QUOTE(siren @ Jun 28 2008, 02:36 PM)
For properties... in SG u can only use SGD300k to buy only a HDB, not even a condo (provided u r a singaporean..PR can only buy 2nd hand HDB, which is more expensive). In MY you can use RM300k to buy a double storey house..
You are not comparing apples to apples.
Singapore is a city state with limited land. The standard for housing is a flat. Malaysia's standard is a house. If we use your logic, then 99% of the people in HK, Tokyo, Seoul etc will never be as fortunate as Malaysians because they will never afford houses.
The comparison needs to be how many people can afford to get standard housing. In Singapore, almost everyone can. In Malaysia, we're not quite there yet.
QUOTE(siren @ Jun 28 2008, 02:36 PM)
For education, study a E&E degree will cost around SGD100k min but it will cost only bout RM80k in MY, I am comparing the lousiest degree from a lousiest uni.. for more reputable uni, it will easily cost u more than SGD150k.
It's quite low for Singaporeans due to the govt tuition grant. Net it is around S$6000 (if I'm not mistaken) for the whole undergraduate course. PRs and foreigners who agree to serve a 3 year bond with a Sg registered company also get the same grant.
QUOTE(siren @ Jun 28 2008, 02:36 PM)
For CPF contribution, they will deduct u a max of 20% of ur monthly salary whereas in MY they will only deduct u 11%.... That means u have lesser income to spare.. I noe some will argue that CPF are part of ur savings but to those who noes what NPV means, CPF in SG is a crap.. U can only withdraw ur CPF after u retired at 55 yrs... Hence, i rather obtain my 100% of my salary now than to only obtain my 80% of my salary and the balance 20% after i am 55 yrs... For those who only intend to work there for 4 to 5 yrs to earn some income then afterthat come back to MY to marry, why do u want to put ur CPF in SG which u can only withdraw it after 55 yrs??
This is the reason why i do not want to apply for a PR even i have worked there for 2 yrs...ie once u apply for a PR, u are compulsory to contribute CPF... What a stupid law is that...
CPF is 20% of salary up until a maximum cap of only S$900 a month. Any salary over and above 4500 is CPF free. Max employee portion of CPF is S$10800 a year. You get a tax deduction for CPF contributions, which means the net take home cashflow impact is less.
And if you're talking about staying short term in Singapore, new PRs have the option of only paying very low CPF contribution rates for the first 2 years.
If you don't become a PR, yes, you don't contribute max S$900/mth to CPF, but your employer also doesn't contribute their portion as well. So, you need to do your sums to see if losing the employer's portion is worth it to your individual situation. I've got friends in both camps.
The 55 year old limitation of withdrawals even after giving up PR, is dumb. I fully agree. And it only applies to West Malaysians, not East Malaysians nor any other nationality. But there is a loophole. It applies to Malaysians RESIDING in West Malaysia (not BORN in West Malaysia). That means if you get PR in Australia etc or get your home address in your IC & passport changed to an East Malaysian address, you can withdraw your CPF.
But at the end of the day, it's a moot point if you are deciding whether to work in Mys or Sg. You also can't withdraw your Malaysian EPF before you're 55. So what's the difference between having your money stuck in CPF or EPF until you're 55? Me, I'd actually trust CPF much more than EPF. At least they don't use CPF to bail out failing GLCs or political cronies.
In addition, in terms of pure net cash flow, my Sg after tax salary net of $900 CPF is still more than my Mys after tax salary net of EPF in absolute units (S$ vs RM) due to the fact there is no cap on EPF contribution, and the Mys tax rate is higher than Sg. And when you apply the 2.4X multiplier for exchange rates, the incentive is definitely there.