how is 9300m performance? saw 1 benq selling 2k3 only...
most of nb using ati one...
Mobile GPU comparisons, Now u know there's > 50 mobile GPU's
Mobile GPU comparisons, Now u know there's > 50 mobile GPU's
|
|
May 5 2009, 03:04 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,270 posts Joined: May 2005 From: somewhere else |
how is 9300m performance? saw 1 benq selling 2k3 only...
most of nb using ati one... |
|
|
|
|
|
May 5 2009, 03:09 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
22,158 posts Joined: Aug 2008 From: Singapore |
|
|
|
May 5 2009, 11:09 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,270 posts Joined: May 2005 From: somewhere else |
|
|
|
May 13 2009, 04:53 AM
|
![]()
Newbie
4 posts Joined: May 2009 |
hey guys graphics cards are not really my language...meaning i really dont understand it...so if u guys can help me compare these 2 graphics cards that'd be great
NVIDIA GeForce GT 130M 1GB or NVIDIA 9700M GT 512MB DDR3 which one is better? and are they both good graphics cards? thanks in advance |
|
|
May 13 2009, 04:58 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,002 posts Joined: Dec 2008 From: Kuala Lumpur |
gt 130m is similar to 9650mGT
so clearly 9700mGT is better |
|
|
May 13 2009, 05:33 AM
|
![]()
Newbie
4 posts Joined: May 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 13 2009, 11:37 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,270 posts Joined: May 2005 From: somewhere else |
is it 8600M better than new 9300M ?
|
|
|
May 17 2009, 08:30 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,304 posts Joined: Mar 2006 From: Chicago(Port25) |
|
|
|
May 17 2009, 08:47 PM
|
|
Elite
8,711 posts Joined: Nov 2007 From: Butterworth, PG / Machang, Kelantan |
QUOTE(lms2005 @ May 13 2009, 11:37 AM) 8600M is faster than 9300M...Refer HERE Heck TS never update the list. |
|
|
May 18 2009, 07:38 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,270 posts Joined: May 2005 From: somewhere else |
mm... like that i hv to look for ati 4870....
|
|
|
May 18 2009, 08:43 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
17,053 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
|
|
|
May 19 2009, 12:18 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,270 posts Joined: May 2005 From: somewhere else |
|
|
|
May 19 2009, 12:26 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
22,158 posts Joined: Aug 2008 From: Singapore |
4870 is pretty rare in the market...
anyway, the clock of THE GPU is pretty low... probably can't fully utilize GDDR5 also... 4850 is getting common in high end laptops though... but i myself prefer to see 4860... This post has been edited by astria: May 19 2009, 12:26 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
May 19 2009, 12:33 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
17,053 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(astria @ May 19 2009, 12:26 AM) 4870 is pretty rare in the market... 4860 is a downclocked 4830 right? it only has 640 shaders if not mistaken wouldn't the high clock gives out more heat?anyway, the clock of THE GPU is pretty low... probably can't fully utilize GDDR5 also... 4850 is getting common in high end laptops though... but i myself prefer to see 4860... |
|
|
May 19 2009, 01:02 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,270 posts Joined: May 2005 From: somewhere else |
ati model name a bit weird also...
|
|
|
May 19 2009, 07:16 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,304 posts Joined: Mar 2006 From: Chicago(Port25) |
|
|
|
May 19 2009, 10:14 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
22,158 posts Joined: Aug 2008 From: Singapore |
QUOTE(Darkmage12 @ May 19 2009, 12:33 AM) 4860 is a downclocked 4830 right? it only has 640 shaders if not mistaken wouldn't the high clock gives out more heat? 4860 is the mobile version of desktop 4770...somehow in benchmark, it's slightly faster than 4850... probably cuz 4850 has been downclocked severely compared to desktops version... This post has been edited by astria: May 19 2009, 10:16 AM |
|
|
May 19 2009, 10:16 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,270 posts Joined: May 2005 From: somewhere else |
4850 > 4860 > 4870 ??
|
|
|
May 19 2009, 10:19 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
22,158 posts Joined: Aug 2008 From: Singapore |
performance in ascending order...
4830 (640SP, 128bit, GDDR3) 4850 (800SP, 256bit, GDDR3) 4860 (640SP, 128bit, GDDR5) 4870 (800SP, 256bit, GDDR5) strange, but true (as AMD claims so)... This post has been edited by astria: May 19 2009, 10:21 AM |
|
|
May 19 2009, 10:43 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,270 posts Joined: May 2005 From: somewhere else |
D@mn confusing
|
| Change to: | 0.0175sec
0.72
6 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 14th December 2025 - 04:43 PM |