Simple, I would not vaccinate my child if the vaccination is confirmed to cause allergic reaction. But I will seek doctor's advice on other non allergic types of vaccinations. If there are no other types of vaccinations, then vaccination is not possible and the child will have to live his/her life more carefully. Thats all. Having said that, it doesn't mean
ALL vaccinations for ALL children should be abandoned as what that icehart85 is so keen on propagating.
If there's no side effects to the child, then why not? My child went through the full cycle of immunisation with no side effects (except for that 1 or 2 fevers). My neighbour's child is going through the same immunisation and no side effects as well. So are children of other family members. Your's could be an unfortunate case, the statistical 1%
Perhaps your child may be protected by herd immunity. But what if everybody is not immunized? We have zero polio cases now. What if, in a hypothetical scenario, sometime in the future where nobody is immunized and a foreigner came to the country with polio. What will happen?
I will rather immunise my child against eradicated diseases now, than taking chances and hoping the child grows up and never encounter any of those diseases.
Rather than cherry picking information from a chiropractor, I'd rather come to my own conclusion from more neutral sources of information such as vaccines.procon.org
Never in my position have I stated that. Rather the position by pro vaxx is what irks me the most: ALL vaccinations for ALL children should be imposed. In fact it should be mandatory. Why? To infuse herd immunity for the benefit of whole population.