If don't like, then sell it off later.
> > - - I-Mobile 902 - - < <, The King of All Camera-Phones!
> > - - I-Mobile 902 - - < <, The King of All Camera-Phones!
|
|
Dec 25 2007, 12:05 PM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
102 posts Joined: Apr 2007 |
Wow, this thread still keep popping up. Most likely I will buy one to try.
If don't like, then sell it off later. |
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 25 2007, 01:06 PM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
102 posts Joined: Apr 2007 |
|
|
|
Dec 29 2007, 09:17 PM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
102 posts Joined: Apr 2007 |
QUOTE(KTCY @ Dec 29 2007, 09:10 PM) Just in hand not more then 48 hours. For night shots, you are suppose to mount the phone/camera on a tripod or rest it on a flat surface. How to hold it for 4 seconds without moving the hands. Have to snap more to learn the night shot. Night shot is really killing. Exposure time 4 seconds is killing my hand |
|
|
Dec 29 2007, 11:11 PM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
102 posts Joined: Apr 2007 |
No doubt. I-mobile 902 takes very good photos.
|
|
|
Dec 29 2007, 11:33 PM
Return to original view | Post
#5
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
102 posts Joined: Apr 2007 |
|
|
|
Jan 2 2008, 10:42 AM
Return to original view | Post
#6
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
102 posts Joined: Apr 2007 |
QUOTE(KTCY @ Jan 2 2008, 12:25 AM) Took 70+ photos, normal call, sms battery can stand for 2+ days. Yes, it was way under exposed. The shutter speed was captured at 1/4 sec. Since you use aperture priority, I wonder why the camera did not use a slower shutter speed like 1 sec.A photo taken minutes ago ![]() ![]() Underexposed again |
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 2 2008, 12:39 PM
Return to original view | Post
#7
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
102 posts Joined: Apr 2007 |
QUOTE(KTCY @ Jan 2 2008, 11:51 AM) Regardless of what type of light condition, the camera should expose the photo to the right value.If you want a brighter photo than normal, then you set +EV or darker photo, you det to -EV. After PS, the photos are very good. |
|
|
Jan 4 2008, 03:12 PM
Return to original view | Post
#8
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
102 posts Joined: Apr 2007 |
Yep, should take the same shot immediately but on different mp.
|
|
|
Jan 6 2008, 09:04 AM
Return to original view | Post
#9
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
102 posts Joined: Apr 2007 |
|
|
|
Jan 6 2008, 10:59 AM
Return to original view | Post
#10
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
102 posts Joined: Apr 2007 |
I got it from The Ampwalk.
These photos were taken this morning. Did not do any PS on them. Comment on the picture quality please. ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
|
Jan 6 2008, 11:09 AM
Return to original view | Post
#11
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
102 posts Joined: Apr 2007 |
I think it is caused by the direct sunlight on the flower.
Have to practice more. |
|
|
Jan 6 2008, 08:17 PM
Return to original view | Post
#12
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
102 posts Joined: Apr 2007 |
|
|
|
Jan 8 2008, 08:55 PM
Return to original view | Post
#13
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
102 posts Joined: Apr 2007 |
QUOTE(tony_chew @ Jan 8 2008, 08:25 PM) Yeah must admit the photos are great on this 902. Still nobody want to help this poor fellow http://www.howardforums.com/showthread.php?t=1271945 Friend, that seller is located in Canada lah. Can he bring the phone to the buyer here for testing?Added on January 8, 2008, 9:35 pmTwo more photos from me. Are they sharp? ![]() ![]() This post has been edited by lokewh: Jan 8 2008, 09:35 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 9 2008, 08:00 AM
Return to original view | Post
#14
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
102 posts Joined: Apr 2007 |
I wonder why all photos taken by this camera phone is at Aperture f2.8 and ISO 50. Is it a standard exif they can show?
|
|
|
Jan 9 2008, 10:58 AM
Return to original view | Post
#15
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
102 posts Joined: Apr 2007 |
|
|
|
Jan 10 2008, 09:26 PM
Return to original view | Post
#16
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
102 posts Joined: Apr 2007 |
Took some macros this afternoon.
![]() ![]() |
|
|
Jan 10 2008, 09:52 PM
Return to original view | Post
#17
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
102 posts Joined: Apr 2007 |
|
|
|
Jan 11 2008, 08:57 AM
Return to original view | Post
#18
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
102 posts Joined: Apr 2007 |
QUOTE(KTCY @ Jan 11 2008, 01:11 AM) Sorry but to disappoint you. Anything above ISO-50 seems got noise. I use attachment so that you can view it in full size mode as the photo reach 1.8MB. When I save your photo, it becomes a .bmp file with a size of 14.4MB!!!!![attachmentid=376330] Above ISO 50, noise will definitely be there. That is why most of the time, this camera-phone take photos at ISO 50. |
|
|
Jan 11 2008, 09:08 AM
Return to original view | Post
#19
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
102 posts Joined: Apr 2007 |
QUOTE(dragna @ Jan 11 2008, 09:02 AM) Well, I click to enlarge the photo on post # 1020. After that I right click and choose Save Picture As. The next pop up window only give me an option for .bmp file with filename as Untitled.Nevertheless, no Exif info on the photo. |
|
|
Jan 11 2008, 09:27 AM
Return to original view | Post
#20
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
102 posts Joined: Apr 2007 |
QUOTE(KTCY @ Jan 11 2008, 09:22 AM) I already mentioned. KTCY,Most likely upload to LYN server kill of the EXIF. How many times do I have to post the same thing over and over again Don't get so hot up on the Exif info. That info is secondary. What I am surprised is that when I save the photo, it becomes a .bmp file with a file size of 14.4MB |
| Change to: | 0.0521sec
0.50
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 30th November 2025 - 08:51 PM |