Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Mazda CX-5 GL or Honda HRV V spec?, Rm126k vs Rm118k

views
     
SportyHandling
post May 5 2015, 11:50 AM

On my way
****
Junior Member
623 posts

Joined: Jul 2013
QUOTE(Complexity @ May 5 2015, 02:39 AM)
I-Stop got its own problems too.

Read this article
*
QUOTE(cucubud @ May 5 2015, 07:49 AM)
The special battery used is not a problem. It is expensive to replace only. tongue.gif
The Toyota Hybrid cars also use the special battery. I am not referring to the battery in the boot, I am referring to the battery next to the engine.
*
The i-stop is not a problem as mentioned. The special battery is slightly more expensive to replace only, that's all. The original battery from Japan costs RM1,500 whereas the local equivalent is RM700-800. However, one can still use the normal battery which is significantly cheaper but i-stop will not function with the cheap batteries. The Mazda's i-stop or Skyactive system is proprietary hence the requirement of some custom components to cater for these features.


SportyHandling
post May 5 2015, 11:55 AM

On my way
****
Junior Member
623 posts

Joined: Jul 2013
QUOTE(xSean @ May 5 2015, 12:23 AM)
after i checked the hrv, the quality just like local car...it really not worth for rm100k just because H brand...

yes, there is no mini SUV for RM100K but quite many ordered the high spec which cost around rm120k...just add rm10-20k can buy cx-5 or crv normal spec...the quality and space totally worth it...
*
I haven't seen the HRV but have viewed and test driven its bigger brother, the CRV late last year before we chose the CX-5 2.5 CBU from Japan. Not too sure about the HRV but the interior dashboard and door panel of the CRV looks like a Proton Saga. No offense. Even the Proton Preve's interior and dashboard looks more upmarket than the CRV. That is one of the main reasons we scratched off the CRV an went for the Mazda CX-5 which looks more premium inside out.

From the scale of the interior quality and trimming and dashboard material, based on my observation

Honda CRV = Proton Saga < Proton Preve Turbo < Mazda 2/3/6/CX-5 < Ford Focus
SportyHandling
post Sep 2 2015, 10:51 AM

On my way
****
Junior Member
623 posts

Joined: Jul 2013
QUOTE(chinteck79 @ Sep 2 2015, 09:44 AM)
Honda quality (now) vs Mazda quality no fight at all. due to cost cutting, honda quality really down the drain. Many ppl i know who have bought honda recently will not buy honda again including me.
*
Agreed. People still buy Honda due to Japanese reliability, other than the cars which look rather nice and sporty on the outside, in this case the HRV. It sure looks quite nice and classy on the exterior, but when you step into the car, the interior of the car is poor, looks like a Proton Saga. No offense. The interior dashboard layout and quality of materials on the dashboard and door panels etc. look cheap. On the other hand, with the Mazda(CX5 or any other model), exterior looks good and interior quality looks much nicer and higher quality than the Honda. It's not only the HRV but the City and CRV as well - the interior dashboard and door panel looked cheap in the layout and quality.

Only the Honda Accord's interior looked acceptable. All other lower-range Honda cars, the exterior of the car may look nice but the interior of the car is of sub-par quality at Proton's level (though reliability-wise the Honda should do a lot better than the Proton).

This post has been edited by SportyHandling: Sep 2 2015, 10:52 AM
SportyHandling
post Sep 2 2015, 10:54 AM

On my way
****
Junior Member
623 posts

Joined: Jul 2013
QUOTE(aaronpang @ Sep 2 2015, 10:07 AM)
Taking delivery of CX5 AWD CBU today.

Here's how I felt after after trying out the following cars.

HR-V - no powah and feels a spec lower - not a fair comparison against CX-5
CR-V - good car dated looks, older transmission.
Ford Ecosport - love the looks, smallish interior and hated the dashboard.
Subaru XV - beautiful engine and love the way it drives. Equipment and trim is sorely lacking.
Subaru Forrester - damn it's huge and expensive.

CX-5 wins in terms of overall technology, safety and fuel economy, love the modern and nicer looking interior.

Some of the other cars tested may be ahead in certain areas, overall the Mazda is a better package.

Didn't manage to test the new Nissan X-Trail  tongue.gif
*
One of my colleagues took delivery of the Ford Ecosport in white colour. It looks nice on the outside. Dashboard is a bit funky though. One thing I noticed is the sound of the Ecosport's engine is rather loud even if standing outside next to the car. Maybe the car wasn't run-in yet.

Subaru XV is also a nice car on the exterior.
SportyHandling
post Sep 3 2015, 04:20 PM

On my way
****
Junior Member
623 posts

Joined: Jul 2013
QUOTE(nxtpg @ Sep 2 2015, 10:57 AM)
whats your say on the x-trail's cvt transmission?
*
No experience with the new X-trail. However, based on my 5-year ownership with the Nissan Sylphy's CVT, I can say it is reliable, super-smooth and quiet.
SportyHandling
post Sep 3 2015, 04:30 PM

On my way
****
Junior Member
623 posts

Joined: Jul 2013
QUOTE(KennyKB @ Sep 3 2015, 08:23 AM)
True. The first time I sat in a CRV I was shocked at so much plastic. This isn't a cheap car but everything from the dashboard to central console to door panels are made of hard plastic.
*
To me it is grossly overpriced. For the price you are paying, and you get this sort of quality it's not worth it, the CRV. The low-spec CRV is almost RM150k and the high spec model is even costlier.

I can understand people will still choose the HRV (despite its cheap interior) not only for its beautiful looks on the exterior but also the rather affordable price, closer to RM100k. But the hard-plasticky CRV for RM150k+ is just too much. Even the high-spec Perodua Alza at less than RM70k looks better (in the interior) than the CRV. As usual horses for courses.

 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0200sec    0.24    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 15th December 2025 - 07:52 PM