Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Mercedes A250, Godcar?

views
     
zweimmk
post Dec 18 2015, 06:25 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
512 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(Quazacolt @ Dec 18 2015, 10:49 AM)
i just baffle at how a huge majority of people misses the entire point of the car.

and it is interesting how the original 86 being so hyped up (i guess can owe it to initial d rofl) despite being an even worse/even more under powered car lol.
*
Haha. I think many people don't realize how the GT86 is actually manufactured and designed inside out by Subaru. Perhaps @sleepwalker can enlighten me again, is there anything actually Toyota about the GT86 aside from the badge?

And given Subaru's technical expertise, if Toyota wanted something that matches the A250 - it really wouldn't have been a problem at all.

This post has been edited by zweimmk: Dec 18 2015, 06:26 PM
zweimmk
post Dec 18 2015, 09:13 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
512 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(Magnum Beast @ Dec 18 2015, 08:17 PM)
the manufacturer missed the whole point of it as well not turbocharging it 😂
*
I'm pretty sure from a technical and design point of view, they didn't.
zweimmk
post Dec 19 2015, 11:40 AM

On my way
****
Senior Member
512 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(Magnum Beast @ Dec 19 2015, 08:08 AM)
LoL ok good. So objectively, the designers got the GT86 wrong by not providing it with greater torque, by today's standards.

IMHO Slapping on a turbo would have easily sufficed citing above while meeting emission regulations.
*
Which brings us back to why Quazacolt earlier's statement of why many don't understand the point of the GT86.

It's not hard to put in a turbocharger into the engine but doing that will change the entire dynamics of the car.
zweimmk
post Dec 20 2015, 10:04 AM

On my way
****
Senior Member
512 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(Magnum Beast @ Dec 20 2015, 09:12 AM)
Can't I have both? 😯😂
*
Can, the new Focus RS seems to do both. And it looks phenomenal as well.

You only need to fork out close to 300k or more for it when it finally arrives in Malaysia.
zweimmk
post Dec 20 2015, 09:27 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
512 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(Quazacolt @ Dec 20 2015, 08:11 PM)
considering the evo x was officially well over 300k, unless ford is aggressive on the pricing, it may be in the 400k region sad.gif
then again, they had been rather generous on the focus side offering specs/features that only cars well in the 300-500k region offered.

so who knows?
*
Probably not la.

The Golf R, WRX STI all retails for just under 300k. If they are going to sell the Focus RS over 300k, then they are going into A45, 1M, S3 territory. '
zweimmk
post Dec 21 2015, 02:44 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
512 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(Magnum Beast @ Dec 21 2015, 08:21 AM)
So back to the topic, is Mercedes A250 a Godcar?  😂
*
The stock performance of the A250 is surprisingly quite tame.

Attached Image

In terms of raw numbers, the Megane 265, mk7 Golf GTI and the Focus ST are actually better than what the A250 achieves.

So I let you decide if it's god car or not.
zweimmk
post Dec 31 2015, 12:59 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
512 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(dontbanme967 @ Dec 31 2015, 11:42 AM)
none of u guys understand why gt86 is a failed opportunity.

gt86 is targeted at sports car enthusiasts. now what is the number 1 top hobby of sports car enthusiasts??, why , modding their cars of course !

think how much more tuning potential the gt86 would have if it was turbocharged ?
*
Failed opportunity depends on where you are coming from. For Toyota's, they succeeded in creating what they want or believe is best for the consumer.


zweimmk
post Dec 31 2015, 01:33 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
512 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(dontbanme967 @ Dec 31 2015, 01:11 PM)
u don't get my point . I am saying the gt86 has the potential to be so much more. it could be more tuneable and record more sales if only it had a turbo engine.

pls use your brain. which would u rather have ?
1. car which can tune only suspension
2. car which can tune both suspension and engine.

do u even logic ?
are u saying with a turbo engine I WONT love it, WONT be able to drive around exploring the limits, CANNOT bond with the ride, CANNOT enjoy the road ??
are u saying only with NA engine I will be able to "drive around exploring the limits, bond with the ride, enjoy the road" ?

dude,  don't even dream about winning dragstrip  and slashing circuit records.
the gt86 will get eaten by tiny hatchbacks like Renault clio, fiesta st, Peugeot 208 gti. if there is 1 thing it needs, its a turbo engine.

finally, fyi engine tuning is a major part of car mods. thats why engine tuning/remap/power box is a multi billion dollar industry.
which proves my point that many car enthusiasts love to tune for more power. which proves u wrong.
purity means nothing . sales figures is most important. how many more sales would it have recorded if it had a tuneable engine ?
*
The FD2R doesn't have a turbo engine, but yet it laps around Sepang way quicker than a highly tuned Golf R can. And let's add the Megane to the list for that matter. Is it any lesser of a car? No, it still remains highly sought after and prized by enthusiast and racers around the world.

In the case of the GT86, it's a car created with a different purpose. Would it sell more had it come with a turbo engine? Possibly... but remember, UMW Toyota did get greedy by overpricing the car in our country at 230k to 240k? Even the Civic Type R was sold only for RM199k back in the day. Had it been priced at a more reasonable 150ish to 170k like the US or Japanese counterpart, it would probably have been a quick sell out.
zweimmk
post Dec 31 2015, 02:36 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
512 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(dontbanme967 @ Dec 31 2015, 02:14 PM)
the fd2r is not a valid comparison. it was launched 10 years ago , back when there were no emisions standards.  lets restrict the discussion to cars which are on sale today.

and why are u bringing in the megane ? whats your point regarding the megane ?
*
I meant the FD2R is faster than the Golf R or Megane around the track.
zweimmk
post Dec 31 2015, 04:37 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
512 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(dontbanme967 @ Dec 31 2015, 03:12 PM)
really? which track in germany is that ? I don't remember manufacturers testing their cars in SIC.
*
Check the lap times for time to attack in sepang. It's all there
zweimmk
post Dec 31 2015, 05:06 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
512 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(dontbanme967 @ Dec 31 2015, 04:53 PM)
timetoattack ? modded cars don't mean shit.  the only globally accepted benchmark is nurburgring nordscheilfe. with factory specs, running on original equipment factory fitted tyres.
*
If that's what you think then there isn't anything else to discuss.
zweimmk
post Jan 2 2016, 07:12 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
512 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(yamato @ Jan 2 2016, 10:42 AM)
completely off-track, TS asked A250,
u guys syok sendiri went 10 pages GT86 and FD2R.

*ultimate facepalm*
*
Because someone else went off-topic first about missed opportunities and all that crap.

 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0247sec    1.92    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 17th December 2025 - 07:20 AM