Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

Philosophy Moderator vs Mediator, Please help to differentiate

views
     
SUScute_miao
post Nov 4 2015, 09:43 AM, updated 11y ago

Look at MY STARS!!!!!!!!!
******
Senior Member
1,438 posts

Joined: Dec 2011



hi friends,


i still cant differentiate the role of moderator and mediator.

As far as i could remember,

(I) one is like a TOLL where it will directly affect the DV

(II) one is like REST & RELAX area where it might or it might not affect the DV.


please help me to clarify it

thanks
Mr.Wang
post Nov 4 2015, 09:55 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
377 posts

Joined: Nov 2010
Full mediating effect is where the mediator is needed to link the relationship between independent variable and dependent variable.

As for moderating effect, it can increase or decrease the effects of independent variable on dependent variable.
SUScute_miao
post Nov 4 2015, 10:58 AM

Look at MY STARS!!!!!!!!!
******
Senior Member
1,438 posts

Joined: Dec 2011



QUOTE(Mr.Wang @ Nov 4 2015, 09:55 AM)
Full mediating effect is where the mediator is needed to link the relationship between independent variable and dependent variable.

As for moderating effect, it can increase or decrease the effects of independent variable on dependent variable.
*
tq bro
Blofeld
post Nov 4 2015, 12:41 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,697 posts

Joined: Mar 2012
QUOTE(cute_miao @ Nov 4 2015, 09:43 AM)
hi friends,
i still cant differentiate the role of moderator and mediator.

As far as i could remember,

(I) one is like a TOLL where it will directly affect the DV

(II) one is like REST & RELAX area where it might or it might not affect the DV.
please help me to clarify it

thanks
*
The basic explanation for moderator and mediator was well explained in the seminal article by Baron and Kenny (1986).

To understand the difference, read this article by Baron and Kenny.
http://www.public.asu.edu/~davidpm/classes/psy536/Baron.pdf

Moderator variables are typically introduced when there is an unexpectedly weak or inconsistent relation between a predictor and a criterion variable (e.g., a relation holds in one setting but not in another, or for one subpopulation but not for another).

Mediation, on the other hand, is best done in the case of a strong relation between the predictor and the criterion variable.

koaydarren
post Nov 4 2015, 06:49 PM

Mr D
***
Junior Member
430 posts

Joined: Feb 2011
For moderating effect, MOD happens together with IV and DV

For moderating effect... IV must influence MED first, then only influence DV
SUScute_miao
post Nov 5 2015, 09:17 AM

Look at MY STARS!!!!!!!!!
******
Senior Member
1,438 posts

Joined: Dec 2011



QUOTE(koaydarren @ Nov 4 2015, 06:49 PM)
For moderating effect, MOD happens together with IV and DV

For moderating effect... IV must influence MED first, then only influence DV
*
tq friend. i understand noow
SUScute_miao
post Nov 6 2015, 09:03 AM

Look at MY STARS!!!!!!!!!
******
Senior Member
1,438 posts

Joined: Dec 2011



QUOTE(koaydarren @ Nov 4 2015, 06:49 PM)
For moderating effect, MOD happens together with IV and DV

For moderating effect... IV must influence MED first, then only influence DV
*
Hi friend,

Thanks for your help.

i wanted to know, based on the picture i attached, which is correct drawing of a framework. 1 or 2. or both wrong?


1. i wanted to know whether A is hving r/s with C
2. i wanted to know whether A is having r/s with C moderated by D

is this correct way of using the moderator?

badly need ur advise.


Attached thumbnail(s)
Attached Image
koaydarren
post Nov 6 2015, 10:21 AM

Mr D
***
Junior Member
430 posts

Joined: Feb 2011
QUOTE(cute_miao @ Nov 6 2015, 09:03 AM)
Hi friend,

Thanks for your help.

i wanted to know, based on the picture i attached, which  is correct drawing of a framework. 1 or 2. or both wrong?
1. i wanted to know whether A is hving r/s with C
2. i wanted to know whether A is having r/s with C moderated by D

is this correct way of using the moderator?

badly need ur advise.
*
Both are wrong... Just draw the arrow from A to C, then D point in the middle of the arrow from A to C.. Since B is irrelavant in the model why bother to include
SUScute_miao
post Nov 6 2015, 10:31 AM

Look at MY STARS!!!!!!!!!
******
Senior Member
1,438 posts

Joined: Dec 2011



QUOTE(koaydarren @ Nov 6 2015, 10:21 AM)
Both are wrong... Just draw the arrow from A to C, then D point in the middle of the arrow from A to C.. Since B is irrelavant in the model why bother to include
*
hi bro,

thanks for the feedback

actually b is relevant.

just i wana to take 1 example oni


here is what i planned to do:


1. do a has r/s with c
2. do b has r/s with c

3. do a has r/s with d
4. do b has r/s with d

5. do d moderates the r/s between a and c
6. do d moderates the r/s between b and c

is this right?

if yes, which model is appropriate? 1 or 2?
mycolumn
post May 15 2016, 01:20 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,085 posts

Joined: Aug 2013

QUOTE(Mr.Wang @ Nov 4 2015, 09:55 AM)
Full mediating effect is where the mediator is needed to link the relationship between independent variable and dependent variable.

As for moderating effect, it can increase or decrease the effects of independent variable on dependent variable.
*
this is very straight forward. smile.gif

 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0175sec    0.57    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 28th November 2025 - 10:00 PM