Actually to most people they CAN actually afford it, but instead of spending it on the things they need, they focus on the things they want.
Some of those things that they want are like the shopping sprees, cigarettes, alcohol, etc. Do they actually really need it? Can they do without it? The decision is thier choice, no commitments, full of freedom etc. So they spend off all thier money and left with nothing to save at the end of the month.
Then there are some which are smarter, they save first before they spend. So at least it helps to control their own spending a bit. So they save save save, and after 3 months, since they felt that they have been good boys n girls and decided maybe a reward would be good for themselves and just that there's this nice watch, handbag, dress, shoe, or that ps2 your friend just bought which you just need to have it because he keeps telling you how much fun he's having. So yeah, the end up spending off what they have saved. This we called it delayed spending, not really saving.
Then there are those which are the most dicipline. Save every month, for years and manages their financials well enough. Do not overspend in anything at all. Saves as much as he can on all things and make sure he doesn't overtip the waitress or even leave any tips at all. So after a few years 3-4 perhaps, so he has a sizeable amount of money, and since he's planning to get married, buy a house etc. where will the money come from? The savings of course. So what happens then? Back to square one again and start saving again because they plan to have a baby and which is great and the cycle continues. This is much better than delayed spending and its called goals saving.
So which group do you think most single young graduates belong to? 1st, 2nd or 3rd? I would think either 1st or 2nd mostly, and If there was a product that could give them good PROTECTION, actually help and discipline them to SAVE and also INVEST it at the same time with the help of professional fund managers with ONLY that 10-15% of thier monthly income, do you think that they can afford it? Can you show me any other better way to teach them how to save, give them the protection they need and also help them invest at the same time?
Those in the 3rd group with better financial knowledge would even benefit greater from such a product since they already know how to manage it.
Would you be interested in such a product? Do you know which product that is? Take a guess, it has been explained before in the earlier posts.
The reason why such a product exist is because, the market wants its, the trends are changing.
During our grandfather's day they save money, accumulate it, then only invest it.
In our father's day its the reverse, they invest first, then accumulate, then only save for retirement.
In this new generation, we Save, we Accumulate and We invest All at the Same Time.
As I said earlier, banks are not just banks nowadays, insurers are not just insurers anymore, brokers are not just brokers. They are all fighting to get the bigger piece of the pie. Everyone is stepping over each other's line of business. If you have a choice, would you stick to the old conventional ways? or be willing to move forward and embrace the new trends in the industry? That choice is up to you.
1) Whole life insurance existed for a long long time. People had overspent on whole life insurance for many many years. It is NOT new. What is new is the packaging of unit trust and so on into insurance? A person really have to know what they are buying now.
2) There are 4th group of people. People that know how to save for their whole life. They DO NOT need insurance with saving option to teach them that. And, that is the group of people that will get rich.
3) I DO NOT DISAGREE WITH YOU on if a person do not have the discipline to save money on their own, insurance with saving and investment option may be a good choice for them. But, that should be the last option since it is the MOST expensive option. A person can do monthly contribution to unit trust and get more for their investment.