[quote=Kevin Chan,Jul 5 2015, 06:28 PM]
[attachmentid=4549421]
sentence look quite clear that any portion after GST is subject to GST for commercial title development.
It is depends on the S&P bro, If there is no GST clause in S&P,developer have no right to transfer the GST to the buyer
[/quote]
Hi, i do agree above clause quoted is correct & applicable generally for commercial property with clear spelled gst provision or those in effect after 1/4/15. However, ours is transitional project hence we should be governed by what is written in S&P. First of all, there's no clause, provision or any fine print that mention about GST. Addition to that, please refer S&P page 15 "New Laws Affecting The Project" which reads that we are not liable to additional fees, charges or taxes in the event of new law / amendment of existing law imposed. Besides that most of their marketing gimmick in general property sites advertised "GST absorbed by developer". What's more is that Kastam Ruling Q&A 33 did specific answer on this assuming that silence on gst provision, price is assumed inclusive gst. Ideal City has no right to amend s&p as claimed in attched memo and include the provision of gst to make us liable to pay for it. What we need to do is bring the matter to Kastam GST department for further confirmation with their tax invoices, memo & our s&p. Each individual purchaser should make an effort to clarify with Kastam & assert Ideal City to absorb the remaining progressive GST.
This post has been edited by Priscilla Yong: Jul 5 2015, 11:25 PM
Attached thumbnail(s)
Jul 5 2015, 10:57 PM

Quote
0.0732sec
0.85
7 queries
GZIP Disabled