Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

> Is this the end of standalone cameras?, Retarded fanboys DONT kam in

views
     
TStreblecase
post Jul 6 2015, 04:38 PM, updated 11y ago

IHI
*****
Senior Member
779 posts

Joined: Aug 2009



Apple so confidently puts up billboards the whole world proclaiming those photos on it were shot using the iPhone 6. Now, any photographer will tell you that for such a large photo, the pixels counts & many factors comes into play..aperture, shutter speed, white balance yada yada yada. So, if that's so, why in the world do we need standalone cameras like DSLR, hybrids, compacts etc anymore when a small phone will do. Is it time to throw away standalone cameras?

user posted image

Photos taken from apple.com/worldgallery

user posted image

user posted image

user posted image

This post has been edited by treblecase: Jul 6 2015, 09:13 PM
munak991
post Jul 6 2015, 04:40 PM

ZONIC!
*******
Senior Member
2,746 posts

Joined: Mar 2006
From: 21st century


Possible, cause it didnt state the post process use

They can take 12 pictures and merge with photoshop to produce one freaking billboard picture.

Hopefully this picture summarize your understanding

user posted image

This post has been edited by munak991: Jul 6 2015, 04:40 PM
Perbaman
post Jul 6 2015, 04:40 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
63 posts

Joined: Nov 2011


yes. iphone camera so very gooding. dslr all can bungkus liao
after this tengok la sports like epl la liga bundesliga f1 ferari badminton yang amik gambar kat tepi2 sume use ipon
SUSCosmicMass
post Jul 6 2015, 04:40 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
371 posts

Joined: Jun 2013
From: Between KL to Sacramento.
TS never heard of paranomic photo?
Current Events guy
post Jul 6 2015, 04:40 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Junior Member
966 posts

Joined: Nov 2009
Nah there will always be purists just like any hobby
Boom Mortar
post Jul 6 2015, 04:41 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
227 posts

Joined: Sep 2013
ads got photochop
FireIceCombo
post Jul 6 2015, 04:41 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
206 posts

Joined: Jul 2015
yes, taken with ipon 6. edited with mspaint.
marsupilami
post Jul 6 2015, 04:41 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
313 posts

Joined: Mar 2009
From: ✡ ✈ ▌▌

DSLR way better, cant argue
idoblu
post Jul 6 2015, 04:41 PM

stars for sale
********
All Stars
11,308 posts

Joined: Feb 2008
A7rii > all
DSLR can bungkus soon

This post has been edited by idoblu: Jul 6 2015, 04:42 PM
foohoa
post Jul 6 2015, 04:42 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
981 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: SABAH!!!


that detail u say it can kill standalone camera???
foohoa
post Jul 6 2015, 04:43 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
981 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: SABAH!!!


QUOTE(idoblu @ Jul 6 2015, 04:41 PM)
A7rii > all
DSLR can bungkus soon
*
yes.... a parasite camera, which can support nikon and canon lens, make it more gooding than other rclxms.gif
pinkfoxlulu
post Jul 6 2015, 04:44 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
159 posts

Joined: Jul 2008
From: sunat lazerrrrr


standalone camera is mean forevralone use camera
TStreblecase
post Jul 6 2015, 04:44 PM

IHI
*****
Senior Member
779 posts

Joined: Aug 2009



You guys don't understand? Even if it's shot using a composite of photos, you still don't have lug around a heavy camera. I'm not talking about purist. But for the masses, I don't think they'll bother buying another standalone camera anymore. If the phone can solve the problem of night photography, it's sunset for cameras.
tahfeikei
post Jul 6 2015, 04:44 PM

TALK TO MY ENGRISH
******
Senior Member
1,248 posts

Joined: Feb 2013
From: opis
if you are into photography, you do not need to ask such questions
xtrabite
post Jul 6 2015, 04:45 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
181 posts

Joined: Mar 2009
From: Pengu world


Try capture in low Lightning condition, confirm you want to throw your phone
ichi_24
post Jul 6 2015, 04:45 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
480 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
From: /K/opitiam



Topkek who believe the billboard

Some digging in tar interwebs will enlighten yuo

Filthy goy
SUSSoft Rice King
post Jul 6 2015, 04:45 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
69 posts

Joined: Apr 2015
last time apple says big phone no one wanna use.. lol
TStreblecase
post Jul 6 2015, 04:46 PM

IHI
*****
Senior Member
779 posts

Joined: Aug 2009



QUOTE(tahfeikei @ Jul 6 2015, 04:44 PM)
if you are into photography, you do not need to ask such questions
*
Read my comment above yours.
idunnolol
post Jul 6 2015, 04:47 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,044 posts

Joined: Jun 2008
QUOTE(munak991 @ Jul 6 2015, 04:40 PM)
Possible, cause it didnt state the post process use

They can take 12 pictures and merge with photoshop to produce one freaking billboard picture.

Hopefully this picture summarize your understanding

user posted image
*
how much android paid you to tarnish apple tongue.gif
munak991
post Jul 6 2015, 04:47 PM

ZONIC!
*******
Senior Member
2,746 posts

Joined: Mar 2006
From: 21st century


QUOTE(treblecase @ Jul 6 2015, 04:44 PM)
You guys don't understand? Even if it's shot using a composite of photos, you still don't have lug around a heavy camera. I'm not talking about purist. But for the masses, I don't think they'll bother buying another standalone camera anymore. If the phone can solve the problem of night photography, it's sunset for cameras.
*
The thing with small len,is cannot get shallow depth of field.
24-30 MP picture quality for poster, billboard and a lot more.

You try use iPhone now to shoot night video with high ISO, see how much noise it generated?

If stand alone camera can solve everything, why still need DSLR or even Mirrorless
andymillenium
post Jul 6 2015, 04:47 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
776 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
those who say iphone can can bungkus dslr seriously knows shit about dslr.......
there are way more things that can be done on dslr that cant be done on a iphone cam.....

for point n snap, casual photos i do giv credit to iphone for doing a neat job....other than that...meh...
munak991
post Jul 6 2015, 04:49 PM

ZONIC!
*******
Senior Member
2,746 posts

Joined: Mar 2006
From: 21st century


QUOTE(idunnolol @ Jul 6 2015, 04:47 PM)
how much android paid you to tarnish apple  tongue.gif
*
Android? Im coming from a photographer Point of view.
This is a photography technique, take multiple picture and merge into one on post process

Its a lightroom feature and previous photoshop tools
Check it out your self.

user posted image
tahfeikei
post Jul 6 2015, 04:49 PM

TALK TO MY ENGRISH
******
Senior Member
1,248 posts

Joined: Feb 2013
From: opis
QUOTE(treblecase @ Jul 6 2015, 04:46 PM)
Read my comment above yours.
*
i will still say the same....if you really understand photography, you do not need to compare an iphone with a dslr/csc/compact/etc etc
maraippo
post Jul 6 2015, 04:49 PM

~PoPoPoPoPo~
******
Senior Member
1,165 posts

Joined: Jul 2008
From: Kami's Palace


different lenses give different usage. u try use iphone camera shoot f1 still image can or not?

also different photography have different needs for equipment.

single lens point n shoot maybe ok for simple outdoor casual shoot. but for proper one, still need dslr.

if iphone want to boast, actually nokia have this first with their 41MP camera. and manual setting waaaaay earlier since n8
SUSLVL1NiNjA
post Jul 6 2015, 04:50 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
753 posts

Joined: Dec 2013


iPhone camera is great for its category and size but DSLR still leads the way.

Can your iPhone do this? icon_idea.gif


TStreblecase
post Jul 6 2015, 04:51 PM

IHI
*****
Senior Member
779 posts

Joined: Aug 2009



QUOTE(munak991 @ Jul 6 2015, 04:47 PM)
The thing with small len,is cannot get shallow depth of field.
24-30 MP picture quality for poster, billboard and a lot more.

You try use iPhone now to shoot night video with high ISO, see how much noise it generated?

If stand alone camera can solve everything, why still need DSLR or even Mirrorless
*
Again, I'm not talking about purist. What I'm trying to convey is, the standalone cameras will be trounced by a phone, no matter which brand, for those who don't bother about DSLR, mirror less or even compacts.

QUOTE(andymillenium @ Jul 6 2015, 04:47 PM)
those who say iphone can can bungkus dslr seriously knows shit about dslr.......
there are way more things that can be done on dslr that cant be done on a iphone cam.....

for point n snap, casual photos i do giv credit to iphone for doing a neat job....other than that...meh...
*
I'm not saying phone can bungkus DSLR.
yeelong
post Jul 6 2015, 04:51 PM

K for /K
******
Senior Member
1,218 posts

Joined: Jul 2007
From: Sibu, Cheras Selangor



QUOTE(munak991 @ Jul 6 2015, 04:40 PM)
Possible, cause it didnt state the post process use

They can take 12 pictures and merge with photoshop to produce one freaking billboard picture.

Hopefully this picture summarize your understanding

user posted image
*
ifon talak panorama features??? :hmmm:
whyamiblack
post Jul 6 2015, 04:51 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
70 posts

Joined: Feb 2014
It's advertising. Since when advertising has anything to do with honesty and truth?
ichi_24
post Jul 6 2015, 04:52 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
480 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
From: /K/opitiam



QUOTE(treblecase @ Jul 6 2015, 04:51 PM)
Again, I'm not talking about purist. What I'm trying to convey is, the standalone cameras will be trounced by a phone, no matter which brand, for those who don't bother about DSLR, mirror less or even compacts.
I'm not saying phone can bungkus DSLR.
*
Standalone = not dslr they say

fantasy1989
post Jul 6 2015, 04:52 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,707 posts

Joined: May 2008



yes ..next time your wedding photo etc all use ipong ..dont use dslr
fantasy1989
post Jul 6 2015, 04:53 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,707 posts

Joined: May 2008



QUOTE(yeelong @ Jul 6 2015, 04:51 PM)
ifon talak panorama features??? :hmmm:
*
panorama using static focus (while capturing)

which meant you cant change your focus when u "capturing"
limfreelance
post Jul 6 2015, 04:54 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
343 posts

Joined: Jul 2011
From: Land of SaberLion :3
kotak sudah gulung tikar bai..just the matter of time
fantasy1989
post Jul 6 2015, 04:54 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,707 posts

Joined: May 2008



QUOTE(LVL1NiNjA @ Jul 6 2015, 04:50 PM)
iPhone camera is great for its category and size but DSLR still leads the way.

Can your iPhone do this? icon_idea.gif


*
ipong will show their 4X "DIGITAL" zoom laugh.gif
TStreblecase
post Jul 6 2015, 04:55 PM

IHI
*****
Senior Member
779 posts

Joined: Aug 2009



This is purely a discussion on the viability of cameras being made a dinosaur by the phone. I'm saying this coz there are many camera shops that would have to bungkus soon. It's not like say 5 years back when everyone wants to have a DSLR. For casual photo shoot, I don't think many would bother buying a camera anymore
MR_alien
post Jul 6 2015, 04:55 PM

Mr.Alien on the loss
*******
Senior Member
3,582 posts

Joined: Oct 2007
From: everywhere in sabah



lel....a phone camera beating DSLR?
it can't even win RX100
dnt even mention RX10, RX1, A7, A7R2
yeelong
post Jul 6 2015, 04:55 PM

K for /K
******
Senior Member
1,218 posts

Joined: Jul 2007
From: Sibu, Cheras Selangor



QUOTE(fantasy1989 @ Jul 6 2015, 04:53 PM)
panorama using static focus (while capturing)

which meant you cant change your focus when u "capturing"
*
hmm.gif hmm.gif
munak991
post Jul 6 2015, 04:55 PM

ZONIC!
*******
Senior Member
2,746 posts

Joined: Mar 2006
From: 21st century


QUOTE(yeelong @ Jul 6 2015, 04:51 PM)
ifon talak panorama features??? :hmmm:
*
OMG doh.gif doh.gif doh.gif doh.gif doh.gif doh.gif
I lazy to explain la...

The panorama feature yes......
But iPhone and Android only can take vertical straight line panorama

In advance photo editing. you can merge 50 photos into 1 big ass picture when you need high resolution
consist of vertical, horizontal and also pan merge doh.gif
TStreblecase
post Jul 6 2015, 04:57 PM

IHI
*****
Senior Member
779 posts

Joined: Aug 2009



OK, I think I made a mistake of calling DSLR fags to kam in. Put your butthurt aside & discuss la.
SUSbig[1]
post Jul 6 2015, 04:58 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
632 posts

Joined: Jun 2015
because iphone cannot zoom brows.gif

it is at focal length 28mm brows.gif
fantasy1989
post Jul 6 2015, 04:58 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,707 posts

Joined: May 2008



QUOTE(munak991 @ Jul 6 2015, 04:55 PM)
OMG  doh.gif  doh.gif  doh.gif  doh.gif  doh.gif  doh.gif
I lazy to explain la...

The panorama feature yes......
But iPhone and Android only can take vertical straight line panorama

In advance photo editing. you can merge 50 photos into 1 big ass picture when you need high resolution
consist of vertical, horizontal and also pan merge  doh.gif
*
merge 50 photo into 1

then compress it to 8MP

and claim it captured using ..bla bla phone ...owai
fantasy1989
post Jul 6 2015, 04:59 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,707 posts

Joined: May 2008



QUOTE(big1 @ Jul 6 2015, 04:58 PM)
because iphone cannot zoom brows.gif

it is at focal length 28mm brows.gif
*
who say cannot?


"digital" zoom biggrin.gif
SUSbig[1]
post Jul 6 2015, 04:59 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
632 posts

Joined: Jun 2015
QUOTE(foohoa @ Jul 6 2015, 04:43 PM)
yes.... a parasite camera, which can support nikon and canon lens, make it more gooding than other  rclxms.gif
*
parasite?

how?


neoexcaliber
post Jul 6 2015, 04:59 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
86 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
Photos taken using an iphone but did they mention what kind of supporting gears they also used or who took that photo? Even a potato photo can look good if it's taken by a pro in ideal lighting condition.
yeelong
post Jul 6 2015, 05:00 PM

K for /K
******
Senior Member
1,218 posts

Joined: Jul 2007
From: Sibu, Cheras Selangor



QUOTE(munak991 @ Jul 6 2015, 04:55 PM)
OMG  doh.gif  doh.gif  doh.gif  doh.gif  doh.gif  doh.gif
I lazy to explain la...

The panorama feature yes......
But iPhone and Android only can take vertical straight line panorama

In advance photo editing. you can merge 50 photos into 1 big ass picture when you need high resolution
consist of vertical, horizontal and also pan merge  doh.gif
*
Ayam sorry that ayam causing you butthurt... so much
idunnolol
post Jul 6 2015, 05:01 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,044 posts

Joined: Jun 2008
QUOTE(munak991 @ Jul 6 2015, 04:49 PM)
Android? Im coming from a photographer Point of view.
This is a photography technique, take multiple picture and merge into one on post process

Its a lightroom feature and previous photoshop tools
Check it out your self.

user posted image
*
this is android propaganda biggrin.gif
munak991
post Jul 6 2015, 05:01 PM

ZONIC!
*******
Senior Member
2,746 posts

Joined: Mar 2006
From: 21st century


QUOTE(yeelong @ Jul 6 2015, 05:00 PM)
Ayam sorry that ayam causing you butthurt... so much
*
Not butthurt, just all these feature is is actually available already.
Just programmer make it User friendly, and people thought that it originated from Apple or Android.
ichi_24
post Jul 6 2015, 05:01 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
480 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
From: /K/opitiam



QUOTE(treblecase @ Jul 6 2015, 04:55 PM)
This is purely a discussion on the viability of cameras being made a dinosaur by the phone. I'm saying this coz there are many camera shops that would have to bungkus soon. It's not like say 5 years back when everyone wants to have a DSLR. For casual photo shoot, I don't think many would bother buying a camera anymore
*
Oh just like those anti pc claim pc will die smartphone will rule

When fact is x86 is everywhere, even phone tablet, heck peasant race console grumbly begged using x86 glorious master race platform

Yes it would spell the end in mainstream market but not now not tomorrow maybe in distant future

Heck instead they too like pc transcient into just another form factor

While phone cam just another trendy point and shoot, still nowhere near what dslsr/professional can provide
tahfeikei
post Jul 6 2015, 05:01 PM

TALK TO MY ENGRISH
******
Senior Member
1,248 posts

Joined: Feb 2013
From: opis
wow apple punya marketing impressed TS so much
shyan90's
post Jul 6 2015, 05:02 PM

To Be Old and Wise You Must First be Young and Stupid
******
Senior Member
1,200 posts

Joined: Jun 2015
From: Malaysia


QUOTE(xtrabite @ Jul 6 2015, 04:45 PM)
Try capture in low Lightning condition, confirm you want to throw your phone
*
Same to DSLR but cant admit that DSLR will have more quality...Cause i own dslr and ipon also.... ipon is handphone with addition camera to take photo. DSLR is made to take photo...Spot the differences? So to those who take ipon and pretend want to do photographer and etc. PLS FAGGOT
maraippo
post Jul 6 2015, 05:02 PM

~PoPoPoPoPo~
******
Senior Member
1,165 posts

Joined: Jul 2008
From: Kami's Palace


QUOTE(treblecase @ Jul 6 2015, 04:51 PM)
Again, I'm not talking about purist. What I'm trying to convey is, the standalone cameras will be trounced by a phone, no matter which brand, for those who don't bother about DSLR, mirror less or even compacts.
I'm not saying phone can bungkus DSLR.
*
those walk around in town handing dslr at neck outing with gf etc is hipster lah. they only using auto mode mostly. knows shit about photography.

got good phone camera also will bring dslr for style and showing off.

that trend died oredi. nobody wants to walk around with something heavy hanging round the neck.

SUSbudakdegilz
post Jul 6 2015, 05:02 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,138 posts

Joined: Dec 2006



ifag VS photographer enthusiasts
the clear winner is
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «

tahfeikei
post Jul 6 2015, 05:03 PM

TALK TO MY ENGRISH
******
Senior Member
1,248 posts

Joined: Feb 2013
From: opis
QUOTE(idoblu @ Jul 6 2015, 04:41 PM)
A7rii > all
DSLR can bungkus soon
*
this statement i believe
ichi_24
post Jul 6 2015, 05:03 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
480 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
From: /K/opitiam



QUOTE(fantasy1989 @ Jul 6 2015, 04:59 PM)
who say cannot?
"digital" zoom  biggrin.gif
*
I wonder who stoop low using those "digital zoom"
doppatroll
post Jul 6 2015, 05:03 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,123 posts

Joined: Sep 2013
Remember this stories....

nokias pureview fake ads using DSLR

Nokia Lumia Fake ads Part 2

Still believe in phone companies ?

This post has been edited by doppatroll: Jul 6 2015, 05:05 PM
ALIAS.JG
post Jul 6 2015, 05:04 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,940 posts

Joined: Feb 2005


I look at the 'Shot on iPhone 6' posters, then I look at my HTC One M8 and i cri evrytim
mw1980
post Jul 6 2015, 05:05 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
40 posts

Joined: Jan 2015


it's really that good, last time i stayed in sunway hotel and i took photos of those girls in the theme park from my room.
yeelong
post Jul 6 2015, 05:05 PM

K for /K
******
Senior Member
1,218 posts

Joined: Jul 2007
From: Sibu, Cheras Selangor



QUOTE(doppatroll @ Jul 6 2015, 05:03 PM)
Remember this stories....

nokias pureview fake ads using DSLR

Still believe in phone companies ?
*
dun spoil the fun la adoiiiiiiiiiii tered not even reach 10 pages..
SUSthelightside
post Jul 6 2015, 05:08 PM

samsengfag 0.o
******
Senior Member
1,824 posts

Joined: Mar 2012
From: troll la la
Topkek ifeg thinks milo tin can pong > big sensor cam whistling.gif
SUSweyyt
post Jul 6 2015, 05:12 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
88 posts

Joined: Feb 2012


> iPhone
> DSLR

TOPKEK
loki
post Jul 6 2015, 05:15 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,109 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Damansara Damai, PJ



ด็็็็็้้้้้็็็็้้้้้็็็็็้้้้้็็็็็้้้้้็็็็็้้้้้ด็็็็็้้้้้็็็็้้้้้็็็็็้้้้้็็็็็้้้้้็็็็็้้้้้ด็็็็็้้้้้็็็็้้้้้็็็็็้้้้้็็็็็้้้้้็็็็็้้้้้ด็็็็็้้้้้็็็็้้้้้็็็็็้้้้้็็็็็้้้้้็็็็็้้้้้ด็็็็็้้้้้็็็็้้้้้็็็็็้้้้้็็็็็้้้้้็็็็็้้้้้ด็็็็็้้้้้็็็็้้้้้็็็็็้้้้้็็็็็้้้้้็็็็็้้้้้ด็็็็็้้้้้็็็็้้้้้็็็็็้้้้้็็็็็้้้้้็็็็็้้้้้ด็็็็็้้้้้็็็็้้้้้็็็็็้้้้้็็็็็้้้้้็็็็็้้้้้ด็็็็็้้้้้็็็็้้้้้็็็็็้้้้้็็็็็้้้้้็็็็็้้้้้ด็็็็็้้้้้็็็็้้้้้็็็็็้้้้้็็็็็้้้้้็็็็็้้้้้ด็็็็็้้้้้็็็็้้้้้็็็็็้้้้้็็็็็้้้้้็็็็็้้้้้ด็็็็็้้้้้็็็็้้้้้็็็็็้้้้้็็็็็้้้้้็็็็็้้้้้
Ask_Yip
post Jul 6 2015, 05:18 PM

Retired Audiophiles
*******
Senior Member
2,864 posts

Joined: Feb 2011
From: NoWhere
topkek ipong camera
Aivihc
post Jul 6 2015, 05:20 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
466 posts

Joined: Feb 2013
From: Jesselton, North Borneo
for static of coz la.. try panning.. and uh try beat 135mm f/2 bokeh
ajax91
post Jul 6 2015, 05:22 PM

macOS Enthusiast
******
Senior Member
1,206 posts

Joined: Dec 2012



wait another 10 years still cant overtake PureView
taohannan
post Jul 6 2015, 05:22 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
429 posts

Joined: Aug 2009


lol TS clearly didnt ever capture picture using any of full frame dslr
tahfeikei
post Jul 6 2015, 05:24 PM

TALK TO MY ENGRISH
******
Senior Member
1,248 posts

Joined: Feb 2013
From: opis
QUOTE(taohannan @ Jul 6 2015, 05:22 PM)
lol TS clearly didnt ever capture picture using any  of full frame dslr
*
nowadays..no need FF DSLR....try csc la..already FF
wertty
post Jul 6 2015, 05:25 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
154 posts

Joined: Jul 2008
From: Petaling Jaya



because common folks cant tell a difference anyway


taohannan
post Jul 6 2015, 05:26 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
429 posts

Joined: Aug 2009


QUOTE(tahfeikei @ Jul 6 2015, 05:24 PM)
nowadays..no need FF DSLR....try csc la..already FF
*
csc apo?

#inb4 slowpoke
tahfeikei
post Jul 6 2015, 05:31 PM

TALK TO MY ENGRISH
******
Senior Member
1,248 posts

Joined: Feb 2013
From: opis
QUOTE(taohannan @ Jul 6 2015, 05:26 PM)
csc apo?

#inb4 slowpoke
*
aiyoh

compact system cameras.....compact and mirrorless...maciam sony a7rii
sniper on the roof
post Jul 6 2015, 05:32 PM

20k VIP Club
Group Icon
VIP
23,414 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Taipei
Size does matter

» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «

taohannan
post Jul 6 2015, 05:34 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
429 posts

Joined: Aug 2009


QUOTE(tahfeikei @ Jul 6 2015, 05:31 PM)
aiyoh

compact system cameras.....compact and mirrorless...maciam sony a7rii
*
aiyohh usualy i hard mirrorles oni... i buy 1st lumix gf1.. til now regret lol. a7 mahal liao, nak beli carl zeiss lense lagi, facepalm

fuji xt1 full frame?
sniper on the roof
post Jul 6 2015, 05:35 PM

20k VIP Club
Group Icon
VIP
23,414 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Taipei
QUOTE(taohannan @ Jul 6 2015, 05:34 PM)
aiyohh usualy i hard mirrorles oni... i buy 1st lumix gf1.. til now regret lol. a7 mahal liao, nak beli carl zeiss lense lagi, facepalm

fuji xt1 full frame?
*
APS-C
taohannan
post Jul 6 2015, 05:39 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
429 posts

Joined: Aug 2009


QUOTE(sniper on the roof @ Jul 6 2015, 05:35 PM)
APS-C
*
...

stil kecik, like this save for nikon df lor
cHaRsIeWpAu^^
post Jul 6 2015, 05:40 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
937 posts

Joined: Jun 2006



dslr more control.
smartphones camera just point and shoot.

sometimes its about the experience, not the outcome, eg analog vs digital camera.
sniper on the roof
post Jul 6 2015, 05:40 PM

20k VIP Club
Group Icon
VIP
23,414 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Taipei
QUOTE(taohannan @ Jul 6 2015, 05:39 PM)
...

stil kecik, like this save for nikon df lor
*
doh.gif doh.gif doh.gif doh.gif
sniper on the roof
post Jul 6 2015, 05:41 PM

20k VIP Club
Group Icon
VIP
23,414 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Taipei
QUOTE(cHaRsIeWpAu^^ @ Jul 6 2015, 05:40 PM)
dslr more control.
smartphones camera just point and shoot.

sometimes its about the experience, not the outcome, eg analog vs digital camera.
*
but but but smartphone now already got full manual controls and shoots RAW too.
Aivihc
post Jul 6 2015, 05:42 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
466 posts

Joined: Feb 2013
From: Jesselton, North Borneo
QUOTE(taohannan @ Jul 6 2015, 05:39 PM)
...

stil kecik, like this save for nikon df lor
*
apa yg kecik? how big u want? u do commercial printing?
foohoa
post Jul 6 2015, 05:43 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
981 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: SABAH!!!


QUOTE(big1 @ Jul 6 2015, 04:59 PM)
parasite?

how?
*
its good think la actually, sony camera have great body feature, just the lens sux
now can use canon and nikon lens, the image should be no much problem dy

parasite mean..... 1 camera can use so many other brand lens and first ever, u can AF with nikon lens
cHaRsIeWpAu^^
post Jul 6 2015, 05:43 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
937 posts

Joined: Jun 2006



QUOTE(sniper on the roof @ Jul 6 2015, 05:41 PM)
but but but smartphone now already got full manual controls and shoots RAW too.
*
physical buttons and touchscreen feeling not same one. hmm.gif
its like playing nintendo games with emulator in computer vs playing games with nintendo 3ds.
tahfeikei
post Jul 6 2015, 05:45 PM

TALK TO MY ENGRISH
******
Senior Member
1,248 posts

Joined: Feb 2013
From: opis
QUOTE(taohannan @ Jul 6 2015, 05:39 PM)
...

stil kecik, like this save for nikon df lor
*
don't think that way..some apsc like ricoh GR.....is very good
taohannan
post Jul 6 2015, 05:48 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
429 posts

Joined: Aug 2009


QUOTE(Aivihc @ Jul 6 2015, 05:42 PM)
apa yg kecik? how big u want? u do commercial printing?
*
ler sukahati i le i nak censor besar2, im not even talk about mp
Fizzy-Fiz
post Jul 6 2015, 05:49 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
696 posts

Joined: Dec 2009
cameraphones replacing dedicated camera ahahahah suck my dick la.

any serious photographers above the level of hobbyist could easily justify the allure of owning a system

what apple did was that they gave the iPhone to a high-tier pro and a proper commercial post processing pro and they claim the result is representative of the majority of the output. anyone who denies this is a shill, this has always been the standar SOP of commercials be it apple canon or nikon. they probably even use state of the art lighting equips for those great "iphone" camera samples.
sniper on the roof
post Jul 6 2015, 05:52 PM

20k VIP Club
Group Icon
VIP
23,414 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Taipei
QUOTE(foohoa @ Jul 6 2015, 05:43 PM)
its good think la actually, sony camera have great body feature, just the lens sux
now can use canon and nikon lens, the image should be no much problem dy

parasite mean..... 1 camera can use so many other brand lens and first ever, u can AF with nikon lens
*
Its an amazing camera but lack of native lens and using Canikon lens sorta defeats the purpose of a light setup and it feel totally not balanced on hand.

I do see it as an interesting "digital back" for vintage lenses though.


QUOTE(cHaRsIeWpAu^^ @ Jul 6 2015, 05:43 PM)
physical buttons and touchscreen feeling not same one. hmm.gif
its like playing nintendo games with emulator in computer vs playing games with nintendo 3ds.
*
Agree but I'm unker already. My kids are more used to touchscreen than buttons.

QUOTE(tahfeikei @ Jul 6 2015, 05:45 PM)
don't think that way..some apsc like ricoh GR.....is very good
*
This one is purist camera.
taohannan
post Jul 6 2015, 05:54 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
429 posts

Joined: Aug 2009


QUOTE(tahfeikei @ Jul 6 2015, 05:45 PM)
don't think that way..some apsc like ricoh GR.....is very good
*
there is a lot APSC, that why i keep it simple, for myself at least lol. like xt1, they use APS-C-sized 16M X-Trans CMOS II... what the fucuk of that also u dunno, some say it can surpass FF dslr quality img, but in what aspect... i go to blog review , it is so technical for noob like me.. lol



Aivihc
post Jul 6 2015, 05:55 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
466 posts

Joined: Feb 2013
From: Jesselton, North Borneo
QUOTE(taohannan @ Jul 6 2015, 05:48 PM)
ler sukahati i le i nak censor besar2, im not even talk about mp
*
big sensor = big mp

user posted image
bloodmoney
post Jul 6 2015, 05:55 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
70 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
compare ferrari with kancil?
sniper on the roof
post Jul 6 2015, 06:01 PM

20k VIP Club
Group Icon
VIP
23,414 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Taipei
QUOTE(taohannan @ Jul 6 2015, 05:48 PM)
ler sukahati i le i nak censor besar2, im not even talk about mp
*
Medium format straight.... lagi busar

user posted image

QUOTE(taohannan @ Jul 6 2015, 05:54 PM)
there is a lot APSC, that why i keep it simple, for myself at least lol. like xt1, they use APS-C-sized 16M X-Trans CMOS II... what the fucuk of that also u dunno, some say it can surpass FF dslr quality img, but in what aspect... i go to blog review , it is so technical for noob like me.. lol
*
I think that statement was made with Canon 5D MkII as benchmark.



cHaRsIeWpAu^^
post Jul 6 2015, 06:01 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
937 posts

Joined: Jun 2006



QUOTE(sniper on the roof @ Jul 6 2015, 05:52 PM)

Agree but I'm unker already. My kids are more used to touchscreen than buttons.

*
laugh.gif i feel you unker.

i always bring ricoh gr when traveling alone and ask people help me to take photos. laugh.gif
sniper on the roof
post Jul 6 2015, 06:03 PM

20k VIP Club
Group Icon
VIP
23,414 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Taipei
QUOTE(cHaRsIeWpAu^^ @ Jul 6 2015, 06:01 PM)
laugh.gif i feel you unker.

i always bring ricoh gr when traveling alone and ask people help me to take photos. laugh.gif
*
Stick a small reflective sticker on your GR, turn on face detect then selfie lo.
ProfessorR
post Jul 6 2015, 06:05 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
26 posts

Joined: May 2015



Frankly I find that 80% of the pictures I take are using my iphone.

The other 20% use DSLR only during special events.



I don't even bring my fucking DSLR for overseas trips.
spontaneousASHLEE
post Jul 6 2015, 06:06 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Validating
779 posts

Joined: Jul 2014
Billboard so far, mana tau
SUSwilsonjay
post Jul 6 2015, 06:08 PM

6 Stars Social Justice Warrior
******
Senior Member
1,605 posts

Joined: Feb 2006


I blame instagram
sniper on the roof
post Jul 6 2015, 06:11 PM

20k VIP Club
Group Icon
VIP
23,414 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Taipei
QUOTE(ProfessorR @ Jul 6 2015, 06:05 PM)
Frankly I find that 80% of the pictures I take are using my iphone.

The other 20% use DSLR only during special events.
I don't even bring my fucking DSLR for overseas trips.
*
Move to mirrorless

QUOTE(wilsonjay @ Jul 6 2015, 06:08 PM)
I blame instagram
*
Filters solves everything tongue.gif
andrewhtf
post Jul 6 2015, 06:19 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,583 posts

Joined: Apr 2006
From: Clerking. Data Entry like a Mad Man


I want a nokia 808!!!!!
andrewhtf
post Jul 6 2015, 06:20 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,583 posts

Joined: Apr 2006
From: Clerking. Data Entry like a Mad Man


QUOTE(ajax91 @ Jul 6 2015, 05:22 PM)
wait another 10 years still cant overtake PureView
*
Wahahaha looks like nobody is disputing it
Burningsunz
post Jul 6 2015, 06:22 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
300 posts

Joined: Jul 2007
From: Area 51


no way phone can be better than DSLR vmad.gif vmad.gif

Attached Image Attached Image Attached Image Attached Image
ReWeR
post Jul 6 2015, 06:23 PM

Foreveralone
******
Senior Member
1,715 posts

Joined: Sep 2004
From: KL


for normal people yes.

but for commercial use, i still see people using DSLR.
TStreblecase
post Jul 6 2015, 06:25 PM

IHI
*****
Senior Member
779 posts

Joined: Aug 2009



QUOTE(taohannan @ Jul 6 2015, 05:22 PM)
lol TS clearly didnt ever capture picture using any  of full frame dslr
*
Clearly you can't hold on to a decent conversation. Please quote me if I ever mentioned anywhere in my post or comments that iPhone>all?

I'm tempted to think most of you are a bunch of retards or at least fanboy of something.

Let me reiterate.....

THIS IS NOT ABOUT IPHONE HAVING BETTER PQ THAN STANDALONE CAMERAS! IF YOU STILL CANT UNDERSTAND, MAY I SUGGEST THE NEAREST MONTESSORI.
otakotak
post Jul 6 2015, 06:30 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
280 posts

Joined: Nov 2010


ts hulu never own any dslr that's why donno
Emanyshie
post Jul 6 2015, 06:30 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
50 posts

Joined: May 2012
Siapa percaya, mak dia hijau
ciwi1166
post Jul 6 2015, 06:32 PM

~~~Prestissimo~~~
*******
Senior Member
2,263 posts

Joined: Dec 2006
From: In your head...
for normal average evryday peoples, maybe la coz they dun need all those dslrs, etc.. smile.gif
TStreblecase
post Jul 6 2015, 06:32 PM

IHI
*****
Senior Member
779 posts

Joined: Aug 2009



QUOTE(otakotak @ Jul 6 2015, 06:30 PM)
ts hulu never own any dslr that's why donno
*
These are the type of retards in /k thumbup.gif
wKkaY
post Jul 6 2015, 06:34 PM

misutā supākoru
Group Icon
VIP
6,008 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(treblecase @ Jul 6 2015, 04:51 PM)
Again, I'm not talking about purist. What I'm trying to convey is, the standalone cameras will be trounced by a phone, no matter which brand, for those who don't bother about DSLR, mirror less or even compacts.
I'm not saying phone can bungkus DSLR.
*
Yup smartphones have been displacing the camera market for a long time now. You can see it from the camera industry sales figures like this one: http://petapixel.com/2015/04/09/this-is-wh...hones-included/
spacelion
post Jul 6 2015, 06:39 PM

Ada Liu
******
Senior Member
1,692 posts

Joined: Mar 2009
From: Probation?
it's like astrophotography, u dont think that 1 image give u the milky way lel
tentang rasa
post Jul 6 2015, 06:41 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
66 posts

Joined: Sep 2012
hebat gila.. tu baru 8 mp tu drool.gif
TStreblecase
post Jul 6 2015, 06:44 PM

IHI
*****
Senior Member
779 posts

Joined: Aug 2009



QUOTE(spacelion @ Jul 6 2015, 06:39 PM)
it's like astrophotography, u dont think that 1 image give u the milky way lel
*
Obviously being a senior member here doesn't exclude you from the R category. Do you even understand plain English to begin with?

If I wanna talk about PQ, the title of this tered would've been "why iPhone photos better than DSLR". But it's not. You guys are just full of butthurt.
wlcling
post Jul 6 2015, 06:49 PM

Hippidy Hoppidy
*******
Senior Member
2,711 posts

Joined: Sep 2005


Depends on perspective. I think compacts and prosumers can bungkus already. Dslrs just a matter of time

Just see how the dslrs have evolved over the past 5 years vs the now trusty camera phone
spacelion
post Jul 6 2015, 06:50 PM

Ada Liu
******
Senior Member
1,692 posts

Joined: Mar 2009
From: Probation?
QUOTE(treblecase @ Jul 6 2015, 06:44 PM)
Obviously being a senior member here doesn't exclude you from the R category. Do you even understand plain English to begin with?

If I wanna talk about PQ, the title of this tered would've been "why iPhone photos better than DSLR". But it's not. You guys are just full of butthurt.
*
what is PQ, party quest? lol why u so mad. u post an obvious bait thread and expect ppl to reply seriously to you? in kopitiam ?
TStreblecase
post Jul 6 2015, 06:52 PM

IHI
*****
Senior Member
779 posts

Joined: Aug 2009



QUOTE(spacelion @ Jul 6 2015, 06:50 PM)
what is PQ, party quest? lol why u so mad. u post an obvious bait thread and expect ppl to reply seriously to you? in kopitiam ?
*
You don't even begin to understand what a bait tered is. Am I not asking a legitimate question? Tell me which part is the bait? By calling you guys DSLR fags? tongue.gif
DValentine
post Jul 6 2015, 06:54 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Junior Member
773 posts

Joined: Dec 2010
From: isudahinsap.flac


ts trying hard to be professional


bungkus la dey
spacelion
post Jul 6 2015, 06:55 PM

Ada Liu
******
Senior Member
1,692 posts

Joined: Mar 2009
From: Probation?
QUOTE(treblecase @ Jul 6 2015, 06:52 PM)
You don't even begin to understand what a bait tered is. Am I not asking a legitimate question? Tell me which part is the bait? By calling you guys DSLR fags?  tongue.gif
*
lol, i dont own a dslr so im not insulted by your comment

but if you really wanna debate whether something that has been around for ages will dissappear so soon, then I think you might as well debate whether sports cars will go the way of the dodo once we have efficient electric cars. The answer, obviously, is that there will always exist a niche where people will push the limits of technology, trying to get as much performance as possible out of something.

your post is like saying that desktop computer will go away once we have tablet.
TStreblecase
post Jul 6 2015, 07:00 PM

IHI
*****
Senior Member
779 posts

Joined: Aug 2009



doh.gif doh.gif doh.gif

OK, DSLR>all

http://www.businessinsider.my/iphone-6-vs-...1MR02ptK2ybR.97
clamp_wl
post Jul 6 2015, 07:08 PM

Ted Guy
******
Senior Member
1,935 posts

Joined: Jan 2013


Standalone camera won't die. But it will become a very niche market with only a few players left to serve the market. Many would divest and exit the field.
spacelion
post Jul 6 2015, 07:11 PM

Ada Liu
******
Senior Member
1,692 posts

Joined: Mar 2009
From: Probation?
QUOTE(treblecase @ Jul 6 2015, 07:00 PM)
QUOTE
THE VERDICT: In every instance, the DSLR is going to take a higher quality image. It has many times more options and the larger file sizes, which allow for clearer and increased detail, especially when enlarged or printed. But for every day shooting and sharing of photos, the iPhone does a surprisingly good job. iPhone images are optimized for viewing on a iPhone as well, so if you’re taking pictures to text, email, SnapChat, or upload to Facebook, an iPhone will do a fine job.
now now dont get so upset. it's like those stupid audiophiles, they think CD is the big thing but eventually become outdated as digital high bitrate becomes widely available. You will have your day in the sun, it just won't be as soon as you think.
wlcling
post Jul 6 2015, 07:15 PM

Hippidy Hoppidy
*******
Senior Member
2,711 posts

Joined: Sep 2005


QUOTE(treblecase @ Jul 6 2015, 07:00 PM)
The dslr user quite fail... If able to lose to iPhone in catching moving objects (page 7,8,9)

Anyway nowadays it's not so much about Image quality already, all the users also viewing on phones and tablet, hard to see much difference. In fact with emergence of mobile devices, the preferred format of videos now are going vertical too.. camera phones trumps in this age because of the ecosystem, it connects to your phone which has a cloud, has post processing apps, links to social media, etc. the experience is constantly evolving unlike the dslr which may try to do the same but ends up clunky
TStreblecase
post Jul 6 2015, 07:28 PM

IHI
*****
Senior Member
779 posts

Joined: Aug 2009



QUOTE(spacelion @ Jul 6 2015, 07:11 PM)
now now dont get so upset. it's like those stupid audiophiles, they think CD is the big thing but eventually become outdated as digital high bitrate becomes widely available. You will have your day in the sun, it just won't be as soon as you think.
*
Now that's a more decent reply thumbup.gif Although my sarcasm meter is tingling wildly tongue.gif

QUOTE(wlcling @ Jul 6 2015, 07:15 PM)
The dslr user quite fail... If able to lose to iPhone in catching moving objects (page 7,8,9)

Anyway nowadays it's not so much about Image quality already, all the users also viewing on phones and tablet, hard to see much difference. In fact with emergence of mobile devices, the preferred format of videos now are going vertical too..  camera phones trumps in this age because of the ecosystem, it connects to your phone which has a cloud, has post processing apps, links to social media, etc. the experience is constantly evolving unlike the dslr which may try to do the same but ends up clunky
*
True, standalone are trying very hard though. Introduction of video function, wifi connectivity even instant connectivity to social medias. Which is laughable. Are they trying to be a smart phone? Meanwhile, the smartphone tries hard to be...a camera! Where's the point of equilibrium? tongue.gif
MR_alien
post Jul 6 2015, 07:31 PM

Mr.Alien on the loss
*******
Senior Member
3,582 posts

Joined: Oct 2007
From: everywhere in sabah



the answer is simple
if phone camera can replace standalone camera
thn there is no need for digital camera, mirrorless, micro 4/3 and DSLR to exist anymore
these companies aren't stupid
TStreblecase
post Jul 6 2015, 07:35 PM

IHI
*****
Senior Member
779 posts

Joined: Aug 2009



Before all of you fanboys comment any further, here's something the most famous of landscape photographer Ansel Adams would say...

The idea here is that the person, not the gear, takes the picture. And there is a story that tells the tale of an encounter between famous novelist Ernest Hemingway and famous photographer Ansel Adams. In the story, Hemingway is purported to have praised Adams’ photographs, saying, "You take the most amazing pictures. What kind of camera do you use?"

Adams frowned and then replied, "You write the most amazing stories. What kind of typewriter do you use?"
phillip88
post Jul 6 2015, 07:37 PM

Sound of Silence
******
Senior Member
1,062 posts

Joined: Dec 2011
From: (╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻)



it's not wrong to dream,

just like vios dreaming of becoming a ferrari

both can run quite well on a perfect line at a short distance.

One reach 5 minutes earlier, the other 5 minutes later.

Not much difference, eh?
hvk13
post Jul 6 2015, 07:41 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
923 posts

Joined: Apr 2008


QUOTE(treblecase @ Jul 6 2015, 04:44 PM)
You guys don't understand? Even if it's shot using a composite of photos, you still don't have lug around a heavy camera. I'm not talking about purist. But for the masses, I don't think they'll bother buying another standalone camera anymore. If the phone can solve the problem of night photography, it's sunset for cameras.
*
If like that, very little ppl will buy standalone camera. Then have to raise camera price to compensate. Purist have to sell backside to buy standalone camera = sadding.
TStreblecase
post Jul 6 2015, 07:45 PM

IHI
*****
Senior Member
779 posts

Joined: Aug 2009



QUOTE(phillip88 @ Jul 6 2015, 07:37 PM)
it's not wrong to dream,

just like vios dreaming of becoming a ferrari

both can run quite well on a perfect line at a short distance.

One reach 5 minutes earlier, the other 5 minutes later.

Not much difference, eh?
*
I'm a little surprise you've used that analogy.

Imagine this scenario...a person with an iPhone & another with his bags of equipment. In the spur of the moment & at that exact moment, a one in a million shot appears. Who would be laughing all the way to the bank? The Ferrari or the vios? And I'm under the assumption that Ferrari is the bags of gears.

Oh, and dang...the person with the bags of gear can't take the shot even after the person with the iPhone camera collected his money for that one in a million shot coz he was busy changing his lens, adjusting the white balance, aperture, shutter bla bla bla tongue.gif whistling.gif
Noyoudontcare
post Jul 6 2015, 07:49 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
252 posts

Joined: Jul 2008
Dont fancy using iphones or top grade android phones when on holiday. Why? Battery drains so much. I tend to stay online when abroad. Will use phones for casual fb and jnstagram pics uploading.for the rest,i depend on my mirrorless samsung nx mini.its decent enough. Im more attracted to its Wi-Fi/wireless capabilities
phillip88
post Jul 6 2015, 07:55 PM

Sound of Silence
******
Senior Member
1,062 posts

Joined: Dec 2011
From: (╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻)



QUOTE(treblecase @ Jul 6 2015, 07:45 PM)
I'm a little surprise you've used that analogy.

Imagine this scenario...a person with an iPhone & another with his bags of equipment. In the spur of the moment & at that exact moment, a one in a million shot appears. Who would be laughing all the way to the bank? The Ferrari or the vios? And I'm under the assumption that Ferrari is the bags of gears.

Oh, and dang...the person with the bags of gear can't take the shot even after the person with the iPhone camera collected his money for that one in a million shot coz he was busy changing his lens, adjusting the white balance, aperture, shutter bla bla bla  tongue.gif  whistling.gif
*
I'm not saying it's wrong to use iPhone as your main camera. You don't get to lose too much in terms of picture quality if you take pictures casually. I mean, heck, the camera app is well written and the coloring of the photo is amazing!

But when you wanna go up the big stage, you get the big gun. Low light? Long shutter speed? Depth? Cannon length lens? List goes on and on in terms of the advantage of using full-fledged camera.

Yes, undeniably, phone camera is really portable and mobile and a one-stop solution for many things. So, it's situational. I don't really think phone camera can really replace those big ass cameras in terms of quality.

Usability? That's a check.
SUSLVL1NiNjA
post Jul 6 2015, 07:56 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
753 posts

Joined: Dec 2013


QUOTE(Noyoudontcare @ Jul 6 2015, 07:49 PM)
Dont fancy using iphones or top grade android phones when on holiday. Why? Battery drains so much. I tend to stay online when abroad. Will use phones for casual fb and jnstagram pics uploading.for the rest,i depend on my mirrorless samsung nx mini.its decent enough. Im more attracted to its Wi-Fi/wireless capabilities
*
So what phone are you using when abroad? unsure.gif
Zaryl
post Jul 6 2015, 08:00 PM

Hardcore Casual Gamer
******
Senior Member
1,709 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Kedah Khap Khoun Khap (4K)



You kidding me?

No way in hell standalone cameras will replace dslr.
Dslr is really exceptional when taking pictures.

Ipong and the likes is for casual photography, taking pictures the moment you want to capture it.


TStreblecase
post Jul 6 2015, 08:03 PM

IHI
*****
Senior Member
779 posts

Joined: Aug 2009



QUOTE(phillip88 @ Jul 6 2015, 07:55 PM)
I'm not saying it's wrong to use iPhone as your main camera. You don't get to lose too much in terms of picture quality if you take pictures casually. I mean, heck, the camera app is well written and the coloring of the photo is amazing!

But when you wanna go up the big stage, you get the big gun. Low light? Long shutter speed? Depth? Cannon length lens? List goes on and on in terms of the advantage of using full-fledged camera.

Yes, undeniably, phone camera is really portable and mobile and a one-stop solution for many things. So, it's situational. I don't really think phone camera can really replace those big ass cameras in terms of quality.

Usability? That's a check.
*
No one is disputing the DSLR in terms of flexibility in usage & in the hands of a capable person can produce photos that a camera phone can only dream of.

However, camera phone has pretty much triumphed over compacts and with more development over the years, who would bet against it toppling mirror less first of all?
Anonymous34
post Jul 6 2015, 08:05 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,176 posts

Joined: May 2013
From: Petaling Jaya


QUOTE(pinkfoxlulu @ Jul 6 2015, 04:44 PM)
standalone camera is mean forevralone use camera
*
Is it next time xtube or xhamster you will see shot with iPhone 6 brows.gif
phillip88
post Jul 6 2015, 08:15 PM

Sound of Silence
******
Senior Member
1,062 posts

Joined: Dec 2011
From: (╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻)



QUOTE(treblecase @ Jul 6 2015, 08:03 PM)
No one is disputing the DSLR in terms of flexibility in usage & in the hands of a capable person can produce photos that a camera phone can only dream of.

However, camera phone has pretty much triumphed over compacts and with more development over the years, who would bet against it toppling mirror less first of all?
*
triumphed over in terms of number of units in the market? Certainly.

Triumphed over in terms of value? maybe. Yeah.

Triumphed over in terms of portability and usability? Definitely.

Triumphed over in terms of quality? I don't know. Maybe. They need to overcome the physical limitation first.
TStreblecase
post Jul 6 2015, 08:21 PM

IHI
*****
Senior Member
779 posts

Joined: Aug 2009



QUOTE(phillip88 @ Jul 6 2015, 08:15 PM)
triumphed over in terms of number of units in the market? Certainly.

Triumphed over in terms of value? maybe. Yeah.

Triumphed over in terms of portability and usability? Definitely.

Triumphed over in terms of quality? I don't know. Maybe. They need to overcome the physical limitation first.
*
A person who would only ever view the photos in FB or Instagram wouldn't care about quality.
phillip88
post Jul 6 2015, 08:25 PM

Sound of Silence
******
Senior Member
1,062 posts

Joined: Dec 2011
From: (╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻)



QUOTE(treblecase @ Jul 6 2015, 08:21 PM)
A person who would only ever view the photos in FB or Instagram wouldn't care about quality.
*
Your assumptions are fair and reflected my opinions too.

But my insta mostly following a/c like Sony Russia, Canon, Nikon, etc. LOL.
poooky
post Jul 6 2015, 08:27 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Junior Member
844 posts

Joined: Sep 2011
No bcos d camera wif d fancy add on lens is sniper
lmunyee
post Jul 6 2015, 08:28 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
42 posts

Joined: Jan 2011
From: Kuala Lumpur
depth of field
TStreblecase
post Jul 6 2015, 08:29 PM

IHI
*****
Senior Member
779 posts

Joined: Aug 2009



QUOTE(phillip88 @ Jul 6 2015, 08:25 PM)
Your assumptions are fair and reflected my opinions too.

But my insta mostly following a/c like Sony Russia, Canon, Nikon, etc. LOL.
*
Sadly that's the reality, like it or not. Have you ever encountered a person who judges the "quality" of the photo based on how clear the device's display is? doh.gif That's the type of person who's the majority & the reason for the impending doom of cameras.
qeyl90
post Jul 6 2015, 08:32 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
331 posts

Joined: Dec 2013


QUOTE(treblecase @ Jul 6 2015, 04:44 PM)
You guys don't understand? Even if it's shot using a composite of photos, you still don't have lug around a heavy camera. I'm not talking about purist. But for the masses, I don't think they'll bother buying another standalone camera anymore. If the phone can solve the problem of night photography, it's sunset for cameras.
*
Just cause its capable doesnt mean evryone can emulate the same result..dont think anyone can take d same result without a specific setups n post processing and multiple exposure edits..u think evryone in the masses can do that..
TStreblecase
post Jul 6 2015, 08:33 PM

IHI
*****
Senior Member
779 posts

Joined: Aug 2009



QUOTE(qeyl90 @ Jul 6 2015, 08:32 PM)
Just cause its capable doesnt mean evryone can emulate the same result..dont think anyone can take d same result without a specific setups n post processing and multiple exposure edits..u think evryone in the masses can do that..
*
Fair point. Read above
HiroBoroi
post Jul 6 2015, 08:45 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,319 posts

Joined: Mar 2009


QUOTE(treblecase @ Jul 6 2015, 07:45 PM)
I'm a little surprise you've used that analogy.

Imagine this scenario...a person with an iPhone & another with his bags of equipment. In the spur of the moment & at that exact moment, a one in a million shot appears. Who would be laughing all the way to the bank? The Ferrari or the vios? And I'm under the assumption that Ferrari is the bags of gears.

Oh, and dang...the person with the bags of gear can't take the shot even after the person with the iPhone camera collected his money for that one in a million shot coz he was busy changing his lens, adjusting the white balance, aperture, shutter bla bla bla  tongue.gif  whistling.gif
*
A lot of the iconic photos, are taken during times of war, famine, natural disasters etc, where there is scarce food, shelter let alone electricity. Hence the use of simple mechanical film cameras. In these conditions, the iPhone would be dead and useless in two days. If you turn on the iPhone for that "one in a million shot" in a war zone, the screen will light up, and you would be dead. nod.gif
phillip88
post Jul 6 2015, 08:46 PM

Sound of Silence
******
Senior Member
1,062 posts

Joined: Dec 2011
From: (╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻)



QUOTE(treblecase @ Jul 6 2015, 08:29 PM)
Sadly that's the reality, like it or not. Have you ever encountered a person who judges the "quality" of the photo based on how clear the device's display is?  doh.gif  That's the type of person who's the majority & the reason for the impending doom of cameras.
*
Vibrance and contrast max.

LOL.

I mean, softness is becoming a rare quality for photos. Nowadays it's max sharpness max contrast. Just like in audio. Max bass = good.

Well, i'm not sure if smartphone cameras can match the quality one day. One thing I guess, it's still a very long way to go.

Regarding the number of sales, I don't think it's that. I guess smartphone can revive the hi-end camera market as more people who have expendable income will enter this segment after having the taste of what smarphone camera can do.
TStreblecase
post Jul 6 2015, 08:48 PM

IHI
*****
Senior Member
779 posts

Joined: Aug 2009



QUOTE(HiroBoroi @ Jul 6 2015, 08:45 PM)
A lot of the iconic photos, are taken during times of war, famine, natural disasters etc, where there is scarce food, shelter let alone electricity. Hence the use of simple mechanical film cameras. In these conditions, the iPhone would be dead and useless in two days. If you turn on the iPhone for that "one in a million shot" in a war zone, the screen will light up, and you would be dead. nod.gif
*
Oh? I didn't know a DSLR is stealthy?
SUSbig[1]
post Jul 6 2015, 08:54 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
632 posts

Joined: Jun 2015
QUOTE(treblecase @ Jul 6 2015, 08:48 PM)
Oh? I didn't know a DSLR is stealthy?
*
why you no want to reply my previous post?
SUSthelightside
post Jul 6 2015, 08:55 PM

samsengfag 0.o
******
Senior Member
1,824 posts

Joined: Mar 2012
From: troll la la
I can't belif ifegit r retarded enuf to belif ipong 0.1" sensor> big sensor...oh waii we're talking about ifeggit now it make sense whistling.gif
Kesh1018
post Jul 6 2015, 08:58 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
353 posts

Joined: Apr 2012
From: Vancouver, Canada - Land of Wokeness


Comparing a mobile's camera capabilities and a DSLR is equivalent to comparing Apples and Oranges.
HiroBoroi
post Jul 6 2015, 09:04 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,319 posts

Joined: Mar 2009


QUOTE(treblecase @ Jul 6 2015, 08:48 PM)
Oh? I didn't know a DSLR is stealthy?
*
I didn't say DSLR. I said mechanical film camera. Could be SLR, Rangefinder, compact cam etc., in short "Standalone camera".
qeyl90
post Jul 6 2015, 09:06 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
331 posts

Joined: Dec 2013


QUOTE(treblecase @ Jul 6 2015, 07:45 PM)
I'm a little surprise you've used that analogy.

Imagine this scenario...a person with an iPhone & another with his bags of equipment. In the spur of the moment & at that exact moment, a one in a million shot appears. Who would be laughing all the way to the bank? The Ferrari or the vios? And I'm under the assumption that Ferrari is the bags of gears.

Oh, and dang...the person with the bags of gear can't take the shot even after the person with the iPhone camera collected his money for that one in a million shot coz he was busy changing his lens, adjusting the white balance, aperture, shutter bla bla bla  tongue.gif  whistling.gif
*
Using a 24-70 f2.8 lens..dnt need to change too much setting..set it to aperture priority mode and ur good to go..heck all d pros already have presets for their settings..no need to do too much fine tuning..btw it is situational..lets give to example
1. Suddenly a ufo appears at night..lets say i can fire my shot as fast as u fire d shot from ur iphone, as i already have a 24-70 at my body..which one do u think can have better result..or might be ur iphone is focus hunting in the dark without being able to focus properly in d dark..
2. An accidents happen 500m away..i can twist my zoom up to the 70mm and get good shots in mere second..u think u can zoom in as much?even if i ddnt zoom in i can still crop my pix better without losing all d details
3. If u r saying i can mess up my settings, thats y use ur dslr to the max..shoot in raw..u can save a lot more then..but then might be there are situation that iphone might have d upper hand..when its ideal for d phone it is..but if two person is already each holding an iphone and a dslr..dnt think d one wit d slr will be slower than the one with iphone if he knws what hes doing..
TStreblecase
post Jul 6 2015, 09:10 PM

IHI
*****
Senior Member
779 posts

Joined: Aug 2009



QUOTE(big1 @ Jul 6 2015, 04:58 PM)
because iphone cannot zoom brows.gif

it is at focal length 28mm brows.gif
*
This? What's to answer?

Butthurtness is still strong here despite of what has been posted. doh.gif
Lifeis@mess
post Jul 6 2015, 09:13 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
108 posts

Joined: Sep 2010
From: 420Amsterdam-Bangi-Kajang


iphone?u must be kidding me
TStreblecase
post Jul 6 2015, 09:19 PM

IHI
*****
Senior Member
779 posts

Joined: Aug 2009



QUOTE(munak991 @ Jul 6 2015, 04:47 PM)
The thing with small len,is cannot get shallow depth of field.
24-30 MP picture quality for poster, billboard and a lot more.

You try use iPhone now to shoot night video with high ISO, see how much noise it generated?

If stand alone camera can solve everything, why still need DSLR or even Mirrorless
*
Sorry I didn't reply this earlier. It was piled up amidst a pike of shit.

OK, so you didn't see the first photo of this tered. So, some of you really are foreveralones who never goes out from the house & doesn't look up to see the many billboards apple puts up on the iPhone 6. Or you take public transport only, never had the chance to see billboards besides buildings & roads. OK, sorry I didn't know you guys are so ignorant.

So anyone wanna challenge Apple that the photos on the billboards were not taken with an iPhone? Afterall, as the quote above said, minimum of 24MP required for billboards. iPhone 6 only has 8MP

This post has been edited by treblecase: Jul 6 2015, 09:32 PM
Manlet
post Jul 6 2015, 09:30 PM

ᕦ (ò_óˇ) ᕤ
*****
Senior Member
762 posts

Joined: Nov 2012
From: 我们都是炎黄子孙


DSLR is to act high class

in chinese words 装逼

there is no real reason for it, hanging several KG things on your neck, that cant take a little bit vibration and water, else it breaks, lolololol

if iphone can already take such photos, those camera phone sure as hell can do much better, and DSLR just isnt worth the money and effort

This post has been edited by Manlet: Jul 6 2015, 09:31 PM
Kyl3
post Jul 6 2015, 09:35 PM

Newbie
******
Senior Member
1,221 posts

Joined: Mar 2006


QUOTE(Manlet @ Jul 6 2015, 09:30 PM)
DSLR is to act high class

in chinese words 装逼

there is no real reason for it, hanging several KG things on your neck, that cant take a little bit vibration and water, else it breaks, lolololol

if iphone can already take such photos, those camera phone sure as hell can do much better, and DSLR just isnt worth the money and effort
*
laugh.gif laugh.gif laugh.gif
adolph
post Jul 6 2015, 09:36 PM

Hail the hitler
*****
Senior Member
832 posts

Joined: Sep 2012
From: Richmond, Oakland hills



argument thread for DSLR and iphone, LOL>

interesting
munak991
post Jul 6 2015, 09:36 PM

ZONIC!
*******
Senior Member
2,746 posts

Joined: Mar 2006
From: 21st century


QUOTE(treblecase @ Jul 6 2015, 09:19 PM)
Sorry I didn't reply this earlier. It was piled up amidst a pike of shit.

OK, so you didn't see the first photo of this tered. So, some of you really are foreveralones who never goes out from the house & doesn't look up to see the many billboards apple puts up on the iPhone 6. Or you take public transport only, never had the chance to see billboards besides buildings & roads. OK, sorry I didn't know you guys are so ignorant.

So anyone wanna challenge Apple that the photos on the billboards were not taken with an iPhone? Afterall, as the quote above said, minimum of 24MP required for billboards. iPhone 6 only has 8MP
*
Ya, imagine DSLR can just take 1 -3 shot and merge to become 1 billboard picture

But take with iPhone 6, maybe require to take 3x the amount and merge it to match the resolution =)
TStreblecase
post Jul 6 2015, 09:40 PM

IHI
*****
Senior Member
779 posts

Joined: Aug 2009



QUOTE(munak991 @ Jul 6 2015, 09:36 PM)
Ya, imagine DSLR can just take 1 -3 shot and merge to become 1 billboard picture

But take with iPhone 6, maybe require to take 3x the amount and merge it to match the resolution =)
*
So, you have just confirmed the worst fear of DSLR fanboys. It's possible for a phone to match a DSLR. tongue.gif a bit more effort but it's possible. whistling.gif
Ayer
post Jul 6 2015, 09:44 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
206 posts

Joined: Mar 2012
thread is so fucking cringe-worthy, arguing that one day phone cameras will completely annihilate professional gears lol effing wutt??

I can see this coming into a total realization if you're one to associate yourself as a fucking pleb lmao, there's a reason why they are called professional gears to begin with.

Here's a case study for you, tablets vs laptops. Go figure what happened to that war and come back here if you got any valid points for your already-doomed argument.
SUSbig[1]
post Jul 6 2015, 09:46 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
632 posts

Joined: Jun 2015
QUOTE(treblecase @ Jul 6 2015, 09:10 PM)
This? What's to answer?

Butthurtness is still strong here despite of what has been posted.  doh.gif
*
butthurt nyaaaaa
TStreblecase
post Jul 6 2015, 09:46 PM

IHI
*****
Senior Member
779 posts

Joined: Aug 2009



QUOTE(Ayer @ Jul 6 2015, 09:44 PM)
thread is so fucking cringe-worthy, arguing that one day phone cameras will completely annihilate professional gears lol effing wutt??

I can see this coming into a total realization if you're one to associate yourself as a fucking pleb lmao, there's a reason why they are called professional gears to begin with.

Here's a case study for you, tablets vs laptops. Go figure what happened to that war and come back here if you got any valid points for your already-doomed argument.
*
Having an army of vocabulary & vulgar words doesn't disqualify you from being a retard. What argument am I for and against? What was presented in my first post?
SUSbig[1]
post Jul 6 2015, 09:47 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
632 posts

Joined: Jun 2015
QUOTE(Manlet @ Jul 6 2015, 09:30 PM)
DSLR is to act high class

in chinese words 装逼

there is no real reason for it, hanging several KG things on your neck, that cant take a little bit vibration and water, else it breaks, lolololol

if iphone can already take such photos, those camera phone sure as hell can do much better, and DSLR just isnt worth the money and effort
*
miskin tak pa, jangan bodo jer.


user posted image
zamanjaafar
post Jul 6 2015, 09:48 PM

NOT DUPIN' SINCE '03
******
Senior Member
1,122 posts

Joined: Jan 2003


to take those kind of pictures, you need to compensate for light intensity, temperature, humidity and also take into account the coreolis effect of the photons
SourLemons
post Jul 6 2015, 09:48 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
223 posts

Joined: Jun 2011
From: Hatfield. England


behind the scenes ada 100 crew to snap that pic with profesional equipment
TStreblecase
post Jul 6 2015, 09:49 PM

IHI
*****
Senior Member
779 posts

Joined: Aug 2009



QUOTE(big1 @ Jul 6 2015, 09:46 PM)
butthurt nyaaaaa
*
If not for your big tits, I would've deleted your post. What is it I'm butthurt about? The only butthurt people here I know are those who seem to be offended or considers it sacrilegious that a phone can ever replace a camera.
adolph
post Jul 6 2015, 09:49 PM

Hail the hitler
*****
Senior Member
832 posts

Joined: Sep 2012
From: Richmond, Oakland hills



nice thread, i liked to take photos.

wait, let me read all posts.

better than cursing government thread. thumb up.
SUSbig[1]
post Jul 6 2015, 09:52 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
632 posts

Joined: Jun 2015
QUOTE(treblecase @ Jul 6 2015, 09:49 PM)
If not for your big tits, I would've deleted your post. What is it I'm butthurt about? The only butthurt people here I know are those who seem to be offended or considers it sacrilegious that a phone can ever replace a camera.
*
user posted image
Kyl3
post Jul 6 2015, 09:53 PM

Newbie
******
Senior Member
1,221 posts

Joined: Mar 2006


Yeap, iPhone's camera is so good till DxO coming out a 'standalone' camera for it

http://www.dxo.com/us/dxo-one
Ayer
post Jul 6 2015, 09:55 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
206 posts

Joined: Mar 2012
QUOTE(treblecase @ Jul 6 2015, 09:46 PM)
Having an army of vocabulary & vulgar words doesn't disqualify you from being a retard. What argument am I for and against? What was presented in my first post?
*
why should i be the one to tell your mustard ass for whom and what you are against?

Here's what i can tell for now, what was presented in the first post might be true but it hardly makes your argument strong enough.
TStreblecase
post Jul 6 2015, 09:59 PM

IHI
*****
Senior Member
779 posts

Joined: Aug 2009



QUOTE(Ayer @ Jul 6 2015, 09:55 PM)
why should i be the one to tell your mustard ass for whom and what you are against?

Here's what i can tell for now, what was presented in the first post might be true but it hardly makes your argument strong enough.
*
And what's my argument? The only argument I see here are by pickle dicks like you who can on,y see things in one light. Pardon the pun.
taohannan
post Jul 6 2015, 10:01 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
429 posts

Joined: Aug 2009


QUOTE(treblecase @ Jul 6 2015, 06:25 PM)
Clearly you can't hold on to a decent conversation. Please quote me if I ever mentioned anywhere in my post or comments that iPhone>all?

I'm tempted to think most of you are a bunch of retards or at least fanboy of something.

Let me reiterate.....

THIS IS NOT ABOUT IPHONE HAVING BETTER PQ THAN STANDALONE CAMERAS! IF YOU STILL CANT UNDERSTAND, MAY I SUGGEST THE NEAREST MONTESSORI.
*
so butthurt so its clear to say u never capture any picture with FF dslr, and thats why u suggested so in ur title? dont open a thread la if cant stand criticism, u think when u open a thread ppl will always worship u? what a retard

QUOTE
Apple so confidently puts up billboards the whole world proclaiming those photos on it were shot using the iPhone 6. Now, any photographer will tell you that for such a large photo, the pixels counts & many factors comes into play..aperture, shutter speed, white balance yada yada yada. So, if that's so, why in the world do we need standalone cameras like DSLR, hybrids, compacts etc anymore when a small phone will do. Is it time to throw away standalone cameras?


so i dont agree with ur own words of suggestion, why u butthurt? stupid enough to go MONTESSORI?

This post has been edited by taohannan: Jul 6 2015, 10:04 PM
Berus Wine
post Jul 6 2015, 10:03 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
101 posts

Joined: Apr 2015


After this nat geo photographer no nid to bring thousands of dollar worth of lense. Just use iPhone
TStreblecase
post Jul 6 2015, 10:04 PM

IHI
*****
Senior Member
779 posts

Joined: Aug 2009



QUOTE(taohannan @ Jul 6 2015, 10:01 PM)
so butthurt so its clear to say u never capture any picture with FF dslr, and thats why u suggested so in ur title?  dont open a thread la if cant stand criticism, u think when u open a thread ppl will always worship u? what a retard
*
I beg your pardon? How about you get lost if you can't stand criticism against your beloved 5 figure full frame whatever that you have. When your teacher asked you to study never did. Now blame others when you can't understand shit.
taohannan
post Jul 6 2015, 10:06 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
429 posts

Joined: Aug 2009


QUOTE(treblecase @ Jul 6 2015, 10:04 PM)
I beg your pardon? How about you get lost if you can't stand criticism against your beloved 5 figure full frame whatever that you have. When your teacher asked you to study never did. Now blame others when you can't understand shit.
*
i think u are full of shit, read ur first post retard, u did ask its time to throw standalone camera

dont go full retard, even if u are full retard
TStreblecase
post Jul 6 2015, 10:09 PM

IHI
*****
Senior Member
779 posts

Joined: Aug 2009



QUOTE(taohannan @ Jul 6 2015, 10:01 PM)
so butthurt so its clear to say u never capture any picture with FF dslr, and thats why u suggested so in ur title?  dont open a thread la if cant stand criticism, u think when u open a thread ppl will always worship u? what a retard
so i dont agree with ur own words of suggestion, why u butthurt? stupid enough to go MONTESSORI?
*
Somehow the words "throw" & "camera" doesn't sit well with you. The inner OCD tingling at the thought of your hard earned cash or lifetime saving used in buying your beloved full frame camera. And wait for it....how sure are you I don't have what you think I don't have? brows.gif Acting rich or pro or as someone puts it here, acting high class?
TStreblecase
post Jul 6 2015, 10:10 PM

IHI
*****
Senior Member
779 posts

Joined: Aug 2009



QUOTE(taohannan @ Jul 6 2015, 10:06 PM)
i think u are full of shit, read ur first post retard, u did ask its time to throw standalone camera

dont go full retard, even if u are full retard
*
Did you did you not see the question mark? A retard is not enough but you have to be blind too? Lol
taohannan
post Jul 6 2015, 10:10 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
429 posts

Joined: Aug 2009


QUOTE(treblecase @ Jul 6 2015, 10:09 PM)
Somehow the words "throw" & "camera" doesn't sit well with you. The inner OCD tingling at the thought of your hard earned cash or lifetime saving used in buying your beloved full frame camera. And wait for it....how sure are you I don't have what you think I don't have?  brows.gif Acting rich or pro or as someone puts it here, acting high class?
*
better act class then be stupid like u, u ask i answer then u rage what a sstupid rclxms.gif
taohannan
post Jul 6 2015, 10:12 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
429 posts

Joined: Aug 2009


QUOTE(treblecase @ Jul 6 2015, 10:10 PM)
Did you did you not see the question mark? A retard is not enough but you have to be blind too? Lol
*
if u ever take picture with FF DSLR u wont compare it with iphone, and u will not ever suggest to throw standalone camera. and only stupid like u will ask such question, and only a retard like u will butthurt over ur own stupidity.
TStreblecase
post Jul 6 2015, 10:13 PM

IHI
*****
Senior Member
779 posts

Joined: Aug 2009



QUOTE(taohannan @ Jul 6 2015, 05:22 PM)
lol TS clearly didnt ever capture picture using any  of full frame dslr
*
This was your first post here FYI. That's an answer? doh.gif
taohannan
post Jul 6 2015, 10:15 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
429 posts

Joined: Aug 2009


QUOTE(munak991 @ Jul 6 2015, 04:40 PM)
Possible, cause it didnt state the post process use

They can take 12 pictures and merge with photoshop to produce one freaking billboard picture.

Hopefully this picture summarize your understanding

user posted image
*
QUOTE(CosmicMass @ Jul 6 2015, 04:40 PM)
TS never heard of paranomic photo?
*
QUOTE(tahfeikei @ Jul 6 2015, 04:44 PM)
if you are into photography, you do not need to ask such questions
*
QUOTE(munak991 @ Jul 6 2015, 04:47 PM)
The thing with small len,is cannot get shallow depth of field.
24-30 MP picture quality for poster, billboard and a lot more.

You try use iPhone now to shoot night video with high ISO, see how much noise it generated?

If stand alone camera can solve everything, why still need DSLR or even Mirrorless
*
QUOTE(tahfeikei @ Jul 6 2015, 04:49 PM)
i will still say the same....if you really understand photography, you do not need to compare an iphone with a dslr/csc/compact/etc etc
*
QUOTE(LVL1NiNjA @ Jul 6 2015, 04:50 PM)
iPhone camera is great for its category and size but DSLR still leads the way.

Can your iPhone do this? icon_idea.gif


*
if everyone a retard, means u are godlike? when all around ppl doesnt agree with u, its mean the problem is u, a full retard TS
Ayer
post Jul 6 2015, 10:16 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
206 posts

Joined: Mar 2012
QUOTE(treblecase @ Jul 6 2015, 09:59 PM)
And what's my argument? The only argument I see here are by pickle dicks like you who can on,y see things in one light. Pardon the pun.
*
Explain why im the ignant one here who oh so refused to see things in many perspectives despite acknowledging your point.

My only gripe is that your argument lacks merit, there's almost zero substance. What im saying is you need to try harder to come up with more stuff, you cant just surge into a battlefield with just one bullet cant you?
TStreblecase
post Jul 6 2015, 10:18 PM

IHI
*****
Senior Member
779 posts

Joined: Aug 2009



QUOTE(taohannan @ Jul 6 2015, 10:12 PM)
if u ever take picture with FF DSLR u wont compare it with iphone, and u will not ever suggest to throw standalone camera. and only stupid like u will ask such question, and only a retard like u will butthurt over ur own stupidity.
*
Ooooooo....a full frame worshipper we have here. Someone who thought he bought the best thing since sliced bread. Credit to you for not using the auto mode coz there's no such thing in an FF camera. tongue.gif

How about show us your masterpiece here? whistling.gif
xperiaDROID
post Jul 6 2015, 10:20 PM

K
*******
Senior Member
3,966 posts

Joined: Jun 2014
From: Kek L
You won't get that kind of quality unless you did some tweaks to the picture. Try taking a picture using an iPhone 6, it takes good pictures, but will never replace a DSLR.
HiroBoroi
post Jul 6 2015, 10:24 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,319 posts

Joined: Mar 2009


QUOTE(treblecase @ Jul 6 2015, 07:35 PM)
Before all of you fanboys comment any further, here's something the most famous of landscape photographer Ansel Adams would say...

The idea here is that the person, not the gear, takes the picture. And there is a story that tells the tale of an encounter between famous novelist Ernest Hemingway and famous photographer Ansel Adams. In the story, Hemingway is purported to have praised Adams’ photographs, saying, "You take the most amazing pictures. What kind of camera do you use?"

Adams frowned and then replied, "You write the most amazing stories. What kind of typewriter do you use?"
*
I believe what he meant was that the camera was not important in a sense that it was just a wooden box. What is important was the lens (not so much as landscape is usually done with small apertures) AND film SIZE i.e. large format. My understanding was that a lot of his pictures were taken by 8"x10". You will never get the same definition/detail using smaller format 35mm negatives. iPhone sensor size is way way smaller. (In short, use the right tools for the right job.)
TStreblecase
post Jul 6 2015, 10:25 PM

IHI
*****
Senior Member
779 posts

Joined: Aug 2009



QUOTE(Ayer @ Jul 6 2015, 10:16 PM)
Explain why im the ignant one here who oh so refused to see things in many perspectives despite acknowledging your point.

My only gripe is that your argument lacks merit, there's almost zero substance. What im saying is you need to try harder to come up with more stuff, you cant just surge into a battlefield with just one bullet cant you?
*
OK. Point taken. If I'm arguing at all that is. A downward spiral in the sale of compacts is not evident enough? A distinct lack and/or interest by the manufacturers in coming out with new compacts is not evident enough?

My question was never meant to be an argument. A suggestion perhaps. But it's those butthurt fanboys who can't engage in a good forum that's the problem here. Oh...so I have a FF so it must be king. Oh..so I have a 70-200 f2.8 lens so I must be invincible. Oh...never in a million years a phone can overtake a DSLR. Please.
chinteck79
post Jul 6 2015, 10:27 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
59 posts

Joined: Mar 2011
QUOTE(Manlet @ Jul 6 2015, 09:30 PM)
DSLR is to act high class

in chinese words 装逼

there is no real reason for it, hanging several KG things on your neck, that cant take a little bit vibration and water, else it breaks, lolololol

if iphone can already take such photos, those camera phone sure as hell can do much better, and DSLR just isnt worth the money and effort
*
To make such bold statement either u r a lousy photographer with dslr or u never use a dslr before. At the end of the day its the man behind the lens that matters.

To take those wonderful shots with iphone on billboards are famous photographer who know exactly what is the strength of the camera and take the shot. They didnt use it to take pictures that show weakness of a camera phone like potraits, extra wide landscape, moving subjects or dark environment. These photographers can squeeze out 100% potential out of the device they have. Try search youtube for "pro photog with cheap camera" by Digitalrev.

There are many dslr users who are just lousy. Shooting in auto mode might as well use compact cam or phone. But you can't generalize all dslr users like that.

It all depends on what you want. U want portability and simple to use then camera phone. U want high quality picture in high res then dslr. If u just want to selfie, instagram or fb the photo, iphone is good enough to view on portable device. If u want to pixel peep or bokeh then dslr. There is market for both segment. Iphone can never replace dslr but replace compact camera is a true fact. Mirrorless taking over dslr market share is also very true as well but will not replace totally.

At the end of the day, the best camera is the camera that is with u when u wAnt to take that shot

This post has been edited by chinteck79: Jul 6 2015, 10:29 PM
TStreblecase
post Jul 6 2015, 10:45 PM

IHI
*****
Senior Member
779 posts

Joined: Aug 2009



QUOTE(chinteck79 @ Jul 6 2015, 10:27 PM)
To make such bold statement either u r a lousy photographer with dslr or u never use a dslr before. At the end of the day its the man behind the lens that matters.

To take those wonderful shots with iphone on billboards are famous photographer who know exactly what is the strength of the camera and take the shot. They didnt use it to take pictures that show weakness of a camera phone like potraits, extra wide landscape, moving subjects or dark environment. These photographers can squeeze out 100% potential out of the device they have. Try search youtube for "pro photog with cheap camera" by Digitalrev.

There are many dslr users who are just lousy. Shooting in auto mode might as well use compact cam or phone. But you can't generalize all dslr users like that.

It all depends on what you want. U want portability and simple to use then camera phone. U want high quality picture in high res then dslr. If u just want to  selfie, instagram or fb the photo, iphone is good enough to view on portable device. If u want to pixel peep or bokeh then dslr. There is market for both segment. Iphone can never replace dslr but replace compact camera is a true fact. Mirrorless taking over dslr market share is also very true as well but will not replace totally.

At the end of the day, the best camera is the camera that is with u when u wAnt to take that shot
*
Very fair point. Just like record player-CD-MP3s, now cloud music (somewhere there a certain record made a minor comeback) If this thread was about how you listen to music, I'm pretty sure it'll be a different set of butthurt audiophiles who are raging. The argument about quality would be the same I guess.

Consider this...

user posted image

And visit this...

http://www.theverge.com/2014/6/12/5802800/...phy-awards-2014
Ayer
post Jul 6 2015, 10:48 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
206 posts

Joined: Mar 2012
QUOTE(treblecase @ Jul 6 2015, 10:25 PM)
OK. Point taken. If I'm arguing at all that is. A downward spiral in the sale of compacts is not evident enough? A distinct lack and/or interest by the manufacturers in coming out with new compacts is not evident enough?

My question was never meant to be an argument. A suggestion perhaps. But it's those butthurt fanboys who can't engage in a good forum that's the problem here. Oh...so I have a FF so it must be king. Oh..so I have a 70-200 f2.8 lens so I must be invincible. Oh...never in a million years a phone can overtake a DSLR. Please.
*
Reason why a phone can never overtake a DSLR, like i hinted before many a times, is a matter of professionals vs casuals. Right now way i see it you are standing up as a casual user, failing to oversee things from a much broader perspective. When you imply that DSLRs and other professional gears will become redundant, you're being dismissive as hell. We're talking an entire industry here, people who not just take it up as a hobby, but as a serious profession.

Compacts and full-fledged photography gears (like DSLR) are different entities, compacts can still be considered as casual device, despite being a single purpose-built gadget.

Oh and i feel like i should tell you that im no professional photographer, im just a person who provides his input on this whole situation.
TStreblecase
post Jul 6 2015, 11:04 PM

IHI
*****
Senior Member
779 posts

Joined: Aug 2009



QUOTE(Ayer @ Jul 6 2015, 10:48 PM)
Reason why a phone can never overtake a DSLR, like i hinted before many a times, is a matter of professionals vs casuals. Right now way i see it you are standing up as a casual user, failing to oversee things from a much broader perspective. When you imply that DSLRs and other professional gears will become redundant, you're being dismissive as hell. We're talking an entire industry here, people who not just take it up as a hobby, but as a serious profession.

Compacts and full-fledged photography gears (like DSLR) are different entities, compacts can still be considered as casual device, despite being a single purpose-built gadget.

Oh and i feel like i should tell you that im no professional photographer, im just a person who provides his input on this whole situation.
*
Alright, fair points taken. I have never suggested a camera phone, no matter the brand, could replace the DSLR in the professional field (people who makes a living from it not casual photographers who just wanna have the best of everything thinking they'll be as good as the pros too). Nor have I suggested that a camera phone could ever replace the gear a hobbyist have at the moment. The purist as I have mentioned before. Sadly, the purist can never overtake the number of casual photographers (term used loosely here). And market force dictates that a DSLR will once again be a niche market.

Love them or loathe them, Apple has actually presented to the GENERAL public that, yes, it's ok to ditch your DSLR, it's ok to ditch your hybrids, it's completely ok to throw your compacts. Buy our phones, you will be perceived as having a pro quality camera JUST like a DSLR ad that suggest yes, you a nerd with apathy in photo skill can be like a pro too!
munak991
post Jul 6 2015, 11:05 PM

ZONIC!
*******
Senior Member
2,746 posts

Joined: Mar 2006
From: 21st century


QUOTE(treblecase @ Jul 6 2015, 09:40 PM)
So, you have just confirmed the worst fear of DSLR fanboys. It's possible for a phone to match a DSLR.  tongue.gif  a bit more effort but it's possible.  whistling.gif
*
Yes, not only just possible. The result its just infront of you.
IT IS PROVEN

http://www.apple.com/iphone/world-gallery/...-kwg-iphone-com

ITS HERE!
photography is all about skill not gear!

This post has been edited by munak991: Jul 6 2015, 11:10 PM
andyng38
post Jul 6 2015, 11:05 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,402 posts

Joined: Jun 2007
This is an interesting vid. Compares Iphone to standalone cameras.


Manlet
post Jul 6 2015, 11:06 PM

ᕦ (ò_óˇ) ᕤ
*****
Senior Member
762 posts

Joined: Nov 2012
From: 我们都是炎黄子孙


QUOTE(chinteck79 @ Jul 6 2015, 10:27 PM)
To make such bold statement either u r a lousy photographer with dslr or u never use a dslr before. At the end of the day its the man behind the lens that matters.

To take those wonderful shots with iphone on billboards are famous photographer who know exactly what is the strength of the camera and take the shot. They didnt use it to take pictures that show weakness of a camera phone like potraits, extra wide landscape, moving subjects or dark environment. These photographers can squeeze out 100% potential out of the device they have. Try search youtube for "pro photog with cheap camera" by Digitalrev.

There are many dslr users who are just lousy. Shooting in auto mode might as well use compact cam or phone. But you can't generalize all dslr users like that.

It all depends on what you want. U want portability and simple to use then camera phone. U want high quality picture in high res then dslr. If u just want to  selfie, instagram or fb the photo, iphone is good enough to view on portable device. If u want to pixel peep or bokeh then dslr. There is market for both segment. Iphone can never replace dslr but replace compact camera is a true fact. Mirrorless taking over dslr market share is also very true as well but will not replace totally.

At the end of the day, the best camera is the camera that is with u when u wAnt to take that shot
*
ok, so now u go vacation instead of bringing a smartphone like the 6 plus, or the s6, which can do pretty much everything above average

you bring a DSLR, because it is the best in capturing picture,
and you also bring along a satellite phone because it has the best signal,
also a military precision GPS because it has the best accuracy that is within 2 meters
you also bring along a desktop right, because then you can book flight and plan your itinerary, and since desktop is the best, compared to laptops
correct ?

This post has been edited by Manlet: Jul 6 2015, 11:07 PM
spacelion
post Jul 6 2015, 11:18 PM

Ada Liu
******
Senior Member
1,692 posts

Joined: Mar 2009
From: Probation?
QUOTE(treblecase @ Jul 6 2015, 08:48 PM)
Oh? I didn't know a DSLR is stealthy?
*
I think he means that you can't zoom THAT far with an iphone aas compared with a DSLR and zoom lens.
Ayer
post Jul 6 2015, 11:18 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
206 posts

Joined: Mar 2012
QUOTE(treblecase @ Jul 6 2015, 11:04 PM)
Alright, fair points taken. I have never suggested a camera phone, no matter the brand, could replace the DSLR in the professional field (people who makes a living from it not casual photographers who just wanna have the best of everything thinking they'll be as good as the pros too). Nor have I suggested that a camera phone could ever replace the gear a hobbyist have at the moment. The purist as I have mentioned before. Sadly, the purist can never overtake the number of casual photographers (term used loosely here). And market force dictates that a DSLR will once again be a niche market.

Love them or loathe them, Apple has actually presented to the GENERAL public that, yes, it's ok to ditch your DSLR, it's ok to ditch your hybrids, it's completely ok to throw your compacts. Buy our phones, you will be perceived as having a pro quality camera JUST like a DSLR ad that suggest yes, you a nerd with apathy in photo skill can be like a pro too!
*
Yes, im with you in saying that Apple has managed to influence the whole game in more prominent ways just like how they did it with the introduction of Apple Store,iTunes and iPhones. More people are snapping pictures, taking photos are no longer an activity exclusive to people with cameras which at one point considered to be a very expensive thing. Making photography more approachable has taken social life into a whole new level. These are all outstanding merits which is why i believe Apple is deserving of all the praises they have gathered so far.

But will camera phones overtake professional gears someday? no and they never will. But why should a competition exist in the first place? they are both entities that compliments each other, as opposed to some opinions out here that demands that only one will survive. This is not a deathmatch, it does not have to be.
kiasunkiasi
post Jul 6 2015, 11:28 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
597 posts

Joined: Nov 2007


why scientists don't replace Hubble Space Telescope with iPhone?
TStreblecase
post Jul 6 2015, 11:29 PM

IHI
*****
Senior Member
779 posts

Joined: Aug 2009



QUOTE(Ayer @ Jul 6 2015, 11:18 PM)
Yes, im with you in saying that Apple has managed to influence the whole game in more prominent ways just like how they did it with the introduction of Apple Store,iTunes and iPhones. More people are snapping pictures, taking photos are no longer an activity exclusive to people with cameras which at one point considered to be a very expensive thing. Making photography more approachable has taken social life into a whole new level. These are all outstanding merits which is why i believe Apple is deserving of all the praises they have gathered so far.

But will camera phones overtake professional gears someday? no and they never will. But why should a competition exist in the first place? they are both entities that compliments each other, as opposed to some opinions out here that demands that only one will survive. This is not a deathmatch, it does not have to be.
*
You sir have my utmost respect in presenting a clear comment in a forum, something that's lacking in most so-called forum participants here.

Apologies for the harsh language earlier notworthy.gif
mashqi
post Jul 6 2015, 11:56 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
72 posts

Joined: Apr 2010


QUOTE(munak991 @ Jul 6 2015, 11:05 PM)
Yes, not only just possible. The result its just infront of you.
IT IS PROVEN

http://www.apple.com/iphone/world-gallery/...-kwg-iphone-com

ITS HERE!
photography is all about skill not gear!
*
It's about skills and gear. You can't that kind of photo with black and white camera can you?
idoblu
post Jul 7 2015, 07:47 AM

stars for sale
********
All Stars
11,308 posts

Joined: Feb 2008
It seems as soon as one iPhone makes it to market fanboys are already clamouring for the next. With this year's update expected to be the obligatory 's' skew to 2014's iPhone 6 expectations should be tempered; however, speculation would have it that this could be the biggest incremental upgrade of all time!

Early rumours in June suggested front camera flash and hints of a DSLR-style lens; and now in July we're beginning to see hard evidence in the form of leaked pics.
9to5Mac reports an almost physically identical upgrade to the unit which would put a damper on murmurs over the use of dual lens DSLR quality camera tech.
With internal boards & components repositioned there's still room to innovate inside

The biggest news from this leak suggests that the iPhone will carry a brand new 12-megapixel rear-facing camera, a 5-megapixel front-facing camera (for the selfie inclined), and 4k video recording to boot; let's hope the iPhone 6s packs enough storage for iPhone filmmakers.

iPhoneography is at an all time high (the most used camera on Flickr)and the award-winning Shot on iPhone 6 ad campaign has been plastered around town to prove it. So will we be seeing creamier photos and the rise of bokeh as iPhone takes it to the mainstream? If so, then we liked it before it was cool!

This post has been edited by idoblu: Jul 7 2015, 07:52 AM
SUSchokia
post Jul 7 2015, 07:50 AM

Chartered Member
*******
Senior Member
3,617 posts

Joined: Oct 2010
Sony sensor in Iphone6 really good


Sony > All
ohman
post Jul 7 2015, 07:51 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,178 posts

Joined: Aug 2014
QUOTE(Manlet @ Jul 6 2015, 11:06 PM)
ok, so now u go vacation instead of bringing a smartphone like the 6 plus, or the s6, which can do pretty much everything above average

you bring a DSLR, because it is the best in capturing picture,
and you also bring along a satellite phone because it has the best signal,
also a military precision GPS because it has the best accuracy that is within 2 meters
you also bring along a desktop right, because then you can book flight and plan your itinerary, and since desktop is the best, compared to laptops
correct ?
*
Such argument
Tookia
post Jul 7 2015, 08:26 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
290 posts

Joined: Sep 2008


A DSLR has many features that an iphone doesn't have. For serious photography like birding and macro shots...burst mode, fast capture and focusing, you haven't experienced the finer points of digital photography. The iphone is good for recreational photography but for serious photography...come on!

Bump Topic Add ReplyOptions New Topic
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0588sec    1.30    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 17th December 2025 - 11:33 AM