This post has been edited by MsGaijin: Jul 7 2015, 04:46 PM
(news) WSJ must produce four witnesses, Hadi says, PAS = PAS Also Songlap???
(news) WSJ must produce four witnesses, Hadi says, PAS = PAS Also Songlap???
|
|
Jul 7 2015, 04:42 PM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
![]()
Junior Member
30 posts Joined: Dec 2008 |
Here to the gullible sheep, make sure to brush up your BM.
This post has been edited by MsGaijin: Jul 7 2015, 04:46 PM |
|
|
Jul 7 2015, 04:51 PM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
![]()
Junior Member
30 posts Joined: Dec 2008 |
|
|
|
Jul 7 2015, 04:59 PM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
![]()
Junior Member
30 posts Joined: Dec 2008 |
QUOTE(eXTaTine @ Jul 7 2015, 04:29 PM) Behaving like a BN component party now....already got bought over? Are you sure that's what Hadi said? Or what MalayMailOnline.....inferredhttp://m.themalaymailonline.com/malaysia/a...t-najib-hadi-sa KUALA LUMPUR, July 7 — International business daily Wall Street Journal (WSJ) needs to provide at least four trustworthy witnesses to back its graft allegations against Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak, PAS president Datuk Seri Abdul Hadi Awang said. Citing the same position his party took in Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim’s sodomy case, Hadi said Islam dictates that these four witnesses are necessary to validate the newspaper’s report last week which claimed that some US$700 million (RM2.6 billion) from state investor 1Malaysia Development Berhad (1MDB) had been channelled to Najib’s private accounts. “Our stand is the stand of Islam. If four witnesses are needed for Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim’s case, then it is the same with the allegations against Najib, there has to be witnesses...fair witnesses. “We follow the fundamentals of Islam, what is good we support, what is not we oppose,” Hadi was quoted saying in Astro Awani today after performing tarawih prayers at a Ramadan event in Kota Baru. On Friday, the WSJ reported that 1MDB investigators have discovered five separate deposits from two sources that were allegedly made into Najib’s accounts, citing government documents that it claimed to have viewed. The largest two transactions, it said, were for US$621 million (RM2.3 billion) and US$61 million allegedly made in March 2013, shortly before the tumultuous Election 2013 in May. A further transfer of RM42 million, purportedly made into Najib’s account at the end of 2014 and the beginning of 2015, is believed to have come from SRC International Sdn Bhd, a former subsidiary of 1MDB that was in 2012 parked under the Finance Ministry that Najib heads, WSJ said. The exposé led to immediate calls for a thorough investigation by opposition leaders, who also demanded that Najib be relieved from his duty until the probe is over. Attorney-General Tan Sri Abdul Gani Patail announced Saturday a special task force is currently investigating the alleged money trail that involves several companies that purportedly channeled the funds to Najib’s bank accounts, including SRC International, Ihsan Perdana Sdn Bhd and Gandingan Mentari Sdn Bhd. What's your opinion joe_mamak ? This is what I meant when we were discussing earlier: » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « |
|
|
Jul 7 2015, 05:02 PM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
![]()
Junior Member
30 posts Joined: Dec 2008 |
|
|
|
Jul 7 2015, 05:06 PM
Return to original view | Post
#5
|
![]()
Junior Member
30 posts Joined: Dec 2008 |
|
|
|
Jul 7 2015, 05:11 PM
Return to original view | Post
#6
|
![]()
Junior Member
30 posts Joined: Dec 2008 |
|
|
|
Jul 7 2015, 07:37 PM
Return to original view | Post
#7
|
![]()
Junior Member
30 posts Joined: Dec 2008 |
QUOTE(whyamiblack @ Jul 7 2015, 05:28 PM) 1) MMO article was based on the interview done by Astro Awani, and yet the article did not mirror the interview. Now pin point to me exactly when did Hadi claimed that 4 witnesses are NEEDED for this WSJ allegation to be implicated against Ah Jib? 2) In the Astro Awani video, if your BM comprehension and listening skills are well polished, the statement DID NOT mention that in order to implicate Najib, 4 witnesses are needed. What's needed are FAIR WITNESSES. Wouldn't fair witness be a paramount element in administering justice properly? Have you forgotten the notion and human right of "Everyone is innocent until proven guilty"? I fuken hate Ah Jib and his govt for his failure to steer the country's economy into better terms, but I prefer that everyone should receive equal opportunity to defend himself in the eyes of law. 3) My "f" word only detract the reward I wish to have, not nullify it. What could batal my puasa are, eating drinking having sex during the fasting period. This post has been edited by MsGaijin: Jul 7 2015, 07:38 PM |
|
|
Jul 7 2015, 08:05 PM
Return to original view | Post
#8
|
![]()
Junior Member
30 posts Joined: Dec 2008 |
QUOTE(Special Agent @ Jul 7 2015, 07:41 PM) ain't this splitting hair ??? Where the fuck in the interview that this need to be trialed in Syariah court?how is Hadi wanting this case some witness as syariah compliance, is justice ???.. WSJ reporter and investigator eligible as witness in syariah ??? This post has been edited by MsGaijin: Jul 7 2015, 08:12 PM |
|
|
Jul 7 2015, 08:37 PM
Return to original view | Post
#9
|
![]()
Junior Member
30 posts Joined: Dec 2008 |
QUOTE(Special Agent @ Jul 7 2015, 08:13 PM) Islamic way is talking about justice and fairness. Evidence is paramount! Someone posted in another thread about a pile of documents paraded as evidence, if those documents are legit and expert witnesses can confirm the validity of the documents, then by all means, put Ah Jib behind bars. As straightforward as that, you fken broken radio.This post has been edited by MsGaijin: Jul 7 2015, 08:38 PM |
| Bump Topic Add ReplyOptions New Topic |
| Change to: | 0.0163sec
0.53
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 6th December 2025 - 02:46 PM |