|
TSkhelben
|
Sep 30 2015, 11:54 AM, updated 11y ago
|
|
Have any one of you guys experiencing lag spikes lately?
I'm on Maxis HOME 10mbps, playing in Barthilas.
Home connection is always fine, chats are smooth. But World connection very unstable. Low latency but with frequent lag spikes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
potatoguy
|
Sep 30 2015, 12:04 PM
|
New Member
|
all thanks to the new unifi 30 mpbs package.
|
|
|
|
|
|
dimensionx
|
Oct 1 2015, 07:37 AM
|
New Member
|
QUOTE(khelben @ Sep 30 2015, 11:54 AM) Have any one of you guys experiencing lag spikes lately? I'm on Maxis HOME 10mbps, playing in Barthilas. Home connection is always fine, chats are smooth. But World connection very unstable. Low latency but with frequent lag spikes. Unifi was unstable for several weeks just awhile ago, according to PingPlotter it was because there was a congestion along the route to the server. End up using WTFast to reroute the game through another route to get good ping. Maybe you can give WTFast a try, since it is currently free for unlimited use. The routing issue may resolve after awhile so you can always stop using it once it is smooth. Native connection is always better if there is no routing issue as traffic does not have to be encrypted and then re-decrypted again (to protect your data privacy).
|
|
|
|
|
|
helven
|
Oct 1 2015, 05:57 PM
|
|
QUOTE(dimensionx @ Oct 1 2015, 07:37 AM) Unifi was unstable for several weeks just awhile ago, according to PingPlotter it was because there was a congestion along the route to the server. End up using WTFast to reroute the game through another route to get good ping. Maybe you can give WTFast a try, since it is currently free for unlimited use. The routing issue may resolve after awhile so you can always stop using it once it is smooth. Native connection is always better if there is no routing issue as traffic does not have to be encrypted and then re-decrypted again (to protect your data privacy). Thanks bud, I was getting lag spike so frequent, playing a WW Monk is near to impossible.
|
|
|
|
|
|
jarofclay
|
Oct 1 2015, 11:20 PM
|
Klipsch Addict
|
What pings are you getting using WTF?
|
|
|
|
|
|
jarofclay
|
Oct 2 2015, 11:43 PM
|
Klipsch Addict
|
Just tried WTF... it's the same as Battleping. Still laggy than normal. Usually I can get 130ms but nowadays it's 190ms.
|
|
|
|
|
|
TSkhelben
|
Oct 2 2015, 11:46 PM
|
|
Before this connection problem that has been occurring for the past few weeks, I get around 110ms on Home and World. And with the recent problem I get around 170 Home and a very unstable World connection. Major lag spikes.
With WTFast I get around 260ms for both but without the lag spike. I guess it's gonna be my temporary solution.
|
|
|
|
|
|
TSkhelben
|
Oct 2 2015, 11:51 PM
|
|
http://us.battle.net/wow/en/forum/topic/19136824039Seems like there are undersea cable repairs going on "There are 2 undersea cables that are currently under repair. One is the Sydney to Japan Via Guam. which is the AJC operated cable with a anchor in Sydney and the Asia-America Gateway or AAG. no ETA on repairs. The issues according to the article will impact the entire area as traffic has to be rerouted onto other cables"
QUOTE "Several Southeast Asian countries, such as Singapore, Thailand, Malaysia, Brunei, Hong Kong, Vietnam, Guam and Philippines, will be experiencing slower internet speeds as one major undersea internet cable breaks again, reports said. A part of undersea cable called Asia-America Gateway or AAG was reported to have been breached somewhere between Hong Kong and Vietnam earlier last week and is still under repair.
According to the reports, cable operators from different countries will gather to repair it and is expected to be completed by next month.
The restoration works on the AAG submarine cable is said to begin on September 29, and takes a week to finish, subject to weather and sea conditions.
“Repair progress can be slowed down by unstable weather,” Vietnam’s FPT Telecom General Director Nguyen Van Khoa noted.
Authorities believe that dragging local ships along the Vietnamese shoreline caused the breakage of the cable, while others say that the design of the cable itself was poorly done. “I must say that the AAG cable system was built to a below-standard technical design, which is the major reason behind its frequent fractures,” Khoa said. He stated that investments in internet cables are costly and complicated, however, every cable results alliance between countries. “The AAG is a 20,000-kilometer-long submarine communications cable system, connecting Southeast Asia with the U.S. mainland, across the Pacific Ocean via Guam and Hawaii,” Vietnam-based website Tuoi Tre News posted.
It was not the first time that the underwater cable was broken. Two months ago, the AAG cable system got broken and it took two weeks to fix it and return internet speeds to normal. “Two years ago, part of the AAG that connects bordering areas between Malaysia and Singapore repeatedly broke, since it goes through overlapping maritime areas between the two countries. A number of boats stop in the said overlapping areas, so their anchors may have become stuck in the cable as sailors raised them and set sail, causing it to break,” Khoa explained."
This post has been edited by khelben: Oct 2 2015, 11:52 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
dimensionx
|
Oct 3 2015, 06:03 PM
|
New Member
|
QUOTE(jarofclay @ Oct 2 2015, 11:43 PM) Just tried WTF... it's the same as Battleping. Still laggy than normal. Usually I can get 130ms but nowadays it's 190ms. You are refering to connection to WOW right? For WOW, I have played different realms in 3 different battlegroup. Under normal conditions with Unifi, Oceanic servers have the lowest ping which is around 180ms, the USA servers have higher pings, depending on which battlegroup, I am getting around 200ms for one and 240ms for the other. Under such normal conditions, there is no lag spike, no teleporting etc. I am not sure which server can get 130ms ping with Unifi. Are you using Maxis instead? Maybe they normally use different oversea route which gives better ping? Lag spike is caused by network bottleneck and data packets gone missing/being dropped between your PC and the servers. That's why teleporting happens. Services such as WTF will avoid congested network to ensure data packet arrives, but it might have to choose a longer route if the shortest route happens to be congested. Therefore, the typical ping can become higher since the data travels a longer distance. It cannot magically clear up the congestion along the shortest path. Those problems belong to the ISP that own that route, and my experiences show that most often than not, it is with oversea operators.
|
|
|
|
|
|
jarofclay
|
Oct 7 2015, 05:45 PM
|
Klipsch Addict
|
QUOTE(dimensionx @ Oct 3 2015, 06:03 PM) You are refering to connection to WOW right? For WOW, I have played different realms in 3 different battlegroup. Under normal conditions with Unifi, Oceanic servers have the lowest ping which is around 180ms, the USA servers have higher pings, depending on which battlegroup, I am getting around 200ms for one and 240ms for the other. Under such normal conditions, there is no lag spike, no teleporting etc. I am not sure which server can get 130ms ping with Unifi. Are you using Maxis instead? Maybe they normally use different oversea route which gives better ping? Lag spike is caused by network bottleneck and data packets gone missing/being dropped between your PC and the servers. That's why teleporting happens. Services such as WTF will avoid congested network to ensure data packet arrives, but it might have to choose a longer route if the shortest route happens to be congested. Therefore, the typical ping can become higher since the data travels a longer distance. It cannot magically clear up the congestion along the shortest path. Those problems belong to the ISP that own that route, and my experiences show that most often than not, it is with oversea operators. I'm still using the old streamyx that's supposedly inferior to unify. To get 130ms is not hard using Battleping previously. My mate in KL with Unify was able to get 110ms previously. I've attached a screenshot taken some time back... was 135ms then.
|
|
|
|
|