But I think 4k tv not entirely float my boat. I went to Pavillon Harvey last Fri to catch a glimpse of 4k tv. I saw Samsung SUHD, but the demo vid showed the veges looked so greenish like florescent lit veges, and also the green apples. The red color is the worst, the parrot after enhancement just looked like florescent bird.

It is digital color I would say, very high contrast and bright, but very artificial and not natural. The only good demo is night sky and night scene with good contrast, or documentary type of videos like travelling and building sites, but not for movies to show true human complexion.

I stayed there for some time even to look at new 8k sharp tv, which was slightly better. I think the hardest part for super 4k is to get the human skin tone color right. I saw patches of skin tone here and there. I also felt long term viewing induce eye fatigue. This is just my opinion, I am minority I guess.

This post has been edited by lateboomer: Mar 16 2016, 02:08 PM

You raise a good valid point. But I don't think Harvey sale person is friendly enough to let me change the settings. So the only gauge is to go to expert house to have a look. For motion handling, as far as I know, this is plasma tv strong point. Are you saying SUHD tv handles motion very smooth for all videos and totally no motion blur?

I guess you are saying the other way, plasma Tv has better motion handling than SUHD tv since it is still LCD tv. Am I right? Then what tv can give very good motion handling? I am using plasma tv actually.

Yeah, I guess so. But still good to listen from the horse mouth, expert I mean.