Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

> Which is worth to get AMD or nVidia, AIB RX 480 vs GTX 1060, AMD Pricing Chat

views
     
NUR_VER.3
post Jul 26 2016, 02:57 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
308 posts

Joined: May 2008
From: Dun ya



QUOTE(crash123 @ Jul 26 2016, 02:29 PM)
Not this shit again 5/10 dx12 games nvidia win
All dx 11 games nvidia win. Sos?google benchmarks
*
What tok U, almost all DX12 games RX480 performs better than GTX 1060 dude.

In time spy (DX12 benchmark), RX480 matches the GTX 1060
user posted image

Here are latest DX12 titles with Async Compute On

user posted image
user posted image
user posted image
user posted image

And not to mention Latest title that fully utilize Async Compute for best compatibility between games and hardware just like they used in Consoles

Lutakbolehasyccomputelol.com

user posted image


Async Compute is the latest technology that already implemented in consoles that focus on maximum compatibility between application and hardware, you should read about the advantages of async compute and why using this can increase your old card from 45fps to 60fps just by changing application setting.

Game developers gotta be stupid for not using async compute in the upcoming games.

This post has been edited by NUR_VER.3: Jul 26 2016, 02:59 PM
NUR_VER.3
post Jul 26 2016, 03:07 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
308 posts

Joined: May 2008
From: Dun ya



QUOTE(ALeUNe @ Jul 26 2016, 01:40 PM)
390x and Fury X bleed at the corner.
But no one cares.
*
user posted image

R9 390X owners no need to upgrade until upcoming RX 490,

Now titan X also lose with FURY X laugh.gif

Their cards already evolved beating GTX 980 without a sweat, ready for DX12 titles. laugh.gif
Kesian GTX 980 kena gimp by NVIDIA, their latest drivers turn OFF ALL ASYNC COMPUTE Features.

This post has been edited by NUR_VER.3: Jul 26 2016, 03:08 PM
NUR_VER.3
post Jul 26 2016, 03:23 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
308 posts

Joined: May 2008
From: Dun ya



QUOTE(amon_meiz @ Jul 26 2016, 03:13 PM)
Wait. Better u mean by 3 to 4 frame?

Only in hitman it beat 1060 kaw kaw

While in tomb raider 1060 win kaw kaw

At best. Even with dx12 and asyn

Both of them stand equal.

Given that both also price almost the same here in malaysia

They are similar. Just pick ur poison

Red or green
*
Dont forget DOOM, check the last picture, 114 frame vs 80 plus frame?

Those who follow GPU scene closely these days would get excited over vulkan because its going to be used by next gen consoles, phones, and all type of gaming OS, this alone promises high compatibility and stability in terms of performance.

Wonder why consoles can produce Good looking games with puny specs? it is due to Async Compute my friend.

So you can bet your money that future game developers focus on utilizing async compute for their new titles because all the current and upcoming consoles (xbox,sony ps, and nintendo) are using the same technology. We have to follow the trend when buying GPU because these cards are not cheap, long term usability is a must for most gamers.

And wanna know why we should look at the console market to estimate your PC GPU long term value? because console games are leading the gaming market since ages, and game developers already starting to focus on cross platform development rather than hardware specific development that still used by NVIDIA gimpworks.

Trust me, RX480 maybe on par with GTX 1060 right now, just wait for another year and see the latest benchmark, its gonna beat GTX 1060 on every dx 12 titles.

Just like all AMD cards from the previous gens, google more about long term value of AMD cards and you will know.

This post has been edited by NUR_VER.3: Jul 26 2016, 03:23 PM
NUR_VER.3
post Jul 26 2016, 03:27 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
308 posts

Joined: May 2008
From: Dun ya



QUOTE(ALeUNe @ Jul 26 2016, 03:21 PM)
GTX1060 FE only available on nVidia online shop.
We don't get FE in our market.

With 14-15% more OC headroom of GTX1060 put into consideration. (vs 3% OC headroom of RX480)

3Dmark Time Spy. nVidia wins.
user posted image

RoTR. nVidia wins.
user posted image

Hitman. AMD wins.
user posted image

Total War. nVidia wins.
user posted image

Ashes of Singularity. nVidia wins.
user posted image

Doom (Vulkan). AMD wins.

DX12 score, nVidia 4 : AMD 2.
So how?  rclxs0.gif
*
Seriously? U compare aftermarket GTX 1060 with aftermarket cooler with ref RX480?

laugh.gif laugh.gif

And people already starting to see RX480 with aftermarket coolers matching the R9 390x, aftermarket GTX 1060 still struggling to compete with REF RX 480 in DX12 laugh.gif
NUR_VER.3
post Jul 26 2016, 03:35 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
308 posts

Joined: May 2008
From: Dun ya



QUOTE(amon_meiz @ Jul 26 2016, 03:25 PM)
Im talking about now. Not later

Seriously. People should stop this "better later"

Nobody buy now and play later

They buy now. To play now

Tho i might agree with u. Lets just put this  to rest

For malaysia. With its pricing

480 is similar and equal to 1060.now.

Later cerita later la. Focus on now.
*
People already know pc gamers expect their hardware to evolve over time, its not like console games that stays the same for the next 2-5 years.

When you play pc games, you will expect latest drivers coming almost monthly, and even games being optimized and updated frequently using patches and fixes. This is what makes pc games worthwhile as you can clearly see your hardware improving from time to time.

Im not arguing about who should buy what brand, Im talking about being a better consumer, if you are putting thousands of ringgit on just graphics cards and expect it to performs as is, then you should stick with console gaming as most console gamers only cares about playing the games.

Pc gamers usually want to see that their system is 'futute proof' a term that is a norm among system builders, that is why with current technology and chip architechture, we need to consider AMD.

Unless NVIDIA starts to acknowledge the importance of Async Compute and the importance of working in an open source environment, they are fighting a losing battle.

Dont get me wrong though, their cards are great based from my past experience their cards does not age well and you can expect latest drivers USUALLY gimp your cards when they already launched a new one.

NUR_VER.3
post Jul 26 2016, 03:37 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
308 posts

Joined: May 2008
From: Dun ya



QUOTE(ALeUNe @ Jul 26 2016, 03:27 PM)
3rd time I mentioned, no reference GTX1060 card.

Sedapnya syiok sendiri.
*
Dude founders edition IS the ref version. laugh.gif
NUR_VER.3
post Jul 26 2016, 03:49 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
308 posts

Joined: May 2008
From: Dun ya



QUOTE(shikimori @ Jul 26 2016, 03:36 PM)
you sir are the best example of typical amd fags who think what if in the future rx 480 will stomp all over nvidia card with vulkan .
Seriously been there done that , before was HBM hype and mantle now vulkan . At the end of the day Nvidia will pull their gameworks and nvidia supported title amd gg

Nobody buys graphic card and expect to be future proof . New shit will be introduce every year best to resell and change annually
*
This is why you are feeding companies like nvidia for nothing, all this while GPUs like Titan, GTX 780, and even the almost obsolete GTX 980 runs perfectly fine but for some unknown reason you will see it starts to fall out as time goes by.

I would have agree with you that technology demands better cards and new games need better cards for that sole reason I agree.

But not to the extent when you can clearly see NVIDIA gimp their cards like GTX TITAN until the lose to ATI 7950 which was launched two YEARS EARLIER.

Dude I am not NVIDIA or AMD fans, but after all the reading and reviews, we can clearly see NVIDIA does not appreciate their loyal customers. You expect to fork out RM3k every year just for a graphics card? you mad ? I dont know about those who think money grows on trees, but for me I expect my hard earned cash to be worthwhile, not just becoming obsolete after 3 years.

But thats just me, its up to you if you want to keep on throwing money just because NVIDIA forced you to do, for me, I am a happy camper with AMD cards for now.


Oh and the Gameworks argument, it might be plausible if its was 2-3 years ago, but considering that AMD already control the console market and they are providing and open source platforms for free to all developers, you can expect fewer gameworks titles in the future, even NVIDIA supporters knows this and they hate gameworks A LOT.

Up to you to consider which is which.

This post has been edited by NUR_VER.3: Jul 26 2016, 03:51 PM
NUR_VER.3
post Jul 26 2016, 04:04 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
308 posts

Joined: May 2008
From: Dun ya



QUOTE(crash123 @ Jul 26 2016, 03:17 PM)

*
And all I can see AMD RX 480 have smooth game play with 60 fps..

Kesian those who bought GTX 970 ohmy.gif To think it was launched 2 years ago.


Take a look at the rival of GTX 970, the R9 390x Once a rival, and now dominate in the same game.

Just like RX 480, max 60 fps frame compared to GTX 970 around 40-50 fps (maybe more if they turn off v syc)

See why I dont buy NVIDIA?

NUR_VER.3
post Jul 26 2016, 04:10 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
308 posts

Joined: May 2008
From: Dun ya



QUOTE(zerorating @ Jul 26 2016, 04:02 PM)
to add salt to that, even big developers like ubisoft seeks for AMD help to implement dx12 on watch doge2, not to forget firaxis with their civilization 6.
*
Thats why malaysians need to get over this "Nvidia is better" assumption, they need to see that only nvidia "latest" card is the best, while the lower ver and previous ones sucks.

AMD, smooth sailing all the way. laugh.gif Dont spend arm and leg and still get enough power to run max at 60 fps. install and let the card evolve bruce.gif
NUR_VER.3
post Jul 26 2016, 04:13 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
308 posts

Joined: May 2008
From: Dun ya



QUOTE(zerorating @ Jul 26 2016, 04:08 PM)
thats only apply if games using lots of compute processing (remedy loves to make lots of graphic experiment), however it considered bad port by alot of people, but still no fix for it from the developers on nvidia end.
*
Yeah I know, most nvidia cards cant run the game that well.
NUR_VER.3
post Jul 26 2016, 04:16 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
308 posts

Joined: May 2008
From: Dun ya



QUOTE(ALeUNe @ Jul 26 2016, 04:11 PM)
You save couple hundreds from buying a GTX1070 @ MYR1.7K.
You just gotta deal with it.  laugh.gif
*
So no more GTX 1060? Wanna kill your own card for what?

Why not cancel GTX 1060 and straight away but GTX 1070? can SLI some more?


Mcm mana mau support NVIDIA nih? laugh.gif
NUR_VER.3
post Jul 26 2016, 04:45 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
308 posts

Joined: May 2008
From: Dun ya



QUOTE(ALeUNe @ Jul 26 2016, 04:17 PM)
GTX970 is indeed launched almost 2 years ago.
R9 390x launched 1 year ago.

Only the low class thinks the newer card should perform slower than old cards.
user posted image
*
That doesnt justify the 20fps difference laugh.gif


QUOTE(crash123 @ Jul 26 2016, 04:18 PM)
R9 390x rival for GTX 970?facepalm.jpeg. R9 390x=GTX 980, R9 380x=GTX 970
Please la dont bullshit me with "why i dont buy nvidia coz i know ati will win someday". doh.gif
Nah see this benchmark, 2-3 fps is not consider to much. And nvidia win/draw in half DX12 and win almost all DX11 game.

*
It aint BS when it has been proven.
oh come see ALeUNe
user posted image
GTX TITAN launch year: 2013
ATI 7950 launch year: 2011

And better yet, losing to 3 gb card
laugh.gif

QUOTE(ALeUNe @ Jul 26 2016, 04:21 PM)
No, that Asus RX480 Strix showed by zerorating was selling at MYR2075.
Deswai I said we might as well get GTX1070 at cheaper rate.
https://www.lowyat.net/2016/110111/asus-gef...s-from-rm-1479/

Wait... you mean you are one of the sohai who is willing to pay MYR2075 for Asus RX480 Strix.

khelben you have a potential sohai candidate here.
*
LOL No point to talk now calling people names?

Did I say anything about buying RX 480?

Real mature kid.

laugh.gif

This post has been edited by NUR_VER.3: Jul 26 2016, 04:47 PM
NUR_VER.3
post Jul 26 2016, 04:56 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
308 posts

Joined: May 2008
From: Dun ya



QUOTE(ALeUNe @ Jul 26 2016, 04:49 PM)
We all know AMD has an edge on Vulkan.
It's either we see new improvement from nVidia on Vulkan or we see Vulkan die like Glide.
Either way, still early to judge on relevance of Vulkan.

Moreover, puny market share of AMD anyway. It's not like moving the market anyway.
*
DUDE, AMD owns the console market lah,

both xbox and sony using AMD not to mention vulkan API is already applied on PS4 and Xbox one, it also used on Smartphones, handhelds, and tablets. Even new android games starts to use vulkan.
user posted image

Wanna tell me why game developers dont want to use vulkan to sell their games?



laugh.gif

This post has been edited by NUR_VER.3: Jul 26 2016, 04:57 PM
NUR_VER.3
post Jul 26 2016, 05:04 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
308 posts

Joined: May 2008
From: Dun ya



QUOTE(ALeUNe @ Jul 26 2016, 04:56 PM)
If Vulkan is a big thing, then we should see some improvement on Vulkan then.
It's common sense to stay relevance for a market leader.

Whether AMD smiles or not, developers will need to decide it's major share audience they are targeting or puny group they are aiming at.
*
Wanna know why newer pascal chips not gonna be able to fully utilize vulkan?

Lutakbuliasynccomputelol.com

QUOTE
"Even with all of these additions, Pascal still won’t quite match GCN. GCN is able to run async compute at the SM/CU level, meaning each SM/CU can work on both graphics and compute at the same time, allowing even better efficiency"


But of course NVIDIA GTX 1080/70 still runs good, its just that they aint gonna see much benefit compared to GCN architecture used by AMD.

You might get 5-10 fps more but not 30fps like AMD with DX12 or vulkan

This post has been edited by NUR_VER.3: Jul 26 2016, 05:06 PM
NUR_VER.3
post Jul 26 2016, 05:17 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
308 posts

Joined: May 2008
From: Dun ya



QUOTE(ALeUNe @ Jul 26 2016, 04:58 PM)
Don't bring consoles to master race market.
It's not relevant.

With console, AMD is going downhill.
Look at its debt and performance over the years. Hefty price paid.
*
NVIDIA not doing so well either, thats why they are moving towards Automotive, server markets, wanna know why the NVIDIA arent as cheap as before? because they are not pushing towards gaming market anymore, they are more focused on industrial based computing.

You see them pushing TITAN gpus that actually meant for professional application rather than gaming, selling it as gaming card just to achieve economies of scale because the chip was too big to cover the chip per wafer production cost.

QUOTE(crash123 @ Jul 26 2016, 05:02 PM)
Please la dont compare RAM, RAM will dont do shit for FPS if u never go above 1080p. I bet u the person who say more ram will make PC faster right?And please learn more about architecture before flaming this. Yes NVIDIA is shit company coz they stop updating old GPU, but old GPU can do that much even if u add 100GB. And ATI  is build for low-overhead API thats why they winning in new game meanwhile NVIDIA is build for openGL. Thats why they losing in vulkan coz they not build for this. See how ATI perform in OpenGL.
BTW 79xx/R9 2xx/R9 3xx is same GPU so u wonder why ATI still provide support to their old card  icon_rolleyes.gif

*
(bolded part) Dont put your words into my mouth la laugh.gif

The reason why Nvidia card does not improve much on vulkan or dx 12 is not that they dont support these APIs, its because their architecture does not have async shaders, IT IS DUE TO HARDWARE design.

That is why I dont go for Maxwell or even PASCAL cards, these cards are just not capable of fully utilizing Async compute as efficiently as GCN architecture.

And I now I hear NVIDIA want to push their Volta cards for next year??? wow, whats the rush NVIDIA? laugh.gif
NUR_VER.3
post Jul 26 2016, 05:22 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
308 posts

Joined: May 2008
From: Dun ya



QUOTE(ALeUNe @ Jul 26 2016, 05:17 PM)
Sigh, kesian the low class.
Had to sell assets. After selling assets, -USD40m net income.  bye.gif  bye.gif  bye.gif

http://www.bizjournals.com/austin/blog/tec...ations-for.html

Not too sure if AMD can survive until the release of next "Vulkan" title.
(prolly acquired by others in the next few months).
*
When fan boys cant justify his lost buying overpriced cards..

They move to "class" arguments


I was like you until I took gimpworks to the knee laugh.gif
NUR_VER.3
post Jul 26 2016, 05:36 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
308 posts

Joined: May 2008
From: Dun ya



QUOTE(ALeUNe @ Jul 26 2016, 05:30 PM)
I agree nVidia does not perform well.

user posted image
*
laugh.gif

When buying GPU leads to company financial performance laugh.gif

Wanna know why AMD having financial diffculties? it is due to the Processor flop aka bulldoze failure.

It does not provide a total picture in terms of graphic and gaming department, let alone their future contracts with console developers and the upcoming ZEN processor laugh.gif
NUR_VER.3
post Jul 26 2016, 05:39 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
308 posts

Joined: May 2008
From: Dun ya



QUOTE(ALeUNe @ Jul 26 2016, 05:34 PM)
Overprice for over-performance cards.
That justifies.

Unlike the low class, overprice for underperformed card
user posted image
*
Umm...Thats for industrial use, VR game developers? laugh.gif

It wasnt meant to be used as just gaming card LOL


NUR_VER.3
post Jul 26 2016, 05:56 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
308 posts

Joined: May 2008
From: Dun ya



QUOTE(crash123 @ Jul 26 2016, 05:44 PM)
All people already know it coz ATI is build mantle so its a retarded if u not build ur GPU to optimize the API right. Mantle=Vulkan. I already say it above so no need to repeat it again.

And for that one I agree coz Pascal not fully support Async compute coz they dont care shit about future tech. Thats why I stay with my card and waiting for next card and dont tell me to buy AMD coz their OC potential+hot card already traumatise me for years. But for now, Nvidia is better coz developer find hard to fully utilize vulkan+dx12 as they are new tech. And if u wanna to keep ur card for at least 3 years go ahead buy ATI.

Async Compute Only Boosted HITMAN’s Performance By 5-10% on AMD cards; Devs Say It’s “Super Hard” to Tune
*
Nope,

Mantle=DX 12 and Vulkan is different API by kronos.

And async compute is not new tech, it was already used in current gen consoles. It only due to late shift to DX12 that people dont fully see the benefits of Async Compute.

Unlike NVIDIA who always close their latest tech for best optimization, ATI/AMD shares their technology with open source method, so your argument that Mantle/DX12 developed by AMD so must be better on AMD is invalid, as it is an open source technology.

Plus if you follow the recent game developers conference, Vulkan is a big thing among them, and even Nvidia demonstrating their findings on vulkan.




NUR_VER.3
post Jul 26 2016, 06:06 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
308 posts

Joined: May 2008
From: Dun ya



QUOTE(zerorating @ Jul 26 2016, 06:00 PM)
as far that i know, vulkan is more closer to mantle compared to directx 12 (lol, macam la microsoft want to annouce we take alot of mantle codes and use it on dx12)
as per wiki:
*
Since MANTLE is an open source code, they have similar base.

But to me it doesnt matter whether it is Vulkan or DX12, I am more interested with what the developers can do with Async compute, since the improvements over Vulkan in DOOM, I have always been addicted to what Async compute can do.

Never before in my 12 years of gaming that a game can improve its Frame rate up to 30 fps and above just with a change in setting with same graphic detail.

2 Pages  1 2 >
Bump Topic Topic ClosedOptions New Topic
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0174sec    0.49    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 21st December 2025 - 10:33 PM