Choosing olympus epl7, sony a6000, and rx100mk3, budget =rm2500 and below
|
|
 Aug 10 2015, 11:19 AM, updated 11y ago
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
 
Junior Member
34 posts Joined: May 2012 
|
hey guys, any suggestions on which camera olympus epl7, sony a6000, and sony rx100mk3 )is of better edge? all of those camera are of below rm2500 and i am not keen on big bulky dslr. semi pro is fine for me? or any further suggestions on other model are more than welcome. thanks
This post has been edited by isaac91: Aug 10 2015, 11:21 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
Aug 10 2015, 03:33 PM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
|
Junior Member
34 posts Joined: May 2012
|
to be honest, i am just wondering between the mk3 and a6000 (with basic kit), would the outcome of picture taken differs alot? especially on colour
|
|
|
Aug 10 2015, 05:13 PM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
|
Junior Member
34 posts Joined: May 2012
|
QUOTE(lwliam @ Aug 10 2015, 12:13 PM) What's your main usage of the camera? What's your expectation of the camera that you'll be buying?  QUOTE(DaddyO @ Aug 10 2015, 12:51 PM) Epl7 and a6000 will add another hundred to thousands to change lens. Interchangable allows better portrait, scenery, macro, all sorts possibilities but cost a lot. If you primarily just point and shoot, rx100 is plenty good. Scenery shots as well as low light is great. But zoom is limiting and the portrait shot is meh. QUOTE(faizalmzain @ Aug 10 2015, 01:54 PM) that's the reason i downgraded to rx100 camera variant because i don't have spare money to buy good lenses, rx100 took sharper images compared to kit lens on interchangeable camera  QUOTE(DaddyO @ Aug 10 2015, 04:57 PM) But if take a look at rx100 shot like in flickr, just feels very point and shoot....ky. Because of sensor size and short zoom there literally almost no subject separation from background. A6000, the kit is meh but paired up with 30 or 50mm prime will see big change. so as the verdict? which one would be a better choice in comparison of all the 3 cameras (with just its basic kit) . i had google the 30mm and 50mm lens that you have suggest and it come about 199usd. But of course really just depends on your artistic style. A6000 is rather expensive piece of gear with subpar kit lens. Other alternative like sony a5100 or nx3300 which i belive <rm2000 can offer some experiment before jumping to serious photography and img quality more less the same as a6000 minus autofocus speed. M4/3 is good as well but sensor size closer to rx100 1" you probably wont notice the bokeh much if you switch. |
|
|
Aug 10 2015, 05:55 PM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
|
Junior Member
34 posts Joined: May 2012
|
QUOTE(lwliam @ Aug 10 2015, 05:31 PM) You have not answered to my question above bro. Giving you advice blindly without knowing your needs is pointless. sorry for my blurness haha. i am looking for an all rounder but utmost it should be nice pic? haha the pictures in your flickr are so awesome!! i supposed it had gone through some editing? the other day i had went over to the sony center to test out this mk3 but it doesnt seems to be that "capable" . the interval between each shots is so long and also the stability as well.(do correct me if i am wrong)This will give you a brief idea on how the rx100m3 is capable of. https://www.flickr.com/photos/williamleong/tags/rx100m3/ |
|
|
Aug 10 2015, 05:56 PM
Return to original view | Post
#5
|
|
Junior Member
34 posts Joined: May 2012
|
QUOTE(DaddyO @ Aug 10 2015, 05:43 PM) All depends. What the camera gonna used for? Sports? Scenery? Kids? Iphone replacement? i just need better pictures quality among this three camera? if possible comparisonvia the basic kit. |
| Change to: |  0.0141sec
 0.48
 6 queries
 GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 24th December 2025 - 09:50 AM |
Quote