QUOTE(JML @ May 23 2017, 01:46 PM)
wah that was how many years ago. 2014??Investors Club V9, Previously known as Traders Kopitiam
Investors Club V9, Previously known as Traders Kopitiam
|
|
May 23 2017, 02:20 PM
Return to original view | Post
#21
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
432 posts Joined: Jan 2013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 24 2017, 08:48 AM
Return to original view | Post
#22
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
432 posts Joined: Jan 2013 |
|
|
|
May 24 2017, 08:55 AM
Return to original view | Post
#23
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
432 posts Joined: Jan 2013 |
|
|
|
May 24 2017, 09:35 AM
Return to original view | Post
#24
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
432 posts Joined: Jan 2013 |
|
|
|
May 25 2017, 08:05 AM
Return to original view | Post
#25
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
432 posts Joined: Jan 2013 |
|
|
|
May 26 2017, 09:55 AM
Return to original view | Post
#26
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
432 posts Joined: Jan 2013 |
Sifu, Actually how to use NTA in determining share price?
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 26 2017, 01:04 PM
Return to original view | Post
#27
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
432 posts Joined: Jan 2013 |
[quote=Nemozai,May 26 2017, 12:32 PM]
You can't. You need more value. But you can roughly estimate the risk of your investment using NTA alone. It's the net worth per share of a company. It generally mean if the company go bankrupt today, all you get per share is the NTA. Simple rules is to make sure NTA is not less than 2/3 of share price to minimize your risk. I asked this question here before but sifus here no reply me. I found this out by researching my own and I'm not sure whether I'm correct. » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « [/quote] thanks. see if another sifu can confirm |
|
|
May 26 2017, 04:18 PM
Return to original view | Post
#28
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
432 posts Joined: Jan 2013 |
[quote=river.sand,May 26 2017, 03:46 PM]
thanks. see if another sifu can confirm [/quote] Meaning, you pick stocks based on NTA because you think you will get something back in case of liquidation. But I wouldn't touch a atock with significant risk of liquidation lah... [/quote] thats the only way to interpret NTA? |
|
|
May 29 2017, 08:04 AM
Return to original view | Post
#29
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
432 posts Joined: Jan 2013 |
[quote=foofoosasa,May 27 2017, 08:37 AM]
thats the only way to interpret NTA? [/quote] some player analyse and value company based on the company intangible assets and projected earning based on announced new project etc... too. Given NTA vs current market share traded how much market perceived the growth earning power , intangible assets or etc. As many guru said before, investment is like art more than science. Just imagine you bought a piece of land 30 years ago RM10k without any revaluation, in this case NTA obviously is not a true indicator for the land right? Imagine the you buy a, Company A vs company B both have the exact same NTA. Company A no more generating profit while company B still making profit above FD rate lets say. Obviously company B is worth more than company A. There are lot of books teaching teachinh these financial ratio. But if you personally involve in business, it helps you to understand better i would say. Sorry for long wind post [/quote] thanks |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.1246sec
0.46
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 3rd December 2025 - 09:30 AM |