Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

4 Pages < 1 2 3 4 >Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Skylake/Kaby/Coffee/Comet/Rocket Lake OC V1, Show off your OC here

views
     
cstkl1
post Jan 2 2019, 10:14 PM

Look at all my stars!!
Group Icon
Elite
6,799 posts

Joined: Jan 2003

QUOTE(owikh84 @ Jan 2 2019, 09:27 PM)
Gotta do with RAM speed + latency, my result was based on 3200 CL16-18-18.
Now increased to 12.3k with 3600 CL16-18-18.
Of course could do higher with further optimization etc.
*
ic ic...
i actually got 12.6k at 4.9ghz.. 5ghz is unstable hence da result always varies

cstkl1
post Jan 2 2019, 11:49 PM

Look at all my stars!!
Group Icon
Elite
6,799 posts

Joined: Jan 2003

QUOTE(owikh84 @ Jan 2 2019, 11:33 PM)
ow.... mine always consistent at 5GHz, giving 11.5k with DDR4-3200 and 12.3k with DDR4-3600.
Had problem hitting 2200cb in Cinebench R15 earlier, sometimes 2090-2150cb.
Managed to get it back up after a fresh install of Windows 10.  rclxm9.gif

Regarding stability...
Although RB v2.56 is stable @ 1.23v for 1 hours, Prime95 v29.5 with AVX custom blend 1344K/1344K will not stable at this vCore (almost instant freeze).
I tried putting 1.275v but doesn't seem to make it stable (core temps still below 100C mark).
Will try 1.285-1.3v later if my cooling (aging Supreme HF) is still able to handle the heat.
Small FFT as expected, shot up to 100C as soon as I started stressing the chip.  sad.gif

Not a golden chip it seems. TBH I'm jealous seeing others getting 5GHz easily under 1.3v.
user posted image
*
wei.. they all lucky.. cause temp etc... high chance u getting getting some power bleed above 80 which affects stability.. seen it even on x299 cpus...
above 80+.. u have issues..

but so far havent seen a proper stable 5ghz 9900k with 4+k ram...
aka rb 2.43 8 hours, 2.56 8 hours, hci memtest 1000%, gsat 2 hours

This post has been edited by cstkl1: Jan 2 2019, 11:50 PM
cstkl1
post Jan 3 2019, 04:48 PM

Look at all my stars!!
Group Icon
Elite
6,799 posts

Joined: Jan 2003

QUOTE(djandrew @ Jan 3 2019, 10:38 AM)
hi guys, im using gigabyte z370 gaming 7 motherboard + 8600k, was thinking of upgrading to i9 9900k in future, googled online many says the 8+2 phase vrm can handle 9900k moderately, what u guys think? any opinion? i know it not as good as z390 power phase but just wondering only if i slot in 9900k is it straight on stock good to go with games and etc? and yeah of course will not run small fft stress test with prime95 lol because with current 8600k oc to 5ghz @ 1.365v peak power reading about 160w the vrm temp hovering around 80c already if no stress test, at normal 5ghz 1.365v the vrm about 51c max with games etc... so i guess with 9900k sure is a no stress test first  laugh.gif
*
i would wait...

ure just seeing da end of life of skylake pcs...

the new IPC from intel especially da 2nd gen of dat should slaughter everything we know now.
cstkl1
post Jan 3 2019, 09:32 PM

Look at all my stars!!
Group Icon
Elite
6,799 posts

Joined: Jan 2003

QUOTE(djandrew @ Jan 3 2019, 06:40 PM)
what u mean bro the new IPC from intel? u mean the next upcoming intel processor?
*
da current gen.. is a sham.
its still based on a 6th gen skylake. improvement has been clockspeed, few more pcie lane on pch chipset, usb 3.1, and finally 9900k optimization for meltdown/specter.. but da cpu single thread clock to clock about the same...

the next gen we been looking at dmi 4.0, intel says double the instruction per cycle etc.. so...

cstkl1
post Jan 30 2019, 02:28 PM

Look at all my stars!!
Group Icon
Elite
6,799 posts

Joined: Jan 2003

QUOTE(owikh84 @ Jan 27 2019, 09:35 PM)
Apparently stability at 4700 is still possible with 1.50v, just need to give the IMC more juice of VCCSA at 1.55v ...

DDR4-4700 CL19-22-22-42-2T @ 1.50v
user posted image

As a bonus, 4800 is also bootable[/B]

DDR4-4800 CL19-22-22-42-2T @ 1.55v
user posted image
*
gila punya orang 1.55v
cstkl1
post Jan 30 2019, 10:50 PM

Look at all my stars!!
Group Icon
Elite
6,799 posts

Joined: Jan 2003

QUOTE(owikh84 @ Jan 30 2019, 07:18 PM)
Actually, it's normal for that RAM speed
For 4500+, ROG default BIOS sets this VCCSA at 1.60v.  blink.gif
5000+ single stick air needs 1.70v-1.75v.
*
hmmmm. betcha compensating for something..

oh well when dmi 4.0 mobo come out will go with z470-z490
cstkl1
post Aug 8 2019, 12:09 PM

Look at all my stars!!
Group Icon
Elite
6,799 posts

Joined: Jan 2003

QUOTE(allsick @ Aug 8 2019, 11:06 AM)
I've only used llc 6, any higher increases the temps by too much. My 9900k isn't the best one, 1.325v in bios for 4.9ghz avx0. Temps up to 90+ during stress test with x72.

Vcore during stress drops to 1.243v with llc6. What gives?

Specs:
9900k P0 stepping
XI Hero on latest bios
X72
2080Ti
*
loadline differs on every cpu.
some requires more some requires less .
cstkl1
post Nov 29 2019, 11:08 PM

Look at all my stars!!
Group Icon
Elite
6,799 posts

Joined: Jan 2003

QUOTE(keyo @ Nov 29 2019, 08:12 PM)
only cam set 3200 14 cannot go higher lastime mix e die +b die can  go 3700 c16
if dual channel ok quad cannot go anywhere
*
whats the cpu and mobo

cstkl1
post May 11 2020, 10:06 AM

Look at all my stars!!
Group Icon
Elite
6,799 posts

Joined: Jan 2003

from info
MY all da ROG boards available.. EXTREME, FORMULA, HERO.. and some APEX boards...

THe issue now is the ETA on the 10900k or KF...

cstkl1
post May 11 2020, 03:16 PM

Look at all my stars!!
Group Icon
Elite
6,799 posts

Joined: Jan 2003

sorry no apex board...

extreme, formula, hero, Strix E/G, TUG PLus, Prime Plus, Creator 10g..

cstkl1
post May 11 2020, 08:17 PM

Look at all my stars!!
Group Icon
Elite
6,799 posts

Joined: Jan 2003

QUOTE(owikh84 @ May 11 2020, 07:57 PM)
My source says Apex is coming but in very limited unit.
Extreme $750 - RM 3429
Formula $500 - RM 2409
Apex $420 - RM 2025
Hero Wifi $400 - RM 1986

10900K no ETA yet, but hard to guess the price cos back then 9900K was launched here at RM2.8k while 9900KS @ RM2.4k. rclxub.gif
*
err apex should be same as hero no..?? 🤔so most of da pricing will be mrsp usd x 4.3+gst + another rm50-150

hero vs formula.
is that extra two phase going to matter in this country climate ..
and seeing that the extreme has a fan mount for the vrm which is same as formula.. so means formula needs active cooling aka water.. ??
what i dont like about da formula is limited pcie 1x/4x slots.. cause i tend to use soundcard/sata card/extra nic etc.. also hero based on website spec.. theres a switch for the two of the m.2 whether u want from pch or cpu..

also will asus purposely nerf hero or even formula bios in favor for extreme/apex.. they done this in the past for memory training etc..

for retailers.. u buy mobo now in advance.. if da cpu u want comes only later in limited quantities.. then they say only bundled with mobo or full system.. (i expect the former).. then how?? all holding shiny new z490 preorder and cant even get the cpu..

only reason i am looking at intel cause lazy to reinstall windows since using intel raid...

cpu pricing i dont think will be crazy.. fence sitters will just shift to amd if intel cpus are priced aggressively.

also da rumour mill the z490 chipset can support pcie 4.0.. sure or not.. amd has to die fab the thing smaller.. uses more power.. and pch gets hot and needs active cooling..

my wc cooling in this country on moderate ac.. can handle 300w of cooling for cpu provided the die/ihs is big enough to transfer the heat.. 10900k i am very curious on this aspect
no ac .. all arnd 1.25v
8700k 5ghz 70s.. delid
9900k 5ghz 80s.. delid
10900k 5ghz 90??? skylake architecture tends to have leakage above 80.. so overvolt might be neccessary for long term but there is a fine tuning between vcssa/vccio for this also..

This post has been edited by cstkl1: May 11 2020, 08:49 PM
cstkl1
post May 11 2020, 11:20 PM

Look at all my stars!!
Group Icon
Elite
6,799 posts

Joined: Jan 2003

QUOTE(nrw @ May 11 2020, 10:12 PM)
So the two of you already seem to be quite committed. Wow.

Motherboards seem to be really lovely this time, lots of tweaking options n very good components.

Regarding DJR I haven't read anything about it yet, but looking at it, it seems to me that they might not be able to tighten timings on lower frequencies. But for Intel it seems to be a nice alternative. What's the availability & price on these locally?
*
Actually no.
Navi high chance will require pcie 4.0 and if ampere specs are true.. they might go pcie 4.0..
Amd current cpu ipc has a 10-15% lead (3950x ipc is faster than 3700x cause of cache etc and how infinity fab works with ram)... thats y u see a single threaded 5ghz 9900k almost equal to a 4.5ghz 3950k in cinebench..

Its reason for loss in gaming is because of latency via its infinity fabric.. but its been getting better and better since 1st gen ryzen.

But y multi core important. I record my video in 4:4:4 and frequently upload/dowload max 200/800 mbps.. on my 10900x just doing this can use up 20% of my cores and with the record and playing vermintide.. it can hit 70%..Sometimes theres remuxing/audio with unrars going on the background from rared tvshows/movies to transfer to my plex via network.. this already hitting 1gbps.. and makes cpu load even higher. ..

So amd 3900x/3950x should be superb on this. The reason atm is the cost of those mobos put alot of ppl off. But if intel think they can price z490 like x570 and have a lack of supply for 10900k.. theres gonna be more ppl buying into amd.

Ram overclocking is a few weeks/months phase. Most ppl dont care.

Look at this vid


So the review boards for 10900k is the m12e and gay Extreme Ultra. Both cost more than the cpu. Its beginning to show that this cpu oc needs a crazy vrm..
Also they didnt ship out any i7 as thats just a 9900k..so that means even on oc wont differ much.. so that kindda gives you a preview of 10900k binning.. its not that much of a diff ..

These are already signs.

Also here are dumbest youtubers who know shit about intel cpu and benching


Y is he a dumb ass. A 9900k 5ghz is arnd 2200. Cinebench scales very good on intel skylake and current 2nd gen amd.
So a 5ghz 10900k is arnd 2750 and each .1 increase is arnd 60 depending on mem bandwidth/latency. 10900k has higher bandwidth and more cores so should be arnd 75-80 so 3k cinebench about correct for 5.4ghz So no idea y this dumbass is disappointed. Its EXACTLY as expected.
What i am curious is that 23xx score. Its not 4.8ghz all core. If was to guess its arnd 4.4-4.5ghz.. and thats about right to comply to a 125w tdp...

Y isnt intel going head to head with amd on cores with multi die.
Intel beliefs in all core one die. Amd took a gamble with first gen ryzen with infinity fab and its paying off big time. They are doing smaller fabs on the die fab but bigger nm fab on the infinity fab.
Alderlake suppose to counter this with 8 main + 8atom cores. However i think the single threaded ipc gains cant compete with ryzen or even sub skylakes like 9900k/10900k .. so thats y u see a sudden mesh architecture for x299 for work/productivity and z series for gaming etc.
seems like being no 1 for gaming is a must for intel. So until they get the clocks up on alderlake.. wont be seeing any fight. Also afaik these uses lga 1700.. so again z490 aint gonna last.

Ram oc.. ddr5 incoming with two stages clocks... so

This post has been edited by cstkl1: May 11 2020, 11:49 PM
cstkl1
post May 12 2020, 01:12 PM

Look at all my stars!!
Group Icon
Elite
6,799 posts

Joined: Jan 2003

QUOTE(nrw @ May 12 2020, 12:12 AM)
Short story right there 😉
Yeah I'm staying on Zen2 or at least AM4 myself until Meteor Lake comes to light which will be when I reevaluate.

Short addition to your words on IF. Zen3 should get latency further down as there will be 8 cores per ccx eliminating cross talk via IO. So yeah, steady improvement. 3100 cs 3300 is a great preview on this. Shared cache and IO interference vs exclusivity and no rerouting. Now AMD are mostly still compensating with caches.

The intel boards (not looking at the price) are however quite nice. But saying that up there I wasn't implying I was positively taken by the CPU's.

The most exciting thing probably is ASRock making a run again and allowing TDP to be adjusted for 65W chips on non z boards to 125W and by that raising base frequency (hence BFB). Lets see if Intel is allowing it this time. I have a feeling given the competition they might.
*
10900k .. buying or not buying atm is all depends on the mobo price.

Msi shared some binning results. Apparently is 1 out of 3 chance approximately u get a better than spec, spec and below spec. I am assuming they are talking about the all core 4.8ghz/5.3ghz thermal velocity all core boost..
1.2v the avg for 5ghz..

Power/heat 4.8 its already 23xwatts.. in this country thats a bye bye aio. U need a ac and custom wc already.

This post has been edited by cstkl1: May 12 2020, 02:56 PM
cstkl1
post May 12 2020, 04:12 PM

Look at all my stars!!
Group Icon
Elite
6,799 posts

Joined: Jan 2003

edit.. hmm heard open test bench dat 10900k with aio 240 can do 5.1ghz...on a strix.. so u all know who it is..

hmm maybe a hero can handle this.. so wondering now about formula..

also ekwb launched a crazy terminal thing to join its velocity block to the vrm ports .. via bridge..
https://www.ekwb.com/custom-loop/momentum-vrm-bridge/

This post has been edited by cstkl1: May 13 2020, 11:30 AM
cstkl1
post May 16 2020, 12:21 AM

Look at all my stars!!
Group Icon
Elite
6,799 posts

Joined: Jan 2003

QUOTE(owikh84 @ May 15 2020, 09:12 PM)
10900K @ 5.0GHz ~ 80-87c on 240mm AIO ft. ROG Strix Z490-A mobo.


Only Z490 Extreme supports PCIe4 on the M.2 port.
user posted image
Source: https://www.cool3c.com/article/153618
*
oh that one we know why cause that dimm m.2 uses pcie 3.0 atm one from pch and another from the cpu.. so the cpu will lose out on the pcie 16x for gpu
so not surprising it can do pcie 4.0. think it was kit guru or oc3d that mention the pcie 3.0 from cpu...

but the issue for next gen is.. whats the point the dmi will will be 3.0 and the chipset all will be 3.0..

this upgrade part i think no point as we all know what happen with sandy bridge before vs ivy bridge...
z490 nobody gonna use the next gen cpu on this and always intel will optimize some power config that will force u to buy the next chipset...



user posted image
HERO

1 x M.2_1 socket 3, with M key, type 2242/2260/2280/22110 storage devices support (SATA & PCIE 3.0 x 4 mode)*3
1 x M.2_2 socket 3, with M key, type 2242/2260/2280 storage devices support (PCIE 3.0 x 4 mode)*4
1 x M.2_3 socket 3, with M key, type 2242/2260/2280/22110 storage devices support (SATA & PCIE 3.0 x 4 mode)
CODE

*2 The PCIEX16_3 shares bandwidth wih M.2_2. The PCIEX16_3 will be disabled when M.2_2 runs x4 mode.
*3 When M.2_1 is operating in SATA mode, SATA6G_2 will be disabled.
*4 M.2_2 shares bandwidth with PCIEX16_3. When M.2_2 runs x4 mode, PCIEX16_3 will be disabled. When M.2_2 runs x2 mode, PCIEX16_3 runs x1 mode.
*5 M.2_3 shares bandwidth with SATA6G_56. When M.2_3 is populated SATA6G_56 will be disabled.

user posted image
FORMULA

1 x M.2_1 socket 3, with M key, type 2242/2260/2280/22110 storage devices support (SATA & PCIE 3.0 x 4 mode)*4
1 x M.2_2 socket 3, with M key, type 2242/2260/2280 storage devices support (PCIE 3.0 x 4 mode)*5
1 x M.2_3 socket 3, with M key, type 2242/2260/2280 storage devices support (PCIE 3.0 x 4 mode)*6
CODE

*2 The PCIEX16_3 shares bandwidth wih M.2_3. When M.2_3 runs x4 mode, PCIEX16_3 will be disabled. When M.2_3 and PCIEX16_3 are both occupied, M.2_3 runs x2 mode, PCIEX16_3 runs X1 mode.
*3 The PCIEX1 shares bandwidth with M.2_1. When M.2_1 runs x4 mode, PCIEX1 will be disabled.
*4 M.2_1 shares bandwidth with PCIEX1. When PCIEX1 is occuppied, M.2_1 runs x2 or SATA mode (when M.2_1 runs SATA mode, SATA6G_2 will be disabled).
*5 M.2_2 shares bandwidth with SATA6G_56. When M.2_2 runs x4 mode, SATA_56 will be disabled. M.2_2 runs x2 mode by default.
*6 M.2_3 shares bandwidth with PCIEX16_3. When PCIEX16_3 runs x4 mode, M.2_3 will be disabled. When M.2_3 and PCIEX16_3 are both occoppied, M.2_3 runs x2 mode, PCIEX16_3 runs X1 mode.

user posted image
EXTREME

1 x ROG DIMM.2 Module supports 2 M.2 Socket 3 , with M key, type 2242/2260/2280/22110 storage devices support (PCIE 3.0 x 4 mode)*2
Intel® Z490 Chipset :
1 x M.2_1 socket 3, with M Key, Type 2242/2260/2280 (PCIE 3.0 x4 and SATA modes) storage devices support*3
1 x M.2_2 socket 3, with M key, type 2242/2260/2280 storage devices support (PCIE 3.0 x 4 mode)
CODE

*1 PCIEx4 slot shares bandwidth with SATA6G_56 and PCIEx4 slot is default set at x2 mode. Please adjust BIOS settings to enable Thunderbolt card.
*2 The DIMM.2 Slots are disabled by default. Please adjust BIOS settings to enable DIMM.2 Slots.
*3 When M.2_1 is operating in SATA mode, SATA6G_2 will be disabled.
*4 USB 3.2 Gen 2x2 works at PCIe 3.0 x2 speeds


and ahem dat 5.1ghz reference was about ahem that pic... that person claimed.. p95 26.6

This post has been edited by cstkl1: May 16 2020, 12:31 AM
cstkl1
post May 16 2020, 11:16 AM

Look at all my stars!!
Group Icon
Elite
6,799 posts

Joined: Jan 2003

All the manuals for msi and asus are up..
user posted image user posted image

Hmm atm formula looks better .. can run
Two nvme 4x + optane (2x) + soundcard +2hdd

Hero a bit vague atm.

This post has been edited by cstkl1: May 16 2020, 11:21 AM
cstkl1
post May 17 2020, 11:26 PM

Look at all my stars!!
Group Icon
Elite
6,799 posts

Joined: Jan 2003

QUOTE(djandrew @ May 17 2020, 04:36 PM)
Thx bro yeah good idea replicate the qvl list i didnt think of it..
My this new bought ram is galax oc lab master 3600mhz (17-18-18-38)
By the way i have tried 4000mhz 17-18-18-38 but the latency is worst than 3900mhz with the same timing haha. Very weird right? lol.. i reset cmos few times already and is the same result. So i stick with 3900mhz..
*
Get the ram speed stable with the vcssa/vccio. Then only tweak the main timings with slight adjustment on vcssa/vccio. Also at this point u can gauge main vs secondary timings diff (tref.. trfc.. tfaw)

Vcssa/vccio voltages can affect cpu/ucore voltage vice/versa.

What affects vcssa/vccio is related to rtl/iol pairing with tcl/twcl pairing.

Cl17-17-17-37 Binned bdies dont do well on cl19 .. because of twcl.. they fab cl17 to cl 14.. cl18 is somewhat passable.

My experience in giga master z390 board. Dont always use that relax memory training preset.. it actually makes things worse .. try diff training preset..

Another note. Found this today
Ignore the 3900x ..



So is that a oced or stock velocity all core boost 4.9ghz@1.25v. But the temps look pretty damn good for vietnam.
Dat cpu should be able to do 5.1 easy.


Intel has done some optimization here..



This post has been edited by cstkl1: May 17 2020, 11:36 PM
cstkl1
post May 18 2020, 12:19 PM

Look at all my stars!!
Group Icon
Elite
6,799 posts

Joined: Jan 2003

https://idealtech.com.my/2020/05/11/malaysi...got-it-first-2/


cstkl1
post May 18 2020, 08:23 PM

Look at all my stars!!
Group Icon
Elite
6,799 posts

Joined: Jan 2003

QUOTE(owikh84 @ May 18 2020, 07:35 PM)
10900K vs 3900X vs 3950X

user posted image

user posted image

user posted image

Soruce: https://www.bilibili.com/video/BV1ZC4y1H7NC/
*
Abit nutty eh this reviewer

His ran high ram clock tight timings for ryzen with high flck
But the 10900k only 4kc18 with probably stock uncore (4.3).. suprised he didnt do 4400c18 with uncore 4.9ghz
To make the imc pushing part more or less at peak for both intel and amd.

This post has been edited by cstkl1: May 18 2020, 08:23 PM
cstkl1
post May 19 2020, 08:43 PM

Look at all my stars!!
Group Icon
Elite
6,799 posts

Joined: Jan 2003

i wonder.. is it because of the insane phase/vrm config atm that contributing to super stable power delivery by distributing the heat...

ASUS
EXTREME 16x90A
FORMULA/APEX 16x70A
HERO 14+2 x 60A
STRIX 14+2 x 50A

MSI GODLIKE 16+1 x 90A
MSI ACE 16 + 1 x 90A
MSI UNIFY 16 x 90A
MSI UNIFY ITX 8 x 90A

GIGA EXTREME/WATERFORCE/MASTER - 16 x 90A
GIGA MASTER - 14 x 90A
GIGA AUROUS ULTRA - 12 x 55A

ASROCK Taichi 12+3 x 50A

the numbers are just nuts... for a possible 300w cpu.
some of the vrm/phases are like those on the refreshed x299 / TRX4

MSI going all out with 90Amps

just for comparison
the z390 formula hd like 8+2 phase 50A....


This post has been edited by cstkl1: May 19 2020, 09:14 PM

4 Pages < 1 2 3 4 >Top
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0612sec    0.28    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 28th November 2025 - 05:15 PM