some are extremely cheap All these sellers are making big profit since you guys are lazy to purchase it from China.

Redmi 4 Prime (3GB RAM + 32GB ROM) had significantly much better battery life while Redmi Note 4 had better CPU. Buy Redmi 4 Prime if you want excellent battery life and you don't mind smaller screen 5 inch to 5.5 inch or Redmi Note 4 if you need better processing power.

C'mon you know Xiaomi never really had good camera quality on Redmi Series and mediocre at most for Mi series.

Looking through first page of this thread wouldn't threaten your life

Yes that is

The problem arise because you bought the phone from unreliable seller that just flash Vendor ROM instead of reputable seller that flashes global rom for you

Just by looking at the version number and letter code you could already tell.

Definitely vendor rom. DirectD had been known for installing vendor rom to made some side income and their after sales service is not up to par to the market average.

This post has been edited by zher4883: Dec 21 2016, 10:25 PM

http://en.miui.com/thread-392159-1-1.html

They should had done it in the first place anyway when they claimed original global rom

Just flash supersu on TWRP if your bootoader is unlocked. Not difficult at all.

This is the only way that have 100% no chance on bricking the phone. Feel free to try other method though.

We ain't even sure it's a Snapdragon 625 or Snapdragon 653 yet.

Good luck with MTK processor phones by the way.

Mediatek is notorious for refusing releasing kernel source and power efficiency is always a step behind Qualcomm Snapdragon.

If you're referring to Redmi Note 3 Mediatek variant, never. Redmi Note 3 Snapdragon are testing nougat based MIUI.

You will end up waiting forever for this mentality as Xiaomi releases new phone is pretty short interval.

MTK is terrible. Period.

Mi Malaysia didn't state 4G+ for certain devices because those device aren't true 4G+ device. It only support intraband CA while a true 4G+ device support both intraband CA and interband CA. Since Malaysian telco are generally using interband CA, so there's no point on advertising those device as 4G+ capable.

Yes