Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Fund Investment Corner, Please share anything about Fund.

views
     
dreamer101
post May 15 2007, 10:16 PM

10k Club
Group Icon
Elite
15,855 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(leekk8 @ May 14 2007, 10:13 AM)
David83,

If you know about share, sure better you find out which 5 stocks mentioned by dreamer and invest in stock directly.
Only for those who has no single idea about stock, if they want to invest in mutual funds, they can invest in dividend funds.

Realty Agents,
According to your signature, it states dealers wanted. How you can say dealers are sleeping partner?
How you can guarantee 25% return per month?
*
leekk8,

<<Realty Agents,
According to your signature, it states dealers wanted. How you can say dealers are sleeping partner?
How you can guarantee 25% return per month?>>

If it is TOO GOOD to be true, it is NOT TRUE. If someone can get 25% per month, why does he/she needs you?? He/she will borrow money from whoever and whatever to make more than enough for himself/herself. Why share?

Dreamer
dreamer101
post Jul 2 2007, 11:59 PM

10k Club
Group Icon
Elite
15,855 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(ejleemy @ Jul 2 2007, 10:00 PM)
There are high-risk, low-risk, government backed and many fancy fancy bonds. Yes, it's possible to lose money with bonds when going after high risk bonds. Generally if your conservative bond fund strategy is going after shorter term bonds, the yield is almost guaranteed higher than FD and the variance would be much smaller as the risk exposed is less as well. If you have checked the record of the local islamic bonds, they are very safe (but not 100% safe) and provide a consistent return of higher than FD rate.
*
<<the yield is almost guaranteed higher than FD and the variance would be much smaller as the risk exposed is less as well. >>

Yes, short term bond has lower interest rate. But, the key word here is "almost".

If you invest on your short term bond today and Bank Negara announces an interest rate hike tomorrow, you still lose money on the principal of your bond.

The key here is risk adjusted return. Do you get compensated enough in the term of return for taking this kind of risk??

If FD is 3.7% and the bond bond is 5%, is it worthwhile for you to take that kind of risk for 1.3% per year more?

You have to answer this kind of question for yourself.

We are at a historical low in term of interest rate. IMHO, interest rate will only goes up or stay at current level. So, the bond fund will not be doing well.

Dreamer
dreamer101
post Jul 3 2007, 10:28 AM

10k Club
Group Icon
Elite
15,855 posts

Joined: Jan 2003

dreamer101
post Jul 26 2007, 03:42 PM

10k Club
Group Icon
Elite
15,855 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(utellme @ Jul 26 2007, 03:34 PM)
this is not from PM, it's advertised in STAR today and it's from maybank . 
capital guarrentee minimun 8% for 3 yrs and 9 month.
is don't performance, I still can get  8%/ 3.75 = 2.133 % per annum woh.

Went to maybank brand just now, all SA not available (mssing in action)  sad.gif
*
utellme,

So what?? If you instead of investing 100% of your money in UT, you put X% in FD and Y% in UT and (X + Y) = 100%, you could create a capital guarantee fund for yourself.

With FD, you get at least (3.7% X 3 ) = 11.1%.

So, if you do all the maths, you could have figured out what is X and Y.

For example, you could have put 90% of your money in one year FD and 10% in UT.

Know how to calculate. If not, people could take money from you and you will not even know it.

Dreamer

P.S.: I am NOT recommending that you buy UT. I am just showing you how to compare this capital guarantee fund to something that you can do it yourself.

This post has been edited by dreamer101: Jul 26 2007, 10:39 PM
dreamer101
post Jul 26 2007, 10:44 PM

10k Club
Group Icon
Elite
15,855 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(utellme @ Jul 26 2007, 03:56 PM)
I didn't manage to speak to the SA yet and so I don't know how much is their commission. 
just got the investment booklet from the counter and the projection is 32.5% for the 3.75 years.
of course projection is always based on history performance. sometimes history can't quarentee future performance. 

normally UT charges me ard 6% upfront.  hmm.gif
*
<<just got the investment booklet from the counter and the projection is 32.5% for the 3.75 years.
of course projection is always based on history performance. sometimes history can't quarentee future performance. >>

With the stock market going on 30% per year now, they are projecting 30% over 3 years. Where the money goes??

<<normally UT charges me ard 6% upfront. hmm.gif>>

I assume now that you figure out you are paying some X% upfront too.

Dreamer
dreamer101
post Jul 27 2007, 03:01 AM

10k Club
Group Icon
Elite
15,855 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(utellme @ Jul 26 2007, 11:59 PM)
<I assume now that you figure out you are paying some X% upfront too.>

Found out from SA, there is not upfront charge and what I need to pay is RM20 Stamp duty.
*
utellme,

What can I say?? Some people just cannot read between the lines.

Dreamer
dreamer101
post Jul 27 2007, 07:52 PM

10k Club
Group Icon
Elite
15,855 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(cherroy @ Jul 27 2007, 07:15 PM)
Reit is definitely another good alternative for those want higher yield than FD but don't want exposure too much risk. Yup, locally it is restricted only a few choice, but at least a start better than none. Late is not an good excuse why it is not doing well. We need to compete and fast react to market need, otherwise surely lose behind.

The reason why reit market is not performing as well:

1. Too high withholding tax (15% for local, 20% for foreigners) compared to regional market (Singapore, 0% for local, 10% for foreigners)
2. Rules are not relaxed enough like foreigner can't hold more than 50%, leverage % to add in new properties etc.
3. some interest conflict when large shareholder treat reit as disposal of properties to retailers while the biggest tenant is themselves.
4. Size is too small to attract foreign interest.

1 & 3 (especially 3) is the biggest obstacle current for Reit market to flourish, otherwise it is a good alternative investment tool which its risk/return criteria some sort sit in between FD and stock market.
*
cherroy,

Beyond FD, so far, I have NOT seen a better low risk investment than buying PBB whenever it is on sale. PBB dividend yield at this moment (at high price) is better than REIT.

Dreamer
dreamer101
post Jul 28 2007, 09:44 AM

10k Club
Group Icon
Elite
15,855 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(ejleemy @ Jul 28 2007, 08:56 AM)


Added on July 28, 2007, 9:03 am
Hmm. can't compare a stock with a property like that... for people who doesnt wish to participate in stock market, it is not an option already..

I realized the tax around with REITS... a stock or mutual fund declared dividend will be taxed too, could be lower of course depends on the person tax bracket. I think even with the REITs 15% tax, its still profitable. Huge redemption occurs in every UT, not just REITs. There are some precautions taken by the management companies for example for public mtuual, one needs direct approval from the fund manager if he plans to invest over x mil. (2 mil if the figure if my memory doesnt fail me) amount into 1 fund.

10% return minus the 1.5% to tax = 8.5% return

not bad at all for people who do not take stock market risk.
*
ejleemy,

You do UNDERSTAND that REIT is some kind of stock too. And, the MAIN attraction of REIT is HIGH DIVIDEND YIELD. Most of the income/return from REIT is because of the dividend. There is LESS possibility of return of appreciation from the property.

From this standpoint, you can compare REIT with high dividend yield stock. REIT yield at this moment is around 5% or less. PBB dividend yield is around 6%. And, PBB's profit is growing at around 20% per year. REIT has lower dividend yield than PBB plus the capital appreciation is lower. So, why buy REIT??

Dreamer
dreamer101
post Jul 29 2007, 01:56 AM

10k Club
Group Icon
Elite
15,855 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(ejleemy @ Jul 28 2007, 10:45 AM)
Its true that REITs trade on exchange, but it's not a stock. It's a real estate investment trust. It invests in property. The real property like KLCC, starhill, UOA etc. A good stock or a good stock portfolio certainly give higher yield than a property investment in long run. But a stock and a real estate are 2 different things you see ?
*
<<A good stock or a good stock portfolio certainly give higher yield than a property investment in long run.>>

ejleemy,

Not true in general. Usually, REIT has higher yield than stock. It has to because it has less likelihood of appreciation than dividend yielding stock. The reason is it has to pay out 90+% of its profit. This is one of the reason why Malaysian REIT is not attractive as an investment at this moment. Malaysian REIT is overpriced now.

For example, in developed market like USA, a typical blue chip stock yield around 3%. A typical REIT yield around 4.5% to 5%.

In Malaysia REIT market, I believe the yield has to be around 7% to 8% before you can start considering REIT as possible investment for the risk that you are taking.

Dreamer
dreamer101
post Aug 26 2007, 08:38 AM

10k Club
Group Icon
Elite
15,855 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(David83 @ Aug 26 2007, 08:20 AM)
Pressure to cut unit trust upfront fees

PETALING JAYA: Pressure is mounting for unit trust upfront sales charges to be reduced as new players emerge.

The matter was also brought up by the Employees Provident Fund (EPF). In recent talks with the Federation of Malaysian Unit Trust Managers (FMUTM) and its members, EPF asked them to consider lowering the charges to facilitate investment in unit trusts.

Industry observers said with Tune Money and InterPacific Asset Management Sdn Bhd coming onstream, there was greater pressure to lower the upfront fees and this should bode well for the investing public.

It is also learnt that EPF, in the past two to three months, had proposed to FMUTM that the maximum sales charges for unit trust investment be capped at 3% as opposed to the average 5% to 6%.

Sources said FMUTM had appealed to the Finance Ministry, saying the EPF's proposed charges were too low and that the federation would consider lowering the charges gradually.

The dispute is expected to continue and the pressure is growing in every meeting between the EPF and the federation, according to an observer.

The latest player to join the unit trust league is InterPacific, which currently does not impose any upfront sales charges. Tune Money, meanwhile, plans to launch funds online with zero or minimal sales charges.

With the entrance of these players, competition is getting intense and fund houses will need to review their charges to ensure they are able to sustain the public's interest in investing with them, according to an industry observer.

By not imposing any upfront fees, a unit trust management company can fully invest their clients' money in the funds, they added.

Sources said many fund houses were not very keen on the EPF proposal to reduce the charges as it would affect their distributors' income, leading to lower sales volumes. At present, many of them sell funds via agents and banks (as third-party distributors).

It is estimated that 60% to 70% of unit trust management companies sell funds through agents and banks. As of May 31, there were 39 unit trust management companies with a total 462 approved funds.

An observer, however, said while the industry trends might lead to a gradual lowering of upfront fund charges, distributors could still succeed by growing their assets under management over the long term.

They could do this by being more productive and further elevating their capability to ensure long-term retention of customers, he added.

URL: http://biz.thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?f...52&sec=business
*
David83,

The pressure will come from ETF.

Dreamer
dreamer101
post Sep 17 2007, 11:44 PM

10k Club
Group Icon
Elite
15,855 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(lwb @ Sep 15 2007, 07:26 PM)
i seriously doubt there're investment pro here..
not many people make a full time living out from their investment..

there keen investors here.. hardly a pro. so any rendition of advices you received, take it with a pinch of salt.. mine included..

we are all here trying to make sense on how money works and it's erratic behaviors..
*
lwb,

A) <<i seriously doubt there're investment pro here..>>

B) <<not many people make a full time living out from their investment.. >>


As far as I know, (A) and (B) do not goes together. My brother is FIRE (Financially Independent Retired Early). So, he is (B). But, he is not (A). Ditto for my sister.

In fact, what I found the most is (A) most likely cannot be (B).

Most people that are FIREed know their limitation on investment skill. They stay with the investment that they know. In most cases, that is more than enough for them to be FIRE.

Dreamer
dreamer101
post Sep 22 2007, 10:37 PM

10k Club
Group Icon
Elite
15,855 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(Jutawan @ Sep 21 2007, 10:48 PM)
I like investment vehicle that really pays.
*
FD pays. It is just a question of how much.

Dreamer
dreamer101
post Dec 23 2007, 05:49 AM

10k Club
Group Icon
Elite
15,855 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
All,

http://www.marketwatch.com/News/Story/quar...301D1E3E7E8D%7D

Google "Lazy Portfolio Farrell" to learn the concept of lazy portfolio aka Asset Allocation Model in simplistic way.

1) If you have a good asset allocation model that you are comfortable with. You could have open an USA online brokerage A/C and buy ETF that invest all over the world across multiple asset classes. The fee is only tradiing cost and annual fee is less than 1%.

2) If you follow asset allocation model and rebalance annually, you will always sell high and buy low.

3) If you can invest on all 4,000 largest public listed companies around the world with low fee (low fee) ( VTI + VEU), so why try so hard??

This is what I call investing. Something that you can do and go to sleep for 5 years without checking.

I appreciate all the money that you are giving me since I own PBB stock. But, there are better way out there. Even for KLSE, you could have buy an ETF that invest on largest 30 companies in KLSE with very low cost.

Dreamer
dreamer101
post Dec 23 2007, 07:43 PM

10k Club
Group Icon
Elite
15,855 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(howszat @ Dec 23 2007, 01:54 PM)
Can you recommend some names for USA online brokers? I have been looking at a few brokers websites, but of course you cannot believe everything you read on the web. smile.gif
*
etrade. I think they have a Singapore office too.


Dreamer
dreamer101
post Jan 18 2008, 11:06 AM

10k Club
Group Icon
Elite
15,855 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(leekk8 @ Jan 18 2008, 10:56 AM)
By saying 5 years or 10 years, unit trust normally give average annual return of 10%-12% for high risk fund.

Don't expect 1000% return in a year from unit trust...even share also not quite possible...Try magnum 4D, maybe can...
*
leekk8,

Are you talking about Malaysia domestic UT?? If you do, do you think Malaysia economy will survive the next recession?? If not, all bets are off. There will be no recovery..

Dreamer
dreamer101
post Jan 21 2008, 10:46 AM

10k Club
Group Icon
Elite
15,855 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(leekk8 @ Jan 21 2008, 10:31 AM)
I refer to all the UTs in general...I believe Msia economy will still survive the next recession. Economy recession is normal in economy cycle, even it takes time, from history, we know Msia economy will recover...
*
leekk8,

Is this based on hope or solid facts?? We used OIL MONEY to bail out the economy for the last two recessions. We no longer have that luxury. So, what makes you think we can recover from recession without OIL MONEY?? If the past performance is the indicator, we will not.

That is what you should learn from history if you bother to look.

Dreamer
dreamer101
post Jan 21 2008, 12:31 PM

10k Club
Group Icon
Elite
15,855 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(JinXXX @ Jan 21 2008, 12:20 PM)
so last time we have oil money to help us.. not oil is running out.. and what is there to help us ?i mean the economy, any ideas ? , dreamer any idea what the government will use to replace the oil to help with the economy?
*
JinXXX,

1) Who cares about the government or Malaysia?? The CORRECT question should be can you survive if Malaysia's domestic economy goes to hell? If not, what you need to do to prepare for this. You and your family had 20 to 30 years to prepare for this.

2) There is NO us. The last time that I check, I received absolutely ZERO HELP from Malaysia over the past 20 to 30 years.

Dreamer
dreamer101
post Jan 22 2008, 11:17 AM

10k Club
Group Icon
Elite
15,855 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(leekk8 @ Jan 22 2008, 10:38 AM)
So, if this is the case, what's your best advice to Msia investors? Withdraw all the investment and put in FD?
*
leekk8,

If you have been reading all my posts, you would have know that

1) I ONLY buy one counter in Malaysia. I do not consider the REST of the KLSE worth putting money in. So, IMHO, domestic UT is useless and too costly.

2) I diversify my investment all over the WORLD.

Dreamer

P.S.: In the end, you have to take all the data and decide what to do next. My counter survive 97/98 recession very well. So, I know I can go to sleep for 5 years with this counter. My advice is a caution to you. Do not assume that Malaysia can recover this time.

This post has been edited by dreamer101: Jan 22 2008, 11:20 AM
dreamer101
post Jan 25 2008, 09:31 AM

10k Club
Group Icon
Elite
15,855 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(leekk8 @ Jan 24 2008, 11:21 AM)
I know from your previous posts that you only buy 1 counter in Msia, and I also buy this counter.
Anyway, I know you mainly invest in US, now most people saying that US market is going into bear, what will you do?
*
leekk8,

<<Anyway, I know you mainly invest in US, now most people saying that US market is going into bear, what will you do?>>

Let's get this straight. I have a US mutual fund A/C. In that A/C, I buy index fund that invest all over the world. And, the asset class that I invest on are

1) US stocks -> 2000 largest companies in USA

2) World stocks -> 2000 largest companies in the world outside of USA

3) US REIT index -> All REITs in USA aka real estate

4) World REIT -> REITs outside of USA

5) US bonds -> 3000 bonds in USA aka total bond market.

So, my money is spread all over the world. I do not care what happen in any individual stock market. And, if ALL stock markets go to hell, usually bonds will do well. And, it is spread across many asset classes. Plus, I have 5 years worth of living expenses in savings as reserve.

What is missing is bond index fund outside of USA.

This is what we call asset allocation model. This is what is really call investing.

By the way, I have no sales load and annual maintenance fee is 0.27%.

Dreamer

http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/lazy...%7D&dist=hpmymw

See above article.

This post has been edited by dreamer101: Jan 25 2008, 09:36 AM
dreamer101
post Jan 25 2008, 11:23 AM

10k Club
Group Icon
Elite
15,855 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(keith_hjinhoh @ Jan 25 2008, 09:58 AM)
Since we have no access or limited access to US broker or funds, I guess the best alternative would be a listed companies like Genting, PBBank, YTL where they have their investment all over the world and we're holding a shares in listed companies that have access to all over the world.

In term of asset allocation, too bad, we just can access to our own countries REIT and bonds. Unless we buy mutual funds where mostly charge 7.5% sales charge and 1.25% on annual maintenance.
*
keith_hjinhoh,

<<Since we have no access or limited access to US broker or funds, >>

You are WRONG!! Anyone with a few K in USD can open a US brokerage A/C over the Internet. And, they could buy ETF which is the stock version of mutual fund.

<< In term of asset allocation, too bad, we just can access to our own countries REIT and bonds. Unless we buy mutual funds where mostly charge 7.5% sales charge and 1.25% on annual maintenance.>>

Do you even read the URL that I posted?? There is an ETF version of the asset allocation. And, you can do that with US brokerage A/C.

Do not assume that you know EVERYTHING. The CORRECT attitude should be "there must be a way" aka "CAN DO". Do a few googles and you would found out.

Dreamer

3 Pages < 1 2 3 >Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.2992sec    0.40    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 10th December 2025 - 06:41 PM