QUOTE(xtorm @ Jan 9 2008, 04:36 PM)
Yup, I think they're OK. If fancy editing with Photoshop, a little more contrast will do, and ever so slightly little more brightness. > > - - I-Mobile 902 - - < <, The King of All Camera-Phones!
> > - - I-Mobile 902 - - < <, The King of All Camera-Phones!
|
|
Jan 9 2008, 04:42 PM
Return to original view | Post
#21
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
892 posts Joined: Sep 2007 From: Behind you... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 9 2008, 10:21 PM
Return to original view | Post
#22
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
892 posts Joined: Sep 2007 From: Behind you... |
Very nice pictures KTCY!
What's the exposure time on all these photos? I think need very steady hands right? Did you try ISO200 with EV-0.5~-1 (or even -2)? Should have the shutter operate in shorter time although noisier, I'm curious about the ISO performance as CCD normally has lower noise than CMOS. I didn't go hunt for the phone today as I only go Pavilion to play around with the Nokia set I'm looking at for my father, see which one is better. Going to hunt tomorrow at sg wang or lowyat hopefully some shop got la... EDIT: Just check the EXIF, 4 sec on ISO50, obviously ISO50 has very low noise but is it more than 4 sec shutter time? This post has been edited by pigcat: Jan 9 2008, 10:24 PM |
|
|
Jan 9 2008, 10:25 PM
Return to original view | Post
#23
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
892 posts Joined: Sep 2007 From: Behind you... |
|
|
|
Jan 9 2008, 10:35 PM
Return to original view | Post
#24
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
892 posts Joined: Sep 2007 From: Behind you... |
if tomorrow I can't get the imobile then I might just get the Nokia 2630...Or ask my father again see which one he prefer, and get from Seaedge (but since only 3 units, guess many people will bid on it lol)...Oh well...
|
|
|
Jan 10 2008, 12:08 AM
Return to original view | Post
#25
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
892 posts Joined: Sep 2007 From: Behind you... |
I saw ghost lol! Damn impressive night shots...
...But I still wonder how a fast night mode shot will do...My N95 is usually 1/5sec on night shots with ISO800. This post has been edited by pigcat: Jan 10 2008, 12:35 AM |
|
|
Jan 10 2008, 01:02 AM
Return to original view | Post
#26
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
892 posts Joined: Sep 2007 From: Behind you... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 10 2008, 01:24 AM
Return to original view | Post
#27
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
892 posts Joined: Sep 2007 From: Behind you... |
QUOTE(KTCY @ Jan 10 2008, 01:12 AM) Yeah lo, can't do anything what. QUOTE(shockk @ Jan 10 2008, 01:21 AM) Sure can only 1GB? Put in 2GB also no use? Then I think buy something else for my father lo... Added on January 10, 2008, 1:25 am QUOTE(dragna @ Jan 10 2008, 01:03 AM) Because my father definitely need more than that and I'm very sure about it. Even me also cannot accept it. This post has been edited by pigcat: Jan 10 2008, 01:25 AM |
|
|
Jan 10 2008, 01:50 AM
Return to original view | Post
#28
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
892 posts Joined: Sep 2007 From: Behind you... |
So sad ler...
By the way if you want to ask me why 1GB not enough, cause I lazy to delete and transfer at first, bringing more than satu keping 1GB card for extensive photo shooting during a (for example) 7 days vacation and above ain't enough and bringing more memory cards is quite troublesome for me as I can lost it quite easily. And most importantly, I love to store many videos since this phone is also capable of playing videos, moreover got video out so if want to show friends many photos 1GB cannot really fit in... It's just me though, so don't take my personal opinion so seriously, this is still a superb phone afterall, just didn't quite meet my need. My father also like that one lol. This post has been edited by pigcat: Jan 10 2008, 01:53 AM |
|
|
Jan 10 2008, 01:22 PM
Return to original view | Post
#29
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
892 posts Joined: Sep 2007 From: Behind you... |
Bump for you...
Yeah post the bulk in sales section and put the very big link in your sig. I think I don't join this bulk lo, my father desperately need a phone to use... |
|
|
Jan 11 2008, 12:41 AM
Return to original view | Post
#30
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
892 posts Joined: Sep 2007 From: Behind you... |
|
|
|
Jan 11 2008, 12:55 AM
Return to original view | Post
#31
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
892 posts Joined: Sep 2007 From: Behind you... |
|
|
|
Jan 11 2008, 01:09 AM
Return to original view | Post
#32
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
892 posts Joined: Sep 2007 From: Behind you... |
|
|
|
Jan 11 2008, 01:47 AM
Return to original view | Post
#33
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
892 posts Joined: Sep 2007 From: Behind you... |
QUOTE(KTCY @ Jan 11 2008, 01:11 AM) Sorry but to disappoint you. Anything above ISO-50 seems got noise. I use attachment so that you can view it in full size mode as the photo reach 1.8MB. Thanks for the effort! [attachmentid=376330] Yeah I can see there're lots of noises, more than I thought in the first place... This post has been edited by pigcat: Jan 11 2008, 01:47 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 11 2008, 02:12 AM
Return to original view | Post
#34
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
892 posts Joined: Sep 2007 From: Behind you... |
I can't read the EXIF too, when download by "save target to" all I get was only 700kb JPEG and the EXIF all lost...So dunno what's the ISO setting for the picture. Can you check check, KTCY?
|
|
|
Jan 11 2008, 11:25 AM
Return to original view | Post
#35
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
892 posts Joined: Sep 2007 From: Behind you... |
|
|
|
Jan 11 2008, 04:37 PM
Return to original view | Post
#36
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
892 posts Joined: Sep 2007 From: Behind you... |
|
|
|
Jan 11 2008, 05:16 PM
Return to original view | Post
#37
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
892 posts Joined: Sep 2007 From: Behind you... |
QUOTE(shockk @ Jan 11 2008, 05:08 PM) Wow. 5 people already asking want to buy. Then can fill up the bulk set seaedge is offering, why not? DSLR got already. xD iPhone bulk no news yet. I'd rather get ipod touch + keeping the 902, at least warranty no worries and got best of both world... |
|
|
Jan 13 2008, 02:21 PM
Return to original view | Post
#38
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
892 posts Joined: Sep 2007 From: Behind you... |
QUOTE(xtorm @ Jan 13 2008, 01:59 PM) http://www.cameras.co.uk/camera-reviews/ph...-70&title=Canon IXUS 70 I find no problem with the pictures in the link you posted... seem like imobile 902 even capture pics better then ixus70 the ixus70 seems to have problem capturing white on bright sunlight like my u600 ixus is 7.1mp ccd, its arond rm800++ any expert on digicam please coment abt the quality of picture taken by 902 compare to digital cam... To my eyes 902 is some kind of overprocessed but in a good way, the ixus pictures look more natural. This post has been edited by pigcat: Jan 13 2008, 02:23 PM |
|
|
Jan 13 2008, 02:57 PM
Return to original view | Post
#39
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
892 posts Joined: Sep 2007 From: Behind you... |
QUOTE(shockk @ Jan 13 2008, 02:43 PM) hmm. i don't think it is suitable for that. indoor shots are very hard to do with the 902 as you have to keep your hands super stable and you must make sure your subject (especially people) are completely still to get a good shot. this is what bugs me the most as the 902 cannot use high ISO like other phone cams. That's why I asked KTCY to do a high ISO shot and post it up for this very simple reason. plus, the xenon also works at short range only, and it is not strong enough to be used as a fill-flash like real digicams. regarding the flash, is it same with N82 or weaker? Cause from what I saw N82 seems to have super strong flash consider it's a camera phone... |
|
|
Jan 13 2008, 03:50 PM
Return to original view | Post
#40
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
892 posts Joined: Sep 2007 From: Behind you... |
QUOTE(shockk @ Jan 13 2008, 03:33 PM) I can't tell the difference. I asked my bro about the 902 flash and he says even my K800i's flash was brighter. Yup the N82 flash shots a lot are ISO-800. But strange thing is with the same ISO-800 N82 seems to perform better than N95...Which makes the N82 even better for flash photos... On photographs, the flash will seem stronger for other phones as I believe they are using high ISO than the 902. |
| Change to: | 0.0401sec
1.13
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 1st December 2025 - 01:06 AM |