Between Mosel Vitelic & Elpida chip, which one is better for Pentium4 overclocking?
Mosel Vitelic & Elpida, DDR1, DDR-400
|
|
 Nov 8 2006, 09:29 PM, updated 20y ago
Show posts by this member only | Post
#1
|
 
Senior Member
1,443 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: ......   
|
|
Quote|
|
|
|
|
Nov 8 2006, 09:56 PM
Show posts by this member only | Post
#2
|
Senior Member
1,405 posts Joined: Jun 2005 
|
QUOTE(Lemon @ Nov 8 2006, 09:29 PM) Between Mosel Vitelic & Elpida chip, which one is better for Pentium4 overclocking? vitelic 5ns?.. i got one doing 250 @ 3-3-3-5-1T @ 2.75VDimm b4.. 250 should be ok for P4 i think unless it was 2.4C.. |
|
|
Nov 9 2006, 02:20 PM
Show posts by this member only | Post
#3
|
 
Elite
5,784 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Shah Alam
|
Yeap, the Mosels are decent overclockers. Not sure of the Elpidas as i've not tried 'em b4
|
|
|
Nov 9 2006, 07:15 PM
Show posts by this member only | Post
#4
|
Senior Member
1,058 posts Joined: Apr 2006 From: Penang , Malaysia
|
hard to get Elpida chipset ram.
Elpida chipset is formerly known as Hitachi Semicon chipset |
|
|
Nov 13 2006, 07:54 PM
Show posts by this member only | Post
#5
|
Senior Member
7,173 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: PCH
|
QUOTE(Lemon @ Nov 8 2006, 09:29 PM) Between Mosel Vitelic & Elpida chip, which one is better for Pentium4 overclocking? i used to have this RAM Chip before i sell it  not too long time ago, IMO, Mosel Vitelic is better than Elpida, i tried to run 250MHz on Elpida, it doesnt work even loosening the timing or increase vDIMM (Kingston KVR Elpida RAM Chip), while on Corsair PC3200 2-3-2-6 Version 5.2 (Silver one) -- this uses Vitelic, and i must say, overclocking is good, but not that good, i can go high as 245MHz, perhaps bad chip or bad mobo  |
| Change to: |  0.0160sec
 0.30
 5 queries
 GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 29th November 2025 - 07:35 AM |
All Rights Reserved © 2002- 2025 Vijandren Ramadass (~unite against racism~)
Powered by Invision Power Board © 2025 IPS, Inc.