2 links given on previous post.

if you're gamer who mostly play latest games, DX12/Vulkan API would be a future for some AAA titles which AMD performance shines

Those don't even support the claim properly.

AMD has been talking DX12 for more than a year now, R9 Fury, R9 Fury X, R9 Nano and R9 300 series.

Supposedly better DX12 but in the end still lost to Nvidia 900 series.
Your argument is moot actually, when you compare DX12 games, it doesn't bring much of a performance boost when going from DX11 to DX12.

In the end regardless of what architecture, no AMD card is capable of providing the performance level of GTX 1080 and GTX 1070.

The Fury range doesn't even look attractive now with those cards around.

i'm quite busy not really interested to debate. not to mention when you don't any supported links  . BTW, you google "DOOM on vulkan", or maybe just any DX11 vs DX12 benchmarks.

amd fanboys cry over not able to get anything to on the green camp so far is hilarious to see... if really wanna fight wait for amd to release the Polaris ... before that , its still loser camp at the moment.

you are all wrong. the best gpu is from Matrox

on a serious note, personally I'd go something that has best value-performance ratio, that is to see which shop will clear their GTX980/GTX980i at insance prices. Insane I mean, priced lower than RX480

if you're gamer who mostly play latest games, DX12/Vulkan API would be a future for some AAA titles which AMD performance shines, and it would likely be that way for a long time to come. AMD maybe slow in updating its hardware architecture, however on the bright side, it means driver supports for latest games still covers former generation series, hence the 290x rock solid performance compared to his supposedly superior peer 780Ti (link).

No doubt Nvidia driver is superior than AMD, but that probably for current Nvidia generation(link). That's why I said its perfectly fine to buy Nvidia if you update card annually. That being said, avoid buying their 900 and 700 series gpu. those are tuned for DX11 and likely left out on driver support.

Dude, the article was published on 24 August 2015, ie. last year. Both cards (from AMD and Nvidia) are obsolete.

I am not a fan of either Nvidia or AMD, frankly graphic cards from both companies can last for years. I was using a Geforce GTX 580 for more than 3 years (I am still using it now)

Similarly, I had a ATI Radeon 9700 Pro for more than 3 year. I can't remember whether I sold this card or eventually scrapped it as it was too many years ago.

U r right when it comes to driver support, older graphic card that keep on update to the latest driver will sometimes cause a performance degradation or worse

You drunk or something?

I guess i wont take 'Hardware' too seriously when 'admin' start trolling. I thought i was in /k/.

Some said AMD’s drivers were lacking while others went so far as to claim NVIDIA may have purposely crippled Kepler’s performance in an effort to drive 900-series sales. None of that was evident after running through each game’s respective benchmark scene at least four times over.

As it stands, I couldn’t find any instance where the GTX 780 Ti exhibited debilitating performance problems. That includes newer games I’m currently playing that aren’t in the benchmarks like Trine 3 and the Call to Arms beta. All of the results were in line, if not better than expected given this card’s memory limitations and relative age.

For a while I thought I'm in /k. 

Now, you see what I had to deal with in the public FB group I had to deal with, Goldfries? I gave up and did the most sensible thing, play more games rather than continue arguing. Cherry picking doesnt begin to describe it.