The problem is the manager is weak in identifying good players and the record of success in transfer speaks itself.

huh? Hundred million spent, that now complain was not given the money? 

The manager bought 100 million plus of players, whether the net is how much or not doesn't matter.
Fact is 100 mil is given to be splashed.

When a manager spent 100 million and yet complaining no money was given for marquee signing, then it is the manager fault that unable to find good players in the transfer market.
The manager can sign a marquee signing of 60 million with the 100 mil war chest and still got 40 mil left for others.

Lallana, Lovren, Markovic already worth more than 60 million. 

Mind that not a single signing (except Can) of last transfer window (that worth more than 100 mil) who can be proclaimed a permanent spot of starting XI.

Sacking n rehiring gonna cost alot? Apparently they werent thinking of dat when they sacked KD n sign a midtable unproven manager no???

I see pace n youth in our players. experienced manager n coach wud know wutto do....BR dont. U want to sacrifice another year to give him a chance??? After 3 years given??? And next year wuts the excuse will be???

Will still be thinking abt the cost of sacking n rehiring???

No one is thinking abt wut it will cost liverpool fc in terms of reputation???

U treasures ur money more??

3 years with liverpool, more than 20 players signed and you tell me he deserve more time because he doesn't have winning players? by your logic, we should let br spend 100m every year until we get the right players, that's if any "good" players want to join us.