bukit tak untung also blow till the next pj la lol

with all due respect, Seasons Garden is not a comparable product. Here are 10 reasons :

1. Location - Lexa is on the main road, assuring easy access while Seasons Garden is further in. SG is surrounded by existing medium low and low medium cost units blocks which unfortunately are not that well maintained. Further, it is right by DUKE, translating into higher noise factor.
2. Concept - Lexa is part of a 5-Phase masterplan with a central park as a focal point in the middle. Each phase offers an individual identity while adopting part of the overall concept plan of the 16.5 acre The Quartz. This ensures consistency and continuity, with a good central landscape theme. SG is a all-in-one development with little differentiation one from the other.
3. Commercial/Retail - Developer will retain the commercial/retail portion in Lexa to ensure the right product and tenant mix that will fit the lifestyle being offered. Besides that, the entry and exit to the commercial area is right off the main road while the residential access is via the central park so there is separation between the two.
4. Land tenure - Lexa and The Quartz is freehold while SG is leasehold
5. Density - Lexa has 438 units on 2.7 acres (162 units/acre) while SG has 1,502 units on 6 acres (250 units/acre). Also, being all 3 and 3+1 layout designs, population density in SG is much higher than Lexa.
6. Layout - While both projects target affordable absolute prices, as you indicated, the designs are quite different. SG prefers to give yards for all types, at the expense of the kitchen. It is quite safe to say that all users will eventually combine both to accommodate realistic needs for kitchen size. In Lexa, there are several configurations available ie 2, 2+utility, 3 and 4 bedroom designs. Each has their own benefits but are all very practically designed with every masterbedroom accommodating a king sized bed, secondary rooms a queen sized bed except for the utility room (unit nos 8 & 9), the compact room in type C (Unit no. 6) which fit a single bed. All clearly specified. Lexa designs are all very efficient with little unusable wasted space, and allow a lot of natural lighting and ventilation, with most ( except for Type A and C ie Unit No. 1 and 6 ) boasting windows on front and side due to the semi-detached unit design and point block design as opposed to the long corridor approach of SG. Lastly, there is the option of larger balcony space according to personal preference.
7. Filling a market gap - In relation to all the other ongoing developments in Wangsa Maju, Lexa is the only one that offers a 4 bedroom design, priced at RM 600K ( expected average price ). For those that actually do offer this configuration, they are priced at RM1.3 and 1.8mil, well beyond the affordability range of the residents.
8. Specifications & quality - Lexa offers quality materials which are clearly specified from the beginning with selection already made and locked in. Further, they offer free kitchen cabinets with hob and hood, airconditioners to living and master, water heater to bathrooms, shower screens, vanity tops, feature walls in bathrooms.
9. Facilities - the land area in SG is able to offer more facilities. However, they are not optimised to suit the needs of the residents, nor well laid out. Lexa offers a 50m pool, and open lawn space for little children to run around and kick a ball (consider Nadia homes in Desa Park City as a good example). Too often, developers succumb to the temptation to landscape up every inch of common area, forgetting the need for simple outdoor space for kids. This is such a luxury now. Lexa caters to all members of the family while SG seems to prefer the adults' needs only. Besides that, there is a deliberate effort to ensure a sense of space. The main lobby will be large double volume, akin to what you will find in Marc Residences KLCC for comfort and great welcome feeling. SG's facilities face the carpark podium which is not ideal.
10. Developer - Lexa Residence and The Quartz are being developed by Beverly Group, a Singaporean outfit that has successfully completed Marc Residences KLCC and currently constructing 28BLVD in Pandan Perdana. They have operations and projects in Singapore, Brunei, Malaysia and China, having partnered with many key names such as ING and CapitaLand. Here, they are collaborating with Mapletree from Temasek, Singapore ( Investment arm of Singapore Government, equivalent to our Khazanah Nasional ), and Lai Sun Group from Hong Kong, a listed diversified conglomerate founded in 1947. All three have strong financial standing and expertise to deliver a great product, with reputations to uphold. Buyers can be assured of a great product with fine construction quality, abiding by all rules and regulations.

There you have our take on the comparison. What are your thoughts?

stage 2a billing will take some time... according to SA, developer needs 4 years because they need longer time for foundation