Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Big 4 Recruitment Drive_v3

views
     
dasecret
post Nov 18 2015, 01:58 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,498 posts

Joined: Nov 2012
QUOTE(alternativehype @ Nov 18 2015, 01:01 AM)
Just wanted to clarify a point noted about Big 6 in the old v2 thread...

Back in the days, Big 6 referred to Price Waterhouse, Ernst & Young, Deloitte, KPMG, Arthur Andersen and Coopers & Lybrand

BDO & Crowe Howath were never considered "big"
*
I think BDO & Crowe Horwath is within Malaysia's regulators' definition of Major Firms together with Big4

Globally Crowe Horwath is not so big, global regulator define the GPPC firms to include Big4+ Grant Thornton and BDO

And really it depends on how you count, there are not so big firms in Malaysia that is associated to very large network, for example RSM

Not sure why this big or not big thingy matter though
dasecret
post Dec 3 2015, 02:11 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,498 posts

Joined: Nov 2012
QUOTE(ks0108 @ Dec 2 2015, 09:15 PM)
they asked me a lot about accounting standards, audit standards and audit methodology.....
my answer is not up to their standards especially on audit methodology since I'm coming from small firm, they were not satisfied with the way I replied
*
If you are applying for anything more than freshie, of course they would expect you to know the accounting and auditing standards as what their own staffs would know at their level

Sorry, I'm not trying to add salt to your wound, but just because you come from small firm doesn't give you the excuse of not knowing the accounting and auditing standards after 3.5 years. If that's what the small firm taught you, I recommend you run fast fast to another medium firm maybe, so you won't be forever stuck. Even accounting staffs in PLCs or MNCs are expected to know accounting standards these days
dasecret
post Dec 7 2015, 09:33 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,498 posts

Joined: Nov 2012
QUOTE(pherac @ Dec 6 2015, 07:15 PM)
More exposure to complicated sections and issues and lucrative industries
You get to audit public listed co or major banks
Higher pay
Better audit methodology

So yes, better career path due to steeper learning curve
*
Audit methodology should be standardise for all global network firms
I guess the main difference is working with different people on a variety of experience - the companies in KL tends to be bigger, you get more variety, they do more exotic things compared to branch offices that are more straightforward or standard

But I was told hours are better in branch offices, less traffic jam... so I guess it boils down to what you want
I knew I have to work in KL, there's too limited career opportunities in my hometown, after audit firm, what's next? Or even within audit firms, opportunity to go up is less
dasecret
post Dec 8 2015, 09:54 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,498 posts

Joined: Nov 2012
QUOTE(yanhui95 @ Dec 8 2015, 02:28 AM)
Anyone here that could possibly shed some light on which industry that I should go for that enhances career progression?

I'm given the chance to audit either:

i) Banks
ii) Insurance
iii) Asset Management

This will be in the UK if that matters. I did an internship doing Insurance but Asset Management caught my attention when I did some of the work for them. Personally feel that Banking might be a bit worse in terms of working hours and not sure if it comes with more benefits.
*
I'm not from those industries, so can't really comment. But 1 thing I observe amongst my friends is, if you are in asset management, there is limited career opportunities in Malaysia and you will have to work in Singapore or Hong Kong if you want to be back to Asia

Generally it's easy to get a job with UK banking or insurance experience
dasecret
post Jan 18 2016, 05:09 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,498 posts

Joined: Nov 2012
QUOTE(keeganwoon90 @ Jan 12 2016, 12:36 AM)
Do you guys prefer working in a big four with no life,  or middle size firms with a bit of life?
*
Big4. No question about it. Look far, aim high... it's not forever, the things you see and the people you meet would make up for the additional hours. Not to mention what is on your CV

Others have mentioned so I won't repeat. Life in medium firms aren't rosy at all; while small ones you learn the outdated stuffs.




dasecret
post Feb 14 2016, 03:45 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,498 posts

Joined: Nov 2012
QUOTE(I_Thought @ Feb 10 2016, 12:26 PM)
ahh I am in audit. will prepare myself mentally and pray hard for a good temper mentor to guide me lol.  biggrin.gif  biggrin.gif
*
Expect the worst and you may be pleasantly surprised.
Yeah, friends and seniors are your pillars of support; align yourself to the positive minded people and as a team you can solve what seemingly impossible
Gambate! flex.gif

It's the toughest but arguably the best years as well... speak to those who survive till manager and left, most would have fond memories as a junior
dasecret
post Apr 15 2016, 12:32 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,498 posts

Joined: Nov 2012
QUOTE(mmm92 @ Apr 14 2016, 06:09 PM)
Hi there, would require your personal opinion if your were in my case:

I am about to commence as an audit associate in one of the big four, I cannot name it as I scared later I will be targeted lol, I am a fresh grad that is about to commence in June.

I am an Australian PR just because I stayed long enough due to my study period here in Australia.

I have no experience working in the industry that I want, namely the audit industry, besides as an audit intern for three months in a medium size audit firm in my kampung when I visited my family. Lately I have decided to go back Malaysia and work in KL, one of the Big 4.

I can choose to stay in Australia or Malaysia and I already know I m lucky enough so please don't bombard me with how lucky I am without reading it further.

Option 1: if I stay in Australia, due to my inexperience, I do not think I will be able to get a job in the audit industry or big four. Also I don't think my English is good enough, I cannot score band 8 for Ielts, I got band 7 which like most of the Malaysians, and so this restricts my employment scope. I have already thought of my worst case scenario, I will work as retail assistant and live a peaceful life here in Australia, enough to feed myself. By that, I will have to forgo what I did for so many years, degree till master, so many years of study, I feel reluctant to not give it a try to work for big four Malaysia or other big companies in Malaysia, and suffering while working in these companies and earning an amount that might not be enough to feed myself.

Option 2: I always wanted to try out big four, although now I am scared by the late working hours and the underpay problems stated by many of the forumers, but I think that's what I should do after so many years of tertiary study, I know this is kinda putting myself at the cutting edge when option 1 is a better choice with the aim of continuing feeding urself and stay alive. I actually chose option 2 with the aim to finish the professional paper in three years time and get myself qualified on the board before I come back Australia. At this stage, I am planning to not give up my PR and want to come back after getting myself qualified in three years time, and that's the only reason I will want to work for big four with the long hours and underpay. I think with that three years, I might put myself in a better position compared to not having a try and live as a retail assistant forever in Australia. At the same time, I am afraid that I cannot manage to finish my professional paper within the three years timeframe and will need to stay longer in Malaysia which will then risking myself to lose my PR in Australia.

If you were me, what would you do? Please feel free to express your opinion, it is much appreciated.

Thank you.

Regards,
mmm92
*
I'm all for option 2; although it was never an option for me. But yeah, would you be happy to just do a no-brainer job wondering about the road less travelled

However, I must warn you that option 2 is not the easier route for sure, it could be very rewarding though, if you have the drive to pull through the 3 years, get your qualification and get a job in Australia. I'm pretty sure you would have much better chance to land a more relevant accounting related job by then

All the best! thumbup.gif
dasecret
post Apr 15 2016, 12:45 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,498 posts

Joined: Nov 2012
QUOTE(habaapaaa @ Apr 14 2016, 11:12 PM)
Could any sifu analyse in more details about the pro and con for each audit department i.e. FS, EUMI, MMG, CIPS etc.? (I heard that FS and EUMI are harder to audit and more work to do?)
Which is good to join if I don't have any preference on all of them?

And some forumers said that in EY you can do what u want i.e. can go back earlier a bit, after finishing your work, the seniors won't keep pushing more tasks to you so that you won't go back earlier than them.. how about PwC?

What is the cut off date for promotion for EY and PwC? If I were to join any of them in July/ August, when will be my latest promotion date?

Since sometimes auditors work until midnight, can they just sleep at the office till the next morning instead of going back? tongue.gif

If from BIG4 jump to middle firm say after 2 or 3 years, will middle firm discount the experience in BIG4?

Will BIG4 pay for your ACCA annual subscription fees? If yes, by how much?
Thank you for your time!
*
Question - Do you think you have what it takes to get through the tough years? Because as far as I can see from your question, you wanted the Big4 credentials but is not willing to put in the effort

Anyway, back to your questions
FS and Eumi is specialised industry and they tend to have more demanding deadlines... but actually it depends on your luck really. Anyway, specialised industry also mean you get skills that MMG and CIPS don't have. There's always a pros and cons
But hor.... I thought now PwC moved to cross industry for first year associates? They call it IX or something, where you would get a flavor of different industries. But don't quote me la, I don't work there

Well sure, you can slack and do your own tasks and go off after you are done while the rest of the team is working hard; or you can offer to help the rest
Which one do you think will get you a better appraisal and a good reputation within the group? Good work ethics goes a long way. Besides, offering to do more than the assigned task means you learn more and can prove to your superior that you are ready to move up sooner

Cut off date - No idea. PwC promotion cycle used to be July and exceptional cases in Jan, there's some rules but there are fast track route... is it really such an important consideration?

Sleep in office - Not my forte. No idea. I still prefer to shower at home and wear fresh clothes for the next day

Big4 jump to medium firms - usually no discount. If you can convince them, maybe can get a promotion? tongue.gif But why would you want to do that?! I can assure you the hours is not any better in the bigger medium firms, and the kind of clients you get rclxub.gif

Annual subscription - yes, RM1.5k I think. Generally it would be enough if it is just for ACCA, but if you also want to claim MIA... I'm not sure of the rules
dasecret
post Apr 15 2016, 06:49 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,498 posts

Joined: Nov 2012
QUOTE(habaapaaa @ Apr 15 2016, 04:25 PM)
Sorry for leaving such impression for u, dasecret sweat.gif  , I am just trying to gather as much information as I can here. Have gone through all the threads from v1, most of them are really informative. thumbup.gif  But I still have some doubts over the discussions of you guys, so am trying to clear it up here. Of course I know the years would be tough, no pain no gain and I have to put in the efforts. wink.gif  Would u mind sharing with me on how you get through the tough years though?
Thank you for your inputs thumbsup.gif
*
Hmm.... I was very lucky I guess... my late nights are relatively not so late; and study leave is a good time to recuperate (just make sure you pass your exams quickly though, it gets tougher when you are more senior)

And the bunch of people you work with is your life line, you spend so much time together you see them more than your own family or bf/gf. So if you have a great team then it becomes more bearable too

As fresh graduates you are young and energetic and can physically take the long hours; it's the best time to focus on career and learn as much as you can. Can you imagine putting in the hard work only in your 30s when you have family and all? If not now, when?
dasecret
post Apr 19 2016, 03:19 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,498 posts

Joined: Nov 2012
Question - Much have been debated on which firm is better

Have you guys consider the bonus range that each firm offers as part of the consideration of which firm to join?

I was told PwC offer significantly higher bonus for top performers compared to average performers, if same amount of effort, might as well slave for PwC than other Big4 right? Although investment banking even higher in good times

And the thing that I find is a big turn off for EY is, the bonus is paid in 2 tranches, way after you completed the service... ranting.gif
dasecret
post Apr 20 2016, 10:04 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,498 posts

Joined: Nov 2012
QUOTE(tzxsean @ Apr 19 2016, 07:58 PM)
It's to retain employees ... Imagine you going to audit with newbies for big cases due to no other senior staffs during peak period
*
No doubt. But you as employee, do you like that your performance bonus is paid in tranches months after you completed the year of service?

Just saying that you have a choice within the Big4, and the Firms doing stuffs like this will eventually need to conform to market practices if they want to be competitive

Compare la the big ticket items like this, not mileage claim or parking charges brows.gif
dasecret
post Apr 22 2016, 01:57 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,498 posts

Joined: Nov 2012
QUOTE(red_apples @ Apr 22 2016, 09:49 AM)
Hi!

To those working full time in audit and attending classes during the weekends, what is it like? What advice would you give as I will be doing the same thing? Could you maybe share how is your schedule roughly like?

Thanks! biggrin.gif
*
Is like hell, one of the toughest thing I have to do in life

If you do those weekend full day classes only, you must make sure you work late on weekdays to finish all your work so that you can focus on classes during weekends

I did combination of night classes + saturday class
For the 3 core papers, I have to leave work at 5+pm (no car, gotta take public transport), get to college, attend class. Finish class tapao dinner/supper. After that continue working at home until 1am or late... On saturday attend full day class, sunday catch up on work again
No life lor....

But 3 papers also means 3 weeks study leave, + all the annual leave and OT leave I took almost 2 months off to study. So not so bad la. Just make sure you pass at first attempt
dasecret
post Apr 23 2016, 11:15 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,498 posts

Joined: Nov 2012
QUOTE(red_apples @ Apr 23 2016, 10:55 AM)
Hey what paper are you taking? Wouldn't taking 2 months off burn your entire leave quota for the year?
*
I did ACCA. Well, for the overtime I worked, the firm allow for it to be taken as time off. And yeah, all my annual leave entitlement is used up for study. That's why no life. But get it over once n for all. Repeating paper is not funny when you are senior in charge for large engagements
dasecret
post Dec 23 2016, 10:13 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,498 posts

Joined: Nov 2012
QUOTE(HouHouSek @ Dec 19 2016, 07:33 PM)
Wonder how quick can one be promoted as Manager and Senior Manager.
Managers in Big 4 should be young.
*
Career progression for average performer, can be faster or slower depending on performance:
From fresh grad to senior - 2 years
From senior to AM - 2 years
From AM to M - 2 years
From M to SM - 2 years

After that is very much by merit and whether or not the bosses like you

Personally I've met a 4.5 year manager but the poor girl burnt out quickly and I'm guessing basically does not have the emotional maturity to handle managerial role. Sometimes it's not a good thing to expedite promotion even if the person is a star performer.


dasecret
post Dec 23 2016, 11:25 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,498 posts

Joined: Nov 2012
QUOTE(ThanatosSwiftfire @ Dec 23 2016, 11:13 AM)
The 2 year Am thing is relatively new (they changed it every few years.). Back when I was still in big 4 it's only 1 year, so by 25 I was already a manager, but as they say, it's not an easy job, and many of us burn out very quickly.
*
I think it depends on which Big4 you are referring to, apparently the firm you came from changed it back to 6 years because they realise whilst it attracted talent, they couldn't retain when they promote people too quickly. Gotta say the steepest curve is when you become a manager

Anyway, I just counted my years properly and I was made manager in 4.5 years. So the girl I was referring to must have made manager in 4 years
dasecret
post Dec 23 2016, 05:24 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,498 posts

Joined: Nov 2012
QUOTE(ComingBackSoon @ Dec 23 2016, 12:22 PM)
I heard a different story.

What I hear is that basically the firm received too many complaints that the quality of the audit managers were not up to standard. The harshest complaints came from ex-audit managers who have left the firm and joined commercial, becoming the firm's clients. These old-timers were comparing the current audit managers to the audit managers of their era, which were more experienced by the time they hit manager level.

So the firm decided that average AMs should stay 1 more year to gather more experience before being promoted to managers.
*
I supposed it's the same story from different perspective. the managers may not be up to standard because they do not have enough experience, because we are talking about average performers, not high performers. In the end, although more people would be motivated to stay for longer than 3 years, it is still lose lose situation when they become managers and leave almost immediately.

So I believe their revised solution is to higher more juniors so they keep the good ones for longer instead of slave drive the good ones and they leave prematurely.

QUOTE(calvinmax @ Dec 23 2016, 03:50 PM)
Is it a lot of people that left after a year? What is the option thereafter?
*
Leave after a year you don't get far at all, would still be account exec level. I never understand why would anyone leave after a year, but there are more and more people doing that. They are just determined that they hate audit

QUOTE(ketupatpalas @ Dec 23 2016, 05:03 PM)
my friend says his brother failed his final professional paper and only promoted to AM in his 5.5 years there. He left after half year
*
Yup, in my past posts I did mention about the importance of completing your professional papers. Your promotion would be delayed. It is a firm HR policy across most big4, even the top performer would suffer. So the most important thing in your first 3 years is, whatever happens, exam comes first
dasecret
post Dec 28 2016, 03:27 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,498 posts

Joined: Nov 2012
QUOTE(Topace111 @ Dec 28 2016, 02:40 PM)
I always thought the motivation to stay in the firm is that one day they can leave (to a better place), quite ironic.
*
You are absolutely right... the firms even market themselves as training ground or university extension and accepts the fact that people leave after 3 years

In a way this profession is getting unsustainable
dasecret
post Jan 17 2017, 10:24 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,498 posts

Joined: Nov 2012
QUOTE(Manada @ Jan 15 2017, 11:17 PM)
Hello just asking, how's the BIG 4 landscape in Malaysia or even better in ASEAN in terms of Consulting/Advisory.

I heard Malaysian clients is primarily dominated by PwC and EY, then only KPMG and Deloitte.

Malaysia:

1) PwC
2) EY
3) KPMG
4) Deloitte

?? Correct me if im wrong
*
I think it depends on what type of clients you are talking about. Your sequence is probably true for banking and PLC clients
But for MNC clients Deloitte should be quite strong since Deloitte is No1/2 in the world and MNC is mainly referred work from other offices
PwC has small number of listed clients, but they are mostly big. EY has the most number of listed clients and some can be really problematic
All the comments above refers to audit clients

In terms of consulting/advisory it should be very different. A lot of advisory work cannot be provided to audit client due to independence threat

QUOTE(eastwoodmax @ Jan 16 2017, 01:33 PM)
I think BDO got better audit clients than Deloitte.
*
Well, like I mention above, it depends of what type of client you are talking about. BDO has a few big PLC. Deloitte should have some good MNCs
Workload wise MNC tends to be better than PLCs, cleaner, lower risk
dasecret
post Apr 3 2017, 10:15 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,498 posts

Joined: Nov 2012
QUOTE(limeuu @ Mar 31 2017, 01:09 PM)
Is it really that appealing, to work for a big 4 firm?....

I was told they don't pay well, need to work long hours, and many people jump after just a few years....Very low staff retention rate....
*
QUOTE(Justin Wong @ Apr 2 2017, 09:19 AM)
It has been a while since I last visited this forum but I am going to reply you anyway since your question caught my attention.

If you seek career mobility, my experience is YES so far - many of my friends who stayed long enough in Big 4 including myself travelled and worked internationally with Big 4s in other countries.

You are right to point out that big 4s generally do not pay well compared to commercial sector jobs, but that really depends on what you seek - money or mobility? If you want to make a lot of money in the shortest period of time in your lifetime, common sense dictates that you should do your own business or be in a sales role. Besides, there is also a lot of good Management trainee programs out there that offers equally rewarding career start too. So let me make it very clear in a very succinct way before I proceed further about my personal opinion - Big 4s are not the only attractive choice nowadays but still attractive on its own. 

If you want the brand name on your CV, the exposure to a variety of professional network and potentially a chance for overseas experience (by way of moving to Big 4 overseas), I will say Big 4 is a good choice. The network that I made connection with and the CV that I built with my Big 4 experience opened a lot of doors (I get headhunters calling every week), and I believe you can only see the real benefit if you have at least 3-5 years experience behind you, which means toiling away the good part of your 5 years social and leisure life.

Would I do it differently if I were to do it again? I would because it was not easy. But is it worth it looking back? Yes of course!

There is really no best choice really, you can only make the best out of your choice - so my advice is, take the leap of faith, and always be willing to go against the crowd and do what you think which may work for you.

You won't know until you try.

Cheers
*
Well said. I advise accounting graduates to go on this route too. Sure, it's not the easiest or pay the most, but you basically compact the learning in 1/2 the time or less. Which means while you don't get paid very much when you are in Big 4, after 5 years you have ample options that people who are in commercial wouldn't have. Hence this is especially ideal if at the point when you graduate you are not sure what you want to do yet, and Big 4 would help you find what you like and what you are good at

But if you don't have the grit, and would give up at the first opportunity you get, then Big 4 is not for you. I've met so many who left after a year or two. That won't get them anywhere

QUOTE(calvinmax @ Apr 3 2017, 06:52 AM)
Just wondering a few things,
1. Since big 4 name on the cv is so prestige, isn't it mean that u will earn more at the end of the day compared to commercial or any sales job?
2. What if I do not have a professional paper, how far I could progress in big 4?
3. Is it true that no matter what position u are at at big 4 u will not have worklife?
4. I heard that the increment was very good like 25% and 3 months bonus. Is it true?
*
1. What is considered 'at the end of the day'? I think if you join commercial/sales on day 1, chances of you ending up as CFO is very remote compared to joining Big4 or IB or consulting firms. But not everyone is aspire to that
2. Most Big4 would not allow for you to become manager without professional qualification. But all Big4 would sponsor you for the exams, subject to training contract of course.
3. That's not true. What is your definition of work life? Clocking out at 5.30pm everyday? Then probably yeah, you won't get that in Big4, or in fact in any job that has a good future or get to learn a lot. But if you are talking about having a vibrant social life, some of the teams are very closed knit and they would go on trips together, they would go for karaoke, drinks etc. And work-life-balance is up to you to manage, your boss, your team, your peers. If you let others dictate your hours, of course it would not be balanced. It's a good skill to learn early on in life
4. 3 months bonus consider very good? The best bonus I've gotten from Big 4 was 7 months. Of course that's peanuts compared to IB, but it's a lot better than shared services. 25% increment should refer to promotion; I only got a 25% salary adjustment as part of alignment of compensation package; but that's very rare
dasecret
post Apr 3 2017, 11:08 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,498 posts

Joined: Nov 2012
QUOTE(limeuu @ Apr 3 2017, 11:02 AM)
that's what i mean....people use the big 4 as stepping stones to gather experience and CV credits....and then move to better jobs....because there is a "glass ceiling" for most in the big 4....

few find permanency in big 4 employment it seems...
*
I won't call it glass ceiling really; it's not because you cannot go up; most of the time it's because there are better choices out there; or you decide that there are other things you want to do than audit for the rest of your life.

In the past and at the moment, the pyramid structure served audit firms well; they need lots of juniors but not so many senior people; hence the natural attrition works for both parties. I'm not sure about the future though; since less people are willing to put in the hard work for the kind of skills they would get in Big4; then firms need to figure out a way to be sustainable. That's why they are looking into using more automation. The thing is, what are the new graduates going to do to gain the skills needed?

I did overstay in audit firm; and now looking into going back to one after I left for 4 years. So it depends on what you want really

2 Pages  1 2 >Top
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0246sec    0.78    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 28th November 2025 - 06:17 AM