Wait till I get mine tmr then I post
Aeneon 1GB DDR 400 Discussion Thread, Owner Please share
|
|
 Jan 11 2007, 12:32 PM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
 
All Stars
19,320 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Klang  
|
|
Quote|
|
|
|
|
Jan 12 2007, 03:16 PM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
|
All Stars
19,320 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Klang
|
Looks like AMD boards get better speeds
I can't even get into Windows at 250Mhz 3-3-3-8 Currently running at 230Mhz 3-3-3-8, double priming, so far no errors |
|
|
Jan 12 2007, 11:23 PM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
|
All Stars
19,320 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Klang
|
Any Intel users here?
Post your results, I can't stable at 250Mhz 1:1 3-3-3-8 at all |
|
|
Jan 13 2007, 12:47 AM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
|
All Stars
19,320 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Klang
|
its ur RAM problem, not ur GC
irangan, mine can boot at 225Mhz 2-3-2-5 but memtest86 got errors so don't bother tighting it. Currently on 227Mhz 2.5-3-3-6 2.7VDimm |
|
|
Jan 13 2007, 02:10 AM
Return to original view | Post
#5
|
|
All Stars
19,320 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Klang
|
Hmmm...I found something weird, maybe its for Intel users or solely from my board
Lets say that 235Mhz 3-3-3-8 at 2.8Vdimm and 1.65Vcore in BIOS 1:1 with processor 235Mhz FSB, it can boot and run benchmarks no problems but memtest86 will show errors BUT I manage to eliminate that by apply more CPU voltage to a higher amount >.>" How about other Intel users? Same thing like mine? Need to pump up the juice just the stabilize the memtest86? |
|
|
Jan 13 2007, 07:14 PM
Return to original view | Post
#6
|
|
All Stars
19,320 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Klang
|
Today after countless times of testing, the highest I got is till 240Mhz 2.5-3-3-6 1:1 with my Intel setup
Really picky with Intel boards indeed This post has been edited by shinjite: Jan 13 2007, 07:15 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 14 2007, 03:11 PM
Return to original view | Post
#7
|
|
All Stars
19,320 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Klang
|
lack of voltage
|
|
|
Jan 15 2007, 01:38 PM
Return to original view | Post
#8
|
|
All Stars
19,320 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Klang
|
QUOTE(irangan @ Jan 14 2007, 11:23 PM) shinjite, previously i mentioned in 478 thread that my ram cant even boot when 225fsb 2 3 2 5 vdimm 2.7. after some testing, i found that whenever i cant boot at those timing, i just need to use 2.8vdimm then i can use my comp like normal. as I said, this ram is picky on Intel mobos~~but most of the time, i can use those timing with only 2.7v. i dont know why is that. probably my mobo problem.  Most of the testing done is on AMD so nothing much we can do~~ My experience a bit weird too....memtest86 errors at 227Mhz 2.7V 2.5-3-3-6 but can boot to Windows. Tested with 2.8V same timing, memtest86 no errors at all.....now went down to 2.65V/2.7V with 2.5-3-3-5 no errors whatsoever.... This post has been edited by shinjite: Jan 15 2007, 01:39 PM |
|
|
Jan 16 2007, 12:23 PM
Return to original view | Post
#9
|
|
All Stars
19,320 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Klang
|
QUOTE(horphi @ Jan 15 2007, 07:28 PM) i have even more weird. have to test a lot of times, the possibility and all...i have pass memtest >8hr 250Mhz 3-3-3-8 2.7V , 260Mhz 3-3-3-8 2.7V but fail to boot windows. now 225 3-3-3-8 fail memtest #5  with 2.6v , 2.7v , 2.73v , 2.63v |
|
|
Jan 17 2007, 07:58 PM
Return to original view | Post
#10
|
|
All Stars
19,320 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Klang
|
QUOTE(skydna @ Jan 16 2007, 05:25 PM) for my exp find out ur proc max fsb use sp2004 I rather run at default priority as I need to work with the comp alsothen run sp2004 blend stress test priority 9 and set fsb and timming with clock gen and a64 info or memset run more than 2 hour sp2004 blend stress test priority 9 for 24/7 setting for me memtest cant be trust any more...i just use it for burn in the memory memtest can't be trust? Its one of the most sought after tool for RAM stability my friend, be it DOS or Windows version, both are very accurate. For CPU, I will run both large and small ffts. You want another stability programme will be running SuperPI 32M test, if your system is unstable, you will get get the "NOT EXACT IN ROUND" error  This post has been edited by shinjite: Jan 17 2007, 08:03 PM |
|
|
Jan 19 2007, 06:01 PM
Return to original view | Post
#11
|
|
All Stars
19,320 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Klang
|
Well not all can perform the same
This ram doens't run that well on my Intel system, so just go with what you got Initially AMD can get better results..... Anyway, if u guys overclock and pass the SP2004, make sur go for 3dmark too and do the looping to make sure your RAM is 3D stable or play some games This post has been edited by shinjite: Jan 19 2007, 06:02 PM |
| Change to: |  0.0190sec
 0.29
 7 queries
 GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 4th December 2025 - 10:53 PM |
All Rights Reserved © 2002- 2025 Vijandren Ramadass (~unite against racism~)
Powered by Invision Power Board © 2025 IPS, Inc.