QUOTE(MilitaryMadness @ Dec 2 2015, 01:01 PM)
Flares only work against IR-guided missiles, which are usually used by MANPADS or short-range AA missiles like AIM-9 Sidewinder. S-400 is radar guided, flares would do diddly squat against it. What you do is you could try to trick its radar by active countermeasures (ECM pod) or passive countermeasures (Chaff & decoy dispenser).
Also, When suppressing enemy air defenses, attackers usually aim at the radar system. Very rarely do 'Wild Weasel'-type SEAD mission aim at the missiles or AA guns themselves. Air defense radars are more fragile and transmit powerful emissions that can be targeted from long-range by Anti-Radiation missiles like AGM-88 HARM missile. After the radar is down, then only you have the option to used bombs against the now-disabled SAM missiles, although this can be a dangerous option, as sometimes the battery still has MANPADS or optically aimed missiles & AA guns for short range work.
I get that, I was trying to be brief. The point being, short of air to ground SEAD or DEAD work there is nothing an aircraft can do, but suffer being painted by S400 and hope the gunner isn't as trigger happy as the dumbass who shot down MH17. And any nonsense like firing HARMs obviously will trigger WW3.
QUOTE(SouzaDE @ Dec 2 2015, 11:37 AM)
Those are the one you said deployed in November, in addition to what they already have in that region.
So how is Russian deployment of S400 affect or cause US to send in additional F-15Cs (which happened way before the down of SU-24 and subsequent deployment of the afore mentioned deployment of S400) as mentioned by you in earlier post?
As I said earlier, the F15Cs were deployed in
November in response to Russian incursion into Turkish airspace by a MIG-29 air superiority fighter in early
October. Supposedly the fighter even illuminated Turkish F16s flying QRA.
So the better question is what's the point of flying MIG-29s into Turkey? Its not as if Syria is like Singapore, too cramped for flying...