QUOTE(azriel @ Mar 2 2016, 04:37 PM)
uncle sam no support juntanow thai is buddy2 with putin
Military Thread V20
|
|
Mar 2 2016, 06:57 PM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
![]()
Junior Member
27 posts Joined: Feb 2014 From: Somewhere in the pacific, or indian ocean |
QUOTE(azriel @ Mar 2 2016, 04:37 PM) uncle sam no support juntanow thai is buddy2 with putin |
|
|
Mar 5 2016, 01:11 AM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
![]()
Junior Member
27 posts Joined: Feb 2014 From: Somewhere in the pacific, or indian ocean |
QUOTE(KLboy92 @ Mar 4 2016, 08:42 PM) After looking into our Malaysian Army structure I am a little confused. more like 6, para got their own armor i thinkKor Armor Diraja is said to have 5 regiments. Naturally 1 regiment operates our PT-91s. Other listed equipment are: 26 FV101 Alvis Scorpion 90 (Para Armd Sqdn) 184 Sibmas 90 IFV (160 90mm, 24 ARV?) 460 Condor APC 80 Bv206 103 K200 KIFV 211 ACV300 Adnan In what way are they organised into the other 4 regts? At about 80+ vehicles per battalion I can make them fit, sort of. But as far as I can see these are 'empty' IFVs and APCs, except Sibmas 90. Are they intended to mate up with infantry battalions when deployed? And where will the 250 Deftech AV8s go? Mintak ajar skit... dun take face value, most of the sibmas and some of the condor is ady retired, the armor themselves is considered a "support" elements, so they are always deployed alongside other infantry battalion and other support elements under their corresponding division command atreyuangel pls correct me if im wrong |
|
|
Mar 5 2016, 08:08 PM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
![]()
Junior Member
27 posts Joined: Feb 2014 From: Somewhere in the pacific, or indian ocean |
|
|
|
Mar 7 2016, 10:46 AM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
![]()
Junior Member
27 posts Joined: Feb 2014 From: Somewhere in the pacific, or indian ocean |
|
|
|
Mar 8 2016, 04:55 PM
Return to original view | Post
#5
|
![]()
Junior Member
27 posts Joined: Feb 2014 From: Somewhere in the pacific, or indian ocean |
|
|
|
Mar 9 2016, 07:50 PM
Return to original view | Post
#6
|
![]()
Junior Member
27 posts Joined: Feb 2014 From: Somewhere in the pacific, or indian ocean |
|
|
|
Mar 11 2016, 07:29 AM
Return to original view | Post
#7
|
![]()
Junior Member
27 posts Joined: Feb 2014 From: Somewhere in the pacific, or indian ocean |
QUOTE(azriel @ Mar 10 2016, 12:15 PM) some of the ships got different weapons, some got russian gatling, looks like they still tinkering what to put on it |
|
|
Mar 11 2016, 07:52 AM
Return to original view | Post
#8
|
![]()
Junior Member
27 posts Joined: Feb 2014 From: Somewhere in the pacific, or indian ocean |
|
|
|
Mar 14 2016, 10:13 PM
Return to original view | Post
#9
|
![]()
Junior Member
27 posts Joined: Feb 2014 From: Somewhere in the pacific, or indian ocean |
QUOTE(thpace @ Mar 14 2016, 09:28 PM) A6 or A7 PIM I getting the felling that the m109 is just a stop gap measure before a capable is sourced QUOTE(Dreadstar @ Mar 14 2016, 09:59 PM) iinm US offer 24-30 free m109A5 sph. and the MY army wanted upgraded to A6 version. US no problem, but u have to pay the upgrading cost. sure its a6? cuz only the us operates the a6 "paladin" standard, not sure if they want others to have it, though a5+ standard is ady ok enoughand iinm the budget for upgrading cost already approved. |
|
|
Mar 14 2016, 11:11 PM
Return to original view | Post
#10
|
![]()
Junior Member
27 posts Joined: Feb 2014 From: Somewhere in the pacific, or indian ocean |
QUOTE(thpace @ Mar 14 2016, 10:58 PM) why not.. as long you have the $$$ better go for ruag kawest standard, longer barrel longer rangetough as usually, there bound to be restriction imposed by US but given our relationship now they might even close one eyes msia have been a good customer for ruag, maybe its a possibility |
|
|
Mar 18 2016, 04:52 PM
Return to original view | Post
#11
|
![]()
Junior Member
27 posts Joined: Feb 2014 From: Somewhere in the pacific, or indian ocean |
|
|
|
Mar 18 2016, 05:31 PM
Return to original view | Post
#12
|
![]()
Junior Member
27 posts Joined: Feb 2014 From: Somewhere in the pacific, or indian ocean |
|
|
|
Mar 22 2016, 04:33 PM
Return to original view | Post
#13
|
![]()
Junior Member
27 posts Joined: Feb 2014 From: Somewhere in the pacific, or indian ocean |
|
|
|
Mar 26 2016, 01:17 AM
Return to original view | Post
#14
|
![]()
Junior Member
27 posts Joined: Feb 2014 From: Somewhere in the pacific, or indian ocean |
QUOTE(lk23 @ Mar 25 2016, 03:09 PM) QUOTE(lk23 @ Mar 26 2016, 01:10 AM) https://youtu.be/mh7TkLmEGI8 stop watching that channel, it gives me cancerMortar variant 😍 but the 120mm gun is too much i think or is it 90 mm.😕😕 |
|
|
Mar 26 2016, 01:37 AM
Return to original view | Post
#15
|
![]()
Junior Member
27 posts Joined: Feb 2014 From: Somewhere in the pacific, or indian ocean |
3rd A400M(msn36) for RMAF spotted on a taxi test
https://twitter.com/ja_almarza/status/713351368577327104 ![]() |
|
|
Mar 26 2016, 02:29 PM
Return to original view | Post
#16
|
![]()
Junior Member
27 posts Joined: Feb 2014 From: Somewhere in the pacific, or indian ocean |
|
|
|
Mar 29 2016, 02:02 PM
Return to original view | Post
#17
|
![]()
Junior Member
27 posts Joined: Feb 2014 From: Somewhere in the pacific, or indian ocean |
QUOTE(Fat & Fluffy @ Mar 29 2016, 10:55 AM) why need a trailer... cant the vehicle move by itself? unless of course not fully assembled.. i believe fuel consumption for that trailer would be higher... easier lor.. put on trailer no need full military convoy escort, and one of them dun even have plate number so clearly its not "road legal" yetsafvc dun teach you ka charles? This post has been edited by DDG_Ross: Mar 29 2016, 02:03 PM |
|
|
Mar 29 2016, 03:12 PM
Return to original view | Post
#18
|
![]()
Junior Member
27 posts Joined: Feb 2014 From: Somewhere in the pacific, or indian ocean |
UN says disputed Falkland Islands are in Argentina territorial waters
https://www.rt.com/news/337508-argentina-te...ters-falklands/ Falkland Islands lie in Argentinian waters, UN commission rules http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2016/ma...s-un-commission oh UN you funny boy ![]() un ruling may give the falklands back to the argies ![]() argentine minister says "historic occasion" ![]() the falklands war is for nuthin' then? This post has been edited by DDG_Ross: Mar 29 2016, 03:15 PM |
|
|
Mar 30 2016, 01:15 AM
Return to original view | Post
#19
|
![]()
Junior Member
27 posts Joined: Feb 2014 From: Somewhere in the pacific, or indian ocean |
QUOTE(Fat & Fluffy @ Mar 30 2016, 12:33 AM) depends lor~ ive seen the av8 rcws doing the 10k road test cruising around the plus highway without any escorthis point is why dun you ask anyone in the saf cuz they also do the same thing but why such small island also need flatbeds to transport things around? thats the weird thing clearly the vehicle has power and can move by itself? and why smaller vehicle also need to put on flatbeds? |
|
|
Mar 30 2016, 01:41 AM
Return to original view | Post
#20
|
![]()
Junior Member
27 posts Joined: Feb 2014 From: Somewhere in the pacific, or indian ocean |
QUOTE(Fat & Fluffy @ Mar 30 2016, 01:20 AM) cause saf only contract transporters for big occasions in bulk... for both track and all other vehicles for the parade, not for individual vehicles unless supplier ownself decides to do so... on normal days, it is on wheels at night... most non track ~30ton vehicles only go on flatbed due to constrains, aka lack of manpower, no full assembled, spoil, transporting several at ones... etc etc there you go the answer to ur question, both av8 that you see are deftechs prototype vehicle so the its up to them (deftech) how to transport it, its not up to the militarymanpower? just call them up? spoil? those things are that fragile? no full assembled? engine can run can jalan to assembly area ady? im not convinced with your reasoning charles This post has been edited by DDG_Ross: Mar 30 2016, 01:45 AM |
| Bump Topic Topic ClosedOptions New Topic |
| Change to: | 0.0657sec
0.57
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 6th December 2025 - 02:38 PM |