Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

> Military Thread V18

views
     
SUSKLboy92
post Dec 4 2015, 09:41 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
189 posts

Joined: Aug 2015
From: Cherasboy
QUOTE(AxeFire @ Dec 4 2015, 09:18 PM)
intresting...

seems Europe is not bothered with developing a Stealth Eurofighter
all forced to buy f35
*
They memang jumped into F35 as the JSF program since almost before 2000. The idea is, better let US develop rather than face another shitstorm like Eurofighter... only to run into yet another shitstorm. But TBH it saved F35... if only US tanggung probably would've been long cancelled.
SUSKLboy92
post Dec 4 2015, 09:45 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
189 posts

Joined: Aug 2015
From: Cherasboy
QUOTE(cunnilinguist @ Dec 4 2015, 09:19 PM)
It's different. The gurkhas, while from nepal, are trained by the british, and considered as part of british military. The same goes with France and the FFL.

This is just blatant use of mercenary.
*
And they get free English lessons, citizenship, pensions and benefits waaay more than they could earn otherwise. But only the most elite Gurkhas are chosen.

1 battalion is always stationed in Brunei as its part of the Commonwealth.
SUSKLboy92
post Dec 4 2015, 09:54 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
189 posts

Joined: Aug 2015
From: Cherasboy
QUOTE(cunnilinguist @ Dec 4 2015, 09:44 PM)
How is Eurofighter a shitstorm?

The problem is mainly due to  budget cuts and problem to secure export beyond the participant countries back then (Korea, Japan, Singapore, India, etc). It's a fully functional aircraft since early 2000s
*
The shitstorm is exactly why the participants dropped out, and in the end the biggest customer is UK IIRC. Program started in 1980s and its not fully functional in the UK RAF until now. No AESA radar, no CFTs, no laser guidance pod, no Meteor, and only Paveway IV LGB, no Brimstone or other AGMs. But those will be coming soon... 2020s. Then Tornado can finally retire.

Granted though its a highly manoeuvrable jet. Supposedly a Mig-29 splashed into the Black Sea trying to follow a Typhoon.
SUSKLboy92
post Dec 5 2015, 12:57 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
189 posts

Joined: Aug 2015
From: Cherasboy
QUOTE(BorneoAlliance @ Dec 5 2015, 09:04 AM)
The U.S. Navy Is Slowly Realizing It May Have to Sink Ships Again in the Future

user posted image
http://www.popularmechanics.com/military/w...-in-the-future/
*
Yeah... the same class of boat as KD Perdana tongue.gif

Antiship missiles, antiair missiles... if every one of them had the Pk as advertised... doh.gif even Exocet had its bad days

Firing Standards is cheaper than firing Harpoons, can be useful to swat the threatened Iranian patrol boat swarm.
SUSKLboy92
post Dec 6 2015, 01:02 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
189 posts

Joined: Aug 2015
From: Cherasboy
QUOTE(BorneoAlliance @ Dec 5 2015, 10:38 PM)

*
rclxms.gif Can now add that Turkey (good) bought oil from ISIS and so is considered (bad) too.

fucking Mid East politics...
SUSKLboy92
post Dec 6 2015, 06:22 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
189 posts

Joined: Aug 2015
From: Cherasboy
Tiba2 Rusiya manyak jilat UK and yahudis hmm.gif

"Abandoned warehouse" my ass, sounds like Mossad just scored another covert win... wonder what was inside
SUSKLboy92
post Dec 7 2015, 12:42 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
189 posts

Joined: Aug 2015
From: Cherasboy
Wahlao. Philippines baru start receiving NVGs, 1 or 2 jets, 1 or 2 patrol boat start to boast "world class" already?

Means before this really "out of this world" class...
SUSKLboy92
post Dec 7 2015, 05:40 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
189 posts

Joined: Aug 2015
From: Cherasboy
QUOTE(waja2000 @ Dec 7 2015, 12:44 PM)
yes,  technically latest-generation SAM can take down modem aircraft.
but is not easy compare to last time, aircraft much easy to take down SAM from far distance,
SAM just take a beating, deplete war, depend how long can sustain. 
compare technology, aircraft have more improvement in technology in aircraft also to air-ground missile, more type and more range
also jamming from aircraft.
if no have choice between defense SAM/ Jet fighter i will choose Jet fighter.
*
Whole article by professional telling you why its difficult bro biggrin.gif

Keyword is 'integrated air defence'... no longer you fire 1 HARM = 1 lubang in the radar net, where the only backup is a bunch of MANPADs. Now there are backup radars, interlocking fields of fire, etc and counter-missiles like Iron Dome and land Phalanx...

azrielNice pics. I think we should get Caesar rather than those Paladins, I know its not under armour but how capable is the Paladin of crossing our roads, fields and plantations?
SUSKLboy92
post Dec 7 2015, 09:03 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
189 posts

Joined: Aug 2015
From: Cherasboy
QUOTE(MilitaryMadness @ Dec 7 2015, 08:26 PM)
Essentially they can go where tanks can go. Although it looks bulky, Paladin SPH are far lighter than most MBTs, at around 25 tons (PT-91 weigh in at 45 tons) and have lower ground pressure.

As a rule of thumb tracked vehicles fare better in offroad situations than wheeled ones and make better all-round combat vehicles.
*
Yeah I get that, it was the dimensions I was thinking of, but its the same as Twardy anyhow...

Instead of getting MBTs which are assault units I would've thought a fleet of wheeled and tracked IFVs would be better for our purely defensive purposes. Not that we have a lot of armour in truth...

PT-91 is 45 tons? Thats not awe-inspiring, looking at the 65+ of M1A2...
SUSKLboy92
post Dec 7 2015, 10:16 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
189 posts

Joined: Aug 2015
From: Cherasboy
The Jacel Kiram is a convenient political assassination, not that Nurul Izzah isn't a complete ass for even allowing this kind of thing to happen. Other than that, Defence is a songlap sink except for anti-riot/insurgency and anti-ISIS because they're afraid for their own skins... pendatang kena penggal not their problem

Moving on to something nicer... rather than try to replicate old Cold War style US formations with the artillery and all, why don't we focus on genuine needs like helis, patrol boats and limit our armour to IFVs... not the Twardy isn't nice to have but only the top end tanks have a chance of surviving the ATGMs now available, just focus on ATGMs and don't try to go head to head with our neighbours.

Analogy is the Russians who develop SAMs and supersonic antiship missiles in response to NATO/US focus on air and carrier power.

6 choppas... usually 2-2-2 right? Three flights... 1 operational 1 maintenance 1 reserve/training...

This post has been edited by KLboy92: Dec 7 2015, 10:19 PM
SUSKLboy92
post Dec 7 2015, 10:34 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
189 posts

Joined: Aug 2015
From: Cherasboy
QUOTE(yinchet @ Dec 7 2015, 10:30 PM)
Not really sure if russia have carrier killer missile of its own.
P800 not enough power.
Need some carrier killer. US confirm pening
*
Brahmos? Moskit? Cold War era AS-5 Kelts*? Tak ingat the rest
*edit: AS-4 Kitchen, AS-16 Kickback

No lar both sides trying not to provocate. Rusiya also didn't deploy medium air-to-air missiles until that stupid SU-24 incident.

This post has been edited by KLboy92: Dec 7 2015, 10:37 PM
SUSKLboy92
post Dec 7 2015, 10:45 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
189 posts

Joined: Aug 2015
From: Cherasboy
QUOTE(yinchet @ Dec 7 2015, 10:40 PM)
Those were not advertise as carrier killer.
*
They are standard antiship missile loadouts for their Backfire bombers. Mach 4+ both. Just not advertised.

As for P800, a quick wiki turned up something interesting...
QUOTE
Syria

In 2010 Sergei Prikhodko, senior adviser to the Russian President, has said that Russia intends to deliver P-800 to Syria based on the contracts signed in 2007.[4][5] Syria received 2 Bastion missile systems with 36 missiles each (72 in total).[6] The missiles' test was broadcast by Syrian state TV.[7]

In May 2013, Russia continued the contract delivery to the Syrian government of Bashar al-Assad supplying missiles with an advanced radar to make them more effective to counter any future foreign military invasion.[8][9] The warehouse containing the Bastion Missile was destroyed in an Israeli air strike on Latakia on 5 July 2013, but US intelligence analysts believe that some missiles had been removed before the attack.
Remember the recent airstrike? "Abandoned warehouse" my ass!
SUSKLboy92
post Dec 8 2015, 02:48 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
189 posts

Joined: Aug 2015
From: Cherasboy
QUOTE(sniper on the roof @ Dec 8 2015, 02:24 PM)
But USAF look down on turboprops.
*
Whether Scorpion or Texan 2, the modifications to make them capable of this kind of ground attack is not cheap and it comes up to a few tens of million anyway. And I shudder to think what the ISIS's AAA cannons and MANPADs would do to them.
SUSKLboy92
post Dec 8 2015, 02:54 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
189 posts

Joined: Aug 2015
From: Cherasboy
QUOTE(enviro @ Dec 8 2015, 01:53 PM)
For the past year usa have been dropping bombs in the desert . They cannot attack assad legally so they want isis to help moderates to defeat assad. USA also did not stop illegal oil sale because they want to reward Turkey for their roll to topple assad.

Now russia come in and expose them by easily defeating isis. For the first time I see USA as the bad guys really messing up the world.

Why they hate assad only God knows. I watch Ian Wright visit syria before the war on astro and it was a beautiful country. The even allow sell sex toys in their bazaar lol
*
Cause Assad don't play ball with USA. He's in the Russian camp - which is why the Russians are supporting them by bombing FSA.

As for attacking ISIS... they've been doing it on a low level since waaaay before the Russians did, in support of the Arab Coalition.

Basically in the Middle East nothing is black and white.
SUSKLboy92
post Dec 8 2015, 05:28 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
189 posts

Joined: Aug 2015
From: Cherasboy
QUOTE(MilitaryMadness @ Dec 8 2015, 04:44 PM)
While modified prop-engine COIN planes may be costly as a whole, they are not as costly individually as high-tech strike aircraft like Scorpion(Embraer Super Tucano typically only costs around $ 10-14 million USD per unit).

Good precision stand-off weapons and advanced electro-optical sensors can place them as far away from insurgent's AA guns as needed. As they are mostly being powered by piston or turboprop engines, they generate less IR signature compared with a plane with jet engines making it very difficult to aim with MANPADS.

Being slow also makes the IR signatures generated from friction be reduced dramatically. Powered by propellers also makes them far less noisy than jet engined planes.

Nonetheless, I think for this type of operation, armed UAV like Reaper are more suited. hmm.gif
*
I dunno, there has to be a reason why the superpowers aren't going for it. I believe I read that once you factor in the EO/laser targeting pods the cost goes up significantly... but I may be remembering wrong.

Reapers perform most of the UK airstrikes in Iraq. Brimstone is a real wonder weapon.
SUSKLboy92
post Dec 8 2015, 08:38 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
189 posts

Joined: Aug 2015
From: Cherasboy
QUOTE(BorneoAlliance @ Dec 8 2015, 08:11 PM)
Did a blind Bulgarian clairvoyant predict the rise of ISIS?

user posted image

user posted image
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-33...m-war-2016.html
*
"Great Muslim war"

Sorry but when hasn't there been one...?
SUSKLboy92
post Dec 9 2015, 02:24 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
189 posts

Joined: Aug 2015
From: Cherasboy
QUOTE(waja2000 @ Dec 9 2015, 10:29 AM)
generally disappointed getting MD530G ....
so for next 10 year, basically dead chance getting Attack Helicopter already.. shakehead.gif
*
We were pretty damn close to not getting *anything* so... besides we also will have a pair of Blackhawks, and they're much more useful for our purpose than antitank attack helis

QUOTE(BorneoAlliance @ Dec 9 2015, 12:35 PM)
U.S. Says Russia—Not Coalition Forces—Accidentally Bombed Syrian Allies

user posted image
http://www.popularmechanics.com/military/w...rce-bomb-syria/
*
hmm.gif I think what the article means is that Tu-22/22M doesn't have laser targeting pods...? its perfectly capable of launching guided weapons.
SUSKLboy92
post Dec 9 2015, 02:45 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
189 posts

Joined: Aug 2015
From: Cherasboy
QUOTE(MilitaryMadness @ Dec 9 2015, 10:53 AM)
Most steel or concrete bridge can accommodate a 50-60 ton tank crossing quite well due to the fact the tank is constantly moving, so its weight doesn't remain in place for too long. As long as you don't stop, the bridge should do fine.

Although due to avoid overstressing the bridge structure, the crossing may involve only one tank crossing at a time, which can be tactically dangerous due to the bottleneck this may produce.

If no suitable bridge can be found you could either deploy an assault bridge or if the riverbanks are climbable just have the tanks swim it.
*
Well the British had to develop the Scorpion specifically for Malaysian terrain, and they actually fought using armoured cars here. They must know something we don't.

Armour is too vulnerable these days to precision guided weapons. I still think light antitank vehicles are better suited, even gun armed tanks. The Europeans believe in it, US and Russia don't. Incidentally the only US effort in this area was picked up by Thailand IIRC - the Textron Stingray.
SUSKLboy92
post Dec 9 2015, 08:19 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
189 posts

Joined: Aug 2015
From: Cherasboy
QUOTE(DDG_Ross @ Dec 9 2015, 06:35 PM)
no love for russian stuff?  biggrin.gif  biggrin.gif

user posted image
*
I would've said buy Russian too, its usually cheaper, but I think they're still under embargo

6 Pages « < 4 5 6
Bump Topic Topic ClosedOptions New Topic
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0591sec    0.60    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 11th December 2025 - 09:43 AM