Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
120 Pages « < 97 98 99 100 101 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

> Military Thread V19

views
     
Fat & Fluffy
post Feb 14 2016, 11:06 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
397 posts

Joined: Jan 2016
From: Hong Kong



Happy Valentines

user posted image

user posted image

on this day when most are celebrating Valentine's Day, or the 7th day of Chinese New Year (Ren Ri, all humans birthday), there was a hero who died on 14 February 1942. His name, is Adnan Bin Saidi. one of the many war heroes who laid their lives, for our peace.

user posted image

user posted image

user posted image

"If we do not remember our heroes, we will produce no heroes. If we do not record their sacrifices, their sacrifices would have been in vain…
the greatest strength we have as a people is our common memories of the past and our common hopes for the future…
For without those memories, the next generation will not have the fighting spirit to carry on."
BG(NS) George Yeo
Former Singapore Minister

This post has been edited by Fat & Fluffy: Feb 14 2016, 11:26 PM
xtemujin
post Feb 14 2016, 11:14 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
318 posts

Joined: Nov 2009
From: Singapura, Singapore


2016 Singapore Airshow Preview with RMAF SU30MKM performance.
14 February 2016 Sunday

http://www.ainonline.com/aviation-news/vid...display-preview

This post has been edited by xtemujin: Feb 14 2016, 11:17 PM
Fat & Fluffy
post Feb 14 2016, 11:28 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
397 posts

Joined: Jan 2016
From: Hong Kong



user posted image
Enter here;

https://goo.gl/AUGk3O
BorneoAlliance
post Feb 14 2016, 11:52 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Dec 2014

Cuba returns lost dummy missile to US: State Department

user posted image

QUOTE
The United States has recovered a missile that was accidentally sent to Cuba in 2014 after a logistical mixup in Europe, bringing an end to an unusual and sensitive episode in the world of defense.

The dummy training version of a US Hellfire missile was returned to the US with the "cooperation of the Cuban government," State Department deputy spokesman Mark Toner said Saturday, declining to provide specifics.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/wires/afp/artic...Department.html
BorneoAlliance
post Feb 15 2016, 12:16 AM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Dec 2014

“That’s Not a Cluster Bomb” – The Differences Between OFAB 250-270s and RBK-500s

QUOTE
Concerning the suppositions on cluster bombs.

Russian aviation does not use them.

There are dozens of foreign journalists here who had been at the Hmeymim airbase and filmed the preparations for combat sorties, take-offs and landing for nearly 24 hours a day. No one even asked about this type of munitions.

That is because there are no such munitions at the Russian air base in Syria.
QUOTE
However, the OFAB 250-270 has distinct features that are clearly different from the RBK series bombs. OFAB 250-270s are featured in many of the videos from Hmeymim airbase, providing many reference images for comparison to RBK series cluster munitions. The most obvious difference is the rear of the bomb:


user posted image

QUOTE
In the above image of the rear of an OFAB 250-270 at Hmeymim airbase (source) we can see a pair of “tail rings”, and that the rear of the main part of the bomb does not extend to the end of the tail section. In the below image (source) we see a RBK series cluster munition mounted on a jet in Hmeymim airbase where we can clearly see the differences:


user posted image

QUOTE
Only one “tail ring” is present, and the main section of the bomb extends fully to the end of the tail section. This can be seen more clearly in this photograph of a model of a RBK-500 ShOAB-0.5 cluster bomb at Ukraine’s State Aviation Museum (source):


user posted image

QUOTE
Another clear difference is the front of the OFAB 250-270, with a distinct ridge before the front of the bomb, a slight dome on the front, and a single large fuze


user posted image

QUOTE
In a Svoboda.org article on cluster bombs at Hmeymim airbase two images from the airbase show what are believed to be RBK-500 AO 2.5 RTM cluster munitions, clearly showing the front of these munitions are very different from those of the OFAB 250-270


user posted image

user posted image

QUOTE
No RBK-500 series cluster munition share the features of the OFAB 250-270s described above, therefore claims that the munitions featured in reports about Russian cluster bombs at Hmeymim airbase show OFAB 250-270 are clearly and demonstrably untrue.


https://www.bellingcat.com/resources/how-to...s-and-rbk-500s/
Fat & Fluffy
post Feb 15 2016, 12:43 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
397 posts

Joined: Jan 2016
From: Hong Kong




SUSKLboy92
post Feb 15 2016, 12:45 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
189 posts

Joined: Aug 2015
From: Cherasboy
QUOTE(MilitaryMadness @ Feb 14 2016, 10:41 PM)
You just pointed out the symptom of this affair: IEDs are more numerous and effective these days because western forces in Afghanistan and Iraq are too bound to the sparse road network. The fact that they need roads for their heavy wheeled armored vehicles like the MRAPs & Strykers and only some few good roads that are available in these countries literally funnel the vehicles into easily mined and ambushed territory. 

Insurgents could safely guess which road a patrol will go through due to the lack of good roads able to take the weight of a heavy wheeled vehicle. Just bury an IED on a road near a significant village or town and you're bound to get some military patrol coming through there eventually.

To avoid the IEDs being detonated by regular traffic, insurgents have learned the absurdly simple method  of burying the detonator system at a certain depth where the only the heavier weight of an armored vehicle will detonate it and not lighter everyday vehicles.
*
You been reading the M113 nuts izit? laugh.gif

In Afghanistan wherever tracks are needed they do employ tracks. Iraq is not Afghanistan, its much more developed. The vehicle is travelling on roads through towns and farmland where offroading is not always possible. The insurgents are also smart enough to put the IEDs at choke points where offroading is not possible.

Stryker and other wheeled APCs complement tracked APCs by offering different capabilities. This is recognised in both doctrine and practice. Strykers are usually assigned to urban areas where they can outrun tracked vehicles on roads. And they equip formations which have been riding in nothing thicker than Humvees. Something the Stryker critics conveniently omit to mention.

This post has been edited by KLboy92: Feb 15 2016, 12:48 AM
BorneoAlliance
post Feb 15 2016, 01:47 AM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Dec 2014

Unique Russian Aircraft Undergoes Test Flight (VIDEO)

user posted image

QUOTE
The Russian private design bureau ‘Modern Aviation Technologies’ has developed a single-engine, all-composite aircraft SR-10.

Developed by a private Russian design bureau called KB SAT, the aircraft features a moderate forward-swept wing (FSW) scheme. This feature allows the plane to be more compact, improves stability at low speeds and takeoff and landing performance.

The SR-10 is quite suitable for learning the basics of flying. Flight tests of the prototype are being tested at the Oreshkovo airfield in the Kaluga region. Judging by the video, the tests are successful.  The forward swept wing helps improve the maneuverability of the aircraft, making the SR-10 not only a trainer jet but also as sports aircraft.




http://sputniknews.com/military/20160214/1...est-flight.html
BorneoAlliance
post Feb 15 2016, 07:49 AM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Dec 2014

Mind-blowing drone footage of a South Korean armored vehicle parade

A new video released on Friday shows the impressive range of tanks and armored vehicles in the South Korean Army’s 20th division.

The video, taken by a drone in South Korea’s Gyeonggi Province, shows South Korean made K-1 and K2 tanks, as well as armored vehicles, air defense vehicles, and mobile artillery pieces.

South Korea currently has more than 2,300 tanks, 2,600 armored vehicles, and almost 2,000 self-propelled artillery pieces.

To see 340 of these vehicles proudly rolling in formation, view the video below.



Read more at http://www.businessinsider.my/drone-footag...TSaqtmwDT6dw.99
BorneoAlliance
post Feb 15 2016, 07:56 AM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Dec 2014

Terrier' Is The UK's Crazy Leatherman Multi-Tool Of A Combat-Engineering Tank

user posted image

QUOTE
British Army and Royal Marine engineers had relied on FV180 Combat Engineering Tractor for four decades prior to 2013, but that began to change just a few years ago. BAe Systems’ ridiculously versatile, and rapidly transportable combat engineering vehicle named the Terrier has taken over the role, and it’s not just a combat-engineering vehicle—it’s also a transformer.

The 32-ton Terrier can dig ditches, drill holes, excavate defensive positions, clear obstacles such as boulders, structures, bridges, cars and logs, and haul all types of building materials. It has a long menu of attachments to make all this happen, including trailers, pincers, rock hammers, hoists, shovels, augers and buckets. It even has a ripper tool that makes roadways and runways unusable by the enemy. A medium machine gun can also be


user posted image

http://foxtrotalpha.jalopnik.com/terrier-i...-com-1759049206
waja2000
post Feb 15 2016, 09:41 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
137 posts

Joined: Oct 2006
QUOTE(thpace @ Feb 14 2016, 11:04 PM)
Have anyone wonder why we didnt get a dedicated long ranger mid air refuel tanker especially when we is a country divided into two?

Well c130 and a400 can do the job but it is not permanent solution?

Malaysia have any plan for it?
*
i admit refuel tanker is new requirement for current/new generation air-force
and plane like A330 MRTT not only for tanker, but also for transportation, our defense force so many UN mission in oversea, so we no need rely on MAS/AA (plan transportation)
anyway still matter off no budget and not priority ...
from kuantan AB to kuching/Labuan AB just about 850km and 1400km, still within our fighter ferry range.
i see we need new milti role auxiliary/support ship to support logistic 2 side country.

This post has been edited by waja2000: Feb 15 2016, 09:43 AM
MilitaryMadness
post Feb 15 2016, 11:26 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,302 posts

Joined: Oct 2010
From: Over your shoulder


QUOTE(thpace @ Feb 14 2016, 11:04 PM)
Have anyone wonder why we didnt get a dedicated long ranger mid air refuel tanker especially when we is a country divided into two?

Well c130 and a400 can do the job but it is not permanent solution?

Malaysia have any plan for it?
*
Well, the majority of global air forces use probe-and-drogue C-130 or Il-76 for midair refueling so I think it is the best current solution.

If you are proposing an actual dedicated tanker like a KC-135 Stratotanker or KC-10 Extender, I don't think we can afford something like that anytime soon.

QUOTE
i see we need new milti role auxiliary/support ship to support logistic 2 side country.
Use the Bunga Mas auxiliary ships model, or straightaway RMN buy a few used MISC container ships and use them as supply vessels.

This post has been edited by MilitaryMadness: Feb 15 2016, 11:32 AM
Fat & Fluffy
post Feb 15 2016, 11:30 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
397 posts

Joined: Jan 2016
From: Hong Kong




Fat & Fluffy
post Feb 15 2016, 11:48 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
397 posts

Joined: Jan 2016
From: Hong Kong



QUOTE(olman @ Feb 14 2016, 05:53 PM)
F-15 manyak sexy
*
amoi at boeing lagi sexy...

QUOTE(MilitaryMadness @ Feb 15 2016, 12:41 AM)
You just pointed out the symptom of this affair: IEDs are more numerous and effective these days because western forces in Afghanistan and Iraq are too bound to the sparse road network. The fact that they need roads for their heavy wheeled armored vehicles like the MRAPs & Strykers and only some few good roads that are available in these countries literally funnel the vehicles into easily mined and ambushed territory. 

Insurgents could safely guess which road a patrol will go through due to the lack of good roads able to take the weight of a heavy wheeled vehicle. Just bury an IED on a road near a significant village or town and you're bound to get some military patrol coming through there eventually.

To avoid the IEDs being detonated by regular traffic, insurgents have learned the absurdly simple method  of burying the detonator system at a certain depth where the only the heavier weight of an armored vehicle will detonate it and not lighter everyday vehicles.
*
track vehicles travel on roads too... and if not, like afghan, non paved tracks too become trap zones...

even with track vehicles, a patrol would still travel on roads...

are you referring to makeshift mines?

user posted image
ok, got my sentry posting... zzzzz, boring area... nothing to see... so hot too...
TechSuper
post Feb 15 2016, 02:24 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
5 posts

Joined: Jun 2015


QUOTE(MilitaryMadness @ Feb 15 2016, 11:26 AM)
Well, the majority of global air forces use probe-and-drogue C-130 or Il-76 for midair refueling so I think it is the best current solution.

If you are proposing an actual dedicated tanker like a KC-135 Stratotanker or KC-10 Extender, I don't think we can afford something like that anytime soon.

Use the Bunga Mas auxiliary ships model, or straightaway RMN buy a few used MISC container ships and use them as supply vessels.
*
MISC manada kapal kontena lagi dah bang. Semua sudah sold off quite a few years ago.
waja2000
post Feb 15 2016, 02:32 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
137 posts

Joined: Oct 2006
Tambah gaji ooooooo laugh.gif siapa kerja ATM belanja minum haha

user posted image

This post has been edited by waja2000: Feb 15 2016, 02:32 PM
MilitaryMadness
post Feb 15 2016, 02:41 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,302 posts

Joined: Oct 2010
From: Over your shoulder


QUOTE(Fat & Fluffy @ Feb 15 2016, 11:48 AM)
amoi at boeing lagi sexy...
track vehicles travel on roads too... and if not, like afghan, non paved tracks too become trap zones...

even with track vehicles, a patrol would still travel on roads...

are you referring to makeshift mines?
*
I get that tracked vehicles also use roads, problem is sometimes 15-20 ton heavy wheeled vehicles cannot even move to the side of the road to bypass a suspected stretch of road, especially after bad weather. Everyone have to either wait in full view of insurgents for either engineers to find and disable any IEDs or wait for anti-IED vehicles.

user posted image
laugh.gif

BorneoAlliance
post Feb 15 2016, 02:50 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Dec 2014

Troops from 20 countries prepared for largest military drill

user posted image

QUOTE
The countries are: Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates, Jordan, Bahrain, Senegal, Sudan, Kuwait, Maldives, Morocco, Pakistan, Chad, Tunisia, Comoros, Djibouti, Oman, Qatar, Malaysia, Egypt, Mauritania, Mauritius, in addition to the Peninsula Shield force.


http://saudigazette.com.sa/saudi-arabia/tr...military-drill/
MilitaryMadness
post Feb 15 2016, 02:57 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,302 posts

Joined: Oct 2010
From: Over your shoulder


QUOTE(BorneoAlliance @ Feb 15 2016, 02:50 PM)
Troops from 20 countries prepared for largest military drill
*
LoL, suddenly got Malaysia?

Sounds like Saudis syok sendiri. laugh.gif
BorneoAlliance
post Feb 15 2016, 02:58 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Dec 2014

Malaysian Mig-29 and F-5 Decisions in 2016?

user posted image

Compared to many other nations in the region, Malaysia has a relationship to China that seems positively laid-back. The government in Kuala Lumpur has long held a relaxed attitude toward supposed Chinese aggression, and even the curious case of the mooring of a Chinese Coast Guard vessel in Malaysian waters hasn’t caused much fuss.

At some point around 2013, an island formed in an area of reefs known both as Luconia Shoals and as Gugusan Beting Patinggi Ali, some 80 miles off the Sarawak coast. The new island aroused some territorial interest, despite its location well inside Malaysia’s economic zone. Around the same time, a Chinese Coast Guard vessel dropped anchor in the shoals and didn’t leave.

Last year, a Malaysian minister insisted that the area belonged to Malaysia and that its navy and coast guard were monitoring the area “to ensure the sovereignty of the country.” In August, the Malaysian government said it had been sending weekly letters of protest to China. Toward the end of September, local fishermen reported being threatened by armed men on the Chinese ship.

Last June, the shoals had a Malaysian flag planted on them, apparently for the first time – not by the Malaysian government, but by a German-born Australian marine archaeologist Hans Berekoven, who discovered the wreck of the HMS Viscount Melbourne near the shoals. The Melbourne sank while sailing from Singapore to Macau in 1842.

This leisurely approach to territorial disputes seems to be reflected in the progress of the nation’s military procurement programs. A decision is expected this year on a replacement for the Royal Malaysian Air Force’s MiG-29 and F-5 fleets, though the discussion has been ongoing since the start of the decade. All the usual suspects – Boeing F/A-18E/F Super Hornet, Dassault Rafale, Eurofighter Typhoon, Saab JAS 39 Gripen – are in the running.

One new aircraft type is in service: The RMAF took delivery of its first Airbus A400M last year, and the second of four arrived in January.

http://aviationweek.com/singapore-airshow-...-decisions-2016

120 Pages « < 97 98 99 100 101 > » 
Bump Topic Topic ClosedOptions New Topic
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0218sec    0.26    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 7th December 2025 - 01:51 AM