what is the point of lomo-ing if everything also 'photoshop'?
weird
lomography
|
|
 Dec 25 2008, 11:34 PM
|
 
Senior Member
4,637 posts Joined: Jan 2003  
|
|
Quote|
|
|
|
|
Dec 25 2008, 11:36 PM
|
Senior Member
1,111 posts Joined: Jan 2003 
|
QUOTE(hello-panda @ Dec 25 2008, 08:53 PM) to rhapsodie, sell ur diana then go buy the deluxe package get a diana, now got deluxe package with fisheye lens to fix on, but diana uses 120mm film (normal films u usually see is 35mm film), so it's abit hard to find and more pricey... Added on December 25, 2008, 8:55 pm i got a diana too...wanna get the diana back but the price so... *toot*    |
|
|
Dec 26 2008, 12:12 AM
|
|
Senior Member
1,394 posts Joined: Apr 2007
|
QUOTE(ifer @ Dec 25 2008, 11:34 PM) what is the point of lomo-ing if everything also 'photoshop'? Cause everyone's wondering how that photo was made. And all sorts of explanations were given. I was just pointing out the most obvious of them all, photochopweird weird2 This post has been edited by joyyy: Dec 26 2008, 12:12 AM |
|
|
Dec 26 2008, 12:33 AM
|
Senior Member
1,153 posts Joined: May 2006 From: Boleh Land !!!
|
photoshop would kill the fun of lomo-ing
|
|
|
Dec 26 2008, 12:54 AM
|
|
Senior Member
1,394 posts Joined: Apr 2007
|
QUOTE(khairolnizam @ Dec 26 2008, 12:33 AM) photoshop would kill the fun of lomo-ing Would explain the sprocket holes better than using a 120mm camera and snapping the photo with a 35mm film.  |
|
|
Dec 26 2008, 01:51 PM
|
Senior Member
2,491 posts Joined: Dec 2004 From: initrd 
|
here is my Fisheye #2 pics that have been developed long time ago..
  |
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 26 2008, 06:22 PM
|
Junior Member
474 posts Joined: Feb 2008
|
are these pix photoshop or real lomography camera done?
|
|
|
Dec 26 2008, 06:24 PM
|
|
Senior Member
1,394 posts Joined: Apr 2007
|
QUOTE(tanling26 @ Dec 26 2008, 06:22 PM) are these pix photoshop or real lomography camera done? Easier to be real fisheye than photochop  |
|
|
Dec 26 2008, 06:34 PM
|
|
Senior Member
552 posts Joined: Jan 2007 
|
@Doomsday - really like them especially the multiple exposed sg wang and BTS. good job =]
|
|
|
Dec 26 2008, 07:19 PM
|
Senior Member
1,776 posts Joined: Oct 2004
|
|
|
|
Dec 26 2008, 08:47 PM
|
|
Senior Member
4,637 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
the double exposure fisheye photographs look damn cool
|
|
|
Dec 27 2008, 11:23 AM
|
Senior Member
1,256 posts Joined: Sep 2005 From: Prince Of Wales Island, The
|
how do you all print or scan your film? i am thinking of buying Holga online but i scared the local shop here don do the printing, do they?
|
|
|
Dec 27 2008, 02:11 PM
|
|
Senior Member
2,491 posts Joined: Dec 2004 From: initrd
|
QUOTE(tanling26 @ Dec 26 2008, 06:22 PM) are these pix photoshop or real lomography camera done? Real  » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « QUOTE(ryuuzaki @ Dec 26 2008, 06:34 PM) @Doomsday - really like them especially the multiple exposed sg wang and BTS. good job =] Thanks  QUOTE(yikyeou @ Dec 27 2008, 11:23 AM) how do you all print or scan your film? i am thinking of buying Holga online but i scared the local shop here don do the printing, do they? I usually, develop the film then scan using scanner into digital format. Local shops have service where they convert the scans into digital too but need to pay some extra charges. This post has been edited by Doomsday: Dec 27 2008, 02:13 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 27 2008, 06:33 PM
|
|
Senior Member
552 posts Joined: Jan 2007
|
holga uses 120 format film. afaik, normal photo labs wont process them but some professional labs does.
anyways, anyone tried developing their own film? i want to know where to get them... |
|
|
Dec 27 2008, 06:40 PM
|
Junior Member
33 posts Joined: Sep 2008
|
how much does it cost for developing??thanks..
=) |
|
|
Dec 28 2008, 01:42 AM
|
|
Senior Member
2,491 posts Joined: Dec 2004 From: initrd
|
QUOTE(caseyzz @ Dec 27 2008, 06:40 PM) how much does it cost for developing??thanks.. Normally around RM 16 - RM 20 per 1 film (+- 36~37 pieces)=) |
|
|
Dec 28 2008, 10:39 AM
|
|
Junior Member
85 posts Joined: Dec 2008
|
QUOTE(khairolnizam @ Dec 25 2008, 04:22 PM) xprocessing wont necessary cause vignetting effects.. i tried xpro my shots uding film slr and the pics come out very clear.. it depends on the camera and the lens used itself.. hmm, has anyone here used a holga 135 BC? not exactly looking for vignetting, though it would be nice. want a camera with old-school-colours, washed out, vintage or whatever.Holga 135 BC can give very nice vignetting.. BC = Black Corner QUOTE(hello-panda @ Dec 25 2008, 08:53 PM) to rhapsodie, cool...how much is the diana? won't grab the deluxe package though, dislike fish eye get a diana, now got deluxe package with fisheye lens to fix on, but diana uses 120mm film (normal films u usually see is 35mm film), so it's abit hard to find and more pricey... |
|
|
Dec 31 2008, 12:26 AM
|
|
Senior Member
1,256 posts Joined: Sep 2005 From: Prince Of Wales Island, The
|
I just bought a Diana F+ here in Guangzhou for 390Yuan. Can't wait to go out on a sunny day for my first roll. One thing is, I bought along the flash adapter but it doesn't sync with my Canon DSLR's flash, how come?
|
|
|
Dec 31 2008, 01:44 AM
|
|
Senior Member
4,637 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
how come so cheap at 390yuan only geh?
|
|
|
Dec 31 2008, 09:21 AM
|
|
Senior Member
1,111 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
anyone tried cross-process b4?, do normal film(C-41) can do this process??
just now i go a camera shop, she says normal film(C-41) can't do cross process, only those film(E-6)@other can do this process. quite exp to process T T~~~ is it true? |
| Change to: |  0.0348sec
 0.91
 6 queries
 GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 23rd December 2025 - 07:34 PM |
All Rights Reserved © 2002- 2025 Vijandren Ramadass (~unite against racism~)
Powered by Invision Power Board © 2025 IPS, Inc.