u don't get my point . I am saying the gt86 has the potential to be so much more. it could be more tuneable and record more sales if only it had a turbo engine.
pls use your brain. which would u rather have ?
1. car which can tune only suspension
2. car which can tune both suspension and engine.
do u even logic ?
are u saying with a turbo engine I WONT love it, WONT be able to drive around exploring the limits, CANNOT bond with the ride, CANNOT enjoy the road ??
are u saying only with NA engine I will be able to "drive around exploring the limits, bond with the ride, enjoy the road" ?
dude, don't even dream about winning dragstrip and slashing circuit records.
the gt86 will get eaten by tiny hatchbacks like Renault clio, fiesta st, Peugeot 208 gti. if there is 1 thing it needs, its a turbo engine.
finally, fyi engine tuning is a major part of car mods. thats why engine tuning/remap/power box is a multi billion dollar industry.
which proves my point that many car enthusiasts love to tune for more power. which proves u wrong.
purity means nothing . sales figures is most important. how many more sales would it have recorded if it had a tuneable engine ?
The FD2R doesn't have a turbo engine, but yet it laps around Sepang way quicker than a highly tuned Golf R can. And let's add the Megane to the list for that matter. Is it any lesser of a car? No, it still remains highly sought after and prized by enthusiast and racers around the world.
In the case of the GT86, it's a car created with a different purpose. Would it sell more had it come with a turbo engine? Possibly... but remember, UMW Toyota did get greedy by overpricing the car in our country at 230k to 240k? Even the Civic Type R was sold only for RM199k back in the day. Had it been priced at a more reasonable 150ish to 170k like the US or Japanese counterpart, it would probably have been a quick sell out.