QUOTE(highburybaby @ Mar 22 2016, 03:18 PM)
Right. Grand Saga seems the most "favourable" choice for sungai Long ppl. If being given a direct flyover on Silk to Balakong direction, will you still be using Grand Saga?Properties in Sg Long & BMC V5
Properties in Sg Long & BMC V5
|
|
Mar 22 2016, 03:30 PM
Return to original view | Post
#21
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
15,454 posts Joined: Nov 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mar 22 2016, 03:46 PM
Return to original view | Post
#22
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
15,454 posts Joined: Nov 2011 |
QUOTE(Palmwalker001 @ Mar 22 2016, 03:24 PM) Cheras is the most populous area in KL compare to other area the demand is big however LRT only reach Bandar Tun Razak & low cost flat at 3.5 miles Cheras, the rest of Cheras is excluded, Sg Long & BMC also no exception. I still remember how happy I am when ppl showing similiar kind of comparison last time (LRT vs KTM commuter), thought KL traffic will significantly reduced. Another key word is Capacity, LRT has limited capacities whereas MRT has more than double or triple of its capacities, below is the comparison between BRT, LRT & MRT for your perusal. Anyhow, it is good to have a hope. Let's hope I can drive past Jalan Loke Yew within 10 minutes during morning rush hour after MRT in operation. |
|
|
Mar 24 2016, 10:58 AM
Return to original view | Post
#23
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
15,454 posts Joined: Nov 2011 |
|
|
|
Apr 7 2016, 12:07 PM
Return to original view | Post
#24
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
15,454 posts Joined: Nov 2011 |
QUOTE(Palmwalker001 @ Apr 7 2016, 11:26 AM) Hundreds of rats holes in BMC Seksyen 9 commercial area ! That's the price need to be paid for variety of food. But it's okay lah, it happens everywhere, only BMC being reported because of the complaint from UTAR student I believe?http://www.enanyang.my/news/20160406/%E3%8...B0%BF%E7%97%85/ |
|
|
Apr 17 2016, 12:40 PM
Return to original view | Post
#25
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
15,454 posts Joined: Nov 2011 |
|
|
|
Apr 17 2016, 07:08 PM
Return to original view | Post
#26
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
15,454 posts Joined: Nov 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Apr 30 2016, 11:22 AM
Return to original view | Post
#27
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
15,454 posts Joined: Nov 2011 |
Sungai Long student hostel business huat ah...
Attached image(s) |
|
|
Jun 16 2016, 01:30 PM
Return to original view | Post
#28
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
15,454 posts Joined: Nov 2011 |
QUOTE(Palmwalker001 @ Jun 16 2016, 10:10 AM) Around 8am today, BFM 89.9 interviewed Seacera Group Bhd, according to its MD Zulkarnin Ariffin, they are going to partners some big boy to develop its 500 acres land in Sg Long into a township. He even say they will fare better than project in vicinity develop by SP Setia, EcowWorld, Mah Seng because its location is better Old news ler... Perhaps will have a new road to Nirvana from Sungai Long / Twin Palm next time.. Still got 500 acres land in Sg Long meh apart from Symphony Life Bhd's 419 acres behind Desa Budiman? https://forum.lowyat.net/topic/3933561/all This post has been edited by samkps: Jun 16 2016, 01:30 PM |
|
|
Jun 16 2016, 01:36 PM
Return to original view | Post
#29
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
15,454 posts Joined: Nov 2011 |
QUOTE(Palmwalker001 @ Jun 16 2016, 11:31 AM) Yup I think so, this is in the middle of jungle in Semenyih, why people always associates their project with Sg Long? Because the new accesss (if really built up) shall be connecting to Silk very near to Twin Palm / Sungai Long.. Next time go to Nirvana can be from Sungai Long and no need to pass through sungai lalang Semenyih.. Sungai Long name premium ke http://www.thestar.com.my/news/community/2...ousing-project/ Hopefully the connecting road will be a flyover and not something like Goodview Height.. This post has been edited by samkps: Jun 16 2016, 01:42 PM |
|
|
Jun 16 2016, 01:46 PM
Return to original view | Post
#30
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
15,454 posts Joined: Nov 2011 |
QUOTE(danielisme @ Jun 14 2016, 02:30 PM) Rm400 is pay for strata maintenance only ???? There got club house but is separate join membership . I heard the Eco hill the cluster with strata title also pay rm400++ w/o facilities too The mighty Oriental Garden and Grassland park in Precinct 3 Ecohill are not facilities? Perhaps can have a look on this video to justify if it is true.. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gLWB051HRGI By the way, Ecohill 1 is individual title with DMC, current rate is RM 300 / month.. |
|
|
Jun 16 2016, 01:47 PM
Return to original view | Post
#31
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
15,454 posts Joined: Nov 2011 |
QUOTE(Palmwalker001 @ Jun 16 2016, 01:44 PM) The access road should be built nearer than GVH, Semenyih (aka Sg Long South) than Twin Palms Sg Long. better location = nearer to sungai long... Lot 631, Mukim Semenyih just 1.5km away from Nirvana this company MD dear to say better location than Ecohill (SP Setia) & EcoMajestic (EcoWorld) in BFM 89.9 interview today According to EDGE: Lot 613 is located about 2 kilometres off the Kajang SILK High way and about 1.6 kilometres from the Sg. Long toll plaza. This post has been edited by samkps: Jun 16 2016, 01:51 PM |
|
|
Jun 16 2016, 02:27 PM
Return to original view | Post
#32
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
15,454 posts Joined: Nov 2011 |
|
|
|
Jun 16 2016, 05:01 PM
Return to original view | Post
#33
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
15,454 posts Joined: Nov 2011 |
QUOTE(Palmwalker001 @ Jun 16 2016, 04:19 PM) No this fake Sg Long land actually located in Jalan Sg Lalang of Semenyih near by three grave yard ie Semenyih Memorial Hills, Nirvana Memorial Park and Nirvana Memorial Garden. This is the whole plan ler... The MD of Seacera has given misleading information via BFM Attached thumbnail(s) |
|
|
|
|
|
Jun 16 2016, 05:19 PM
Return to original view | Post
#34
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
15,454 posts Joined: Nov 2011 |
QUOTE(Palmwalker001 @ Jun 16 2016, 05:14 PM) I afraid even the following information given to Bursa also wrong, obviously the distance between Lot 613 and Sg Long more than 1.6km and 2km from SILK too. Maybe measure from the edges in straight line manner.. Lot 613 Land is located about 2 kilometres off the Kajang SILK Highway and about 1.6 kilometres from the Sg. Long toll plaza. The exact location of this "Sg Long" land: Access to the subject site from the town centres above is via Jalan Sungai Lalang from the Semenyih town heading north up to Kampung Sungai Pening, turn left onto JALAN SUNGAI PENING and proceed for approximately 1.5 kilometres before coming across an offroad path on the right hand side that lead to the subject property approximately 800 metres away. The off-road path may be accessed using light motorcycles or 4x4 vehicle. http://disclosure.bursamalaysia.com/FileAc..._GA_ATTACHMENTS They have talk about this Sg Long land since 2014 as reported in the Star http://www.thestar.com.my/business/busines...n-and-property/ |
|
|
Jun 16 2016, 10:43 PM
Return to original view | Post
#35
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
15,454 posts Joined: Nov 2011 |
|
|
|
Jun 16 2016, 10:50 PM
Return to original view | Post
#36
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
15,454 posts Joined: Nov 2011 |
|
|
|
Jun 20 2016, 11:10 AM
Return to original view | Post
#37
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
15,454 posts Joined: Nov 2011 |
QUOTE(danielisme @ Jun 20 2016, 10:07 AM) From bandar Sg long after toll .. Is it mean the car from semenyih have to make u turn at twin Palm then pay rm1.80 then turn to ekve ..? Nope, the interchange is located between goodview height and twin palm toll. Cars from Semenyih no need to go to twin palm toll to reach this interchange. https://www.google.com/maps/d/viewer?mid=16...JYBKX8UpA&hl=en |
|
|
Jun 20 2016, 11:11 AM
Return to original view | Post
#38
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
15,454 posts Joined: Nov 2011 |
|
|
|
Jun 20 2016, 02:08 PM
Return to original view | Post
#39
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
15,454 posts Joined: Nov 2011 |
QUOTE(cyberkid @ Jun 17 2016, 10:49 AM) There are 3 types from my understanding:1.) Guard house and fencing built by developer / residents, but the management is run by the residents association. Some people call this as FnG. Advantage for this scheme is resident normally pay very minimum maintenance fees. Disadvantage is there is no rule protecting this scheme, residents can choose not to pay the maintenance fees and residents association can't do anything on them, since this scheme is on voluntairy basis. 2.) Guard house and fencing built by developer only, and the management is run by the developer mainly. Units are in individual title. Developer has signed an DMC with the purchaser so the purchaser is bound by some rules set in the DMC. So, there is somehow a "legal document" that require the residents to pay maintenance fees. Some people call this GnG but there are people call this FnG as well. Advantage for this scheme would be the housing area is more properly managed if compared to RA, as developer normally is more experience in handling the issues and generally they are more financially sound compare to residents association. Disadvantage for this scheme is normally the maintenance fees is higher, since developer normally provide more advanced security system to the residents compare to RA (budget issue). 3.) Guard house and fencing built by developer only, and the management is run by the developer mainly. Units are under strata title. Most people call this GnG. Developer has signed an DMC with the purchaser so the purchaser is bound by some rules set in the DMC. On top of that, strata title act does provide protection that every residents must pay the maintenance fees. Advantage for this scheme same as (2) as the housing area is more properly managed if compared to RA, as developer normally is more experience in handling the issues and generally they are more financially sound compare to residents association. Disadvantage for this scheme is normally the maintenance fees is highest, since all the maintenance of all facilities inside the fencing area need be shared by the residents. |
|
|
Jun 21 2016, 01:37 PM
Return to original view | Post
#40
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
15,454 posts Joined: Nov 2011 |
QUOTE(jesline @ Jun 21 2016, 09:52 AM) My community falls under 2.) If it is illegal, how can the developer build the guard house and fencing at the first place? Developer won't be so naive until don't know MPKJ won't accept such handover on the common facilities if there is no prior approval on the guard house and fencing. My guess would be it is actually the first category, but developer tends to "polish" it as second group, to boast the sale price. We have moved in for more than 2 yrs but the the guard house and fencing are considered illegal. The developer claimed the application must be submitted by RA. Is that the proper way? There is a clause in the DMC stated : 1. it has effect between Housebuyer's Entity and the Purchaser 2. between the purchaser and each of the other purchaser under which each of them agrees to observe and perform the provisions of this deed and other deed similar to this deed entered into by each of the Other Purchases with the Vendor as in force for the time being so far as these provisions are applicable to them. Our main concern is fees collection. Based of the DMC, is that mean RA and Purchaser is legally binded? Does this apply to Sub-sales? Thanks. Please take note that when the management is given back to RA, that's mean the DMC is no more valid, because it is an agreement between the purchaser and developer, and not the between the RA and the developer. For a real second group project, the developer will settle the guard house and fencing issue with the local authority and will manage accordingly until exit. |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.0722sec
1.15
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 17th December 2025 - 07:21 AM |