Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Problematic TV Brand, Owner Sharing Experience

Which Brand LCD/LED TV Giving Owner Problem
 
Sony [ 17 ] ** [12.14%]
Panasonic [ 12 ] ** [8.57%]
Sharp [ 9 ] ** [6.43%]
Samsung [ 49 ] ** [35.00%]
LG [ 15 ] ** [10.71%]
Toshiba [ 4 ] ** [2.86%]
Philips [ 9 ] ** [6.43%]
Hisense [ 12 ] ** [8.57%]
Haier [ 13 ] ** [9.29%]
Total Votes: 140
Guests cannot vote 
views
     
TSOPT
post May 12 2016, 09:31 PM, updated 9y ago

Wee wang wang
*******
Senior Member
2,065 posts

Joined: Feb 2011
Getting owners to share experience on previously owned TVs and whether it has caused phobia to buy another TV from the same brand mega_shok.gif

When you go to shops, some sales will say "This brand no good/This brand a lot customer complaint" as well as "This brand no complaint so far/This brand as far as I know no issue"....

Personally I have a 32" LCD from Sharp (6 years) and a 42" LED from Sony (5 years). Both still going strong thumbsup.gif

This post has been edited by OPT: May 12 2016, 09:34 PM
TSOPT
post May 12 2016, 09:57 PM

Wee wang wang
*******
Senior Member
2,065 posts

Joined: Feb 2011
QUOTE(adamw @ May 12 2016, 09:50 PM)
Phail! Where's >Xiaomi?
*
biggrin.gif

MiTV not officially selling in Malaysia leh...
TSOPT
post May 12 2016, 10:22 PM

Wee wang wang
*******
Senior Member
2,065 posts

Joined: Feb 2011
QUOTE(AVFAN @ May 12 2016, 10:06 PM)
TV's...

20 years ago, CRT tv's last 15-20 years.

today, LCD-plasma-LED... normal home usage, not trashed or left in store...

if last <5 years - piece of crap.

5-8 years - normal, expectancy.

>8 years - excellent.

imo. tongue.gif
*
I think early adopters of LCD/Plasma should be going into their 2nd or 3rd unit by now...

Early Plasma's famous for burn-in issues...
TSOPT
post May 13 2016, 09:30 PM

Wee wang wang
*******
Senior Member
2,065 posts

Joined: Feb 2011
QUOTE(jimmyteng18 @ May 13 2016, 06:48 PM)
I still using my 32" Sharp LCD since 2006.
*
Wow, extremely value for money!

Or is it you seldom use?
TSOPT
post May 15 2016, 04:58 PM

Wee wang wang
*******
Senior Member
2,065 posts

Joined: Feb 2011
Yeah, I'm just like you. Sony is supposedly better QC. Heard a lot of negative feedbacks reading Korean brands, though I have yet to purchase a Korean brand TV before.

Would I ever buy a Korean? Most likely not, considering a TV lifespan can go as long as more than a decade...

Apart from Sony, used to have Toshiba, Philips CRT...not too impressed.

Sharp? Had one before, was okay. May just opt for an entry level Sharp again in near future, as opposed to Samsung, LG, Toshiba, Philips...

By the way, you seemed like a person who's particular with brands/display QC...What do you think of those 4Ks that you had bought? Is it better in display over Full HD at below 50 inch?

QUOTE(nikrizal @ May 15 2016, 01:36 PM)
Sony Bravia LCD KDL-32D3000 (2007) amazingly still ok    notworthy.gif

Sony Bravia LED KDL-40NX803 (2011) still ok except if switched on too long will give vertical lines (started last month), if let it cool a bit then back to ok.

Samsung 4K UA48JU6000K bought last year obviously no problem just yet.

LG 4K 49UF640T bought last month, yet to give me any trouble.
I think the poll somehow will give us some idea which brand people buy most, consequently more people will report its problems. Samsung marketing has been so good for the past few years, more people buy Samsung as compare to more expensive Sony, thus reflect more reports on Samsung. Furthermore people (including me) tend to believe brand like Sony put more attention to quality as compared to other brands.

But this time I just want to test Korean brand like Samsung and LG and see their reputation.
*
This post has been edited by OPT: May 15 2016, 04:59 PM
TSOPT
post May 15 2016, 07:57 PM

Wee wang wang
*******
Senior Member
2,065 posts

Joined: Feb 2011
QUOTE(nikrizal @ May 15 2016, 07:46 PM)
I'm positive that 4k display is much better provided you are watching native 4k content (for me Netflix & Youtube 4K videos). Even with TV below 50" you will notice the difference. 4K TVs have four times more pixel than full HD thus you'll experience more clearer pictures/videos.

I can confirm that in 4K tvs the image  has more detail than that of 1080p tvs. You'll be able to see details of threads on clothes, amazing details of hairs and overall edges around objects are much smoother.

I've read somewhere that certain viewing distance is quite crucial if you really want to experience the difference between 4K and 1080 quality. For 50" 4K TV, the viewing distance is around 2.0 meters, which is happening to be in my case  smile.gif . Beyond that you'll need a larger tv.
*
Great. It's a pity Sony 4K are priced quite premium as compared to Korean's. If I ever buy a 4K, then most likely it will be Korean then...

I'm very particular at the display quality, but I don't think I will watch 4K content soon cause as it is I'm mostly watching 720p content.

Hmm, would be interested in how 720p looks like in a 4K tv...

This post has been edited by OPT: May 15 2016, 07:59 PM
TSOPT
post May 16 2016, 09:31 PM

Wee wang wang
*******
Senior Member
2,065 posts

Joined: Feb 2011
Surprisingly, I myself can't view the polls!

I thought no one has voted until I logged in through another device and saw the votes blink.gif

I think it's because I have yet to vote - My TVs are still working fine, thus it's unfair to give a bad vote to any brand nod.gif

Saw Samsung and LG being the highest votes for problematic TV...
TSOPT
post May 16 2016, 10:26 PM

Wee wang wang
*******
Senior Member
2,065 posts

Joined: Feb 2011
QUOTE(AVFAN @ May 16 2016, 10:15 PM)
that's when warranty/extended w/insurance comes in,

rm1-2k, no bother, just junk if it fails right after normal warranty.

>rm3k, should consider.
*
For someone who has yet to purchase extended warranty...

1. If TV rosak within warranty, you sent in for repair, thus 2-3 weeks no TV?
2. Normally extended warranty is for how many years? 2-3 yrs? How frequent will TV rosak within 2 - 3 years?
TSOPT
post May 16 2016, 10:38 PM

Wee wang wang
*******
Senior Member
2,065 posts

Joined: Feb 2011
QUOTE(AVFAN @ May 16 2016, 10:31 PM)
1. same like car no? accident, workshop, no car...

2. some tv's come with 1, some 2. some can add 1, 2, 3.
depends on tv, outlet, seller...

you must have experienced breaking down RIGHT AFTER std warranty expires! biggrin.gif

like i say, for a tv, 5 years is min expected. 6-8 good, >8 excellent.
*
My TV so far so good, belum rosak brows.gif, no add on warranty because they were cheap in the first place, and it would pain me to be without TV for a long period - I would rather go out and straight buy a brand new TV icon_rolleyes.gif

This post has been edited by OPT: May 16 2016, 10:39 PM
TSOPT
post May 16 2016, 10:48 PM

Wee wang wang
*******
Senior Member
2,065 posts

Joined: Feb 2011
QUOTE(AVFAN @ May 16 2016, 10:42 PM)
technically, a tv's life is described as xy,000 hours of operation.

so, if u use it lightly, can last a long long time.

but in reality, so many things can go wrong...

for users like me that use a 5-10 hours a day, get extended warranty for costly tv.

need it to last 5 years min.
but yes... if buy cheap-cheap tv, can change all the time. biggrin.gif
*
Getting extended warranty is ok for me, just cannot be without TV for extended time blush.gif

Not sure about other people, but my house only 1 TV. Of course, if house each room got one TV, then its another story console.gif
TSOPT
post May 17 2016, 02:12 PM

Wee wang wang
*******
Senior Member
2,065 posts

Joined: Feb 2011
QUOTE(httan @ May 17 2016, 12:00 PM)
LG plasma 720p 50" bought in year 2007 stll fine, but my brother and friend bought samsung LCD/Plasma same time already using their 3rd set now.

So I dare not touch samsung, although it claimed that the colour very nice..
*
Ya, a lot of so called bad perception to Korean brands, especially Samsung. Probably in the past, but I had talked to a lot of repairman and electronics shops and they said the same thing... hmm.gif
TSOPT
post May 23 2016, 07:24 PM

Wee wang wang
*******
Senior Member
2,065 posts

Joined: Feb 2011
QUOTE(GamersFamilia @ May 23 2016, 04:17 PM)
my samsung lcd tv also so far so good since bought it ... warranty expired long time ago , but if rosak i think im gonna buy a new one straight away 4k UHD tv may be  laugh.gif
*
Somehow, I'm slightly hoping that my TV will break soon ...also intention to get 4k tongue.gif

This post has been edited by OPT: May 23 2016, 07:24 PM
TSOPT
post May 25 2016, 07:32 AM

Wee wang wang
*******
Senior Member
2,065 posts

Joined: Feb 2011
Hmm, looks like the poll results is about even now...not much difference.. hmm.gif
TSOPT
post May 26 2016, 06:56 PM

Wee wang wang
*******
Senior Member
2,065 posts

Joined: Feb 2011
QUOTE(jovigrunge @ May 26 2016, 04:35 PM)
There must be a valid reason why Samsung was on top of the problematic list.  brows.gif
*
Today I ask another electrical shop...reply also same smile.gif
TSOPT
post May 29 2016, 11:59 PM

Wee wang wang
*******
Senior Member
2,065 posts

Joined: Feb 2011
QUOTE(one punch man @ May 29 2016, 11:48 PM)
1. SAMSUNG 51" Plasma PA51H5000
Weekdays used < 3 hours/ day sometimes not on also.

July 2014 - Purchased
Feb 2016 - Vertical line appeared  sweat.gif ...at first, it was only 1 tiny line in the middle of screen...then it got bigger and multiply
Mar 2016 - Repaired, replaced the whole panel

not that reliable but at least the customer service is superb  rclxms.gif  pickup call at weekend and night, technician also came quickly to fix at home
2. PANASONIC 42" Plasma
>8 hours/day

2011 - Purchased
still going strong  rclxms.gif
*
Finally, a detailed info biggrin.gif



TSOPT
post May 30 2016, 07:14 PM

Wee wang wang
*******
Senior Member
2,065 posts

Joined: Feb 2011
QUOTE(jovigrunge @ May 30 2016, 05:59 PM)
According to the small survey above, Panasonic has one of the best durability and reliability compared to the sexy Samsung.

Samsung - Korea
Panasonic - Japan

Samsung - Modern and sexy design but unsustainable quality
Panasonic - Decent design but sustainable quality

Your pick?  brows.gif
*
Jap > Korean biggrin.gif
TSOPT
post Jun 1 2016, 06:04 PM

Wee wang wang
*******
Senior Member
2,065 posts

Joined: Feb 2011
QUOTE(dannyw @ Jun 1 2016, 06:00 PM)
Recent News:

Panasonic says it is going to stop making screens for its televisions in Japan by the end of September.

It has never been a profitable venture since production started in 2010 due to heavy price competition from South Korean and Chinese rivals.

*
Next time only Korean/Chinese and ultimately maybe only Chinese...
TSOPT
post Jun 1 2016, 10:10 PM

Wee wang wang
*******
Senior Member
2,065 posts

Joined: Feb 2011
QUOTE(weikee @ Jun 1 2016, 09:58 PM)
Panasonic,  the last model of plasma have some problem with panel lifespan (at least my observations in Panasonic thread)
*
I think he wants to know more on Sammy, not Pana innocent.gif
TSOPT
post Jun 2 2016, 06:28 PM

Wee wang wang
*******
Senior Member
2,065 posts

Joined: Feb 2011
QUOTE(jovigrunge @ Jun 2 2016, 06:15 PM)
Firstly I don't decide. It's them that voted and yet out of 15 only 1 dude gave the details of the problem.
Any idea why? Tv or human problematic?  tongue.gif
*
I think most people are not technically well versed in TVs...

Rosak = rosak

No picture = rosak

Got line = rosak

biggrin.gif
TSOPT
post Jun 14 2016, 09:20 PM

Wee wang wang
*******
Senior Member
2,065 posts

Joined: Feb 2011
QUOTE(jovigrunge @ Jun 14 2016, 08:32 PM)
This thread shouldn't die off. It would be interesting to see Samsung top the chart for such a long period.  sad.gif
*
rclxms.gif

Surprising to see Toshiba and Philips maintaing..or it means general public is not buying Toshiba/Philips rclxub.gif

Samsung being the top is 'expected'...well, at least for me

Sony unexpected to be that problematic confused.gif I know Sony QC quite good...

Pana not bad thumbsup.gif

This post has been edited by OPT: Jun 14 2016, 09:21 PM

2 Pages  1 2 >Top
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0537sec    0.99    8 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 17th December 2025 - 06:18 AM