Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

8 Pages  1 2 3 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

Photography Canon EOS Family, One Big EOS Family - V59, The White Paladins' Territory!

views
     
LegendLee
post May 6 2016, 12:32 PM

><3LG3|\|D
Group Icon
Elite
2,725 posts

Joined: Mar 2006


QUOTE(Lego Warfare @ May 5 2016, 07:29 PM)
No as in real photographers with their tripods, infra red, etc. A whole bunch of them in groups. Day time not as bad as night time for Milky Way shots.
*
I once tried to do that at night on pitstop which was on the way to Milford sound. Didn't pack the appropriate clothes and it was below zero lol. Need to stay out there due to long shutter. Too bad it was cloudy.
LegendLee
post May 6 2016, 04:44 PM

><3LG3|\|D
Group Icon
Elite
2,725 posts

Joined: Mar 2006


QUOTE(Lego Warfare @ May 6 2016, 03:02 PM)
lol it was pitch black by 7pm. but still a lot more safer than Msia biggrin.gif
I was lucky to have 3 nights of clear milky way, 1st night in Arthur's Pass, 2nd in Lake Tekapo and 3rd in Mount Cook. I was dead tired and lazy by the 3rd night, or having Mount Cook + snow capped mountain as backdrop among the stars would be the final icing on my 12 days self drive trip sad.gif

You didn't go for Milky Way shots with Milford Sound backdrop instead of the pitstop? That would really make a nice backdrop too.
*
It was too cold then and I was concentrating on capturing videos more for the trip.
Edited the video within 2 days. Photos.... Most are still unedited.... And it has been 2 years hahahah
LegendLee
post May 24 2016, 11:31 PM

><3LG3|\|D
Group Icon
Elite
2,725 posts

Joined: Mar 2006


By the way guys,
Do you use any cloud storage to store/backup your photos?

Looking for a cloud backup solution with highspeed upload (not one cap at less than 10Mbps) and unlimited storage.

LegendLee
post May 25 2016, 08:48 PM

><3LG3|\|D
Group Icon
Elite
2,725 posts

Joined: Mar 2006


QUOTE(Rice_Owl84 @ May 25 2016, 06:24 PM)
I just use online cloud like dropbox at the moment.  But I might switch to Amazon Cloud.  Seeing Amazon Cloud Drive offering 12USD/year for unlimited photos storage, maybe check that out and see if its suitable for you.  Amazon having 60USD/year for unlimited everything sounds much cheaper than Dropbox's 180USD/year for unlimited business plan.

Quick review of Amazon vs Dropbox:  http://www.backupreview.com/amazon-cloud-drive-vs-dropbox/
*
Thanks for the suggestion
I'm looking for an online cloud solution that mirrors my HDD and backs up everything on a regular basis.

I'm actually using the dropbox 1TB plan.
Useful when I need to transfer large files and have it stay there indefinitely. (Unlike we transfer)

I tried amazon cloud drive before, I think the upload speed is slower than dropbox on my side.

QUOTE(goldfries @ May 25 2016, 06:37 PM)
How about using stuff like WD MyCloud?
*
Thats a good solution...
I might just run a program to mirror the data I want to backup to this disk...

Thanks

Update : Just placed an order for a Western Digital My Cloud EX2 2-Bay NAS
Now to hunt for cheap WD RED drives....

I just hope the speed is good and the resource consumption isn't a lot.

This post has been edited by LegendLee: May 25 2016, 09:32 PM
LegendLee
post May 25 2016, 10:31 PM

><3LG3|\|D
Group Icon
Elite
2,725 posts

Joined: Mar 2006


QUOTE(goldfries @ May 25 2016, 09:48 PM)
Why didn't you buy those that package with drive?

Resource hog very little, newer ones are plenty powerful.
*
Found a good deal online for the diskless one. (The most recently release ultra)
Rm 830 online from lazada without discount.
The 4TB one is more than double the diskless price.

I am not sure if I can do better for the NAS price wise... but for the WD RED drives, I think I can get a better price offline.

This post has been edited by LegendLee: May 25 2016, 10:37 PM
LegendLee
post Jun 5 2016, 08:37 PM

><3LG3|\|D
Group Icon
Elite
2,725 posts

Joined: Mar 2006


Finally got a working back up system on.

Using a Raid 1 configuration 4TB My Cloud EX2 Ultra connected to my router.
And the using carbon copy cloner to clone/synchronise all the photo/video files on my thunderbolt duo 4TB Raid 0 drive to the network drive.

Back up rate at over 90MB/s
Far faster than the 1-3 MB/s back up with dropbox and back blaze.


LegendLee
post Jul 28 2016, 08:24 PM

><3LG3|\|D
Group Icon
Elite
2,725 posts

Joined: Mar 2006


QUOTE(munak991 @ Jul 28 2016, 05:00 PM)
using one. not very good for travel. cause it takes too much time to setup.
It is good for Point and shoot. but not DSLR. If you mount it with a single 24-70, it is already overweight.

I rather u get something so portable and can put at anywhere. like this

user posted image
*
There are several versions of the gorillapod.
I'm using the SLR zoom with a Manfrotto ball head.
No issues with DSLR and larger primes.

LegendLee
post Aug 26 2016, 09:47 AM

><3LG3|\|D
Group Icon
Elite
2,725 posts

Joined: Mar 2006


QUOTE(MooTikPin @ Aug 25 2016, 04:59 PM)
So 5d mark 4 is out.

Any brother upgrading?
*
4k video is disappointing
It's a 1.64x crop.
This means smaller fov and I believe the image quality will take a major hit too. (For lens that cannot resolve such a small pixel size)

Thinking of jumping ship to Sony.

This post has been edited by LegendLee: Aug 26 2016, 09:49 AM
LegendLee
post Aug 26 2016, 01:56 PM

><3LG3|\|D
Group Icon
Elite
2,725 posts

Joined: Mar 2006


QUOTE(MooTikPin @ Aug 26 2016, 11:42 AM)
1.74*

😊

Yea lorh, many people say the same 😔
*
A bit confusing.
Some articles like this state it as 1.64
https://m.dpreview.com/reviews/canon-eos-5d...ressions-review

While others state as 1.74

Well. Both are unacceptable....
LegendLee
post Sep 6 2016, 02:15 PM

><3LG3|\|D
Group Icon
Elite
2,725 posts

Joined: Mar 2006


QUOTE(DaddyO @ Sep 6 2016, 01:24 PM)
Dont really understand the obsession with having 4k video in a camera meant for still photos. Sure you can get all in one package, but that simply makes the cost go higher which is not a plus point. Instead of better fps shots, autofocus, dynamic range and touch screen, a lot time and cost pour into video feature instead. If video geeks want to do video there are other more suitable video camera out there without the 30min limit due to taxation reason and heat sink problem. You cant have your cake and eat it too. Take GH4 as example. Its a great 4k video but not a good photo camera. A6300 would have been great step up from a6000 and cheap too if they hadnt bother with 4k. Really 5DmkIV would have been great if it just marketed as still photo camera and canon would have better off develop mirrorless with the dual pixel tech.
*
Because at the moment there are people with lots of canon glass who seek good 4K video with a 35mm full frame sensor without breaking the bank with the cinema or 1D series.
Many have already migrated to Sony because of this. Some are holding back because of the potential of 5D4.

This post has been edited by LegendLee: Sep 6 2016, 02:18 PM
LegendLee
post Sep 6 2016, 03:57 PM

><3LG3|\|D
Group Icon
Elite
2,725 posts

Joined: Mar 2006


QUOTE(DaddyO @ Sep 6 2016, 03:27 PM)
I get that. But sony receive a good deal of critism on their side too. Overheating, pixel binning, 30min limit, poor battery life, no touch screen and not really cheap lens selection. 4k really is becoming a bane than a plus for those hoping just to have reasonably priced FF photo camera with updated specs in areas like battery life.

80D for example is a fine video camera with everything needed for video and control except people beaching about 4k.
*
30 mins limit.
Over heating.
Poor battery life.
Pixel binning.
All 4 of this is very difficult to avoid and dslr/mirror less video shooters have already gotten used to it even in the 1080P era.

30 mins limit is hardly an issue unless you are recording a really long event. In which case over heating will happen first. If however, you take non event videos- this isn't an issue at all.
Battery life can be solved simply by carrying more batteries.

As for pixel binning. Well, better that than a crop sensor.
I don't think they have a choice with pixel binning anyway unless the sensor itself is 4k.

It's frustrating that almost everything has 4K. Even mobile phones. Trust me, I understand it's a lot harder to implement that on a larger sensor... But it's still frustrating.
In a few years time, 4K will be the new 1080P

This post has been edited by LegendLee: Sep 6 2016, 04:00 PM
LegendLee
post Sep 6 2016, 05:24 PM

><3LG3|\|D
Group Icon
Elite
2,725 posts

Joined: Mar 2006


QUOTE(DaddyO @ Sep 6 2016, 04:58 PM)
Forgot to mention the mother of all complaint. Rolling shutter. Good luck getting that ironed out. Knowing how much 4k processing demand on a cmos sensor, it will be bloody expensive. Canon is currently developing global shutter on this issue but i bet it will not be implement on dslr for many years. 4k on smartphone is possible due to lower end construction compared to dslr. But who watches at 4k?
*
The sensor technology itself makes it cheaper to produce a 4k sensor for a phone. The demand is way higher too, so they can mass produce it at a very cheap price.

4K itself has a few advantage.
1. Gives you the ability to crop even if your output is 1080P. Even reduce camera shake.
2. Downscaling a 4k video will generally give you more details than a 1080P video. This depends on how (which algorithm) you downscale it, but it can be better than on camera 1080P.
3. Some screens are already in 4K. In a few years time, 4K will be the new 1080P.


As for Rolling shutter.
It's not that bad for some models and its alright for some genre. Global shutter however is quite an old technology even on cmos camera but it'll just be more expensive. That extra cost may not justify the loss in sales.

This post has been edited by LegendLee: Sep 6 2016, 05:28 PM
LegendLee
post Sep 7 2016, 01:03 AM

><3LG3|\|D
Group Icon
Elite
2,725 posts

Joined: Mar 2006


QUOTE(DaddyO @ Sep 6 2016, 06:08 PM)
I think we are getting off topic here. I'm not disputing 4k benefit. I'm disputing why 4k is like a compulsory feature on a camera nowadays. Oh no, 5DmkIV failed because it has shit 4k. Seriously? Was it supposed to be a video dslr in the first place?

Just a side note, I'm not a fan of Canon and their primitive decision not to innovate until Sony took over. Just that this 4k race is slowly eating up features that should be improved like battery life, touchscreen on cameras (we have like cheap phone with touch screen but camera department is wayyyyyy too slow), better wifi/internet/social integration, and cheaper production model. Hey, just like a6000 when it came out. But all ignored in favor of 4k feature.
*
Well, to cinematographers/videographers.
That is a major factor.
Ever since the 5D2 days, videographers have been getting canon cameras just because of its video functionality.

To them and to me to a certain extend, we value the video functionality more than the rest. And we are a significant portion of the market that will buy a dslr simply for its video functionality. Canon have been losing profit, they cannot afford to give up on this market.

If you need high resolution 4k video on a 35mm sensor under USD 4k, there are simply not many choices at the moment.
Canon can defend all they want, saying its for photo and not video. Well, if the features we want is not included... We will leave.



This post has been edited by LegendLee: Sep 7 2016, 01:07 AM
LegendLee
post Sep 7 2016, 02:28 PM

><3LG3|\|D
Group Icon
Elite
2,725 posts

Joined: Mar 2006


Right now....
If there is a metabones option for canon 5D4 in 4k mode.... Then I might still consider.
Else the Sony camp is a lot more tempting.

The C500 had a major price drop recently. But it's still very expensive at nearly twice the price of the 5D4 while losing almost all photo capability of a dslr.....




LegendLee
post Oct 19 2016, 07:47 PM

><3LG3|\|D
Group Icon
Elite
2,725 posts

Joined: Mar 2006


Sent my 50L for service.
There is a back focus issue.
Got it back and checked... Problem persist.

As usual, they tried the stop down and it'll be find trick.
But lol. I didn't get that lens to use at f/4.

Knowing the notoriety of this lens with back focus.... I don't think they can fix it at all.

This post has been edited by LegendLee: Oct 19 2016, 07:47 PM
LegendLee
post Oct 20 2016, 03:44 PM

><3LG3|\|D
Group Icon
Elite
2,725 posts

Joined: Mar 2006


QUOTE(adam_lss @ Oct 20 2016, 02:28 PM)
then how like that?
*
Update :
canon service centre manage to fix it.
After heading there twice, they've managed to get the focus back on track. Kudos to the service engineer whom I heard worked on it for several hours.
Total turn around time was 3 working days and cost less than rm200. I'm a cps member but I don't think this has anything to do with it.


I've been using this lens for over 3 years.
It got this bad when my friend dropped it. I believe I kinda know what happened. Some of the elements are shifted inside. This lens has very tight tolerance to correct aberrations. You get a shit lot of spherical aberration when it's misaligned and the same aberration will cause the lens to backfocus.

Just have to fix it the best they can. It's not an easy task, but we will see.
I'm using it for videos mainly so it's not that bad.
Just that now it has no resale value and the sharpness might be affected too.

This post has been edited by LegendLee: Oct 20 2016, 07:32 PM
LegendLee
post Oct 22 2016, 09:49 AM

><3LG3|\|D
Group Icon
Elite
2,725 posts

Joined: Mar 2006


QUOTE(adam_lss @ Oct 22 2016, 09:45 AM)
200 with all that work is like super cheap la!
mana lu hilang???
*
Yeap.
Really happy with what they have done.
They don't charge for inspection too. I think Nikon does.

Definitely went the extra mile to fix it for me.

This post has been edited by LegendLee: Oct 22 2016, 09:49 AM
LegendLee
post Oct 22 2016, 11:20 AM

><3LG3|\|D
Group Icon
Elite
2,725 posts

Joined: Mar 2006


QUOTE(adam_lss @ Oct 22 2016, 09:51 AM)
does the charges differ for non-cps customers?
*
For regular servicing. Cps members get like 30% off I think.
However for AF adjustment, the price is the same.

This post has been edited by LegendLee: Oct 22 2016, 11:23 AM
LegendLee
post Dec 7 2016, 08:58 PM

><3LG3|\|D
Group Icon
Elite
2,725 posts

Joined: Mar 2006


Took a jump and got the 5Dmk4.
Reasoning :-
Too lazy to change systems. Lazy to sell off my lens when I still need to use them

Also, I won't be shooting 4K anytime soon.
Editing rig not built for it.

Right now I'll need to upgrade my Lightroom. My Lightroom 4 cannot read the raw files.
Certainly don't feel like paying a few hundred more after spending so much on the body....

This post has been edited by LegendLee: Dec 8 2016, 02:03 AM
LegendLee
post Dec 8 2016, 10:05 AM

><3LG3|\|D
Group Icon
Elite
2,725 posts

Joined: Mar 2006


QUOTE(adam_lss @ Dec 8 2016, 09:59 AM)
drool.gif  drool.gif  drool.gif  drool.gif  drool.gif

any noticeable difference compared to your previous setup?
*
Haven't really use it yet.
So far only notice shutter sound is different haha.

I'm sure the autofocus will be way better than My 5D2 /!: 6D. Missed a few shots due to the slow af speed.

Will install magic lantern and cinestyle today.

Still pissed that their video files is extremely large. 10x larger than the Sony a7r2.

Sincerely hope I don't regret this choice haha.
Certainly less excited when compared to the time I got my first dslr, 500D 7 years back and first FF 5D2 5 years back.

Expecting this camera to pay itself off in a few months time from the video projects I get.

This post has been edited by LegendLee: Dec 8 2016, 10:10 AM

8 Pages  1 2 3 > » Top
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0714sec    0.30    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 22nd December 2025 - 12:34 PM