Malaysians like free stuff...

Klang Valley most are OK.

win2 situation. mvno does not need to invest so much into infra but get the big coverages in no time.

how do u think webe get to cover areas fast in 2 months of establishment?

by this, they can use the money to focus on their plans, by providing cheaper rates.

This post has been edited by ciwi1166: Dec 20 2016, 07:48 AM

by definition, mvno does not have physical infra. in today's world it's kinda loose term. We do have pure-mvno like xox, friendi. we do also have kind like a hybrid. Umobile use their own infra for 4G & 3G, RAN Share on certain areas for 3G, and DR for 2G. By DR, they only share the radio access part (base station), the backbone is all theirs.

for WEBE case, they DR on Celcom. but they also have TM and previous P1 infra which put them in kinda grey area.

most subscribers only understand face value lorh...

if this telco cheap, others must follow.

technically, the way u get resources on mobile networks is by access contention.

the more users using simultaneously, all the users will suffer.

indians like to talk i guess..

so u rather have same plan for years, than various plans? mind u, upgrading infrastructure take years. how long is enough?
telcos like umobile & webe have to play it this way if they want to compete. they cant adopt strategies of traditional telcos like celcom, maxis and digi or they will lose out.

those telcos have start ahead advantages of infra and subscriber-base.