QUOTE(zest168 @ Apr 28 2016, 04:59 PM)
It is better to have a plan without an annual limit but with a lifetime limit. Of course if there is a plan with NO LIMITS at all would be the best, but the premiums may be sky high then.
Without annual limit cap, you have the flexibility of making claims as long as cumulative of all claims still remains below the Lifetime Limit.
Those with Annual Limit cap, means if the claim for that year is more than the Annual Limit, then claim payment will stop at the Annual Limit.
How about a plan with a RM1.5mil ANNUAL LIMIT, Without annual limit cap, you have the flexibility of making claims as long as cumulative of all claims still remains below the Lifetime Limit.
Those with Annual Limit cap, means if the claim for that year is more than the Annual Limit, then claim payment will stop at the Annual Limit.
with NO LIFETIME LIMIT,
and comparable premiums?
QUOTE(watabakiu @ Apr 28 2016, 05:33 PM)
To put it simply; there is no cap on how much you can claim annually.
e.g.
Yr 1 - zilch
Yr 2 - 100k
Yr 3 - 1m
This is because usually you are capped at how much you can claim annually.
So the term unlimited is really to say that, well, this policy, does not put a cap on how much you can claim.
However, you are then bound to another condition, which is your accumulated claim is capped at, say, 1.5m.
Are you hearing yourself? e.g.
Yr 1 - zilch
Yr 2 - 100k
Yr 3 - 1m
This is because usually you are capped at how much you can claim annually.
So the term unlimited is really to say that, well, this policy, does not put a cap on how much you can claim.
However, you are then bound to another condition, which is your accumulated claim is capped at, say, 1.5m.
Apr 28 2016, 07:19 PM

Quote
0.0807sec
0.32
7 queries
GZIP Disabled