Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 NVIDIA GeForce Community V15 (new era pascal), ALL HAIL NEW PASCAL KING GTX1080 out now

views
     
Unseen83
post Aug 22 2015, 11:01 PM

TooFAT4U 2Handle!
*******
Senior Member
2,337 posts

Joined: Dec 2008
From: KING CANNEL JB


QUOTE(shikimori @ Aug 22 2015, 10:48 PM)
My rig suddenly auto shutdown with burning smell . When try to turn on again no power but if removed the card got power

Had to wait for 2 weeks till replacement
*
unsure.gif gosh... gtx 980 Ti Ref.. die oledy.. sad.gif xx well my R9 fury X send his condolence... guess tho super high clock oc got it limit.. eh ? but bright side you got brand new GTX 980 Ti 3 cooler rclxms.gif
Unseen83
post Aug 22 2015, 11:30 PM

TooFAT4U 2Handle!
*******
Senior Member
2,337 posts

Joined: Dec 2008
From: KING CANNEL JB


QUOTE(shikimori @ Aug 22 2015, 11:22 PM)
biggrin.gif thank you kind fury x owner . I hope my former 980 ti ref will rest in pieces peace  .

The new card barely make any sound finally !!!! thumbup.gif  no more hair dryer

Asic is around 71 is this okay ?
*
eh haha icon_rolleyes.gif no need la oc to 1.4GHz, Fury x not chasing you... my fury x cant go higher 1.2Ghz.. game or bench crash.. lolx but temp is under 60C.. doh.gif is good to game 6-8 hour temp still under 60c smile.gif x

ppl on youtube says higher is good for OC



add-on GPU with HBM do not support ASIC... unsure.gif

This post has been edited by Unseen83: Aug 22 2015, 11:31 PM
Unseen83
post Sep 1 2015, 04:35 AM

TooFAT4U 2Handle!
*******
Senior Member
2,337 posts

Joined: Dec 2008
From: KING CANNEL JB


QUOTE(ngkhanmein @ Sep 1 2015, 12:00 AM)
http://www.guru3d.com/news-story/nvidia-wa...n-settings.html

"Currently is seems that Nvidias Maxwell architecture (Series 900 cards) does not really support Asynchronous compute in DX12 at a proper hardware level. Meanwhile AMD is obviously jumping onto this a being HUGE and they quickly prepared a PDF slide presentation with their take on the importance of all this. Normally I'd share add the slides into a news item, but this is 41 page of content slides, hence I made it available as separate download.

In short, here's the thing, everybody expected NVIDIA Maxwell architecture to have full DX12 support, as it now turns out, that is not the case. AMD offers support on their Fury and Hawaii/Grenada/Tonga (GCN 1.2) architecture for DX12 asynchronous compute shaders. The rather startling news is that Nvidia's Maxwell architecture, and yeah that would be the entire 900 range does not support it. I can think of numerous scenarios as to where asynchronous shaders would help."
*
but but Nvidia says...

http://blogs.nvidia.com/blog/2015/01/21/wi...10-nvidia-dx12/

" We’re more than ready. GPUs built on our Maxwell GPU architecture – such as our recently released GeForce GTX 970 and GeForce GTX 980 – fully support DX12. "

This post has been edited by Unseen83: Sep 1 2015, 05:06 AM
Unseen83
post Sep 1 2015, 06:20 PM

TooFAT4U 2Handle!
*******
Senior Member
2,337 posts

Joined: Dec 2008
From: KING CANNEL JB


QUOTE(ngkhanmein @ Sep 1 2015, 11:35 AM)
support doesn't mean will include everything cool2.gif
*
the Quote: Focus on "Fully support" cool2.gif

We’re more than ready. GPUs built on our Maxwell GPU architecture – such as our recently released GeForce GTX 970 and GeForce GTX 980 – fully support DX12.

http://blogs.nvidia.com/blog/2015/01/21/wi...10-nvidia-dx12/

This post has been edited by Unseen83: Sep 1 2015, 06:20 PM
Unseen83
post Sep 1 2015, 10:18 PM

TooFAT4U 2Handle!
*******
Senior Member
2,337 posts

Joined: Dec 2008
From: KING CANNEL JB


QUOTE(Demonic Wrath @ Sep 1 2015, 08:41 PM)
Funny how NVIDIA actually losses performance when going for DX12 API at Ashes of Singularity benchmark.. maybe they optimized their DX11 drivers too well?

Support async or not, what's important is the actual FPS of the game.. if anyone is quoting Ashes of Singularity benchmark saying AMD has better implementation, check again.. R9 390X is also performing close to R9 Fury too. (source: http://www.pcgameshardware.de/Ashes-of-the...tX-11-1167997/) It is just that AMD DX11 implementation is so bad that it makes DX12 looks very good.

One thing we know for sure, currently NVIDIA has the market share (82%!). Who knows what will happen to future DX12 games, especially those GameWorks titles.
*
yeah funny indeed... but NVIDIA is telling/pressure Oxide to disable async compute/shader feature on the bench.

" The rather startling news is that Nvidia's Maxwell architecture, and yeah that would be the entire 900 range does not support it in the way AMD does. I can think of numerous scenarios as to where asynchronous shaders would help."

http://www.guru3d.com/news-story/nvidia-wa...n-settings.html

add-on: oh bro your signature correction on "MSI NVIDIA GeForce GTX970 Gaming 4GB GDDR5" is 3.5GB GDDR5 icon_rolleyes.gif

This post has been edited by Unseen83: Sep 1 2015, 10:20 PM
Unseen83
post Sep 1 2015, 11:51 PM

TooFAT4U 2Handle!
*******
Senior Member
2,337 posts

Joined: Dec 2008
From: KING CANNEL JB


QUOTE(Minecrafter @ Sep 1 2015, 11:25 PM)
I've seen some of these for the past months since the GTX970's "RAMgate"... biggrin.gif

It has 4GB GDDR5,but 3.5GB is fast,0.5GB is slow.

No need to make a big problem out of it. wink.gif
*
oh so total 4GB but on separate partition/speed 3.5GB on faster or ads speed meanwhile 0.5gb on slow or half ads speed hmm.gif okay thanx for that info biggrin.gif

QUOTE(Demonic Wrath @ Sep 1 2015, 11:21 PM)
Huh? You mean the GTX970 has physically only 3.5GB GDDR5? Ok...thanks for info
*
naah i was wrong.. gtx 970 have total 4gb gddr5 laugh.gif
Unseen83
post Sep 1 2015, 11:56 PM

TooFAT4U 2Handle!
*******
Senior Member
2,337 posts

Joined: Dec 2008
From: KING CANNEL JB


QUOTE(JohnLai @ Sep 1 2015, 11:46 PM)
Wait until you tell him that GTX970 has only 1.75 MB L2 Cache and 56 ROP instead of marketed 2MB and 64 ROP.

Because of 970 memory segmentation, the GPU VRAM bandwidth is effectively 196GB/s due to 224bit bus width.
Originally it is advertised to have 224GB/s and 256bit bus width.
*
ohmy.gif really.. wow.. i did not know that also.. hmm imagine i almost go for GTX970 Sli in exchange R9 290x crx
Unseen83
post Sep 2 2015, 10:45 AM

TooFAT4U 2Handle!
*******
Senior Member
2,337 posts

Joined: Dec 2008
From: KING CANNEL JB


QUOTE(Demonic Wrath @ Sep 2 2015, 08:50 AM)
Since both all graphics hardware vendor doesn't have a card that can fully support DX12, just wait till 2016 or 2017 to get a full DX12 feature support card.. but then again, maybe that time got DX12.1 feature?

Edit: For those who really needs full DX12 support, just wait till DX12 games are released first then only see benchmarks..
*
but but.. AMD never Claim to fully Support DX12, meanwhile Nvidio proudly claim it's Maxwell FULLY DX12 support" but like you said.. Nvidia own 82% market so got all money so maybe they can pay off game dev to delay using dx12.. while they conjure up pascal, but at the end is about one dishonest company fool its customer/fan... sad.gif
Unseen83
post Sep 4 2015, 05:45 PM

TooFAT4U 2Handle!
*******
Senior Member
2,337 posts

Joined: Dec 2008
From: KING CANNEL JB


QUOTE(ngkhanmein @ Sep 2 2015, 11:35 AM)
i saw ur post so many times, ini kali-lah ur statement, i fully agreed with u. NV purposely pay them to delay. i believe pascal is fully support DX12 but for maxwell users lain kali-lah.

maxwell is partially support for testing purpose on DX12 only. this is a game goin release soon which is favor AMD but look at NV performance really disaster.

i'm curious 980Ti can hit 6GB vram at the peak???  hmm.gif

i remembered NV TOM claimed above 970 is fully support DX12
*
or it could be lie from Oxide and AMD as they working together to bring down Nvidia... is like how Nvidia told game dev add gamework that cripple gpu performance hmm .. hmm.gif



https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=FaWbDpEuuk

This post has been edited by Unseen83: Sep 4 2015, 05:47 PM
Unseen83
post Oct 3 2015, 08:21 PM

TooFAT4U 2Handle!
*******
Senior Member
2,337 posts

Joined: Dec 2008
From: KING CANNEL JB


QUOTE(crash123 @ Oct 3 2015, 02:11 PM)
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «

Just buy a GTX 980Ti Lightning, cant update the status coz being banned for 3 days.LOL
This card is so huge and full speed fan is silent. Never exceed 70c OC when gaming. But what disappointed me is the OC potential is so low. My old MSI 6G is better. And the score for 3dmark is the same for both card and pros of this card is more silent and more cooler. Should I RMA this card? cry.gif
*
nice... this gpu matching with MSI OC mobo , wah you change your system.. again.. hm
Unseen83
post Mar 13 2016, 12:45 PM

TooFAT4U 2Handle!
*******
Senior Member
2,337 posts

Joined: Dec 2008
From: KING CANNEL JB


QUOTE(skylinelover @ Mar 11 2016, 01:00 PM)
Haha already install will test after office laugh.gif rclxms.gif
*
hm does it explode your gpu ? if it does do take picture of it devastation!
Unseen83
post Mar 13 2016, 12:47 PM

TooFAT4U 2Handle!
*******
Senior Member
2,337 posts

Joined: Dec 2008
From: KING CANNEL JB


QUOTE(defaultname365 @ Mar 9 2016, 12:41 PM)
Best course of action - - stay away from 364.47 and 364.51.

http://wccftech.com/nvidia-users-beware-la...vers-damage-pc/

user posted image

EVERYTHING FROM FREEZES TO MELTED CARDS
http://www.destructoid.com/don-t-install-t...cs-347362.phtml

Best to rollback to 362.00 and stay safe. At least for me.

I have a tendency to update to latest drivers as soon as available (even BETA lol..) Well, no more.  sweat.gif
*
hmm.gif where desperado when you need them...

Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0249sec    0.70    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 3rd December 2025 - 04:55 PM