Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

> (news) WSJ must produce four witnesses, Hadi says, PAS = PAS Also Songlap???

views
     
MsGaijin
post Jul 7 2015, 04:42 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
30 posts

Joined: Dec 2008


Here to the gullible sheep, make sure to brush up your BM. icon_idea.gif







This post has been edited by MsGaijin: Jul 7 2015, 04:46 PM
MsGaijin
post Jul 7 2015, 04:51 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
30 posts

Joined: Dec 2008


QUOTE(lukescamwalker @ Jul 7 2015, 04:49 PM)
So which part does he say it need 4 witnesses?
*
what do you think? brows.gif
MsGaijin
post Jul 7 2015, 04:59 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
30 posts

Joined: Dec 2008


QUOTE(eXTaTine @ Jul 7 2015, 04:29 PM)
Behaving like a BN component party now....already got bought over?

http://m.themalaymailonline.com/malaysia/a...t-najib-hadi-sa
KUALA LUMPUR, July 7 — International business daily Wall Street Journal (WSJ) needs to provide at least four trustworthy witnesses to back its graft allegations against Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak, PAS president Datuk Seri Abdul Hadi Awang said.

Citing the same position his party took in Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim’s sodomy case, Hadi said Islam dictates that these four witnesses are necessary to validate the newspaper’s report last week which claimed that some US$700 million (RM2.6 billion) from state investor 1Malaysia Development Berhad (1MDB) had been channelled to Najib’s private accounts.

“Our stand is the stand of Islam. If four witnesses are needed for Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim’s case, then it is the same with the allegations against Najib, there has to be witnesses...fair witnesses.

“We follow the fundamentals of Islam, what is good we support, what is not we oppose,” Hadi was quoted saying in Astro Awani today after performing tarawih prayers at a Ramadan event in Kota Baru.

On Friday, the WSJ reported that 1MDB investigators have discovered five separate deposits from two sources that were allegedly made into Najib’s accounts, citing government documents that it claimed to have viewed.

The largest two transactions, it said, were for US$621 million (RM2.3 billion) and US$61 million allegedly made in March 2013, shortly before the tumultuous Election 2013 in May.

A further transfer of RM42 million, purportedly made into Najib’s account at the end of 2014 and the beginning of 2015, is believed to have come from SRC International Sdn Bhd, a former subsidiary of 1MDB that was in 2012 parked under the Finance Ministry that Najib heads, WSJ said.

The exposé led to immediate calls for a thorough investigation by opposition leaders, who also demanded that Najib be relieved from his duty until the probe is over.

Attorney-General Tan Sri Abdul Gani Patail announced Saturday a special task force is currently investigating the alleged money trail that involves several companies that purportedly channeled the funds to Najib’s bank accounts, including SRC International, Ihsan Perdana Sdn Bhd and Gandingan Mentari Sdn Bhd.
*
Are you sure that's what Hadi said? Or what MalayMailOnline.....inferred

What's your opinion joe_mamak ? This is what I meant when we were discussing earlier:
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «



MsGaijin
post Jul 7 2015, 05:02 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
30 posts

Joined: Dec 2008


QUOTE(whyamiblack @ Jul 7 2015, 04:48 PM)
All about the money.
Did you even watch and listen to what's inside the video? Either I'm perceiving you wrong or you're watching and listening with half a brain.
*
Did you even fucking compare his interview with the title and content of the MMO's article?


MsGaijin
post Jul 7 2015, 05:06 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
30 posts

Joined: Dec 2008


QUOTE(unknown warrior @ Jul 7 2015, 05:03 PM)
Ish Ish Ish.
Puasa ke ko?
*
Yes, kurang sikit pahala for swearing. What to do, who wouldn't be angry seeing gullible idiots... like Najib and sheep~
MsGaijin
post Jul 7 2015, 05:11 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
30 posts

Joined: Dec 2008


QUOTE(whyamiblack @ Jul 7 2015, 05:08 PM)
Yup, of course. Also, your puasa batal.
*
Pffft, learn more before you "batal" my puasa.
MsGaijin
post Jul 7 2015, 07:37 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
30 posts

Joined: Dec 2008


QUOTE(whyamiblack @ Jul 7 2015, 05:28 PM)
Do enlighten. Yeah, the comparison between the 2 sources and your tak batal puasa.
*
1) MMO article was based on the interview done by Astro Awani, and yet the article did not mirror the interview. Now pin point to me exactly when did Hadi claimed that 4 witnesses are NEEDED for this WSJ allegation to be implicated against Ah Jib?

2) In the Astro Awani video, if your BM comprehension and listening skills are well polished, the statement DID NOT mention that in order to implicate Najib, 4 witnesses are needed. What's needed are FAIR WITNESSES. Wouldn't fair witness be a paramount element in administering justice properly?

Have you forgotten the notion and human right of "Everyone is innocent until proven guilty"? I fuken hate Ah Jib and his govt for his failure to steer the country's economy into better terms, but I prefer that everyone should receive equal opportunity to defend himself in the eyes of law.

3) My "f" word only detract the reward I wish to have, not nullify it. What could batal my puasa are, eating drinking having sex during the fasting period.

This post has been edited by MsGaijin: Jul 7 2015, 07:38 PM
MsGaijin
post Jul 7 2015, 08:05 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
30 posts

Joined: Dec 2008


QUOTE(Special Agent @ Jul 7 2015, 07:41 PM)
ain't this splitting hair ???

how is Hadi wanting this case some witness as syariah compliance, is justice ???.. WSJ reporter and investigator eligible  as witness in syariah ???
*
Where the fuck in the interview that this need to be trialed in Syariah court?

This post has been edited by MsGaijin: Jul 7 2015, 08:12 PM
MsGaijin
post Jul 7 2015, 08:37 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
30 posts

Joined: Dec 2008


QUOTE(Special Agent @ Jul 7 2015, 08:13 PM)
so he mean islamic way is talking about westminster system ???
*
Islamic way is talking about justice and fairness. Evidence is paramount! Someone posted in another thread about a pile of documents paraded as evidence, if those documents are legit and expert witnesses can confirm the validity of the documents, then by all means, put Ah Jib behind bars. As straightforward as that, you fken broken radio.

This post has been edited by MsGaijin: Jul 7 2015, 08:38 PM

Bump Topic Add ReplyOptions New Topic
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0163sec    0.53    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 6th December 2025 - 02:46 PM