LG OLED TV Discussion Thread, OLED TV
|
|
 Jan 19 2016, 07:57 PM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
 
Senior Member
5,220 posts Joined: Jan 2003 
|
QUOTE(adam_dkh @ Jan 19 2016, 07:26 PM) I got my self a ULTRA HD TVS, thought it is good, but it suck, if let me choose for another time, for sure i wont buy LG tv. There is a big difference between Oled and LED tv. LG's UHD all suffer from poor contrast and black levels. However the Oled is a different story, worldwide from users and reviewers rate it as the best and second to none. If you buy Lg, only go for the Oled. |
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 20 2016, 12:51 PM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
|
Senior Member
5,220 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
QUOTE(Alexcsyan @ Jan 20 2016, 12:21 PM) if u r talking about entry levels yes there r poor contrast & black levels, except lg uf950t is diff story... oled of coz atm hav no competitors around bcoz no other tech can approach it level... uf950t looks terrible. In fact the whole range of LG UHD are the worst TVs I've seen in my life, except for OLED. The black level and contrast is even worse than China Tvs. Less than 1000 : 1. Read here :-http://www.rtings.com/tv/reviews/lg/uf9500, this is similar to uf950T. This post has been edited by DannyOP: Jan 20 2016, 12:56 PM |
|
|
Jan 20 2016, 02:04 PM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
|
Senior Member
5,220 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
QUOTE(lightastral @ Jan 20 2016, 01:43 PM) i had a long dilemma, coming from myself preferring plasma and previous tv is plasma (pioneer kuro) which is still going strong albeit different location. Should be more, 50" Kuro was rm30k+ back when RM was still strong.black, contrast, accurate color is the major key factors, well at least to me. oled brings back memories of viewing kuro for the first time and in some reviews people are saying its better. in other words, oled is on par or better than the reference level plasma, back then even 42" kuro is like 7-8k if im not mistaken.. This post has been edited by DannyOP: Jan 20 2016, 02:05 PM |
|
|
Jan 20 2016, 02:24 PM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
|
Senior Member
5,220 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
QUOTE(Alexcsyan @ Jan 20 2016, 02:12 PM) well, buying a tv is not just looking at black levels & contrast, the natural of the picture & picture quality, resolution & refresh rate is da main concern of getting a tv, as well as the sound ( i dont use ht frequently bcoz single tarrace house will disturb neighbour easily). i use more of my bare eyes to judge the tv more than info in websites like this bcoz u r using eyes to watch tv & not those equipments plug into your eyes to watch tv though... & website is just for your reference... Actually that's the main criteria for good PQ, and why OLED is better than led due to pure plack and ability to turn on and off individual pixels. LG tvs all suffer from non existent black and only can churn out dark grey colour. This is also an indication of using cheapo panels.china tv tech is catching up nowadays, mi tv & le tv is 1 of the good sample, haier & hisense is abit slow in malaysia market but china do hav alot of latest & good model... |
|
|
May 7 2016, 08:16 AM
Return to original view | Post
#5
|
|
Senior Member
5,220 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
QUOTE(ccschua @ May 7 2016, 07:47 AM) amazing price. 55" is still 7k+. Can't compare Oled with normal led or 4k. First models 55" were above rm30k.this 65ub950t is still webOS 1. whereas EG is already webOS 2 while g6P is webOS3. It's like buying a Bugatti Veyron vs normal Mercedes or Camry at the most. The technology and difference is night and day. The normal led and 4k series from LG are low quality and even the 65ub950t has terrible black levels. |
|
|
May 27 2016, 02:26 AM
Return to original view | Post
#6
|
|
Senior Member
5,220 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
QUOTE(ccschua @ May 23 2016, 01:22 PM) at this price around 7K, samsung 55JS8000 (6k at Desa) is cheaper yet support contrasts. Not possible due to limitations of led, contrast and back levels are lagging far behind. Even 9000 series also fall behind the Oled.i am thinking 55js8000 might be better than ec910t most retailer are getting rid of 2015 models. i wonder when is samsung K model and others going to launch ? date ? Those who can afford Oled don't bother with anything else The only thing bad about Oled is the price, especially 65in onwards is starting from rm20k.. This post has been edited by DannyOP: May 27 2016, 02:36 AM |
|
|
Jun 2 2016, 09:03 AM
Return to original view | Post
#7
|
|
Senior Member
5,220 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
QUOTE(babyevil82 @ Jun 1 2016, 02:27 PM) How bout OLED performance if watch Astro HD?Compare to LED Tv. Oled is the best picture quality you can find, doesn't matter what you watch.Let's put it simply if you have a beautiful girl, she will look beautiful wherever she is and whatever she wears. If you have an average girl, she will be average no matter where she goes or what she wears. |
| Change to: |  0.0215sec
 0.44
 7 queries
 GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 26th November 2025 - 09:52 PM |
Quote