Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
6 Pages « < 3 4 5 6 >Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

> Military Thread V18

views
     
SUSKLboy92
post Nov 29 2015, 05:09 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
189 posts

Joined: Aug 2015
From: Cherasboy
QUOTE(BorneoAlliance @ Nov 29 2015, 04:56 PM)
Hidden Agenda? Why Washington Wants Turkey to Send Troops to Syrian Border

user posted image
http://sputniknews.com/politics/20151129/1...order-isis.html
*
Sputnik News reports hypothetical US false flag plan based on vague assumption, recommends Russia move troops to counter

Why am I not surprised...

Meanwhile in Ukraine there are 0 Russian troops there.
SUSKLboy92
post Nov 30 2015, 06:28 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
189 posts

Joined: Aug 2015
From: Cherasboy
QUOTE(sniper on the roof @ Nov 30 2015, 04:25 PM)
How do they retain proficiency being carrier-less for so long?
*
QE's working up time will be quite long, from 2018 to 2020 IIRC. The F35B pilots will work up carrier ops with the USN's flattops at first. Furthermore the modernised and oversized design of QE is supposed to simplify aircraft handling - you're looking at a ship more than 3/4 the size of Nimitz but carrying a surge max of 36 jets and normally only 12 jets.

They're quite aware of the training factor since that's almost their only edge left along with their high tech weapons. Budget problems are insane and their entire armed forces are smaller than the US Marines.
SUSKLboy92
post Dec 2 2015, 01:20 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
189 posts

Joined: Aug 2015
From: Cherasboy
QUOTE(SouzaDE @ Dec 2 2015, 12:13 AM)
Meanwhile the yanks are sending additional F-15Cs to Turkey to fight IS. O wait, someone just said IS has no air power no??
*
What is the purpose of S400 then? doh.gif With the S400 in place the West will be forced to step down their bombing or even cease altogether. The risk and consequences of a shootdown is too great especially if ISIS then get their hands on a pilot.

Of course the konspirasi tards will say its proof of West supporting ISIS....
SUSKLboy92
post Dec 2 2015, 10:26 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
189 posts

Joined: Aug 2015
From: Cherasboy
QUOTE(KYPMbangi @ Dec 2 2015, 06:28 AM)
2nd batch LCT30 variant

user posted image
*
Damn that is nice!
QUOTE(MilitaryMadness @ Dec 2 2015, 07:39 AM)
Russia only had basic AA defense systems in place before somebody was stupid enough to shoot down a Russian plane over a 5-second intrusion of airspace. Now anything flying within 600 miles of Hmeimem air base is literally at the mercy of Russian S-400 missiles.
*
QUOTE(red streak @ Dec 2 2015, 07:32 AM)
The F-15C is an air-superiority fighter. Please tell us exactly when ISIS gained their own air force that would require their deployment to Turkey?  hmm.gif
*
Because *somebody* decided to use the Syrian war as a pretext to throw fighters around and entered Turkish airspace like its his datuk mia jalan. Russia is the number 1 world champion in disrespecting airspace all over Europe, and just like every time the NATOs and British have to send their QRA flights up on a monthly basis as a symbolic gesture to say GTFO, this is the US telling Russia not to dick with their buddy Turkey. Practically all of NATO flies out of Incirlik airbase you know.

But now the S400 is deployed the brinkmanship just got ratcheted up again. Meanwhile the main job will be undone simply because Putin wants a dick swinging contest to relive the good ol Cold War days.

At least maybe the West will get a good look at S400 radar. UK deploying another RC-135 to Turkey.
SUSKLboy92
post Dec 2 2015, 10:35 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
189 posts

Joined: Aug 2015
From: Cherasboy
QUOTE(yinchet @ Dec 2 2015, 09:26 AM)
It hard to said. Anyway he speaking on long term basis.
Sgpv batch3 it very possible as the government still under contract to build 27 of with bns.
Mrss is tough nut to crack pity our navy.

Mmea finally select thales uav for its ship.
I thought it will be scaneagle. Lolz
*
Actually now is the right time. Due to the O&G slowdown a lot of support vessels and container ships are sitting idle. Picking up a couple and converting it for military use would be excellent. Ideally a RollOnRollOff that can ferry Twardy and ACVs to ESSCOM but even a small support ship converted from a container ship can give RMN some flexibility.
SUSKLboy92
post Dec 2 2015, 11:02 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
189 posts

Joined: Aug 2015
From: Cherasboy
QUOTE(cunnilinguist @ Dec 2 2015, 10:40 AM)
Transporting amphibious force isn't the same as transporting container.
*
Take 1 container ship. Add 2 heli spots and hangars. Add a containerised hospital and 50 or so wards. Upgrade water purifying plant. Result: support and disaster relief ship. Throw it around next time we have flood or Philippines kena typhoon. Instant credibility.

Add a 30mm cannon fore and aft and a couple of machine guns. Result: 1 extra ESSCOM patrol ship for when not used for disaster relief.

Adjust the deck load; add 2 more heli spots. Result: cheapo LHA that can land at least 1 platoon from the sea. Alternatively add boat davits and buy landing boats. Cheapo LPD.
SUSKLboy92
post Dec 2 2015, 11:10 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
189 posts

Joined: Aug 2015
From: Cherasboy
QUOTE(SouzaDE @ Dec 2 2015, 10:59 AM)
Washington decided to send F-15Cs way before the shoot down of SU-24. So how is additional F-15Cs justifiable to fight ISIS? Has someone not just said ISIS doesn't have airforce?? How is F-15C helpful in the event of a down aircraft? How is additional F-15Cs affected by the deployment of S400, especially when the decision to send additional F-15Cs was made before he deployment of S400??
*
Washington sent F-15C in early November immediately after first incursion (that was publicly announced) by Russian fighters into Turkey airspace. Given that its not difficult to avoid another country's airspace, not like Syria very kecik and cramped, what's the point behind Russia's intrusion seems to be the better question.

S400 changes the game because its Russia's most advanced SAM and no aircraft has a counter against SAM other than ejecting flares and hoping it misses. The only way is to destroy the SAM with bombs and as you say, F-15C doesn't do air to ground. Its literally a gun against which there is no defence. You like walking around with a gun pointed at you, trusting that the user won't make *another* MH17 mistake?

Edit: Besides, Russia brought SU-30s and MIG-29s first, and the original incursions way back in October which everyone conveniently forgets was made by MIG-29s, not dedicated ground attack like SU-24. What's the point of that?

This post has been edited by KLboy92: Dec 2 2015, 11:19 AM
SUSKLboy92
post Dec 2 2015, 11:23 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
189 posts

Joined: Aug 2015
From: Cherasboy
QUOTE(SouzaDE @ Dec 2 2015, 11:17 AM)
That still doesn't explain your earlier post relating S400 to the stationing of F-15Cs. Now you yourself said F-15Cs were sent in early November. So again, how is the deployment of S400 affect or cause Washington's decision to deploy additional F-15Cs?
*
Is Washington deploying "additional" F-15Cs?
SUSKLboy92
post Dec 2 2015, 02:50 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
189 posts

Joined: Aug 2015
From: Cherasboy
QUOTE(MilitaryMadness @ Dec 2 2015, 01:01 PM)
Flares only work against IR-guided missiles, which are usually used by MANPADS or short-range AA missiles like AIM-9 Sidewinder. S-400 is radar guided, flares would do diddly squat against it. What you do is you could try to trick its radar by active countermeasures (ECM pod) or passive countermeasures (Chaff & decoy dispenser).

Also, When suppressing enemy air defenses, attackers usually aim at the radar system. Very rarely do 'Wild Weasel'-type SEAD mission aim at the missiles or AA guns themselves. Air defense radars are more fragile and transmit powerful emissions that can be targeted from long-range by Anti-Radiation missiles like AGM-88 HARM missile. After the radar is down, then only you have the option to used bombs against the now-disabled SAM missiles, although this can be a dangerous option, as sometimes the battery still has MANPADS or optically aimed missiles & AA guns for short range work.
*
I get that, I was trying to be brief. The point being, short of air to ground SEAD or DEAD work there is nothing an aircraft can do, but suffer being painted by S400 and hope the gunner isn't as trigger happy as the dumbass who shot down MH17. And any nonsense like firing HARMs obviously will trigger WW3.

QUOTE(SouzaDE @ Dec 2 2015, 11:37 AM)
Those are the one you said deployed in November, in addition to what they already have in that region.
So how is Russian deployment of S400 affect or cause US to send in additional F-15Cs (which happened way before the down of SU-24 and subsequent deployment of the afore mentioned deployment of S400) as mentioned by you in earlier post?
*
As I said earlier, the F15Cs were deployed in November in response to Russian incursion into Turkish airspace by a MIG-29 air superiority fighter in early October. Supposedly the fighter even illuminated Turkish F16s flying QRA.

So the better question is what's the point of flying MIG-29s into Turkey? Its not as if Syria is like Singapore, too cramped for flying...
SUSKLboy92
post Dec 2 2015, 04:08 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
189 posts

Joined: Aug 2015
From: Cherasboy
QUOTE(MilitaryMadness @ Dec 2 2015, 03:57 PM)
user posted image

Saudi M1 Abrams brewing up furiously after being hit by some sort of anti-tank weapon. Said to be in Yemen.
*
Hmm. Ammo cook off? M1 Saudi standard has no ammo blowout panels IIRC... definitely no depleted uranium armor

QUOTE(SuperGampang @ Dec 2 2015, 03:44 PM)
The reality is everyone need isis. 

Assad and the gang need isis to blow his opposition to kingdom come and sec war with sunni under fighting terrorism flag

Turkey need for oil money to down assad and syiah sec and prevent Kurdistan

West need to justify military spending more like maintain regional influence

Arab need for sec war with syiah. 

And people keep asking why thet so resilient
*
Unfortunately.
SUSKLboy92
post Dec 2 2015, 05:35 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
189 posts

Joined: Aug 2015
From: Cherasboy
QUOTE(SouzaDE @ Dec 2 2015, 12:13 AM)
Meanwhile the yanks are sending additional F-15Cs to Turkey to fight IS. O wait, someone just said IS has no air power no??
*
You're the one who said this, not me. To which I asked, what is the point of S400 then? Because its certainly not there to shoot ISIS either. Its just yet another escalation courtesy of Putin and his NATO-baiting brinkmanship: S400 is a gun that can only be countered by destroying it and that is impossible. It effectively hinders Western attempts to bomb ISIS which is why no Western aircraft have flown strikes against ISIS since S400 was put in place 28 Nov.

As for the F-15Cs they were in response to the Russian incursions into Turkey. And yes, Russia sent in MIG-29s into Turkey, who *claims* they even illuminated the Turkish F-16s. For which there is no explanation why either.
SUSKLboy92
post Dec 2 2015, 08:34 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
189 posts

Joined: Aug 2015
From: Cherasboy
QUOTE(SouzaDE @ Dec 2 2015, 07:05 PM)
So yeah, American warn Russian against arming their jets with AA missiles because ISIS has not airforce. But US sent F-15Cs under the pretext of fighting ISIS is OK, even though ISIS has no airforce. That's what I mean.

You're the one who drag in the S400. Not me. Even in your quoting of my post did I mentioned S400???? F-15Cs were sent way before the downing of SU-24 and of course way before the S400 deployment. So why did you link the deployment of F-15Cs to S400???? They are not cause and consequence. That's what I am saying.

Since when Russian deploy MiG-29 to Syria???
*
Ok I reread the news. The Mig-29 which crossed into Turkey is thought to be Syrian. The Russian fighter which crossed into Turkey was a SU-30SM. These incidents happened around October 4 and 5.

Ok perhaps I misread your first post which seemed to be replying to a news about S400 deployment. The F-15Cs were deployed in November in response to the alleged Russian incursions not because of ISIS. Not sure why you keep beating that dead horse.
SUSKLboy92
post Dec 2 2015, 08:39 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
189 posts

Joined: Aug 2015
From: Cherasboy
QUOTE(BorneoAlliance @ Dec 2 2015, 08:17 PM)
North Korea Threatens Turkey With Nuclear Missile Strike


http://www.jewsnews.co.il/2015/11/30/north...missile-strike/
*
Wadafak...

Kim Jong Un kuda atensi
SUSKLboy92
post Dec 3 2015, 03:46 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
189 posts

Joined: Aug 2015
From: Cherasboy
QUOTE(SouzaDE @ Dec 3 2015, 12:47 AM)
This is a dangerous move. Has war been declared?
*
Damn. I didn't think Erdogan would have the balls to do it.

QUOTE(xtemujin @ Dec 3 2015, 01:02 AM)
Turkey Has No Legal, Economic Basis to Close Bosphorus for Russian Ships
http://sputniknews.com/politics/20151126/1...rus-strait.html
*
And here comes the Sputniknews propa rclxms.gif
SUSKLboy92
post Dec 3 2015, 01:27 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
189 posts

Joined: Aug 2015
From: Cherasboy
QUOTE(red streak @ Dec 3 2015, 05:35 AM)
So pray tell, on what basis do they have to close the straits?  hmm.gif
*
Montreux Convention, also mentioned somewhere upthread. Naturally Sputniknews disagrees tongue.gif
SUSKLboy92
post Dec 3 2015, 04:15 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
189 posts

Joined: Aug 2015
From: Cherasboy
QUOTE(red streak @ Dec 3 2015, 02:45 PM)
You mean the very same treaty that was designed under the principle of ensuring freedom of passage to Black Sea powers (i.e. - Russia) including warships, while ensuring that other powers were granted limitations on what they could move through?  hmm.gif
*
All under the overriding caveat of "because Turkey says so", which was fine for the Russians back when they were friends but not now. Payback's a bitch innit? tongue.gif
SUSKLboy92
post Dec 3 2015, 04:23 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
189 posts

Joined: Aug 2015
From: Cherasboy
QUOTE(MilitaryMadness @ Dec 3 2015, 02:33 PM)
I wonder what the Iraq and Syrian government think of all these foreign jets suddenly 'trespassing' their sovereign airspace?  laugh.gif
*
Iraq is West ally and anyway can barely object.

Syria is hostile but hasn't fired on the Western aircraft though the West is sending fighter escorts just in case.

Speaking of foreign jets... notice all the Arab States have pulled out? So much for revenge for the Jordanian pilot etc
SUSKLboy92
post Dec 3 2015, 10:16 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
189 posts

Joined: Aug 2015
From: Cherasboy
QUOTE(SouzaDE @ Dec 3 2015, 10:14 PM)
Turkey does have the right of blockade, in war time. So what it does now practically mean it is in war with the party blocked. Let's see if Turkey will declare war. But it mostly won't. Conventions and international laws can be throw away if you have big stick. US and UK are very familiar with that.
*
My sympathy really would be with Russia if not for Ukraine/Crimea.
SUSKLboy92
post Dec 4 2015, 05:59 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
189 posts

Joined: Aug 2015
From: Cherasboy
There you go. All those Syrian SAMs... pointed at 'all those' ISIS aircraft... and where did all this hardware magically appear from? Can anyone dispute Russia's true motive of supporting Assad now?
SUSKLboy92
post Dec 4 2015, 06:54 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
189 posts

Joined: Aug 2015
From: Cherasboy
QUOTE(SouzaDE @ Dec 4 2015, 06:14 PM)
Why do you think the Russian are there? So far they have been quite straight forward about their support for assad. Every single foreign power currently in Syria is to "fight terrorism". pahamlah.
*
Yeah I know. Just read too much pro-Rusiya propa, bit fed up. That Kadyrov guy jilat better than our Cabinet man tongue.gif

6 Pages « < 3 4 5 6 >
Bump Topic Topic ClosedOptions New Topic
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0693sec    0.22    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 12th December 2025 - 06:11 PM