General Zulkifeli was speaking to the press after a ceremony to honour serving and retired Armed Forces personnel who were injured in service. During the meet and greet session prior to the ceremony, Zulkifeli even said the food served for lunch was too little “due to the economic crisis”. It could have been a joke but the lunch menu seemed to reflect what he had said.

yep a PAC veteran, even went to Bragg

wtf is that

Japan's F-2 beats China's J-10 in aerial combat: blogger



The Japan Air Self-Defense Force's F-2 multirole fighter would have the edge over its Chinese counterpart, the Chengdu J-10, in an aerial encounter, defense and security blogger Kyle Mizokami says in a piece for National Interest published on Oct. 13.

The territorial dispute over the Diaoyutai islands (Diaoyu to China, Senkaku to Japan which controls them) in the East China Sea has increased the chance of close aerial encounters between fighters of the two sides, Mizokami wrote. He said Japanese patrol aircraft had already been intercepted several times by PLA fighters in the region after China declared its air defense identification zone over the East China Sea toward the end of 2013.

While Japan's American-built F-15J fighter will engage China's Russian-built Su-27 for aerial superiority, the Mitsubishi F-2 is more likely to go head to head with the Chengdu Aircraft Industry Group's J-10 since both aircraft were developed as multirole fighters with aerial combat as well as ground support capabilities.

Overall, Mizokami believes the F-2 has the advantage over its rival in an aerial engagement. First, the F-2 has a superior combat radius — 520 miles, compared to J-10's 340. Second, the F-2 has a better active electronically scanned array radar than the J-10. Picking up the J-10 first, the F-2 can launch a AAM-4B from beyond visual range, he said.

The AAM-4B is currently the only missile in the world fitted with active electronically scanned array radar, he added. Because of the missile's after-launch target lock capability, the Japanese pilot could begin evasive maneuvers even before achieving radar lock and the J-10 could be shot down before it is even able to engage.

Mizokami admitted one advantage of the J-10 over the F-2 at close range, however, as the latter is not fitted with an infra-red search and track system.

http://www.wantchinatimes.com/news/content...000105&cid=1101

You think only isis people is here??? Hizbollah, Hamas and other shits have been going in and out of malaysia with full knowledge of the government for decades. malaysia islamic charity? yeah sure, all are charities and many have "subsidiaries" in certain hot zone. go figure.

J-20 would defeat F-15J in long-range air combat



After claiming that the Japanese F-2 multirole fighter is going to defeat its Chinese counterpart, J-10 in a future air combat over the disputed Diaoyutai (Senkaku) islands, Kyle Mizokami, an American military expert said that the People's Liberation Army's J-20 fifth-generation fighter will be able to shoot down Japan's American-built F-15J fighter in an article he wrote for the National Interest magazine on Oct. 16.

Although the F-15J is an excellent fighter, Japan's ministry of defense had expected to replace the older, cold war era aircraft with the F-22 fifth-generation fighter, Mizokami said. Japan, however, was later prohibited from purchasing the upgrade — the F-22 Raptor — from the US after Congress approved the Obey Amendment in 1997.

Japan's Mitsubishi Heavy Industries was license to manufacture a total number of 223 F-15J since 1981. An upgrade program was carried out by Japan Air Defense Force in early 21st century to fit advanced infra-red guided missiles such as AAM-3, AAM-5, improved AN/APG-63 mechanically-scanned pulse-doppler radars, the AAM-4B radar-guided missiles, improved electronic countermeasures and a nose-mounted infrared search and track sensor to the F-15J fighter.

The precise role of Chengdu Aerospace Corporation's J-20 fighter still remains unknown, Mizokami said. Due to its large size, the J-20 can be developed to mimic Russia's MiG-31 interceptor, with missions to shoot down enemy aerial refueling tankers, early warning and control aircraft, as well as perform reconnaissance and intelligence collection. It can also be designed as a medium long-range bomber like the American-built F-111.

In air combat, if China's J-20 is developed particularly to fight the F-15J as a long-range air superiority fighter, it would be extremely difficult for the F-15J fighter to detect the Chinese fifth-generation fighter at a longer range. If the designers of J-20 are able to reduce the aircraft's radar cross section, the F-15J fighter's advantage in launching an attack from beyond visual range against the J-20 will be reduced gradually.

If the J-20 was additionally fitted with the PL-15 active radar seeker missile, the chances of the F-15J's would be practically non-existent. Without a gun, the J-20 may still lose in a close-range battle against the F-15J, which has superior thrust and excellent maneuverability, Mizokami said. Still, the F-15J must be able to get closer to the Chinese fifth-generation fighter before engaging in any dog fight.

http://www.wantchinatimes.com/news/content...000066&cid=1101

japs jet fighter more motivate even lower class jet can fight with PLA jet

kita punya tak park sama sama ke ? buat lah A400 TT meet up

tu service 1000km first time foc

so convenient.....
Originally designed to fit Ruskie equipment, now sold to Egypt with Ruskie equipment. now there's no need to waste time removing those equipment installed i guess
that's why we can expect F16 kamikaze on Liao ning ?   

LOL what prove do u have bro??? can u atleast give me hint where is the so call training centre LOL

Chinese Landrover also wanna report? Its not even a MRAP or whatever.

BTW does our A400M have a name?

Sure, but tracking this things more fall to the PDRM SB

APMM operation in sumatera

INTERNATIONAL MILITARY REVIEW & ANALYSIS – SYRIA-IRAQ BATTLESPACE, OCT. 19.10.2015


http://southfront.org/international-milita...oct-19-10-2015/

New Laser-Guided Missile Fires From a Grenade Launcher



accurate to within five meters.



If the Army decides to field the weapon, then Pike will occupy the middle ground between light mortars and heavier anti-tank missiles such as the Javelin. On the low end of that range, the M224 60-millimeter mortar is designed to drop a grenade-sized round on the enemy, but may require multiple rounds to get "on target." In the meantime, the enemy will take cover and the mortar's effectiveness will be reduced. Lacking a long-range weapon, American infantry in Iraq and Afghanistan have used Javelin anti-tank missiles against particularly stubborn targets. While a great missile capable of killing tanks up to two kilometers away, Javelin is heavy and—at more than  $200,000 each—very expensive.   1 tank how much

Pike appears to bring best of both worlds. Pike has the lethality of the mortar and the range and precision capability of the Javelin. At five pounds, including grenade launcher and one missile, Pike is nine times lighter than either.

First though, some issues need to be ironed out. The M320 grenade launcher needs to be modified accommodate the Pike. Five-meter accuracy is not that great for a precision weapon with a small warhead, but it's not awful, either. The real potential deal-killer is the pricetag: Raytheon hasn't disclosed the per-missile cost, which is likely to be much, much higher than the $70 cost of your average 40-millimeter grenade. Still, if it works out, Pike will be the first new, really useful weapon for grunts fielded in decades.

http://www.popularmechanics.com/military/w...renades-anyone/

sumthing caught my attention

whats that on their SAR-21..??? it looks like sumkind of a pouch bag..whats the use of it..???

It is a cartridge pouch to catch the expanded rounds.

which is why I asked

or maybe should invest in more water bomber instead

 

our bomba dropping awter on indon not FOC isn't it? when indon going to pay