Haha..Curiosity kills the cat!

Yeah EM should price their apartment units at affordable price, e.g same as D'Cassia and D'Cerrum prices .

EM will have hard time selling their units it their products is too pricey. People will start comparing D'Cassia/D'cerrum with Karisma and Harmoni.

Actually the name Karisma and Harmoni sounds like motorbike's name. LoLs 

Yeah I agree it is a different product alltogether but the EM township will be sandwiched between SEH1 and SEH 2.

I always think that EM is the meat between the two bread, SEH1 and SEH2.

haha 

Any taikor can advise hows developer brand can affect future appreciation of the property ? e.g. Ecoworld vs SP Setia ? if both built quality product with same location , then better brand name can push the appreciation higher?

* Ecoworld brand is on par with SP Setia or just better ?

Just sharing, checked with my SA only recent launch of EM project come with DVD. All the earlier launched i.e. Cradleton and Tenderfield do not have DVD.

this is very serious quality issue, even to one unit.
can u accept if EW justify by saying "oh, this is just unlucky one"???
We need to escalate this further! seriously!

Assigned third party architect/engineer, take all evidents and records in professional manner and sent a copy to EcoWorld.

If they don't provide you that they had rectified and invite you and your checker to inspection before plastering and once they bill you the works, you can proceed the legal action and file into tribunal court as well as HBA

Also, you can proceed to file to LAM (Lembaga Architect Malaysia) to take action on the Architect.

Just brief in very short the meet-up today.

- There were about 15 buyers turned up today while EW had Evon, Alvin, Tracy, Mr Wong, Mr CS Hung (the latter two from project implementation team) and a few other technical / project team members.
- It started with a briefing on how EM / EW engaged its consultants and contractors from the beginning i.e. before commencement of works to the stage of project implementation.
- They (EW) briefed on how they do their QC/QA, what the industry general practices are, what the regulatory requirements are and how they set their standards and expectations on the contractors.
- They did explain the works shown on those pics (as you have seen in some earlier posts of this thread).  I am not going into details here but generally they gave reasons on why and how certain things are done and to be done.
- The buyers, including one who is involved in this industry, asked quite a number of questions and mostly were considered satisfactorily answered.
- There was no visit on the site after considering the safety issues, among other reasons.
- No progress update but we shall expect to see from January 2016 onwards more frequent updates to buyers (probably some pictures to be sent together with the progress billings)
- The meeting was conducted "smoothly and peacefully"
and ended at at around 1.30pm (if I remember correctly).

Was there really bad quality construction?

We will never know now. The complainant did not step forward to pin point the claims. The developer took this opportunity to do PR actvity.

The examples highlighted whether here or other location  is cheap to remedy. As long as it is not structural issues.

The keyword is TRUST. If you cannot trust the vendor even with the best quality system, you'd better take your money else where.

lol Eyes a little sore when I see someone BOOSTED so much about his knowledge about construction. I don't normally active in the forum, though I peep occasionally 
Yea, I'm in this line but I'm not a developer. My knowledge is not as good as certain people who only know how to condemn others work but at least I'm a practical person.
I understand many purchaser concerns. As I'm the same as you guys, I hope to gain other knowledge on other perspective from this forum too. As from my point of view, there's nothing to worry about.
When the time comes, if the quality is bad, it will come means it will come. We can't be standing in the site 24/7 looking at the workers do what is right or what is wrong. Even inspection can't see what is construct within at certain times. At times, we just need to have faith with what we bought. Not much of an effort, it is just solely based on my personal opinion. Feel free to correct me if I'm wrong 

I dont see any issue with such workmanship. score give is about 85/100

Some of your accusations are not actually reflect to the photo give.

I wont correct you all. but example. Upper roof wall + rough plastering = standard. Before CCC, developer need arrange bomba to inspect the said wall for passive fire fighting clearance letter.

the so called shared wall at toilet. Actually is not a shared wall. The sun light outside is actually courtyard.

the window sill using brickwall = standard. Alternatively can construct a cast insitu RC window sill or precast coping. bust using brick to make window sill is more advisable because easy to control the squareness.

There are more.

But i think i should stop here. no time to give free lunch

Please download the video from my ftp 47 min shooting

The link only will be given to purchasers n not em cronies n agent n not even em staffs.very sorry ! Merry x'mas n happy new year!