Talk islam with WSJ?

AHAHAHAHAHAHAHHA

dat mental image when suddenly Najib high-fives Hadi

Kuat jilat ni

lel..media spin confirm..he said bijan only need 2 witness or valid document..SOS from video..bodonye TS

whats the different ??? 2 witness or 4 witness ??...

the point,.. how is this fair ??... WSJ reporter and investigator is non muslim,.. u go read read syariah,.. non muslim can be witness ah ???

apa lj pon mesti tarik religion keluar

apa boleh buat... hadi kata tu ikut hukum syariah hudud

mayb caveman like butt rape?

jgn gitu bro...

maybe tok guru will keluar from grave and cekik him

additional requirement:-

1. witness must be 'adult' 'male' 'muslim'

2. court must be shariah compliant.

four trustworthy witnesses, ok?



This post has been edited by Milupa: Jul 7 2015, 07:11 PM

These "4 witnesses" rule is getting old, and it's not really can be applied now

The effects of ustard wal retards are shining through

Hehehe nak tumpang glamor lettew....

When u tot the bodoh sudah habis. Got even more bodoh

1) MMO article was based on the interview done by Astro Awani, and yet the article did not mirror the interview. Now pin point to me exactly when did Hadi claimed that 4 witnesses are NEEDED for this WSJ allegation to be implicated against Ah Jib?

2) In the Astro Awani video, if your BM comprehension and listening skills are well polished, the statement DID NOT mention that in order to implicate Najib, 4 witnesses are needed. What's needed are FAIR WITNESSES. Wouldn't fair witness be a paramount element in administering justice properly?

Have you forgotten the notion and human right of "Everyone is innocent until proven guilty"? I fuken hate Ah Jib and his govt for his failure to steer the country's economy into better terms, but I prefer that everyone should receive equal opportunity to defend himself in the eyes of law.

3) My "f" word only detract the reward I wish to have, not nullify it. What could batal my puasa are, eating drinking having sex during the fasting period.

This post has been edited by MsGaijin: Jul 7 2015, 07:38 PM

ain't this splitting hair ???

how is Hadi wanting this case some witness as syariah compliance, is justice ???.. WSJ reporter and investigator eligible as witness in syariah ???

This post has been edited by Special Agent: Jul 7 2015, 07:42 PM

who still have faith in PAS.

Insaf lah

can't imagine what will happened if we let this kind of clown to rule Malaysia

7 pages, and i am not going to read thru this drivel by an uneducated moron.

what i know, after nik aziz, i am never going to vote for PAS ever again.

ps : i voted for them in the last 2 elections.

This post has been edited by this issit!: Jul 7 2015, 07:55 PM

minta penyokong Hadi komen sikit.....

So this thread is going to be how many pages later?

Preparing popcon perisa kurma now

Where the fuck in the interview that this need to be trialed in Syariah court?

This post has been edited by MsGaijin: Jul 7 2015, 08:12 PM