Oct 15 2015, 04:35 PM
QUOTE(ryder_78 @ Oct 10 2015, 09:54 AM)
I've had a look at the link. I don't know how reliable DXomark is but based on the points, I highly doubt the quality of the review which is point-based. The points are not entirely focused on image quality but other features such as autofocus speed which the Sony Xperia Z5 does better than most phones, scoring a high point.
But when it comes to overall image quality of photos, the Nokia Pureview 808 and Lumia 1020 should sit at the top of the pack, not at the bottom. The fact that the smartphones with smaller sensors, especially the iPhone6 doing better than the Nokia Pureview 808 already showed the lack of quality or credibility of the Dxomark objective evaluation of the photographic performance of these smartphones, in my view.
Don't know how well you understood the DXO's review but they are a photo centric website first and foremost dealing with real cameras and not a mobile phone centric website that deals with common mobile phone functions. If you look at the graphs in the detailed report, they measure exposure and contrast, colour, texture, noise and artifacts for both photo and video. So in my opinion, they are credible. Size of image sensor is not everything. Image processor also plays a lot of role nowadays.But when it comes to overall image quality of photos, the Nokia Pureview 808 and Lumia 1020 should sit at the top of the pack, not at the bottom. The fact that the smartphones with smaller sensors, especially the iPhone6 doing better than the Nokia Pureview 808 already showed the lack of quality or credibility of the Dxomark objective evaluation of the photographic performance of these smartphones, in my view.
Quote
0.0163sec
0.45
6 queries
GZIP Disabled