@noxxing
So good that you uninstalled your Antivirus and Spybot +Ad-Aware (??!!), you must be kidding. Prevx1 is suppose to be used as a SUPPLEMENTARY SOFTWARE, NOT A STANDALONE!! Read the manual before use.

@rayfoo
I believe from other's post, (I am late, LOL), it is only free until the first cleanup, then, it RTM for free, no further.

@refnulf
If Spyware Doctor and Spysweeper is the only best around, Spybot and Ad-Aware would have long extinct. No offence.

As from some reading up, Prevx1 is only a supplementary software (I hate repeating). It supposedly has Advance Heuristics to prevent new or unknown malware (Virus, Spyware ...) from wreaking havoc. If you would kindly read AV-Comparatives Report (there is one on HIPS, Virtualization and ...), Cyberhawk does a better job that Prevx1. For a better option, "Safe n Sec" would be excellent. No doubt, the report is only written based on a few malware, and the testing is not exactly thorough. But then again, it is adequate as a guideline. Read before Usage. Cheers!

What Spyware did you use to test them? Give me a list. And also, what versions of those Anti-Spyware programs? What are the definition dates? Please tell me. Clarification is the best proof. Cheers!

Hey Hey Hey. Cool down. No, you missed my point very badly. What I am saying is that freeware serves its purpose. I am trying to promote an all-round mentality. I never said that Spyware Doctor or Spysweeper is useless. I am saying that Spybot and AdAware also has a role to play. Initial versions of ZA + AntiSpyware is like, atrocious, considering their Definition file is so limited, but you have to pay for it.

Adaware paid version includes Ad-Watch only. Ad-Watch is redundant. I've tested that. Come on, I test Combos, I sure now what works and what cracks too. Cheers!