BitDefender is better than Avast. For those who are using Windows Defender, best if you at least upgrade to something else. Even most free AV is better than Windows Defender.
What AV are you using with Windows 10?
|
|
 Sep 3 2015, 12:38 AM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
 
Junior Member
636 posts Joined: Jul 2005 
|
|
Quote|
|
Sep 3 2015, 06:08 PM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
|
Junior Member
636 posts Joined: Jul 2005
|
QUOTE(horns @ Sep 3 2015, 11:35 AM) i have more than one av engines. i just don't run them for default real-time protection, because i find wd interferes the least when i work. People don't really care about that. As long as you don't need to pay for it and it works, that is good enough. I've been using BitDefender free for almost 3 years now. Suprisingly good for a free product. It only inteferes when I'm running cracked codes. Other than that it will just sit at the background silently.for home users, yes i think it's better to use other free av for real-time protection. (i don't really call it free, since subscribing to these free av usually means you contributing by submissions of so-called suspected files, urls, etc. to them. 'm just saying)  |
|
|
Sep 3 2015, 06:31 PM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
|
Junior Member
636 posts Joined: Jul 2005
|
QUOTE(horns @ Sep 3 2015, 06:21 PM) Haha true not many care about privacy Some will AV allow crack code if it doesn't have any code deemed malicious. Mostly for application that doesn't use online features. Plus, if we use cracked code, we should know and understand the risk ourself. yes i use bitdefender free on one machine. It's not bad in terms of system resources.I thought all av will interfere when you use cracks, but that's not my main concern. |
| Change to: |  0.0158sec
 0.50
 6 queries
 GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 12th December 2025 - 06:40 AM |
All Rights Reserved © 2002- 2025 Vijandren Ramadass (~unite against racism~)
Powered by Invision Power Board © 2025 IPS, Inc.